“机不可失，时不再来”指的是___

是 ___

在客观规律面前，人的主观能动性表现在___

事物的联系和运动之间的关系___

唯物辩证法的总特征是___

___

“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___

唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___

区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___

质量互变规律揭示了___

质和事物的存在是___

在实际工作中，要注意掌握分寸，防止“过”或“不及”，其关键在于___

区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___

量变的复杂性是指___

量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___

量变中的局部性部分质变是___

揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___

“肯定和否定相互渗透，在一定意义上，肯定就是否定。”这是一种___

事物的否定方面是指___

作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___

辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___

否定之否定规律___

事物发展的周期性体现了___

直线论的错误在于只看到___

循环论的错误在于___

对立统一规律揭示了___

唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___

境外企业首次向中国出口饲料、饲料添加剂，应当向___申请进口登记并取得进口登记证。

进境植物源性饲料发现重大疫情和重大质量安全问题的，海关总署依照相关规定，采取启动应急处置预案等应急处置措施，并发布___。

经现场检查，发现熏蒸剂残留物，或者熏蒸残留气体浓度超过安全限量的，___检验检疫及相关现场查验活动。

现场查验发现进境植物源性饲料包装破损且有传播动植物疫病风险的，应当对所污染的场地、物品、器具及运输工具进行___处理。

凡有国家强制性标准的一般监控物质，其监控结果可作为进口合格评定的依据，如进境植物源性饲料已放行但监控结果不合格，则应启动___。

饲料加工、使用单位要有符合检疫要求的下脚料和地脚粮处理工序，如粉碎（对含假高粱的下脚料和地脚粮粉碎细度要在___以下）、焚烧、湿热处理等。

进境饲料发现重大疫情，或有毒有害物质情况严重的，应在___以书面形式报告海关总署动植司。

海关应当按照相关工作程序及标准，对现场查验抽取的样品及发现的可疑物进行实验室检测鉴定，采样后应向货主出具___。

进境饲料经检验检疫合格的，出具___等相关单证；经检验检疫不合格的，由海关签发《检验检疫处理通知书》作除害、退回或者销毁处理，经除害处理合格的准予进境；需要对外索赔的，由海关出具相关证书。

进境水果现场查验时，检查泰国荔枝、龙眼枝条长度不超过___。

海关应按___比例对每批输往加拿大的苹果进行抽样检疫，并逐果检验。

出口果园注册登记要求中，果园种植面积应达到___以上。

出口澳大利亚的鲜梨若来自实蝇非疫区之外地区或非疫状态被暂停的地区，则需接受冷处理或者其他经由DA认可的有效处理措施,其中冷处理要求果实中心温度___或以下，持续18天或以上。

输往加拿大的苹果果园、包装厂须经陕西、山东、河北、山西和辽宁海关注册登记，然后报海关总署审核批准，总署在出口前___向加拿大集中提供审核批准的果园和包装厂名单。

纸箱装输加拿大苹果在常压下做熏蒸处理时，最大装货空间不超过___。

出境水果果园及包装厂注册登记证书有效期为___。

冷冻水果是指加工后，在___以下储存、运输的水果。

所有输美砂梨应在直径未超过___之前，遵照海关机构批准的《砂梨套袋指南》进行套袋。

产自中国北纬___以南地区的输美砂梨，运输过程中应在美方认可的集装箱中进行冷处理。

出口美国苹果在生长期间应进行套袋，在收货前___不得去袋。

产自北纬___以南的输美苹果，须针对桔小实蝇实施冷处理。

海关对输往澳大利亚油桃、桃、杏、李实施批批检疫，每批货物抽取___水果进行检查。

进境水果指定监管场地周边___范围内没有果园。

对来自智利地中海实蝇管制区范围内的输华水果需在管制区内包装厂包装，并进行0.5℃或以下连续___或以上的冷处理。

老挝加工包装的香蕉，应是开花后___采收的未成熟香蕉，任何黄香蕉不得出口中国。

采用陆空联运的墨西哥输华浆果，必须使用托盘包装，整个托盘应用隔热材料/塑料薄膜或者小于___孔径的防虫网完全覆盖。

意大利柑橘输华前须针对___采取冷处理。

来自果实蝇属非疫区以外的中国输智利鲜枣，需在海关总署授权人员的监管下进行冷处理，冷处理指标为___（果实中心温度）或以下连续处理18天或以上。

输泰国柑橘如来自___、蜜桔大实蝇、番石榴实蝇的发生地区，需经过有效的除害处理。

输入竹木草制品，经检疫发现检疫性有害生物的，应当通知货主或者其代理人作___处理。

口岸对输入的竹木草制品检疫不合格需实施溴甲烷熏蒸检疫处理的，在环境温度为28℃时，投药量为___。

___属于非检疫性有害生物。

___输往加拿大不需要进行熏蒸处理。

输往澳大利亚的木制品，必须在装船或装柜前___完成溴甲烷/硫酰氟熏蒸或热处理。 

输美木制工艺品是指由竹、木、藤、柳等天然成分(含部分天然成分)制成的、部件直径大于___的初加工木制工艺品。

根据《输美木制工艺品检验检疫管理工作规范》要求，企业的生产加工、检疫处理、溯源管理和生产活动记录应保留___。

某企业申报560箱的木制工艺品出口至日本，电子系统拦截显示需实施现场查验，海关人员应现场抽样检查___货物。

申报的木制品与实际不相符的，由口岸海关处___的罚款，已取得检疫单证的，予以吊销。

根据需要，在机场、港口、车站、仓库、加工厂、农场等生产、加工、存放检疫物的场所实施动植物疫情监测，有关单位___配合。

国门生物安全监测体系覆盖了我国___入境口岸。