刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
D
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
推荐试题
【单选题】
在信贷资金总量一定的情况下,信贷资金周转速度、流动性、安全性、效益性的关系是___。
A. 周转速度快,流动性就越强,安全性就越能得保证。但效益性较差
B. 周转速度快,流动性就越强,安全性就差,效益性较差
C. 周转速度慢,流动性就越差,安全性也就越差,效益性较差
D. 周转速度慢,流动性就越差,安全性也就越好,效益性较好
【单选题】
以下措施不能提高商业银行经营流动性和安全性的是___。
A. 存贷款期限结构匹配
B. 提高存货周转速度
C. 提高应收账款的周转速度
D. 提高二级市场股票的换手频率
【单选题】
下列属于直接融资的行为有___。
A. 何某向工商银行借款100000 元专门用于其企业的工程结算
B. A 公司向B 公司投入资金8000000 元,并占有B 公司30%的股份
C. A 公司通过融资机构向B 公司借款600000 元
D. 何某通过金融机构借入资金120000 元
【单选题】
下列不属于借款申请需明确内容的是。___
A. 基本情况
B. 贷款品种
C. 贷款利率
D. 贷款金额
【单选题】
下列关于贷款种类说法,错误的是___
A. 按照贷款币种可分为人民币贷款和外币贷款
B. 按照贷款期限可分为短期贷款和中长期贷款
C. 按照贷款对象可分为生产企业贷款和外商投资企业贷款
D. 按照贷款利率可分为浮动利率贷款和固定利率贷款
【单选题】
下列不属于间接融资的行为有___。
A. 文小姐向银行借款10 万元专门用于其房屋装修
B. A 公司购入B 公司20%的股权,价值80 万元
C. 赵小姐春节期间通过信用卡透支了2 万元购买年货
D. 郑先生通过银行贷款购买了一辆车
【单选题】
调查的基本要求:熟知客户和客户的业务,取得必要的客户信息资料和信贷业务信息资料,并核实资料的___。
A. 真实性
B. 完成性
C. 可操作性
D. 全面性
【单选题】
商业银行在信贷过程中保持贷款种类和期限的多样化是为了保持信贷的___。
A. 效益性
B. 流动性
C. 安全性
D. 自主性
【单选题】
企业向银行借款属于____,发行债券、股票属于____。___
A. 直接融资;间接融资
B. 间接投资;直接投资
C. 间接融资;直接融资
D. 直接投资;间接投资
【单选题】
关于商业银行“安全性、流动性和效益性原则”的说法,不正确的是___。
A. 为了保证贷款的安全性,商业银行需要合理安排贷款的种类和期限
B. 在信贷资金总量一定的情况下,资金的周转速度加快,效益性相应较差
C. 在贷款规模一定的情况下,一般贷款期限越长,收益越大
D. 贷款期限越长,安全性越高
【单选题】
按贷款用途划分,公司信贷的种类不包括___
A. 基本建设贷款
B. 技术改造贷款
C. 流动资金贷款
D. 自营贷款
【单选题】
___是指特定产品要素组合下的信贷服务方式,主要包括贷款、担保、承兑、信用支持、保函、信用证和承诺等。
A. 交易对象
B. 信贷产品
C. 信贷金额
D. 信贷期限
【单选题】
银行市场细分是根据___差异对市场进行的划分。
A. 信贷产品
B. 卖方银行
C. 买方客户
D. 信贷市场
【单选题】
贷放分控是指银行业金融机构将___作为两个独立的业务环节。
A. 贷前申请与贷款审批
B. 贷款审批与贷款发放
C. 贷款发放与贷款清偿
D. 贷款申请与贷款清偿
【单选题】
处于成熟期的行业的风险性___。
A. 最低
B. 中等
C. 最高
D. 较高
【单选题】
除贷款外,商业银行的资金一般主要用于___。
A. 结算业务
B. 代理业务
C. 存款业务
D. 资金业务
【单选题】
___是银行在商业汇票上签章承诺按出票人指示到期付款的行为。
A. 承兑
B. 担保
C. 贷款
D. 公司信贷
【单选题】
在银行流动资金贷前调查报告中,借款人财务状况不包括___。
A. 流动资金数额和周转速度
B. 主要客户、供应商和分销渠道
C. 资产负债比率
D. 存货净值和周转速度
【单选题】
公司信贷的借款人指___
A. 经工商行政管理机关(或主管机关)核准登记的自然人
B. 经行政机关核准登记的企(事)业法人
C. 经行政机关核准登记的自然人
D. 经工商行政管理机关(或主管机关)核准登记的企(事)业法人
【单选题】
贷前调查中最常用、最重要的方法,同时也是在一般情况下必须采用的方法是___。
A. 现场调研
B. 搜寻调查
C. 委托调查
D. 突击检查
【单选题】
影响行业的外部因素不包括___
A. 国民经济
B. 外部经济
C. 国家政策
D. 企业自身规模效益
【单选题】
银行在对客户进行借款需求分析时,不需要关注的是___。
A. 企业的借款需求原因,即所借款项的用途
B. 企业的还款来源
C. 企业还款的可靠程度
D. 公司的治理结构
【单选题】
以下导致企业流动资产增加的因素不包括___。
A. 季节性销售增长
B. 长期销售增长
C. 资产效率下降
D. 债务重构
【单选题】
主营业务指标通常指主营业务收入占___的比重。
A. 营业额
B. 总资本
C. 全部利润
D. 销售收入总额
【单选题】
以下关于流动比率和企业资产的变现能力关系的说法中,正确的是___
A. 流动比率越高,说明企业资产的变现能力越强
B. 流动比率越高,说明企业资产的变现能力越弱
C. 流动比率越低,说明企业资产的变现能力越强
D. 流动比率与企业资产的变现能力没有关系
【单选题】
以下各项中不能反映应收账款的营运能力的是___。
A. 应收账款周转率
B. 应收账款回收期
C. 应收账款账龄
D. 应收账款余额
【单选题】
以下不属于所有者权益项目的是___
A. 未分配利润
B. 资本公积
C. 盈余公积
D. 流动资产
【单选题】
法人贷款业务,申请信贷业务的客户应当是经___核准登记的企业(事业)法人其他经济组织。
A. 工商行政管理机关(或主管机关)
B. 国税局
C. 人民银行
D. 农村信用社
【单选题】
下列因素与借款人的偿债能力无关的是___。
A. 盈利能力
B. 营运能力
C. 资本结构
D. 产品竞争力
【单选题】
下列关于资产负债率的论述中,错误的是___
A. 资产负债率=负债合计÷资产合计×100%
B. 资产负债率=资产合计÷负债合计×100%
C. 资产负债率反映项目各年负债水平、财务风险及偿债能力
D. 银行从债权安全的角度考虑,总希望借款人的负债水平低一点
【单选题】
下列公式中,不能反映存货周转速度的是___
A. 销货成本/平均存货余额×100%
B. 存货平均余额×计算期天数/销货成本
C. 计算期天数/存货周转次数
D. (期初存货余额+期末存货余额)/2
【单选题】
下列不属于资产负债表的基本内容的是___
A. 资产
B. 负债
C. 资本结构
D. 所有者权益
【单选题】
下列不属于企业财务状况风险的是___
A. 借款人在银行的存款有较大幅度下降
B. 应收账款异常增加
C. 流动资产占总资产比重下降
D. 短期负债增加适当,长期负债大量增加
【单选题】
所有者权益代表投资者对企业___所有权。
A. 全部资产
B. 全部负债
C. 净资产
D. 流动资产
【单选题】
商业银行对借款人最关心的就是其现在和未来的___。
A. 技术水平
B. 销售业绩
C. 偿债能力
D. 信息披露
【单选题】
一般企业贷款操作流程:___
A. 建立正式客户-评级-授信-申请贷款-发放贷款
B. 建立正式客户-授信-评级-申请贷款-发放贷款
C. 建立正式客户-申请贷款-评级-授信-发放贷款
D. 建立正式客户-申请贷款-授信-评级-发放贷款
【单选题】
借款人盈利能力的比率通过___反映。
A. 效率比率
B. 杠杆比率
C. 流动比率
D. 营业利润率
【单选题】
借款人还款能力的主要标志就是___。
A. 借款人的现金流量是否充足
B. 借款人的资产负债比率是否足够低
C. 借款人的管理水平是否很高
D. 借款人的销售收入和利润是否足够高
【单选题】
到的比率。___
A. 平均存货余额,销货收入
B. 销货收入,平均存货余额
C. 销货成本,平均存货余额
D. 平均存货余额,销货成本
【单选题】
反映客户长期偿债能力的比率是___
A. 流动比率
B. 资产负债率
C. 净利润率
D. 速动比率
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用