【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举
【单选题】
任何一个社会成员,无论具有何种身份、职业和地位,都必须在公共生活中遵守社会公德。这体现了社会公德具有的___特点。
A. 继承性
B. 基础性
C. 广泛性
D. 简明性
【单选题】
影响公共生活、公共秩序、文明礼貌、清洁卫生以及其他影响社会生活的最主要行为规范是___
A. 社会公德
B. 家庭道德
C. 职业道德
D. 个人道德
【单选题】
《公民道德建设实施纲要》明确指出,社会公德涵盖了___
A. 人与人之间的关系
B. 人与社会之间的关系
C. 人与自然之间的关系
D. 人与人、人与社会、人与自然之间的关系
推荐试题
【多选题】
马列主义、毛泽东思想、邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想,虽然形成于不同的历史时期,面对不同的时代课题,但却是一脉相承的科学思想体系。“一脉相承”在:___
A. 都视人民利益高于一切,都是为全人类的利益服务的
B. 都具有与时俱进的理论品质
C. 都具有相同的社会理想
D. 都以辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义作为哲学基础
【多选题】
在中国共产党的历史上,对毛泽东思想作出系统概括和阐述的党的文献有___
A. 《关于若干历史问题的决议》
B. 刘少奇在七大上所作的《关于修改党的章程的报告》
C. 邓小平在八大上所作的《关于修改党的章程的报告》
D. 《关于建国以来党的若干历史问题的决议》
【多选题】
党的十七大报告首次提出“中国特色社会主义理论体系”的概念,并首次将党的十一届三中全会以来的理论创新的成果加以整合,提出中国特色社会主义理论体系是包括___重大战略思想在内的科学理论体系,是不断发展的开放的理论体系。
A. 毛泽东思想
B. 邓小平理论
C. “三个代表”重要思想
D. 科学发展观
【多选题】
邓小平坚持解放思想、实事求是,解决了关系党和国家前途和命运的重大课题,作出了两大历史性的贡献___
A. 科学地评价了毛泽东,维护了毛泽东的历史地位
B. 实现了党的工作重点的转移
C. 提出了党在社会主义初级阶段的基本路线
D. 成功地找到了建设有中国特色社会主义的正确道路,创立了建设有中国特色社会主义理论
【多选题】
近代中国社会的主要矛盾是___
A. 封建主义与资本主义的矛盾
B. 工人阶级与资产阶级的矛盾
C. 帝国主义与中华民族的矛盾
D. 封建主义与人民大众的矛盾
E. 资产阶级与地主阶级的矛盾
【多选题】
新民主主义革命的动力包括___
A. 工人阶级
B. 农民阶级
C. 城市小资产阶级
D. 民族资产阶级
E. 买办阶级
【多选题】
新旧民主主义革命的不同点集中表现在___
A. 革命所处的时代不同
B. 革命的性质不同
C. 革命的指导思想不同
D. 革命的前途不同
E. 革命的领导力量不同
【多选题】
下列关于土地革命、武装斗争和根据地建设三者之间的关系论述正确的是___
A. 土地革命是民主革命的中心内容
B. 武装斗争是中国革命的主要形式,是农村根据地建设和土地革命的强有力保证
C. 农村革命根据地是中国革命的战略阵地,是进行武装斗争和开展土地革命的依托
D. 武装斗争是民主革命的中心内容
E. 土地革命、武装斗争和根据地建设三者之间是密切结合和有机统一的
【多选题】
新民主主义革命时期,城市小资产阶级包括___
A. 知识分子
B. 小商人
C. 手工业者
D. 自由职业者
【多选题】
新民主主义革命时期,党领导的统一战线,先后经过了___
A. 第一次国共合作的统一战线
B. 工农民主统一战线
C. 抗日民主统一战线
D. 人民民主统一战线
【多选题】
1948年,毛泽东在《在晋绥干部会议上的讲话》中完整地表述了新民主主义革命总路线的内容,即新民主主义革命是___的革命
A. 无产阶级领导的
B. 人民大众的
C. 团结民族资产阶级的
D. 反对帝国主义、封建主义和官僚资本主义的
E. 以马克思主义为指导
【多选题】
近代中国革命的对象是___
A. 帝国主义
B. 封建主义
C. 民族资本主义
D. 官僚资本主义
E. 小资产阶级
【多选题】
新民主主义的经济纲领是___
A. 没收封建地主阶级的土地归农民所有
B. 保护民族工商业
C. 没收官僚垄断资本归新民主主义国家所有
D. 公有制为主体多种所有制共同发展
E. 实行计划经济
【多选题】
1928年至1930年间毛泽东撰写的有关中国革命道路理论的重要著作有___
A. 《战争和战略问题》
B. 《井冈山的斗争》
C. 《星星之火,可以燎原》
D. 《反对本本主义》
E. 《中国的红色政权为什么能够存在?》
【多选题】
1949年,毛泽东在《论人民民主专政》一文中,概括中国共产党为___的党
A. 一个有纪律的
B. 有马克思列宁主义的理论武装的
C. 采取批评与自我批评方法的
D. 领导武装斗争的
E. 联系人民群众的
【多选题】
新民主主义革命时期,以国共合作为基础所建立的统一战线有___
A. 国民革命联合战线
B. 工农民主统一战线
C. 抗日民族统一战线
D. 人民民主统一战线
E. 民族统一战线
【多选题】
新民主主义的文化,是民族的科学的大众的文化。其中“民族的”是指___
A. 反对外来的资本主义文化
B. 反对帝国主义压迫,主张中华民族的尊严和独立
C. 具有鲜明的民族风格、民族形式和民族特色,要有中国作风和中国气派
D. 为全民族90%以上的工农大众服务
E. 反对一切封建思想和迷信的
【多选题】
新民主主义革命的基本经验主要是___
A. 统一战线
B. 阶级斗争
C. 党的建设
D. 武装斗争
E. 独立自主
【多选题】
新民主主义革命就是“新式的特殊的资产阶级民主主义革命”,它的基本特点是___
A. 革命的领导力量是无产阶级
B. 指导思想是马克思主义
C. 属于世界无产阶级革命的一部分
D. 革命的前途是社会主义而不是资本主义
E. 有了新的工农联盟为基础的统一战线
【多选题】
中国共产党实现革命统一战线的基本原则和主要经验是___
A. 必须处理好统一战线中的两个联盟关系问题。
B. 必须坚持独立自主的原则
C. 发展进步势力,争取中间势力,孤立顽固势力
D. 对资产阶级采取又联合又斗争的政策,以斗争求团结的政策
E. 在同顽固派进行斗争时,必须坚持有利、有理、有节的原则
【多选题】
土地革命战争时期,中国的红色政权能够存在与发展的主观条件有___
A. 中国是帝国主义国家间接统治的政治经济发展不平衡的半殖民地半封建的大国
B. 全国革命形势的继续向前发展
C. 相当力量的正式红军的存在
D. 党领导及其正确的政策
E. 良好的群众基础
【多选题】
党在长期斗争中形成的三大优良作风是___
A. 理论联系实际
B. 密切联系群众
C. 为人民服务
D. 批评与自我批评
E. 实事求是的作风
【多选题】
新民主主义革命的三大法宝包括___
A. 土地革命
B. 统一战线
C. 武装斗争
D. 党的建设
E. 根据地建设
【多选题】
新民主主义的文化是___
A. 新民主主义思想领导的文化
B. 共产主义思想领导的文化
C. 民族的文化
D. 科学的文化
E. 大众的文化
【多选题】
近代以来中华民族面对的两大历史任务,一个是求得民族独立和人民解放,一个是实现国家的繁荣富强和人民的共同富裕。这两大任务的相互关系是 ___
A. 前者主要解决生产力问题,后者主要是解决生产关系发展问题
B. 两者的主题、内容与实现方式各不相同,不能相互替代
C. 两者又息息相关,不能分离
D. 前一任务为后一任务扫清障碍,创造必要的前提
E. 后一任务是前一任务的最终目的与必然要求
【多选题】
新民主主义总路线包括的具体内容有___
A. 革命对象
B. 革命动力
C. 革命领导权
D. 革命性质
E. 革命前途
【多选题】
毛泽东在新民主主义革命总路线中所说的“人民大众”,即革命动力是指___
A. 无产阶级
B. 农民阶级
C. 小资产阶级
D. 民族资产阶级
E. 一部分大地主大资产阶级
【多选题】
中国红色政权存在和发展的原因和条件是___
A. 中国是一个政治经济发展极不平衡的半殖民地半封建大国
B. 国民革命的政治影响,有良好的群众基础
C. 相当力量的正式红军的存在
D. 共产党组织的有力量和它政策的正确
E. 全国革命形势的继续发展
【多选题】
中国革命的基本问题是农民问题,这是由于___
A. 在半殖民地半封建的中国,农民占人口绝对大多数,具有很强的革命性
B. 无产阶级对农民的领导,是中国革命中无产阶级领导的中心问题
C. 农民是无产阶级最可靠的同盟军,与无产阶级有天然的联系
D. 农民是中国革命最基本的动力
E. 农民是中国革命的主力军
【多选题】
新民主主义社会主要的经济成分有___
A. 社会主义经济
B. 合作社经济
C. 个体经济
D. 资本主义经济
E. 外资经济
【多选题】
“四马分肥”是指___
A. 国家所得税
B. 企业公积金
C. 工人福利基金
D. 资方红利
E. 奖金
【多选题】
下面对资本主义工商业的社会主义改造经历的步骤表述正确的是___
A. 第一步主要是实行初级形式的国家资本主义
B. 第一步主要是实行委托加工
C. 第二步主要是实行统购包销和经销代销
D. 第二步主要实行个别企业的公私合营
E. 第三步是实行全行业的公私合营
【多选题】
对农业的社会主义改造坚持的基本原则有___
A. 自愿互利
B. 听从上级安排
C. 典型示范
D. 国家帮助
E. 少数服从多数
【多选题】
关于社会主义改造说法正确的是___
A. 社会主义改造的基本完成,使我国社会经济结构发生了根本变化
B. 社会主义改造的基本完成,使我国社会的阶级关系发生了根本变化
C. 社会主义改造的基本完成,表明我国的一切剥削现象都已经被消灭
D. 社会主义改造的基本完成,表明社会主义制度已经基本确立
E. 社会主义改造的基本完成,表明我国的所有矛盾都得到解决
【多选题】
新民主主义时期,中国社会的阶级构成主要包括___
A. 工人阶级
B. 农民阶级
C. 民族资产阶级
D. 地主阶级
E. 其他小资产阶级
【多选题】
在资本主义工商业改造中,高级形式的国家资本主义包括了以下形式___
A. 委托加工、计划订货
B. 统购包销和代购代销
C. 个别企业的公私合营
D. 全行业的公私合营
E. 把私营企业的生产经营纳入国家计划的轨道
【多选题】
20世纪50年代中期,社会主义改造基本完成,标志着___
A. 社会主义制度在我国已经确立
B. 我国进入了社会主义初级阶段
C. 我国步入了社会主义改革时期
D. 我国实现了新民主主义向社会主义过渡
E. 我国进入了主义高级阶段
【多选题】
建国初期建立国营经济的途径有___
A. 没收官僚资本
B. 没收民族资本
C. 陆续收回外国资本企业
D. 各解放区原有的公营经济
E. 没收地主土地
【多选题】
过渡时期总路线的“两翼”是指___
A. 巩固人民民主专政
B. 实现社会主义工业化
C. 实现对手工业的社会主义改造
D. 实现对农业的社会主义改造
E. 实现对资本主义工商业的社会主义改造
【多选题】
中国从新民主主义向社会主义过渡的主要条件是___
A. 近代中国资本主义经济及现代工业初步发展
B. 社会主义国营经济的壮大
C. 无产阶级政党的领导
D. 有力的国际因素
E. 人民民主专政国家政权的建立