【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
推荐试题
【单选题】
29:客户申请金燕e贷,被授信10万元,首次支用了5万元,后又支用5万元,则我行与客户之间存在( )个电子合同?客户的可用额度还剩___元?
A. 1,0
B. 1,10万
C. 2,10万
D. 2,0
【单选题】
30:手机银行无卡取款,预约码有效时间为( ),微信无卡取款,预约码有效时间为( ),柜面预约无卡取款,预约码有效时间为___。
A. 5分钟、5分钟、5分钟
B. 5分钟、2小时、2小时
C. 2小时、2小时、2小时
D. 5分钟、5分钟、2小时
【单选题】
31:特殊限额业务,是针对___设置的?
A. 客户级限额
B. 认证方式限额
C. 账户级限额
D. 网点级限额
【单选题】
32:A为车主,B为车辆使用人,ETC开户时开在B的名下,柜面签约银行卡时,只能签约( )的银行卡。___
A. 车辆使用人
B. 车主
C. 车主&车辆使用人均可
【单选题】
33:ETC记账卡处于( )、( )、( )等情形时无法解约?___
A. 禁止通行名单
B. 有未结清的消费信息
C. 保证金不足
D. 以上全都有
【多选题】
1:限制民事行为能力人实施的纯获利益的民事法律行为或者与其年龄、智力、精神健康状况相适应的民事法律行为有效;实施的其他民事法律行为经法定代理人同意或者追认后有效。相对人可以催告法定代理人自收到通知之日起___予以追认。
A. 1个月内
B. 2个月内
C. 3个月内
D. 4个月内
【多选题】
2:行为人与相对人以虚假的意思表示实施的民事法律行为___。
A. 效力待定
B. 可撤销
C. 无效
D. 部分无效
【多选题】
1:有下列情形之一的,法人解散___
A. 法人章程规定的存续期间届满或者法人章程规定的其他解散事由出现
B. 法人的权力机构决议解散
C. 因法人合并或者分立需要解散
D. 法人依法被吊销营业执照、登记证书,被责令关闭或者被撤销
【多选题】
2:有下列原因之一并依法完成清算、注销登记的,法人终止___
A. 法人解散
B. 法人资不抵债
C. 法人被宣告破产
D. 法律规定的其他原因
【多选题】
4:有下列情形之一的,撤销权消灭___
A. 当事人自知道或者应当知道撤销事由之日起一年内、重大误解的当事人自知道或者应当知道撤销事由之日起三个月内没有行使撤销权
B. 当事人受胁迫,自胁迫行为终止之日起一年内没有行使撤销权
C. 当事人知道撤销事由后明确表示或者以自己的行为表明放弃撤销权
D. 当事人自民事法律行为发生之日起五年内没有行使撤销权的,撤销权消灭
【多选题】
当营业场所遭遇不法分子侵犯时,其处置方式是___。
A. 先报警、再反击、后防身
B. 先藏身、后报警、再反击
C. 先反击、再防身、后报警
D. 先撤离、后报警、在反击
【多选题】
银行自助设备、自助银行现金装填区安全门的钥匙和密码必须实行___制度,不准交叉交接使用,密码要定期更换。
【多选题】
县级行社保卫部门组织检查每年不少于( )次;基层行社社负责人要每月___次的常规检查。
A. 12、3
B. 12、4
C. 6、3
D. 6、4
【多选题】
根据《中华人民共和国消防法》规定,我国消防工作方针是___。
A. 预防为主、防消结合
B. 安全第一、预防为主
C. 预防为主、积极消灭
【多选题】
公共场所发生火灾时,该公共场所的现场工作人员应___。
A. 迅速撤离
B. 抢救贵重物品
C. 组织引导在场群众疏散
【多选题】
下列不属于突发事件的是___。
A. 营业场所或周边地区发生异常情况
B. 营业场所遭遇持枪抢劫
C. 营业场所发生火灾
D. 某柜员因家中有急事提前办理交接班
【多选题】
报警系统的设防、撤防、报警及视频监控图像、声音复核等信息的存储时间应不小于( )天,出入口控制信息存储时间不应小于___天。
A. 60 90
B. 30 180
C. 90 180
D. 60 180
【多选题】
视频监控应实时监视、记录___及运钞交接全过程,回放图像应能清晰显示整个区域内人员的活动情况。
A. 营业柜员
B. 网点负责人
C. 运钞车停靠区
D. 网点保安
【多选题】
下列不属于技术防范设施的是___。
A. 视频监控系统
B. 报警系统
C. 数据中心机房
D. 无线通讯及有关的卫星定位系统
【多选题】
客户提取现金、特别是大额现金时,柜台工作人员应___
A. 提供优质服务
B. 提醒其注意安全防范
C. 注意观察周边情况
【多选题】
安全保卫检查的主要内容:上级安全保卫工作安排、会议精神和有关文件贯彻落实情况;___安全保卫部门人员配备情况; 其他需要检查的事项。
A. 安全保卫工作制度贯彻落实情况
B. 员工防范意识和执行规章制度、操作规程情况
C. 定期分析案件特点、作案手段、发案原因,及时提出防范意见
D. 安全防范设施建设和安防器材管理、使用情况
E. 各类刑事案件和治安、灾害事故查处情况
【多选题】
安全保卫检查以( )定期查与不定期查相结合,采取___的检查方法。
A. 普查和抽查、自查与互查
B. 白天查与晚上查、现场查与非现场查
C. 听(汇报)、看(现状)
D. 问(情况)、查(实况)、评(反馈意见)
【多选题】
上级或外部单位对营业场所、业务库进行检查的。检查时必须持有___经被查单位验证确认登记后,方可允许进入。
A. 检查单位介绍信
B. 并有被查单位保卫部门负责人陪同
C. 出示身份证
D. 非河南省农村信用社系统人员还需要工作证
【多选题】
有下列行为之一的,给予有关责任人经济处罚并视情节给予警告直至开除行政处分,触犯刑法的,移交司法机关处理___
A. 营业期间,大宗现金(抽屉内存放现金超过5 万元或存有整把现金)未入保险柜存放的
B. 营业终了未将现金、印鉴、密押、移动存储介质、有价单证、重要空白凭证入库保管的
C. 未按规定进行安全检查,致使安全隐患未发现或对检查出来的安全隐患不报告的
D. 营业期间接打电话的
E. 营业期间擅离职守,形成一人临柜的或无人临柜的
【多选题】
银行营业场所接待安全检查人员应做到___
A. 在没有本单位领导和保卫人员陪同的情况下,可以打开营业室通勤门让检查人员进入营业室进行检查
B. 请检查人员出示有关证件
C. 对检查人员提出的任何问题可以做解答
D. 检查人员出示相关手续后,营业人员必须接受检查人员的检查,并如实向检查人员反映情况
【多选题】
防尾随联动互锁安全门电控装置发生故障时,应能手动开启。发生紧急情况时,应有___和( )功能。
A. 双开应急开启
B. 钥匙开启
C. 双开强制复位
D. 身份证开启
【多选题】
技防设施系统运行主要检查___、值班、( )、( ),安全用电,( )的管理和使用情况。
A. 监控室及数据中心机房人员配备
B. 应急演练和突发事件处置能力
C. 监控室运行日志、安防设施运行登记
D. 环境卫生、设备完整
E. 视频监控、报警、消防设施
【多选题】
现金业务区应安装摄像机,系统应能( )等交易全过程,回放图像应能清晰显示( )及___。
A. 柜员活动情况
B. 实时监视、记录现金、贵金属
C. 每个客服业务办理全过程
D. 每个现金柜台柜员操作全过程
E. 客户的面部特征
【多选题】
新建改建营业网点、自助设备等安防设施,做到“四明确”即:___
A. 明确建设标准
B. 明确建设方案
C. 明确建设内容
D. 明确责任
E. 明确建设验收结算流程
【多选题】
安全保卫工作坚持( )的原则。各市县行社___为安全保卫工作第一责任人。
A. 领导班子集体负责
B. “谁主管,谁负责”
C. 主要负责人
D. 监事长
【多选题】
1:存款保险条例自___起施行。
A. 2015年1月1日
B. 2015年5月1日
C. 2015年7月1日
D. 2015年10月1日
【多选题】
2:为了建立和规范存款保险制度,依法保护___的合法权益,及时防范和化解金融风险,维护金融稳定,制定本条例。
A. 人民
B. 银行
C. 投保机构
D. 存款人
【多选题】
3:为了建立和规范存款保险制度,依法保护存款人的合法权益,及时防范和化解金融风险,维护___,制定本条例。
A. 金融秩序
B. 金融稳定
C. 经济秩序
D. 经济稳定
【多选题】
4:存款保险条例中的投保机构是指___
A. 在中华人民共和国境内设立的商业银行、农村合作银行、农村信用合作社等吸收存款的银行业金融机构
B. 在中华人民共和国境内外设立的商业银行、农村合作银行、农村信用合作社等吸收存款的银行业金融机构
C. 在中华人民共和国境内设立的金融机构
D. 在中华人民共和国境内外设立的金融机构
【多选题】
5:存款保险条例所称存款保险,是指___向存款保险基金管理机构交纳保费,形成存款保险基金,存款保险基金管理机构依照本条例的规定向存款人偿付被保险存款,并采取必要措施维护存款以及存款保险基金安全的制度。
A. 投保机构
B. 银行
C. 保险公司
D. 存款人
【多选题】
6:被保险存款包括投保机构吸收的___。但是,金融机构同业存款、投保机构的高级管理人员在本投保机构的存款以及存款保险基金管理机构规定不予保险的其他存款除外。
A. 人民币存款
B. 外币存款
C. 人民币存款和外币存款
【多选题】
7:存款保险条例中,被保险存款包括投保机构吸收的人民币存款和外币存款。但是___除外。
A. 金融机构同业存款
B. 投保机构的高级管理人员在本投保机构的存款
C. 存款保险基金管理机构规定不予保险的其他存款
D. 以上选项都是
【多选题】
8:存款保险实行限额偿付,最高偿付限额为人民币___万元。
【多选题】
9:___会同国务院有关部门可以根据经济发展、存款结构变化、金融风险状况等因素调整最高偿付限额,报国务院批准后公布执行。
A. 中国人民银行
B. 中国银行保险监督管理委员会
C. 财政部
【多选题】
10:同一存款人在___所有被保险存款账户的存款本金和利息合并计算的资金数额在最高偿付限额以内的,实行全额偿付;超出最高偿付限额的部分,依法从投保机构清算财产中受偿。
A. 所有银行
B. 同一家投保机构
C. 所有金融机构