刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
D
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
推荐试题
【单选题】
出票人签发存款不足的空头支票、与预留签章不符或支付密码错误的支票,出票人开户行应退票并登记___。
A. 支票处罚系统
B. 公安系统
C. 中国人民银行
D. 银监会
【单选题】
浙江省本票提示付款期限自出票日起最长不得超过___,持票人超过付款期限提示付款的,代理付款行不予受理。
A. 10天
B. 20天
C. 1个月
D. 6个月
【单选题】
签发现金银行本票时,申请人和收款人为___。
A. 均为单位
B. 均为个人
C. 单位或个人
D. 单位和个人
【单选题】
签发的本票欠缺哪项记载事项的,代理付款行不予受理___。
A. 加编的密押
B. 收款人名称
C. 出票日期
D. 出票人签章
【单选题】
出票银行签发银行本票需编制不超过___位密押。
A. 16
B. 18
C. 20
D. 22
【单选题】
代理付款行拒绝受理银行本票时,应向持票人出具___
A. 退票理由书
B. 退票通知书
C. 拒绝付款通知书
D. 拒绝受理通知书
【单选题】
依托小额支付系统办理银行本票业务是指___受理持票人提交的银行本票。
A. 付款行
B. 代理付款行
C. 委托行
D. 出票行
【单选题】
目前本票的使用范围为___。
A. 票据交换区域
B. 绍兴县市
C. 浙江省
D. 三省一市
【单选题】
下列关于本票的表述哪个是错误的___
A. 我国《票据法》上的本票包括银行本票和商业本票
B. 本票的基本当事人只有出票人和收款人(持票人)
C. 本票无须承兑
D. 本票是由出票人本人对持票人付款的票据
【单选题】
根据《票据法》的规定,下列关于本票的表述中,不正确的是___
A. 到期日是本票的绝对应记载事项
B. 本票的基本当事人只有出票人和收款人
C. 本票无须承兑
D. 本票是由出票人本人对持票人付款的票据
【单选题】
本汇票签发时复核柜员在本汇票打印出错,或本汇票和底卡联次没有对齐等时复核柜员需进行___。
A. 录入冲正
B. 复核冲正
C. 复核驳回
D. 录入修改
【单选题】
签发本票时,结算业务申请书的备注栏内注明“不得转让”的,出票行应当在本票___注明。
A. 正面
B. 背面
C. 正面、背面都可以
【单选题】
本票复核中发现录入有误,可驳回修改的事项是___
A. 付款凭证日期
B. 收款人名称
C. 付款人账号
D. 出票金额
【单选题】
___是银行签发的,承诺自己在见票时无条件支付确定的金额给收款人或者持票人的票据。
A. 银行汇票
B. 银行本票
C. 支票
D. 商业汇票
【单选题】
AG、三省一市银行汇票的提示付款期限自出票日超___,持票人超过付款期限提示付的,代理付款行不予受理。
A. 10日
B. 1个月
C. 2个月
D. 半年
【单选题】
AH、华东三省一市汇票没有金额起点,最高限额为:___
A. 50万
B. 100万
C. 500万
D. 无限额
【单选题】
___是银行签发的,由其或代理付款行在见票时按照实际结算金额无条件支付资金给收款人或者持票人的票据。
A. 支票
B. 本票
C. 汇票
D. 银行承兑汇票
【单选题】
银行汇票的实际结算金额大于汇票金额,应___处理。
A. 通知客户存款
B. 退票
C. 先垫款结算,再通知客户存款
【单选题】
持票人向持票人开户银行提交支票要求收款,应作成___
A. 委托收款背书
B. 转让背书
C. 质押背书
D. 保证背书
【单选题】
___的各种款项结算可以使用三省一市银行汇票
A. 单位
B. 个人
C. 单位和个人
D. 单位或个人
【单选题】
华东三省一市汇票是依托___办理。
A. RTS
B. 小额支付系统
C. TIPS
D. 支付汇兑系统
【单选题】
三省一市汇票的背书转让以___为准。
A. 出票金额
B. 申请书票面金额
C. 实际结算金额
【单选题】
城商行汇票复核后___办理汇票资金移存,移存柜员可以在《本汇票登记簿》中触发资金移存交易,此时该签发汇票网点柜员均可操作。
A. 必须当日
B. 可以隔日
C. 3个工作日
D. 5个工作日
【单选题】
我行开出的城商行汇票由各城市商业银行互为代理兑付,同时,___全国各网点也可代理兑付。
A. 工商银行
B. 农业银行
C. 中国银行
D. 建设银行
【单选题】
对超过提示付款期的银行汇票___。
A. 不可以向签发银行请示付款
B. 可以向签发银行请示付款,但需要出具身份证或证明,并作备函说明
C. 票据作废
【单选题】
AR、城商行银行汇票的提示付款期限是___
A. 15天
B. 1个月
C. 2个月
D. 6个月
【单选题】
AS、城商行银行汇票的水印图案为___
A. 梅
B. 菊
C. 兰
D. 竹
【单选题】
银行承兑汇票挂失止付通知书的有效期是___。
A. 12日
B. 12个工作日
C. 13日
D. 13个工作日
【单选题】
我行己贴现的银行承兑汇票在办理委托书收款背书时,最后背书栏应加盖___。
A. 绍兴银行汇票专用章
B. 绍兴银行结算专用章
C. 绍兴银行本票专用章
D. 已电子登记权属
【单选题】
银行承兑汇票挂失手续费按___收取。
A. 0.3%(不足5元收5元)
B. 0.3%(不足10元收10元)
C. 0.1%(不足10元收10元)
D. 0.1%(不足5元收5元)
【单选题】
银行承兑汇票自客户口挂之日起___日内没有收到人民法院的止付通知书,第13日起挂失止付通知书失效。
A. 10
B. 7
C. 12
D. 5
【单选题】
银行承兑汇票的出票人是指___。
A. 承兑申请人
B. 承兑付款人
C. 汇票上的收款人
D. 承兑银行
【单选题】
银行承兑汇票申请人于汇票到期未足额交存票款的,作垫款处理,应对出票人尚未支付的汇票金额按照每日___计收利息。
A. 万分之三
B. 万分之五
C. 万分之十
D. 万分之十五
【单选题】
以下关于纸质银承签发时的流程描述正确的是___
A. 材料审核→票号分配→凭证打印→承兑记账→手续费收取
B. 材料审核→手续费收取→票号分配→承兑记账→凭证打印
C. 材料审核→票号分配→承兑记账→凭证打印→手续费收取
D. 材料审核→手续费收取→票号分配→凭证打印→承兑记账
【单选题】
商业汇票在办理委托收款过程中遗失票据,应由谁申请公示催告___
A. 最后合法持票人
B. 被委托收款银行
C. 邮政部门
D. 付款人开户银行
【单选题】
我行银行承兑汇票签发手续费按票面金额___收取。
A. 0.03%
B. 0.01%
C. 0.05%
D. 0.02%
【单选题】
银行承兑汇票发出托收的会计分录为___。
A. 收:73700101
B. 付:73700101
C. 收:73600101
D. 付:73600101
【单选题】
A客户首次来我行办理票据业务,柜员为A客户办理银行承兑汇票托收的操作流程为___。
A. 企业客户号同步——企业账号同步——代客录票——实物入库——新增托收申请——实物出库
B. 企业账号同步——企业客户号同步——代客录票——实物入库——新增托收申请——实物出库
C. 企业客户号同步——企业账号同步——实物入库——代客录票——新增托收申请——实物出库
D. 企业客户号同步——企业账号同步——代客录票——新增托收申请——实物入库——实物出库
【单选题】
银行承兑汇票解付时,“二代支付”和“核心支付”对应的科目分别是___和( )。
A. 26100802 26100301
B. 26200301 26100802
C. 26100802 26100302
D. 26100302 26100802
【单选题】
我行银承保证金备付科目为___
A. 26100802
B. 24300301
C. 26100302
D. 24300302
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用