相关试题
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
推荐试题
【单选题】
理想和现实的统一性表现在___
A. 理想就是现实
B. 理想总是美好的,而现实中既有美好的一面,也有丑陋的一面
C. 现实是理想的基础,理想是未来的现实
D. 有了坚定的信念,理想就能变为现实
【单选题】
当教师,要当一个模范教师;当科学家,要当一个对国家有突出贡献的科学家;当解放军战士,要当一个最英勇的解放军战士;当工人,要当一个新时代的劳动模范;当农民,要当一个对改变农村面貌有贡献的农民。这些都是人生理想中___
A. 生活理想的表现
B. 社会理想的表现
C. 道德理想的表现
D. 职业理想的表现
【单选题】
下列对信念的理解中,正确的是___
A. 信念强调的是认识的正确性
B. 信念表达的是一种真诚信服的态度
C. 信念反映的是客观事物的发展规律
D. 信念体现的是人们对人生目标的追求
【单选题】
“千里之行,始于足下。”理想的实现,需要每个人从我做起,从现在做起,从平凡的工作做起。这是因为___
A. 理想是人们的主观意志和想当然
B. 社会实践是科学知识产生的源泉
C. 把理想变为现实,要靠实实在在的实践
D. 有了坚定的信念,理想就会自动变为现实
【单选题】
中国传统儒家设计“使老有所终,壮有所用,幼有所长,鳏寡孤独废疾者皆有所养”的大同社会,近代资产阶级追求“民族、民权、民生”的资产阶级共和国,共产党人和广大劳动人民向往“各尽所能,按需分配”的共产主义社会。这些对未来的设计、追求、向往,都属于人生理想中的___
A. 社会理想
B. 道德理想
C. 职业理想
D. 生活理想
【单选题】
下列有关人们对未来的向往和追求中,属于社会理想的是___
A. “三十亩地一头牛,老婆孩子热炕头”
B. “富贵不能淫,贫贱不能移,威武不能屈”
C. 谋一个适合自己的职位,干一番益于人民的事业
D. 把我国建设成为富强、民主、文明的社会主义现代化国家
【单选题】
检验信念正确与否、科学与否的唯一标准是___
A. 科学理论
B. 社会实践
C. 主观愿望
D. 真诚信仰
【单选题】
下列著作不能说明作者身处逆境而有作为的有___。
A. 《周易》
B. 《离骚》
C. 《史记》
D. 《论语》
【单选题】
爱国主义所反映的个人与祖国的关系是___.
A. 依存关系
B. 隶属关系
C. 敌对关系
D. 合作关系
【单选题】
___是调节个人与祖国之间的道德关系的道德要求、政治原则和法律规范。
A. 爱国情感
B. 爱国行为
C. 爱国思想
D. 爱国主义
【单选题】
“八荣八耻”中,鲜明反映爱国主义的是___。
A. 以辛勤劳动为荣,以好逸恶劳为耻
B. 以团结互助为荣,以损人利己为耻
C. 以服务人民为荣,以背离人民为耻
D. 以热爱祖国为荣,以危害祖国为耻
【单选题】
“禾苗离土即死”、“一方水土养一方人”所体现的是___。
A. 祖国对国土的依赖关系
B. 人民对故土家园的依赖关系
C. 国土对祖国的依赖关系
D. 故土家园对人民的依赖关系
【单选题】
___作为一个民族群体意识的载体,常常被称为国家和民族的“胎记”,是一个民族得以延续的“精神基因”。
A. 祖国的大好河山
B. 灿烂的文化传统
C. 自己的骨肉同胞
D. 深厚的道德渊源。
【单选题】
抛弃国外优越的生活与工作条件,历尽千难万险,回归祖国的怀抱,投身到祖国的建设中的,被评为“两弹一星”的功臣而受到国家的表彰的爱国科学家是___。
A. 钱学森
B. 邓稼先
C. 梁守磐
D. 金先仲。
【单选题】
“苟利国家生死以,岂因祸福避趋之”是著名爱国人士___的诗句。
A. 陆游
B. 林则徐
C. 范仲淹
D. 戚继光。
【单选题】
“报国之心,死而后已”出自___
A. 孟子
B. 左传
C. 出师表
D. 论语。
【单选题】
在新民主主义革命时期,爱国主义主要表现为___。
A. 大力支持国家的经济建设
B. 致力于推翻帝国主义,封建主义和官僚资本主义的统治,建设新中国
C. 发扬我国博大精深的民族文化
D. 献身于建设和保卫社会主义现代化事业和促进祖国统一大业
【单选题】
在当代中国,爱国主义首先体现在___。
A. 对当代社会主义中国的热爱上
B. 对未来现代化中国的热爱上
C. 对古代封建主义中国的热爱上
D. 对近代半殖民地中国的热爱上
【单选题】
新时期,爱国主义的主题是___
A. 促进世界和平
B. 大力发展我国的经济
C. 建设中国特色社会主义
D. 发扬中华民族的优良传统
【单选题】
爱国主义与爱社会主义、爱中国共产党、爱人民政府是___。
A. 内在一致的
B. 相互联系的
C. 相互独立的
D. 相互冲突的。
【单选题】
爱国统一战线的范围包括___
A. 全体社会主义的劳动者和社会主义事业的建设者
B. 全体社会主义的劳动者、拥护社会主义的爱国者和拥护祖国统一的爱国者
C. 全体社会主义的劳动者、社会主义事业的建设者、拥护祖国统一的爱国者
D. 全体社会主义的劳动者、社会主义事业的建设者、拥护社会主义的爱国者和拥护祖国统一的爱国者
【单选题】
经济全球化意味着___。
A. 政治一体化
B. 生产要素流动全球化
C. 文化一体化
D. 价值观一体化
【单选题】
经济全球化条件下,___是本民族整体利益的最具权威的代表者。
A. 人民
B. 中央政府
C. 政党
D. 国家。
【单选题】
当今的国际社会架构仍然是以___为国际社会的互动主体。
A. 大国集团
B. 发达国家
C. 发展中国家
D. 民族国家
【单选题】
国家不是从来就有的,而是人类历史发展到___的必然产物。
A. 原始社会
B. 阶级社会
C. 封建社会
D. 奴隶社会
【单选题】
国家的产生是民族和文明发展成熟的___。
【单选题】
经济全球化趋势对个人报效祖国___。
A. 消除了许多障碍或阻隔,开辟了更多的渠道和更大的空间
B. 增加了极大的难度
C. 成为不可能
D. 没有影响。
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑,在五千多年的发展中,中华民族形成了伟大的民族精神.中华民族精神的核心是___。
A. 社会主义
B. 集体主义
C. 爱国主义
D. 人道主义
【单选题】
___是中华民族继往开来的精神支柱。
A. 民族主义
B. 社会主义
C. 爱国主义
D. 集体主义
【单选题】
在“富贵不能淫、贫贱不能移、威武不能屈”的坚贞刚毅品质中体现的是___的民族精神。
A. 团结统一精神
B. 爱好和平精神
C. 勤劳勇敢精神
D. 自强不息精神。
【单选题】
革命烈士的诗句"砍头不要紧,只要主义真.杀了夏明翰,自有后来人",主要体现了中国革命道德传统中___。
A. 艰苦奋斗的精神
B. 追求真理的精神
C. 廉洁奉公的精神
D. 团结互助的精神
【单选题】
以___为核心的时代精神,是当代中国人民精神风貌的集中写照,是激发社会创造活力的强大力量。
A. 不畏艰险
B. 英勇无畏
C. 改革创新
D. 敢为人先
【单选题】
时代精神是民族精神的___体现。
A. 前瞻性
B. 时代性
C. 代表性
D. 经典性
【单选题】
我国的国情决定了我国的发展模式必须是___。
A. 资源型
B. 依附性
C. 创新型
D. 劳动力型
【单选题】
建设创新型国家,我们要把___作为调整经济结构、转变经济增长方式的中心环节。
A. 改革创新
B. 增强自主创新能力
C. 提高对科学技术的重视程度
D. 制度创新
【单选题】
___是其他一切创新的重要保障。
A. 理论创新
B. 科技创新
C. 制度创新
D. 文化创新
【单选题】
___能力是国家竞争力的核心。
A. 理论创新
B. 科技创新
C. 制度创新
D. 文化创新
【单选题】
今天我们发展社会主义先进文化,需要___。
A. 以西方文化为样板
B. 坚决抵制西方文化
C. 避免中国传统文化的影响
D. 古为今用,洋为中用,以我为主,以我所用
【单选题】
爱国主义包含着___三个基本方面。
A. 情感、意志和行为
B. 知识、意志和行为
C. 情感、思想和行为
D. 情感、思想和品德
【单选题】
___是爱国主义精神的落脚点和归宿。
A. 爱国思想
B. 爱国行为
C. 爱国情感
D. 爱国言论