刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
D
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举
推荐试题
【单选题】
1898年,写《劝学篇》,宣扬“中学为体、西学为用”的思想的洋务派官僚是___
A. 李鸿章
B. 张之洞
C. 左宗棠
D. 刘坤一
【单选题】
1905年11月,孙中山将同盟会纲领概括为民族、民权、民生三大主义的文章是___
A. 《猛回头》
B. 《革命军》
C. 《警世钟》
D. 《民报》发刊词
【单选题】
标志着以慈禧太后为首的清政府已彻底放弃了抵抗外国侵略者的念头,甘为“洋人的朝廷”的不平等条约是___
A. 《南京条约》
B. 《北京条约》
C. 《马关条约》
D. 《辛丑条约》
【单选题】
1912年3月,南京临时参议院颁布了中国历史上第一部具有资产阶级共和国宪法性质的法典。它是___
A. 《中华民国约法》
B. 《中华民国法典》
C. 《中华民国临时约法》
D. 《中华民国暂行约法》
【单选题】
1920年,中国最早的共产党组织建立于___
A. 北京
B. 长沙
C. 武汉
D. 上海
【单选题】
新三民主义和中共在民主革命时期的纲领___
A. 在基本原则上是一致的
B. 在基本原则上是不一致的
C. 在基本原则上是完全一致的
D. 在基本原则上是完全不一致的
【单选题】
中国共产党从理论上初步说明无产阶级领导权和工农联盟的会议是___
A. 中共二大
B. 西湖会议
C. 中共一大
D. 中共四大
【单选题】
毛泽东指出“以后要非常注意军事,须知政权是由枪杆子中取得的。”是在___
A. 八七会议
B. 中共六大
C. 中共五大
D. 古田会议
【单选题】
将“没收一切土地”改为“没收一切公共土地及地主阶级的土地”的法规是___
A. 井冈山土地法
B. 兴国土地法
C. 中国土地法大纲
D. 土地问题决议案
【单选题】
1935年1月15日至17日,中共中央政治局在遵义召开扩大会议,会议着力解决了___
A. 党的政治路线问题
B. 红军的前进方向问题
C. 当时具有决定意义的军事和组织问题
D. 土地革命的政策问题
【单选题】
1933年5月成立的察哈尔民众抗日同盟军,其主要领导人是___
A. 冯玉祥、吉鸿昌
B. 冯玉祥、董振堂
C. 赵博生、董振堂
D. 蔡廷锴、蒋光鼐
【单选题】
抗日战争进人相持阶段后,日本帝国主义对国民政府采取的策略是___
A. 以军事打击为主,政治诱降为辅
B. 以政治诱降为主,军事打击为辅
C. 军事打击和政治诱降并重
D. 速战速决,武力征服
【单选题】
中国共产党历史上第一个开展自然科学教学与研究的专门机构是___
A. 中国人民抗日军政大学
B. 陕北公学
C. 鲁迅艺术学院
D. 延安自然科学院
【单选题】
1946年2月10E[,国民党特务政破坏“庆祝政协成功大会”,致李公朴、郭沫若、马寅初及新闻记者等多人被打伤,史称___
A. 下关惨案
B. 较场口惨案
C. “一二.一"惨案
D. 李闻惨案
【单选题】
解放战争时期,1947年6月底,刘邓大军挺进大别山,揭开了___
A. 战略进攻的序幕
B. 战略决战的序幕
C. 战略防御的序幕
D. 战略相持的序幕
【单选题】
1947年10月,被国民党当局宣布为“非法团体”的是___
A. 中国国民党革命委员会
B. 中国民主同盟
C. 中国民主建国会
D. 中国民主促进会
【单选题】
新中国成立初期,各解放区建立的过渡性临时政权形式是___
A. 军事管制委员会
B. 各界人民代表会议
C. 各界人民代表大会
D. 各级人民政府
【单选题】
在中共七届三中全会上作了《为争取国家财政经济状况的基本好转而斗争》报告的是___
A. 刘少奇
B. 陈云
C. 周恩来
D. 毛泽东
【单选题】
鸦片战争前中国封建社会的主要矛盾是___
A. 地主阶级和农民阶级的矛盾
B. 帝国主义和中华民族的矛盾
C. 资产阶级和工人阶级的矛盾
D. 封建主义和资本主义的矛盾
【单选题】
中国封建社会产生过诸多“盛世”,出现在清代的是___
A. 文景之治
B. 贞观之治
C. 开元之治
D. 康乾盛世
【单选题】
将中国领土台湾割让给日本的不平等条约是___
A. 《南京条约》
B. 《北京条约》
C. 《马关条约》
D. 《瑗珲条约》
【单选题】
西方列强对中国的侵略,首先和主要的是___
A. 政治控制
B. 军事侵略
C. 经济掠夺
D. 文化渗透
【单选题】
1839年组织编写成《四洲志》,向中国人介绍西方情况的是___
A. 林则徐
B. 魏源
C. 马建忠
D. 郑观应
【单选题】
19世纪末,在帝国主义列强瓜分中国的狂潮中提出“门户开放”政策的国家是___
A. 俄国
B. 日本
C. 美国
D. 德国
【单选题】
太平天国农民起义爆发的时间是___
A. 1851年
B. 1853年
C. 1856年
D. 1864年
【单选题】
太平天国由盛而衰的转折点是___
A. 永安建制
B. 北伐失利
C. 天京事变
D. 洪秀全病逝
【单选题】
最早对兴办洋务的指导思想作出完整表述的人是___
A. 冯桂芬
B. 马建忠
C. 王韬
D. 郑观应
【单选题】
洋务运动时期最早创办的翻译学堂是___
A. 同文馆
B. 广方言馆
C. 译书局
D. 译书馆
【单选题】
以下对瓦窑堡会议的表述正确的有①提出了在抗日条件下与民族资产阶级重建统一战线的新政策②批评了“左”倾冒险主义和关门主义错误倾向③为迎接全国抗日新高潮的到来做了理论和政治上的准备④明确提出党的总方针是“逼蒋抗日”___
A. ①②③
B. ①②④
C. ②③④
D. ①③④
【单选题】
出席1946年1月政治协商会议的党派,除国民党、共产党外,还有 ①民主同盟②九三学社③民主建国会④青年党___
A. ①②
B. ②③
C. ③④
D. ①④
【单选题】
全国胜利并解决了土地问题以后,新民主主义社会的基本矛盾是①新中国同帝国主义的矛盾②工人阶级和资产阶级的矛盾③封建主义和人民大众的矛盾④中国人民同国民党残余势力的矛盾___
A. ①②
B. ②③
C. ③④
D. ①④
【单选题】
1959年到1961年中国国民经济发生严重困难的主要原因是①自然灾害的影响②“大跃进”和“反右倾”斗争的错误③“文化大革命”动乱局面的影响④苏联政府撕毁合同、撤走专家___
A. ①②③
B. ②③④
C. ①②④
D. ①③④
【单选题】
1983年10月,中共中央就农村体制改革问题作出的重大决定是①废除人民公社②建立乡(镇)政府作为基层政权③成立村民委员会作为村民自治组织④开始实行包产到户___
A. ①②③
B. ①②④
C. ②③④
D. ①③④
【单选题】
第二次鸦片战争到八国联军侵华战争期间西方列强迫使中国政府签订的不平等条约有 ①《南京条约》②《天津条约》③《马关条约》④《北京条约》___
A. ①②③
B. ①②④
C. ①③④
D. ②③④
【单选题】
为了宣传变法维新,康有为著书立说,主要有 ①《新学伪经考》②《孔子改制考》③《人类公理》④《变法通义》___
A. ①②③
B. ①③④
C. ①②④
D. ②③④
【单选题】
20世纪初,工人罢工斗争,少数民族与会党起事等层出不穷。从1902年至1911年,各地发生的爱国运动有①拒俄运动②抵制美货运动③抵制日货运动④拒法运动___
A. ①②③
B. ①③④
C. ①②④
D. ②③④
【单选题】
1924年11月,孙中山发表北上宣言,提出的政治主张是①召集善后会议②召集国民会议③联合世界各国④废除不平等条约___
A. ①②
B. ②④
C. ③④
D. ①③
【单选题】
1928—1930年间,毛泽东撰写的有关中国革命道路理论的重要著作有①《井冈山的斗争》②《中国的红色政权为什么能够存在?》③《中国革命战争的战略问题》④《星星之火,可以燎原》___
A. ①②③
B. ①②④
C. ②③④
D. ①③④
【单选题】
毛泽东全面总结农业合作化运动基本经验的报告是___
A. 《关于农业合作化问题》
B. 《关于农业生产互助合作的决议(草案)》
C. 《关于发展农业生产合作社的决议》
D. 《组织起来》
【单选题】
1956年被毛泽东称作“新经济政策”的是___
A. 社会主义条件下的商品生产
B. 可以消灭了资本主义,又摘资本主义来源:考试大
C. 社会主义条件下的价值规律
D. “三个主体、三个补充”的思想
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用