【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举
推荐试题
【单选题】
动火作业时,氧气瓶应距离火源至少___米。
【单选题】
___是造成火灾中人员伤亡的主要因素。
【单选题】
用灭火器进行灭火的最佳位置是___
A. 下风位置
B. 上风或侧风位置
C. 离起火点10米以上的位置
【单选题】
以下不属于本质安全理念应用的是___。
A. 使用安全电压
B. 设置安全联锁
C. 设置警示标识
D. 安装隔离网
【单选题】
根据事故轨迹交叉理论,一般情况下,吊物伤人至少具备___两大条件。
A. 钢丝绳拉断和违章操作
B. 吊钩脱落和违章操作
C. 绑扎不牢和违章操作
D. 吊物坠落和人在吊物坠落范围内
【单选题】
一般生产经营单位新上岗的从业人员,岗前培训时间不得少于___学时。
【单选题】
发生轻伤事故,负伤人员或最先发现的人员要立即直接或逐级报告单位领导及安全环境与生产保卫部,安全管理人员于___小时内填写《湖南省工伤事故备案表》,经审批后,与医生诊断证明一并存档。
【单选题】
作业现场的气瓶,同一地点放置数量不应超过___瓶;若超过( )瓶,但不超过( )瓶时,应有防火防爆措施;超过( )瓶以上时,必须设置二级瓶库。
A. 10 10 20 20
B. 5 5 15 15
C. 5 5 20 20
D. 10 10 15 15
【单选题】
行灯电压不得超过___V,在特别潮湿场所或导电良好的地面上,若工作地点狭窄(如锅炉内、金属容器内),行动不便,行灯电压不得超过( )V。
A. 36 18
B. 36 12
C. 24 12
D. 24 18
【单选题】
电气施工必须坚持在动力配电箱分闸后,悬挂___牌后方可进行。
A. 注意安全
B. 设备维修
C. 有人作业、禁止合闸
D. 禁止进入
【单选题】
发生重伤或死亡事故,单位领导及安全环境与生产保卫部要___报告公司主要负责人,同时( )将事故概况上报地方政府安全生产行政主管部门、同级总工会、行业主管部门。
A. 立即 立即
B. 1小时内 立即
C. 立即 1小时内
D. 1小时内 1小时内
【单选题】
《生产安全事故报告和调查处理条例》根据生产安全事故造成的人员伤亡或者直接经济损失,将生产安全事故分为___四个等级。
A. 特别重大事故、特大事故、较大事故和一般事故
B. 死亡事故、重伤事故、轻伤事故和轻微伤事故
C. 特大事故、较大事故、一般事故和轻微事故
D. 特别重大事故、重大事故、较大事故和一般事故
【单选题】
以下不属于天车安全附属装置的是___。
A. 超载限制器
B. 上、下卷扬限制器
C. 大、小车行程限位器
D. 限载牌
【单选题】
在平台、通道或工作面上可能使用工具、机器部件或物品场合,应在所有敞开边缘设置___。
A. 带踢脚板的防护栏杆
B. 防护栏杆
C. 踢脚板
D. 围挡
【单选题】
___是一项最基本的安全生产制度,是各级安全生产规章制度的核心。
A. 安全生产标准化
B. 安全生产责任制
C. 安全管理体系
D. 安全检查制度
【单选题】
三级安全教育是指___安全教育。
A. 公司级、事业部(车间级)、班组级安全教育
B. 国家级、省级、市级
C. 中车级、公司级、部门级
D. 厂级、分厂级、车间级
【单选题】
特种作业人员证书每___年复审一次,连续从事10年以上,每6年复审一次,特种设备操作人员证书每( )年复审一次。
A. 3 4
B. 3 5
C. 4 4
D. 4 5
【单选题】
在人机系统中,人始终起着核心作用。解决人机系统安全问题的根本途径是:实现生产过程___和( )。
A. 机械化 自动化
B. 机械化 智能化
C. 机电一体化 自动化
D. 机械化 电气化
【单选题】
工件、物料摆放不得超高,在垛底与垛高之比为( )的前提下,垛高不超过___m。
A. 1:2 1.5
B. 1:2 2
C. 2:1 1.5
D. 2:1 2
【单选题】
以下哪项行为是正确的___。
A. 拒绝违章指挥和强令冒险作业
B. 隐瞒从业人员劳动安全、防止职业危害的事项
C. 强令他人违章、冒险作业
D. 迟报、漏报、谎报、瞒报生产安全事故
【单选题】
精益安全工位是指在工位建立的基础上,将___、管理标准、( )通过各类目视化文件落实到工位,同时,明确各级管理者及员工的( )、管控范围、管控流程,实现现场安全管理常态化。
A. 安全技术 作业规范 管理权限
B. 作业标准 作业规范 管理职责
C. 安全技术 作业规程 管理权限
D. 安全技术 作业规范 管理职责
【单选题】
公司的环境保护方针是:___
A. 建设环境良好企业,提供节能环保交通装备,追求人与自然和谐统一
B. 建设环境友好企业,提供绿色交通装备,追求人与自然和谐统一
C. 建设环境良好企业,提供绿色交通装备,追求人与自然和谐统一
【单选题】
危险源主要来源于人的不安全行为、物的不安全状态、___缺陷和管理缺陷。
【单选题】
中车安全生产十二条禁令中禁止的六个作业指的是:___
A. 严禁违章指挥和强令他人冒险作业、严禁无证从事特种(设备)作业、严禁接触网下登顶作业、严禁未经许可进入有限空间作业、严禁不系安全带进行高处作业和严禁酒后上岗作业
B. 严禁违章指挥和强令他人冒险作业、严禁无证从事特种(设备)作业、严禁接触网下私自登顶作业、严禁进入有限空间作业、严禁不系安全带进行高处作业和严禁酒后上岗作业
C. 严禁违章指挥和强令他人冒险作业、严禁无证从事特种(设备)作业、严禁接触网下私自登顶作业、严禁未经许可进入有限空间作业、严禁不系安全带进行高处作业和严禁酒后上岗作业
【单选题】
采取适当的措施,使燃烧因缺乏或隔绝氧气而熄灭,这种方法称作___。
A. 窒息灭火法
B. 隔离灭火法
C. 冷却灭火法
【单选题】
ABC类干粉灭火器代表能扑灭___。
A. 固体火灾
B. 气体火灾
C. 液体火灾
D. ABC都正确
【单选题】
消防安全重点部位主要是指发生火灾后的___部位、人员或物质集中的部位、性质重要的部位。
A. 容易发生火灾的部位
B. 对消防安全有重大影响
C. A和B都正确
【单选题】
关于消防控制室,下列说法不正确的是___
A. 各类消防设备应处于手动状态
B. 值班人员每班不少于2人
C. 控制室内不得堆放杂物
【单选题】
消防安全管理要做到三定是指定人、定点、___确保齐全有效。
【单选题】
各单位负责对本单位的消防设施、器材装置进行日常管理和维护保养,灭火器材的数量、外观、压力等应按要求至少___进行一次检查。
【单选题】
下列那种措施是处理气瓶受热或着火是应首先采用的?___
A. 设法把气瓶拉出去扔掉
B. 用水喷洒该气瓶降温
C. 让其燃烧
【单选题】
新《大气污染防治法》第四十五条规定:工业涂装企业应当使用___有机物含量的涂料,并建立台账,记录生产原料、辅料的使用量、废弃量、去向及挥发性有机物含量。
【单选题】
生产过程中产生的危险废物堆放要做到“三防”即:防风、___、防晒。
【单选题】
建筑消防设施至少___进行一次全面检测,确保完好有效。
【单选题】
消防安全重点单位消防设施必须进行维护保养周期为___。
【单选题】
___是我国预防、控制和消除职业危害,防治职业病,保护劳动者健康及其相关权益的一部专门法律。
A. 《宪法》
B. 《安全生产法》
C. 《职业病防治法》
D. 《劳动法》
【单选题】
工作场所噪声有害因素职业接触限值为___
A. 55分贝
B. 65分贝
C. 75分贝
D. 85分贝