【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
推荐试题
【多选题】
印鉴卡上以下哪些章可以作为预留印鉴章___
A. 财务章
B. 法人章
C. 单位公章
D. 发票章
【多选题】
单位客户来进行户名变更,变更预留印鉴的,以下哪些是正确的___
A. 客户当天一起办理户名变更和印鉴变更的,《更换银行预留印鉴申请书》中账户名称填写填写旧户名,盖旧公章。
B. 客户当天一起办理户名变更和印鉴变更的,《更换银行预留印鉴申请书》中账户名称填写填写旧户名,盖新公章。
C. 客户在账户名称变更后 ,再次单独进行印鉴变更时,《更换银行预留印鉴申请书》中账户名称填写新户名。
D. 客户在账户名称变更后 ,再次单独进行印鉴变更时,《更换银行预留印鉴申请书》中账户名称填写旧户名。
【多选题】
因印鉴卡变形或残损无法正常核印,或因系统核验等原因需要以旧换新时,开户营业机构应及时发函通知存款人,由存款人被授权人员持营业机构通知函办理全套印鉴卡更换手续。以下说法正确的是___
A. 存款人重新加盖的签章与原预留印鉴一致的,存款人应交回留存的原印鉴卡(客户留存联),依据原预留印鉴式样更换全套印鉴卡。
B. 无法提供原印鉴卡(客户留存联)的,应出具加盖单位公章的公函,承诺承担由此所造成的一切经济、法律责任。
C. 开户营业机构应对印鉴卡更换前后签章的一致性进行审核确认,并在全套旧印鉴卡上加盖“已注销”戳记,注明注销日期,批注“卡片毁损”字样。
D. 同时在新印鉴卡上填写启用日期,启用日期为完成建印模后次日,特殊情况需在当日启用的,应由客户出具加盖公章的公函
【多选题】
对公久悬账户处理交易中,有哪几种方式?___。
A. 正常转收益
B. 久悬转正常
C. 收益转正常
D. 正常转久悬
【多选题】
下面哪两种情况可以使用“特殊业务审批单”,二级支行行长审批:___
A. 久悬转正常的,因特殊情况无法提供相关核实资料的
B. 收益转正常
C. 正常转久悬的
【多选题】
对公账户代理人办理久悬账户处理需要向授权中心上传以下哪些要素:___
A. 开户许可证(基本存款账户信息)
B. 营业执照或其它证明文件
C. 经办人身份证及联网核查
D. 法人身份证及联网核查
E. 授权书
【多选题】
协助有权机关查询时,可以查询被查询单位或个人的___等资料。
A. 开户、存款情况
B. 会计凭证
C. 账簿
D. 对账单
【多选题】
下列机关中有权查询、冻结、划扣单位和个人存款的是___。
A. 人民检察院
B. 人民法院
C. 公安机关
D. 税务机关
E. 银监会
F. 海关
【多选题】
下列哪些有权机关可查询、冻结单位和个人银行存款___。
A. 证券监督管理机构
B. 国务院反洗钱行政主管部门
C. 监察机关(包括军队监察机关)
D. 审计机关
【多选题】
集中查询对象为个人,系统查询时需按数据清单上载明的___、被查询账号(当被查询账号提供时)进行查询。
【多选题】
有权查询、冻结的执法机关为:___
A. 人民检查院
B. 公安机关
C. 国家安全机关
D. 监察机关
【多选题】
金融机构在协助有权机关查询时,对被查询单位的存款资料应如实提供,有权机关根据需要可以___。
A. 抄录
B. 复制
C. 照相
D. 带走原件
【多选题】
以下说法正确的是___
A. 有权机关要求查询、冻结和扣划银行存款时必须出具县团级以上单位签发的“协助查询、冻结和扣划存款通知书”。
B. 协助查询、冻结、扣划存款,经办人员应审查协助查询、冻结、扣划存款相关证明是否真实,手续是否齐全。
C. 协助有权机关查询时,对查询的资料仅限于存款资料,包括被查询单位或个人开户、存款情况以及存款有关的会计凭证、账簿、对账单等资料。
D. 查询、冻结、扣划存款通知书与解除冻结、扣款通知书均应由有权机关执法人员依法送达,金融机构不接受有权机关执法人员以外的人员代为送达的上述通知书。
【多选题】
协助有权机关查询时,对查询的资料仅限于存款资料,包括___ 。
A. 被查询单位或个人开户、存款情况
B. 存款有关的会计凭证
C. 存款有关的账簿
D. 存款有关的对账单
【多选题】
下列机关中有权查询个人存款的有___。
A. 财政部门及其派出机构
B. 海关缉私部门
C. 证券监督管理机构
D. 军队(武警)保卫部门
【多选题】
协助人民法院集中查询工作,对象为个人时,系统查询时需按数据清单上载明的事项进行查询,具体事项如下:___
A. 姓名
B. 证件类型(居民身份证号码、军官证号码、护照号码、香港通行证,澳门通行证、台湾通行证)
C. 证件号码
D. 被查询账号(当被查询账号提供时)
【多选题】
在协助冻结、扣划单位或个人存款时,经办人员应当审查以下内容:___
A. “协助冻结、扣划存款通知书”填写的需被冻结或扣划存款的单位或个人开户金融机构名称、户名和账号、大小写金额;
B. 协助冻结或扣划存款通知书上的义务人应与所依据的法律文书上的义务人相同;
C. 协助冻结或扣划存款通知书上的冻结或扣划金额应当是确定的。如发现缺少应附的法律文书,以及法律文书有关内容与“协助冻结、扣划存款通知书”的内容不符,应说明原因,退回“协助冻结、扣划存款通知书”或所附的法律文书。
D. 有权机关对个人存款户不能提供账号的,应当要求有权机关提供该个人的居民身份证号码或其它足以确定该个人存款账户的情况。
【多选题】
在协助有权机关办理冻结存款业务时,冻结的执行类别有:___
A. 只进不出
B. 存单质押
C. 部分冻结
D. 只出不进
【多选题】
冻结、扣划特种存款和保证金的注意事项___
A. 对社会保险基金帐户资金可以冻结、扣划。
B. 对工会在银行开设的工会会费帐户不得冻结、扣划。
C. 证券公司开立的客户交易结算资金专用账户的存款不得冻结扣划;
D. 新股发行验资专用账户中的资金不得冻结扣划;
E. 被执行人为金融机构时,对其缴存人民银行的存款准备金和备付金不得冻结扣划。
【多选题】
下列有关解冻说法正确的是___。
A. 系统会根据解冻执行机构来筛选相应的“冻结登记号”,所以在选解冻执行机构时,需要考虑原冻结机构,否则无法查出对应的登记号。
B. 解冻可在冻结网点办理。
C. 分期冻结一经解冻,所在分期的一并解冻。
D. 授权:必须授权。
【多选题】
办理协助冻结业务时,经办人员应当核实以下证件和法律文书___
A. 有权机关执法人员的双人双证(工作证与执行证,或根据有关规定出示一项证明)
B. 有权机关是镇团级以上机构签发的协助冻结存款通知书,法律、行政法规规定应当由有权机关主要负责人签字的,应当由主要负责人签字;
C. 人民法院出具的冻结存款裁定书、其他有权机关出具的冻结存款决定书。
【多选题】
对于冻结、扣划特种存款和保证金以下说法正确的是___
A. 对社会保险基金帐户资金不得冻结、扣划。
B. 对工会在银行开设的工会会费帐户不得冻结、扣划。
C. 被执行人为金融机构时,对其缴存人民银行的存款准备金和备付金不得冻结扣划。
D. 信用证开证保证金,人民法院在审理或执行案件时,可依法采取冻结措施,但不得扣划。
E. 银行承兑汇票保证金,人民法院在审理或执行案件时,可依法采取冻结措施,但不得扣划。
【多选题】
以下关于贷款发放说法正确的是___。
A. 借款申请书、借款借据是否加盖贷款审批专用章;
B. 借款借据第一联是否签具借款单位预留印鉴;
C. 各类申请书和合同是否按规定由各方签章确认,签章是否符合规定;
D. 放款通知书、借款借据和合同的各项要素是否相符;
E. 抵(质)押合同上的金额是否与抵(质)押收据上的金额相符。
【多选题】
“入账账号”字段账户状态和账户属性判断,账户属性为___则不允许放款。
A. 全部止付
B. 冻结
C. 资金池
D. 中间业务
E. 今日开户
【多选题】
以下关于贷款业务说法正确的是___。
A. 贷款归还类型为提前还本和提前结清时,需要先由客户经理在信贷系统审批通过。
B. 同一贷款账号下,如果当天先做过提前还本,之后再做提前结清,系统会报错,需将提前还本冲账后再处理提前结清。
C. 有欠款的情况下,允许做提前还本,但还款方式为等额本息(按月、按季)和等额本金(按月、按季)时系统控制,必须先归还欠款后才能做提前还本。
D. 归还垫款时,还款类型只能选归还欠款或逾期结清。
【多选题】
进行受托支付支付确认操作时应注意的事项包括:___
A. 该交易是将受托支付金额作解除止付处理,解除后不允许撤销。
B. 贷款发放后需要冲账,必须受托支付确认成功后再冲账。
C. 同一条受托支付信息允许多次操作。
D. 受托支付通知书中的名称和账号必须与系统中一致。
【多选题】
还款类型为提前还本时,如果还款方式为___时,需选择变期/变额,用于确定提前还本后的剩余本金重新计算还款计划。
A. 等额本息按月
B. 等额本金按月
C. 按月付息到期一次还本
D. 利随本清
【多选题】
贷款归还时,选择还款类型,下拉选项有___
A. 归还欠款
B. 提前还本
C. 提前结清
D. 到期日及逾期结清
【多选题】
下列哪项业务操作前需信贷部门提供有权人签字的相关资料?___
A. 贷款发放
B. 归还欠款
C. 提前还本
D. 提前结清
【多选题】
发放贷款时应审核哪些资料:___
A. 借款申请书、贷款合同、放款通知书、提款申请书、信贷业务审批表、贷款人受托支付通知书(或计划支付清单、实际支付清单)等是否由相关信贷审批人员批准签字;
B. 借款申请书、借款借据是否加盖贷款审批专用章;
C. 借款借据第一联是否签具借款单位预留印鉴;
D. 各类申请书和合同是否按规定由各方签章确认,签章是否符合规定;
E. 放款通知书与借款借据和合同的各项要素是否相符;
F. 抵(质)押合同上的金额是否与抵(质)押收据上的入库金额相符。
G. 各类合同是否加盖双方的骑缝章
【多选题】
下列说法正确的有___
A. 必须凭信贷部门提交的经有权人签批的相关资料办理贷款发放、提前归还等业务
B. 柜台可以直接办理贷款发放、提前归还等业务,无需经过有权人的签批
C. 贷款到期后可由借款人使用支付凭证柜面归还,也可以通过批处理每天扣收欠款。
D. 贷款抵质押物品按信贷部门提供的金额(认定价值)入账,纳入“704抵(质)押品”表外科目核算,记账员和保管员分离,并按规定入库保管
【多选题】
以下关于受托支付说法错误的是___
A. 受托支付支付确认是指将受托支付金额作解除止付处理,解除后不允许撤销。
B. 受托支付支付确认成功后也可做贷款发放冲账。
C. 同一条受托支付信息允许多次操作。
D. 受托支付通知书中的名称和账号必须与系统中一致。
【多选题】
经办柜员须对信贷部门提交的提款申请书___进行合规性审核。
A. 是否填写经办行意见,客户经理及审核人是否签字。
B. 是否加盖单位公章、法人章。
C. 与支付凭证上收付款人是否一致。
D. 与支付凭证上金额、资金用途是否一致。
【多选题】
我行垫款贷款根据业务种类不同,可分为___
A. 担保垫款
B. 承兑垫款
C. 远期结售汇项下垫款
D. 保函项下垫款
E. 其他垫款
【多选题】
垫款发放后按月结息,结息日为次月的对应发放日。例如垫款发放日为2016年3月1日,那么其结息日依次为___,以此类推。
A. 3月21日
B. 4月1日
C. 3月20日
D. 5月1日
【多选题】
下列关于垫款说法正确的是___。
A. 垫款发放后按月结息,结息日为次月的对应发放日。例如垫款发放日为2016年1月1日,那么下一个结息日为2月1日,3月1日等,以此类推。
B. 入账账号账户属性和状态正常情况下,才能入账成功,即放款成功,否则不能放款。
C. 垫款贷款发放后,资金须及时划转,专款专用,网点应协助信贷部门监控垫款账户资金动向.
D. 如有存款,系统自动扣收相应垫款及罚息
【多选题】
委托贷款归还类型有___时,需要先由客户经理在信贷系统审批通过。
A. 提前还息
B. 提前还本
C. 提前结清
D. 逾期结清
【多选题】
委托贷款与公积金贷款发放审核时应确保资料齐全,包括___
A. 放款通知书
B. 委托贷款借款合同
C. 委托贷款协议书
D. 入账通知书
【多选题】
委托贷款及公积金贷款归还需注意___
A. 公积金贷款归还后,需手工将公积金贷款本息挂账户中的本金、利息转入公积金贷款管理中心的结算账户。
B. 归还类型为提前还本和提前结清时,需要先由客户经理在信贷系统审批通过。
C. 若验印结果为人工通过,需要会计主管授权。
D. 归还欠款时,还款类型只能选归还欠款。
E. 同一贷款帐号下,如果当天先做过提前还本,之后再做提前结清,系统会报错,需将提前还本冲账后再处理提前结清。
【多选题】
委托贷款还款时凭证类型可选以下___
A. 转账支票
B. 普通存折
C. 借记卡
D. 特种转账凭证