刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
A
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
推荐试题
【单选题】
【GCCP5.0】软件说法正确的是(     )___    
A. 在分部分项界面对单个清单(子目)的单价构成修改,但是无法应用到同名称的单价构成文件中        
B. 在分部分项界面对单个清单(子目)的单价构成修改,并且可以应用到当前分部中
【单选题】
【GCCP5.0】下列关于智能组价说法不正确的是()___ 
A. 智能组价是通过积累的数据可以快速完成所有清单的一次性组价    
B. 利用行业大数据、自积累数据对项目清单完成快速组价    
C. 对自己组价内容可以和行业大数据进行校核,比较出差异        
D. 对自己非熟悉专业进行组价时,可借鉴行业大数据,学习套价、组价方案参考
【单选题】
关于招投标模块的项目结构树说法错误的是___        
A. 针对项目结构树执行标段结构保护,执行后项目结构不允许调整        
B. 可以针对项目结构树执行单项工程复制功能
C. 项目结构树可以设置展开到单位工程    
D. 项目结构树上支持同时删除不同单项的单位工程
【单选题】
对于招投标模块载入报表功能说法正确的是___
A. 一次只能载入一张报表    
B. 一次可载入多张报表
C. 可以载入报表方案文件    
D. 以上都错
【单选题】
招标方根据投标答疑重新更新了电子标招标清单,而投标方由于已编制了部分组价,希望可以快速完成调整需要用到的功能是___   
A. 更新招标书
B. 导入招标书
C. 导入excel清单  
D. 新建工程从新浏览招标文件
【单选题】
为了提高组价的多样性,提供了更多的设置:①可以选择是否应用换算信息;②支持按分数设置匹配条件;③可以选择对已有清单组价或空清单组价;该描述指的功能是___       
A. 复用数据 
B. 替换数据 
C. 标准组价    
D. 智能组价
【单选题】
以下是招投标模块安装专业特有的 功能是___  
A. 超高降效    
B. 安装费用    
C. 智能组价    
D. 砂浆换算
【单选题】
对于智能组价说法正确的是___    
A. 可以针对单位工程智能组价    
B. 可以针对某一分部智能组价    
C. 可以针对某一清单智能组价    
D. 智能组价不能带入工程的组价内容
【单选题】
调整数据编辑区的字体大小的方式需要用到的功能为为___    
A. 配色方案    
B. 更换皮肤    
C. 报表设计    
D. 无法实现
【单选题】
招投标模块如何在数据编辑区显示定额子目的工料机明细___
A. 其他-显示工料机明细        
B. 右键-显示工料机明细        
C. 工具-显示工料机明细        
D. 无法正常显示
【单选题】
根据2013清单规范,分部分项工程量清单综合单价包括:( )___       
A. 人工费、材料费(包含工程设备)、施工机具使用费、规费、利润        
B. 人工费、材料费(不含工程设备)、施工机具使用费、规费、利润  
C. 人工费、材料费(包含工程设备)、施工机具使用费、企业管理费、利润      
D. 人工费、材料费(不含工程设备)、施工机具使用费、企业管理费、利润
【单选题】
招投标模块中的统一替换,说法错误的是___    
A. 只能针对报表方案进行替换    
B. 可以针对单位工程进行报表替换    
C. 可以针对单项工程进行项目替换    
D. 可以替换某一张指定的报表
【单选题】
云计价平台中验工计价的工程文件后缀名为()___        
A. GCCP5 
B. GSH5   
C. GSC5    
D. GPV5
【单选题】
云计价平台中结算计价的工程文件后缀名为()___
A. GCCP5 
B. GSH5   
C. GSC5    
D. GPV5
【单选题】
【GCCP5.0】验工计价中,针对按自然月进行进度拨款,我们需要()设置每期的工程量___ 
A. 设置周期    
B. 添加分期    
C. 查看分期    
D. 拆分每期工程量
【单选题】
【GCCP5.0】验工计价中,如何查看3.4.5期的工程量和累计完成进度?___        
A. 添加分期    
B. 查看多期    
C. 设置分期    
D. 导出excel查看
【单选题】
【GCCP5.0】有大的变更或补充协议,甲方要求修改合同,怎么办?___      
A. 添加补充协议    
B. 修改合同清单   
C. 添加变更单    
D. 以上都可以
【单选题】
【GCCP5.0】在实际工程中,合同外工程数据也占据了造价的重要数据,想要针对这些数据和工程数据一起做造价分析,如何处理?___   
A. 关联依据    
B. 添加合同外清单
C. 工程归属    
D. 合并工程
【单选题】
编辑好的分析与报告想转换成word格式可通过()实现___  
A. 保存模板    
B. 载入模板    
C. 生成word文件  
D. 不能实现
【单选题】
审核开始前,审核方可以通过()过滤出送审合价或量较大的项作为重点审查内容___    
A. 过滤    
B. 颜色    
C. 查找    
D. 批注
【单选题】
云计价审核模块支持哪几种送审工程格式?___
A. 只有云计价预算工程(GBQ5.0工程)   
B. 只有云计价结算工程(GSC5.0工程)   
C. 云计价预算工程(GBQ5.0工程)以及结算工程(GSC5.0工程)       
D. excel工程
【单选题】
审核工程时经常遇到相似的分析与报告格式,可以通过()调用之前保存过的模板;___
A. 保存模板    
B. 载入模板    
C. 生成word文件  
D. 不能实现
【单选题】
以下那个针对【云计价助手】的描述是错误的?___
A. 分为IOS版和安卓版 
B. 需要分地区安装才能够看不同地区的工程    
C. 可以查看账号下的工程    
D. 可以看到清单的项目特征和组价
【单选题】
如何设置综合单价分析表中清单连续显示?(   ) ___
A. 报表简便设计    
B. 报表高级设计    
C. 以上都可以
D. 以上都不可以
【单选题】
【GCCP5.0】招投标模块中对于调价中的人材机说法错误的是(        ) ___   
A. 可以把不同单位工程人材机汇总在一起,方便检查,规避材料价格不一致的情况
B. 发现错误时,不需要打开单位工程就可以批量调整,大大提高了调整效率      
C. 不能实现不同单位工程人材机汇总在一起
D. 可以处理由于不同的预算员来分工完成的项目工程,产生材料不一样的价格问题,提高效率较少损失
【单选题】
以下那个描述,不是【云计价助手】的功能?___    
A. 能够直接编辑工程数据    
B. 可以查看各地的【造价资讯】
C. 可以通过图标的方式查看工程数据    
D. 能够批注,并且与PC端同步
【单选题】
在外地出差时想要查阅造价文件可以通过()来实现___
A. 造价咨询文件GPS定位后智能化推送,不需要手动操作        
B. 需要手动调整    
C. 需要安装当地区才能够看不同地区的工程    
D. 不能实现
【单选题】
广联达云计价平台简称___    
A. GCCP   
B. GICP    
C. GPV      
D. GBQ
【单选题】
下列不属于云平台模块的是(  )___
A. 估算    
B. 招投标
C. 结算    
D. 审核
【单选题】
没有网络可以通过()使用云计价___
A. 登陆    
B. 离线使用    
C. 不能使用    
D. 其他
【单选题】
没有网络工程存储路径___    
A. 企业空间    
B. 我的空间    
C. 本地文件    
D. 其他
【单选题】
在云计价【GCCP5.0】平台中,可以通过()来快速查看近期做的工程___ 
A. 企业空间    
B. 我的空间    
C. 最近文件    
D. 本地文件
【单选题】
关于云计价【GCCP5.0】的云存储描述正确的是?___      
A. 云计价的云空间分为个人空间、企业空间    
B. 个人空间是存储个人工程的。别人能随便查看    
C. 共享工程不是所有人都可以看
D. 以上都不对
【单选题】
以下哪个操作可以修改子目行的单价构成文件___    
A. 综合单价计算方式选择清单单价取费    
B. 综合单价计算方式选择子目单价取费    
C. 解除清单锁定   
D. 按专业匹配单价构成
【单选题】
在人材机汇总界面,下列哪项操作无法实现___        
A. 新建人材机表并且生成相应的报表
B. 通过输出标记可以控制材料在报表中是否输出    
C. 可以实现查找材料的对应子目或者清单项    
D. 可以批量转换材料类别
【单选题】
在其他项目中默认不计入合价的是___
A. 暂列金额    
B. 暂估价
C. 计日工
D. 总承包服务费
【单选题】
修改了工程中某项费用,想实时查看各项费用的变化情况,我们可以用以下哪个功能___
A. 云检查
B. 项目自检   
C. 费用查看        
D. 局部汇总
【单选题】
软件中对于清单项有关内容描述正确的是___    
A. 清单项的名称不能同时设置工作内容和项目特征
B. 清单项可以设置为暂估清单    
C. 清单项的单位不可以修改
D. 清单项的综合单价不能锁定
【单选题】
软件中哪个功能可以查出项目是否存在重复的清单项编码___
A. 项目自检    
B. 云检查
C. 整理清单    
D. 查询清单
【单选题】
软件中哪个功能,可以同时保存单价构成、措施项目、其他项目、费用汇总以及报表的模板,以便下一个工程重复利用___        
A. 标准组价    
B. 存为工程模板    
C. 复用数据    
D. 替换数据
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用