相关试题
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
推荐试题
【单选题】
23我国在对农业和手工业进行社会主义改造时采取的方针是___
A. 积极领导、稳步前进
B. 利用、限制、改造
C. 和平赎买
D. 自愿互利、典型示范和国家帮助
【单选题】
24对资本主义工商业实行社会主义改造,使资本主义所有制过渡到社会主义公有制具有决定意义的重大步骤是___
A. 委托加工
B. 计划订货
C. 统购包销
D. 全行业公私合营
【单选题】
25社会主义过渡时期总路线错误的说法是___
A. 主要内容是“一化三改”
B. 过渡时期结束的标志是社会主义改造结束
C. 以单一的社会主义公有制为目标
D. 以中国特色社会主义为目标
【单选题】
26我国从新民主主义到社会主义的过渡时期,个体经济向社会主义集体经济过渡的形式是___
A. 国营经济
B. 私人资本主义经济
C. 合作社经济
D. 国家资本主义经济
【单选题】
1《论十大关系》形成于___年
A. 一九五六
B. 一九五七
C. 一九五八
D. 一九五九
【单选题】
3《论十大关系》确定的基本方针是___
A. 以苏为鉴
B. 努力把党内党外、国内国外的一切积极的因素,直接的、间接的积极因素全部调动起来
C. 以经济建设为中心
D. 一个中心,两个基本点
【单选题】
4判断人们的言论和行动是非的六条标准中最重要的一条___是
A. 经济发展
B. 社会进步
C. 人民生活水平的提高
D. 有利于巩固共产党的领导,而不是摆脱或者削弱这种领导
【单选题】
5毛泽东的___,初步总结了我国社会主义建设的经验,明确提出了以苏为鉴,独立自主地探索适合中国情况的社会主义建设道路。
A. 《湖南农民运动考察报告》
B. 《矛盾论》
C. 《新民主主义论》
D. 《论十大关系》
【单选题】
6中国特色社会主义建设道路的探索始于___。
A. 毛泽东
B. 邓小平
C. 江泽民
D. 胡锦涛
【单选题】
7毛泽东提出的实现马克思主义与中国实际的“第二次结合”,就是要___。
A. 走出中国自己的社会主义革命道路
B. 走出中国自己的社会主义建设道路
C. 延续“第一次结合”的内容
D. 弥补“第一次结合”的错误
【单选题】
8中国共产党关于社会主义建设道路的探索是___开始的。
A. 从探索了工业化的道路后
B. 在对苏联模式弊端已有认识的背景下
C. 从对社会主义社会基本矛盾的认识基础上
D. 从中国社会主义改造道路的实践中
【单选题】
9体现社会主义建设道路初步探索的理论成果的重要著作是___。
A. 《中国社会各阶级的分析》和《湖南农民运动考察报告》
B. 《实践论》和《矛盾论》
C. 《新民主主义论》和《论人民民主专政》
D. 《论十大关系》和《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》
【单选题】
10毛泽东的___一文标志着党探索中国社会主义建设道路的良好开端。
A. 《实践论》
B. 《新民主主义论》
C. 《论人民民主专政》
D. 《论十大关系》
【单选题】
11最早专门系统论述社会主义社会的矛盾问题,并形成了社会主义社会矛盾的学说的无产阶级革命导师是___。
A. 马克思
B. 列宁
C. 斯大林
D. 毛泽东
【单选题】
121957年毛泽东所作的系统论述社会主义社会矛盾的理论的报告是___。
A. 《实践论》
B. 《矛盾论》
C. 《论十大关系》
D. 《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》
【单选题】
13中国共产党的第八次全国代表大会是在___年召开的。
A. 一九四五
B. 一九四九
C. 一九五六
D. 一九六六
【单选题】
141956年召开的党的代表大会是党的___。
【单选题】
15敌我矛盾和人民内部矛盾这两类性质完全不同的矛盾,是社会主义社会的矛盾在___上的反映。
【单选题】
16在社会主义社会,关于两类不同性质的矛盾的观点,正确的是___。
A. 敌我矛盾居于主导地位
B. 人民内部矛盾居于主导地位
C. 敌我矛盾和人民内部矛盾都居于主导地位
D. 敌我矛盾和人民内部矛盾都不居于主导地位
【单选题】
17毛泽东指出,解决人民内部矛盾的总方针是___。
A. 民主的方法
B. “团结—批评—团结”的方法
C. “百花齐放、百家争鸣”的方法
D. “长期共存、互相监督”的方法
【单选题】
18根据《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》的分析,对于政治思想领域的人民内部矛盾,解决的具体方针是___。
A. “团结—批评—团结”
B. “批评—团结—批评”
C. “团结—批评—批评”
D. “批评—团结—团结”
【单选题】
19根据《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》的分析,对于物质利益、分配方面的人民内部矛盾,解决的具体方针是___。
A. “团结—批评—团结”
B. 统筹兼顾、适当安排
C. “百花齐放、百家争鸣”
D. “长期共存、互相监督”
【单选题】
20根据《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》的分析,对于科学文化领域里的人民内部矛盾,解决的具体方针是___。
A. “团结—批评—团结”
B. 统筹兼顾、适当安排
C. “百花齐放、百家争鸣”
D. “长期共存、互相监督”
【单选题】
21根据《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》的分析,对于科学文化领域里的人民内部矛盾,解决的具体方针是___
A. “百花齐放、百果飘香”
B. “百花齐放、百家争鸣”
C. “百果飘香、百家争鸣”
D. “百家争鸣、百舸争流”
【单选题】
22根据《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》的分析,对于共产党和民主党派的人民内部矛盾,解决的具体方针是___。
A. “团结—批评—团结”
B. 统筹兼顾、适当安排
C. “百花齐放、百家争鸣”
D. “长期共存、互相监督”
【单选题】
23根据《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》的分析,对于民族之间的人民内部矛盾,解决的具体方针是___。
A. 民族平等、团结互助
B. 汉族至上、少数民族次之
C. 少数民族至上、汉族次之
D. 责任均等、各打五十大板
【单选题】
24中国共产党很早就重视国家的工业化问题,早在___时期,毛泽东就指出,中国的民族独立有巩固的保障,就必须工业化。
A. 大革命
B. 土地革命
C. 抗日战争
D. 解放战争
【单选题】
25在___一文中,毛泽东明确提出要走一条有别于苏联的中国工业化的道路。
A. 《新民主主义论》
B. 《论人民民主专政》
C. 《论十大关系》
D. 《关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的问题》
【单选题】
26社会主义改造完成进入全面社会主义建设时期,为逐步建立独立的比较完整的基础工业体系和国防工业体系,我们把___作为我国经济建设的重点。
A. 重工业
B. 轻工业
C. 农业
D. 服务业
【单选题】
27社会主义建设时期,毛泽东提出了以农业为基础,以工业为主导,以___为序的发展国民经济的总方针。
A. 农轻重
B. 农重轻
C. 重农轻
D. 重轻农
【单选题】
28社会主义建设时期,关于所有制结构的调整,提出要注意发展手工业和农业多种经营的思想的党和国家领导人是___。
A. 毛泽东
B. 刘少奇
C. 周恩来
D. 朱德
【单选题】
29社会主义建设时期,提出“三个主体、三个补充”设想的党和国家领导人是___。
A. 毛泽东
B. 周恩来
C. 陈云
D. 邓小平
【单选题】
30社会主义建设时期,提出“两参一改三结合”思想的党和国家领导人是___。
A. 毛泽东
B. 周恩来
C. 陈云
D. 邓小平
【单选题】
31社会主义建设时期,提出“我们的目标,是想造成一个又有集中又有民主,又有纪律又有自由,又有统一意志,又有个人心情舒畅、生动活泼,那样一种政治局面,以利于社会主义革命和社会主义建设”思想的党和国家领导人是___。
A. 毛泽东
B. 刘少奇
C. 周恩来
D. 朱德
【单选题】
32社会主义建设时期,党和毛泽东提出了实现四个现代化的宏伟目标,并强调实现四个现代化关键在于___。
A. 农业现代化
B. 工业现代化
C. 国防现代化
D. 科学技术现代化
【单选题】
33社会主义建设时期,关于科学和教育,提出实行“两种劳动制度、两种教育制度”设想的党和国家领导人是___
A. 毛泽东
B. 刘少奇
C. 周恩来
D. 朱德
【单选题】
34社会主义建设时期,提出知识分子是工人阶级一部分的观点的党和国家领导人是___。
A. 毛泽东
B. 刘少奇
C. 周恩来
D. 朱德
【单选题】
35社会主义民主的本质是___。
A. 人民当家作主
B. 公民当家作主
C. 工人当家作主
D. 农民当家作主
【单选题】
36我国社会主义制度建立以后,在全党和全国工作重心___的时候,面临着一个如何认识和处理社会主义社会矛盾的问题。
A. 由革命转向改造
B. 由革命转向建设
C. 由革命转向改革
D. 由建设转向改革