刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___
A. 事物数量的增加
B. 事物根本性质的变化
C. 事物的一切运动变化
D. 新事物的产生和旧事物的灭亡
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
D
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
推荐试题
【单选题】
"公路工程施工中由于___原因导致工期延误,承包人应该承担违约责任。
A. 工程量变化
B. 不可抗力
C. 承包人的机械损坏
D. 设计变更"
【单选题】
"根据标准施工招标文件,下列关于暂列金额、暂估价描述不正确的是___。
A. 签约合同价是签订合同时合同协议书中写明的,包括暂列金额、暂估价的合同总金额
B. 暂估价包括以计日工方式支付的金额
C. 暂列金额用于在签订协议书时尚未确定或不可预见变更
D. 暂估价必然发生 "
【单选题】
"根据标准施工招标文件,下列工程索赔产生的原因中属于业主方违约的是___。
A. 外汇汇率变化
B. 建设单位指令增加工程量
C. 合同条款遗漏
D. 未按合同规定提供图纸 "
【单选题】
"根据九部委发布的《标准施工招标文件》中的通用合同条款,工程变更不包括___。
A. 取消合同中任何一项工作转由建设单位实施
B. 改变合同中任何一项工作的质量或其他特性
C. 改变合同工程的基线
D. 改变已批准的施工工艺或顺序"
【单选题】
"根据 《标准施工招标文件》, 由发包人提供的材料由于发包人原因发生交 货地点变更的, 发包人应承担的责任是 ___。
A. 由此增加的费用、工期延误,但不考虑利润
B. 工期延误,但不考虑费用和利润的增加
C. 由此增加的费用和合理利润,但不考虑工期延误
D. 由此增加的费用、工期延误,以及承包商合理利润 "
【单选题】
"《公路工程标准施工招标文件》(2018版)规定:在变更过程中,解释合同文件的优先顺序应为___。①中标通知书;②合同协议书及各种合同附件;③投标函及投标函附录;④项目专用合同条款;⑤通用合同条款;⑥公路工程专用合同条款;⑦技术规范;⑧工程量清单计量规则;⑨图纸;⑩已标价工程量清单;⑪承包人有关人员、设备投入的承诺及投标文件中的施工组织设计;⑫其他合同文件
A. ①②③④⑥⑤⑦⑧⑨⑩⑪⑫
B. ②①③④⑥⑤⑧⑦⑨⑩⑪⑫
C. ①②③④⑥⑤⑧⑦⑨⑩⑪⑫
D. ②①③④⑥⑤⑦⑧⑨⑩⑪⑫ "
【单选题】
"《公路工程标准施工招标文件》(2018版),变更过程中合同价款存在争议时,发承包双方在收到总监理工程师或造价工程师的暂定结构通知之后的___天内,未对暂定结果予以确认也为提出不同意意见的,视为发承包双方认可该暂定结果。
A. 3
B. 7
C. 14
D. 28 "
【单选题】
"《公路工程标准施工招标文件》(2018版)规定,由于设计变更,造价工程师在审核承包人提出的变更价款是否合理时,___是确定的基础。
A. 类似于变更工程的合同价格
B. 施工定额基价
C. 设计单位提出的变更价格
D. 业主提出的变更价格。"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,I类变更设计概算由___编制,按规定报铁总批复。
A. 建设单位按初步设计批复概算原则
B. 施工单位按投标概算原则
C. 施工单位按初步设计概算原则
D. 勘察设计单位按初步设计批复概算原则"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,I类变更设计文件一般在会审纪要下发后___天内完成,特殊情况下I类变更设计完成时间由建设单位和勘察设计单位确定。
A. 15
B. 28
C. 30
D. 60"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,站房除___以外的建筑方案、主体结构变化的,属于重大方案及重大工程措施标准变化。
A. 建筑形态
B. 宽度
C. 位置
D. 高度"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,在建项目已签合同中非责任事故、问题的II类变更设计,增减工程费用___万元及以上的,由建设单位在基本预备费中列支并相应调整施工合同额。
A. 100
B. 150
C. 200
D. 300"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,铁路项目II类变更设计以工点划分,对于工点的定义目前尚无统一的定义,一般指___
A. 单项工程
B. 单位工程
C. 分部分项工程
D. 同一工号"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,___均有权对变更设计违规行为向总公司监察局举报或投诉。
A. 监理单位
B. 任何单位和个人
C. 设计单位
D. 供应商"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,建设单位组织勘察设计单位按确定的变更设计方案编制施工图;勘察设计单位一般应在《变更设计设计会审纪要》下发后___天内完成施工图。
A. 10
B. 14
C. 28
D. 30 "
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,铁路项目实施中,建设单位收到___后,应组织现场核实确认,对现场现状进行照相摄影,对照变更设计建议客观提出核实确认意见,确认人在确认意见上签名。签名后的确认意见和影像资料纳入变更设计档案保管。
A. 变更设计建设书
B. 变更设计方案
C. 变更设计文件
D. 变更设计图纸"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设[2012]253号文)规定),I类变更设计由___编制,并对工程数量和费用进行增减对照,按规定报送铁总审批。
A. 建设单位按初步设计批复的概算编制原则
B. 勘察设计单位按初步设计批复的概算编制原则
C. 施工单位按招标文件的要求编制
D. 施工单位按初步设计批复的概算编制原则"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设【2012】253号文)规定,铁路项目施工图阶段需要对初步设计批复的重大内容调整的,包括施工图预算超出初步设计批复总概算的,比照___程序报初步设计审查部门批准。
A. I类变更设计
B. II类变更设计
C. 新增工程
D. 概算清理"
【单选题】
"根据《铁路建设项目变更设计管理办法》(铁建设[2012]253号文)规定),在初步设计审查部门收到I类变更设计文件后,应尽快组织现场核实,提出明确要求。对符合审批条件的,一般在___个工作日内完成批复;需要补充资料的部分,应及时提出补充要求,并在资料补充后20个工作日内另行批复。
A. 28
B. 30
C. 60
D. 90"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团投资类公司、直管项目公司薪酬与绩效考核管理办法》(中铁四人(2017)860号)规定,局直管项目公司建设期年度考核得分低于___分,取消副处职及以上领导人员年度绩效薪酬兑现资格,建设期全周期绩效考核得分低于( )分,项目公司副处职及以上领导人员预留的20%绩效年薪全部扣除,不再兑现。
A. 50,50
B. 55,55
C. 60,60
D. 65,65"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团投资类公司、直管项目公司薪酬与绩效考核管理办法》(中铁四人(2017)860号)规定,局投资发展部配合拟订投资类公司、局直管项目公司年度绩效考核指标,下达投资类指标目标值并按___进行绩效考核评分。
A. 月度
B. 季度
C. 半年度
D. 年度"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团有限公司PPP项目税务处理指引》(中铁四财〔2017〕793号)规定,实行简易计税的高速公路项目其有关开工日期说法正确的是___
A. 2016年4月30日前
B. 2016年5月30日前
C. 2017年4月30日前
D. 2017年5月30日前"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团有限公司PPP项目投资尽职调查管理办法》(中铁四法(2017)812号)规定,PPP项目投资尽职调查小组成员中法律人员应作为尽职调查工作的牵头人,负责协调尽职调查小组其他成员开展工作。暂未设置法律岗位的单位,在人员到位前由局___指派一人为牵头人。
A. 成本管理部
B. 法律合规部
C. 财务部
D. 投资发展部"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局安全生产费用管理办法》(中铁四成本(2016)418号)规定,各分公司、局直管、代管项目经理部,针对房屋建筑工程、水利水电工程、电力工程、铁路工程、城市轨道工程,每季根据项目的季度建安计划,分别按不低于___的标准提取安全费用,并上缴到指定的“安全资金账户”。
A. 1%
B. 1.5%
C. 2%
D. 2.5%"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局安全生产费用管理办法》(中铁四成本(2016)418号)规定,各分公司、局直管、代管项目经理部,针对市政公用工程、冶炼工程、机电安装工程、化工石油工程、港口与航道工程、公路工程、通信工程,每季根据项目的季度建安计划,分别按不低于___的标准提取安全费用,并上缴到指定的“安全资金账户”。
A. 1%
B. 1.5%
C. 2%
D. 2.5%"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团工程项目合同价款分劈与验工计价管理办法》(中铁四工经﹝2013﹞67号)规定,采用简易计税法的项目,安全生产费照合同价款分劈的安全生产费金额的___计列成本。
A. 85%
B. 90%
C. 95%
D. 全额"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团工程项目合同价款分劈与验工计价管理办法》(中铁四工经﹝2013﹞67号)规定,采用一般计税法的项目,安全生产费照合同价款分劈的安全生产费金额的___计列成本。
A. 85%
B. 90%
C. 95%
D. 全额"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团直、代管工程项目目标利润率确定办法》(中铁四成本(2016)502号)规定,局直、代管工程项目中参建公司工经部门根据经审批的项目管理策划书,结合工地调查和收集的基础资料,除非特别原因,应在参建分部施工组织设计审批通过且局内部分劈文件下达后___内,利用成本管理信息系统,完成参建分部的责任成本预算的编制工作。
A. 15天
B. 30天
C. 60天
D. 三个月"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团直、代管工程项目目标利润率确定办法》(中铁四成本(2016)502号)规定,中铁四局集团直、代管工程项目目标利润率确定办法中目标利润率的计算方法为___
A. 目标利润率=(含税合同价-直接成本预算-责任费用预算)/含税合同价×100%
B. 目标利润率=(不含税合同价-直接成本预算-责任费用预算)/不含税合同价×100%
C. 目标利润率=(含税合同价-直接成本预算)/含税合同价×100%
D. 目标利润率=(不含税合同价-直接成本预算算)/不含税合同价×100%"
【单选题】
"根据《中国中铁关于加强基础设施投资统筹协调和风险管控的通知》(股份传2017-400)规定,为加强基础设施投资统筹协调,各投资公司在划定的责任区域内,应积极运作实施单项___亿元及以上的大型基础设施投资项目,( )亿元以下的单项投资项目应由工程局负责,鼓励有实力的工程局在其优势领域积极运作投资项目。
A. 20,20
B. 30,30
C. 40,40
D. 50,50"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团工程项目合同价款分劈与验工计价管理办法》(中铁四工经﹝2013﹞67号)规定,中铁四局集团工程项目合同价款分劈原则上应在任务划分后___个月内完成。
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 6"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团工程项目验工计价管理办法》(中铁四成本(2016)451号)规定,局成本部按季度和年度,分别下达局指和子分公司验工计价的目标计划。要求各单位将当期验工计价与调度建安产值及建造合同收入的偏差控制在___以内,并在下一期验工计价目标计划中通报上期完成情况.
A. 5%
B. 10%
C. 15%
D. 20%"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局作业层队伍管理办法》(中铁四程(2016)877号)规定,项目部应配置专职或兼职劳务员。劳务员负责基础台账、报表及资料备案、作业层队伍现场管理、施工能力、履约和诚信情况记录等工作。每名在岗的专职或兼职劳务员,每年度参加子分公司举办的劳务员培训不得少于___次。
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局作业层队伍管理办法》(中铁四程(2016)877号)规定,局成本管理部在职能部门职责分工中负责的内容为___
A. 作业层队伍合同管理及诉讼纠纷案件管理
B. 作业层队伍分包单价及结算监管
C. 作业层队伍款项支付监管
D. 作业层队伍技术管理监管"
【单选题】
"根据《中国中铁股份有限公司工程施工劳务(专业)分包管理指导意见》(中铁股份成本﹝2016﹞162号)规定,分包结算必须坚持量价控制。结算开累数量不得超过该队伍所承担任务的___和开累实际分包进度数量,单价以合同单价为准。
A. 分项工程总控数量
B. 分部工程总控数量
C. 单位工程总控数量
D. 整个合同工程数量"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团有限公司境内PPP项目经济利益分配办法》(中铁四财〔2017〕775号)规定,为充分保障履行PPP协议约定的运营义务,局实施的投资项目以PPP项目公司批复局指(代局指)验工计价为基数向参建子分公司收取___的运营准备金,随局享施工收益一并交局。
A. 1.5%
B. 2%
C. 2.5%
D. 3%"
【单选题】
"根据《中铁四局集团有限公司PPP项目投资经营管理办法》(中铁四投(2017)817号)规定,具有明确合法的收费基础,但在合作期内运营收入不足以覆盖项目投资建设成本、运营维养成本、税费及合理收益,按照“使用者付费+可行性缺口补助”的回报机制进行投资建设的项目为___
A. 准经营性PPP项目
B. 非准经营性PPP项目
C. 经营性PPP项目
D. 非经营性PPP项目"
【单选题】
"根据《关于规范供应链金融业务有关事项的通知》(股份办发财务(2018)12号)规定,股份公司所属各单位牵头做反向保理需要聘请保理、信托等中介机构的,应优先选择___合作。
A. 境外金融信托机构
B. 合作类金融信托机构
C. 国有金融信托机构
D. 股份公司内部金融机构
【单选题】
"《中国中铁股份有限公司金融投资管理办法》(中铁股份金融(2016)226号)中规定,股份公司各二级企业应在每个季度结束后___日内向股份公司金融管理部报送本单位所有金融投资数据和业务开展情况报告。
A. 5
B. 15
C. 25
D. 30"
【单选题】
"《中国中铁股份有限公司PPP项目财务管理暂行办法》(中铁股份财务(2018)131号)中规定,资产负债率高于85%或近___年连续亏损的单位不得单独投资PPP项目。
A. 2
B. 3
C. 4
D. 5"
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用