相关试题
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
推荐试题
【多选题】
反对北洋军阀统治的革命斗争有___
A. 武昌起义
B. 二次革命
C. 护法运动
D. 护国运动
【多选题】
辛亥革命失败的原因包括___
A. 没有彻底的反帝反封建纲领,不能建立坚强的革命政党
B. 不能充分发动和依靠群众
C. 民族资产阶级的软弱和妥协
D. 中外反动势力勾结,过于强大
【多选题】
辛亥革命的历史意义有___
A. 推翻了清政府的封建统治,结束了中国两千年的封建帝制
B. 给中国人带来了一次思想的解放
C. 打击了帝国主义侵略势力
D. 促使了社会经济、思想习惯和社会风俗等方面发生了积极变化
【多选题】
戊戌变法和辛亥革命共同的特点有___
A. 是爱国救亡的政治运动
B. 是资产阶级性质的政治运动
C. 未提出彻底的反帝反封建纲领
D. 促进了思想解放
【多选题】
1911年10月10日凌晨处决的辛亥三烈士是___
A. 彭楚藩
B. 刘公
C. 刘复基
D. 杨宏胜
【多选题】
府院之争主要是___和( B )之争。
A. 段祺瑞
B. 黎元洪
C. 张作霖
D. 冯国璋
【多选题】
与中国近代史上的太平天国农民起义和戊戌维新运动相比,虽然都是为了反帝反封,但辛亥革命有着本质的不同,表现在:___
A. 有一个完整的资产阶级革命纲领:三民主义
B. 有一个统一的资产阶级革命政党:同盟会
C. 有一个明确的资产阶级革命目标:中华民国
D. 充分地依赖和发动人民群众
【多选题】
袁世凯专制独裁的行径有___
A. 解散国民党
B. 解散国会
C. 制定颁布《中华民国约法》
D. 接受帝位
【多选题】
以下属于《中华民国临时约法》的内容有___
A. 中华民国主权在民;国内各民族平等
B. 国民有人身、居住、财产、言论、出版、集会、结社、宗教信仰自由
C. 有选举和被选举的权利
D. 参议院行使立法权,有弹劾总统的权力
【多选题】
孙中山辞去临时大总统前后对袁世凯提出的条件有___
A. 要赞成共和,遵守临时约法
B. 发展工商业
C. 反对外国侵略
D. 定都南京
【多选题】
辛亥革命失败的主要原因在于资产阶级革命派本身存在的许多弱点和错误,主要有___
A. 不能建立坚强的革命政党
B. 没有提出彻底的反帝反封建的革命纲领
C. 革命派没有先进思想武装
D. 不能充分发动和依靠人民群众
【多选题】
新文化运动前期的主要内容包括 ___
A. 提倡民主,反对专制
B. 提倡科学,反对愚昧和迷信
C. 提倡新道德,反对旧道德
D. 提倡新文学,反对旧文学
【多选题】
下列关于五四运动背景的叙述中,正确的是 ___
A. 随着中国资本主义发展,工人阶级队伍进一步壮大
B. 新文化运动推动了人民的思想解放
C. 北洋军阀政府的腐败统治和军阀混战,人民反抗情绪增强
D. 十月革命的胜利为中国人民指明了解放的道路
【多选题】
1919年五四运动中,爱国学生提出的口号有 ___
A. 外争国权,内除国贼
B. 取消“二十一条”,拒绝签订和约
C. 停止内战,一致对外
D. 还我青岛
【多选题】
五四运动中,出现了许多以往历史不具备的新因素,这些新因素是指 ___
A. 运动是在十月革命影响下发生的
B. 北洋军阀政府忙于军阀混战
C. 李大钊等先进知识分子起了领导作用
D. 中国工人阶级在运动中独立地走上政治舞台并起了重大作用
【多选题】
五四运动的直接结果有 ___
A. 释放被捕学生
B. 罢免曹、章、陆三个卖国贼职务
C. 未在“和约”上签字
D. 实现了反帝斗争目标
【多选题】
五四运动划时代的伟大意义是 ___
A. 五四运动是一次彻底的不妥协的反帝反封建的爱国运动
B. 五四运动是中国新民主主义革命的开端
C. 五四运动促进了马克思主义在中国的传播和与工人运动的结合
D. 五四运动从思想上和干部上为中国共产党的成立作了准备
【多选题】
1920年夏至1921年初,中国共产党早期组织在以下城市组建 ___
【多选题】
1920年8月,在上海组建的中国工人阶级政党组织成员是 ___
A. 李大钊
B. 李汉俊
C. 李达
D. 陈独秀
【多选题】
1919年9月,李大钊在《我的马克思主义观》这篇文章中系统地介绍了马克思的哪些学说和理论 ___
A. 唯物史观
B. 阶级斗争理论
C. 人权理论
D. 剩余价值学说
【多选题】
1920年10月,创立共产党北京支部的有 ___
A. 毛泽东
B. 陈独秀
C. 张国焘
D. 李大钊
【多选题】
列席中共一大的共产国际代表有 ___
A. 维经斯基
B. 马林
C. 尼柯尔斯基
D. 鲍罗廷
【多选题】
中共一大选出的中央局成员有 ___
A. 陈独秀
B. 李达
C. 李汉俊
D. 张国焘
【多选题】
中国共产党成立的伟大意义有 ___
A. 中国无产阶级有了自己的战斗司令部
B. 中国人民的革命事业有了坚强的领导核心
C. 中国革命有了明确的目标和方向
D. 中国革命的面貌从此焕然一新
【多选题】
中国共产党成立后,“中国革命的面貌焕然一新了”,其中“新”主要体现在___
A. 中国革命开始以马克思主义为指导
B. 中国革命开始了社会主义革命
C. 中国革命在无产阶级政党的领导下进行
D. 中国革命开始以社会主义、共产主义为远大目标
【多选题】
中共二大制定的党的纲领是 ___
A. 马克思主义和中国具体实际相结合的第一步
B. 党的最低纲领
C. 党的最高革命纲领
D. 实现了马克思主义和中国具体实际相结合的历史性飞跃
【多选题】
中共二大指出革命的动力是 ___
A. 工人
B. 农民
C. 小资产阶级
D. 民族资产阶级
【多选题】
国共两党能实现第一次合作是由于 ___
A. 两党确立了合作的共同纲领
B. 共产国际的帮助
C. 孙中山接受中共反帝反封建主张
D. 中共三大做出了正确的决定
【多选题】
国民党一大宣言中阐述的新三民主义中新的民生主义的重要原则是 ___
A. 平均地权
B. 节制资本
C. 平分土地
D. 实行土地的农民所有
【多选题】
北伐战争的重大成果有 ___
A. 基本消灭了北洋军阀吴佩孚、孙传芳的主力
B. 革命势力发展到长江流域和黄河流域大部分地区
C. 出现空前广泛的工农运动高潮
D. 北洋军阀政府被推翻
【多选题】
1925年广东革命政府为统一和巩固广东革命根据地采取的军事行动是___
A. 平定天京叛乱
B. 平定刘、杨叛乱
C. 第一、二次东征
D. 南征
【多选题】
各地共产党的最早组织创办了一批专门供工人阅读的进行马克思主义启蒙教育的刊物有___
A. 上海的《劳动界》
B. 北京的《劳动音》
C. 济南的《济南劳动月刊》
D. 北京的《工人月刊》
【多选题】
下列著作中特别深地铭刻在毛泽东心中并使他建立起对马克思主义信仰的有 ___
A. 《共产党宣言》
B. 《阶级斗争》
C. 《社会主义史》
D. 《唯物主义解说》
【多选题】
十月革命推动中国的先进分子从资产阶级民主主义转向社会主义的原因是 ___
A. 十月革命启示中国人在经济文化落后的国家也可以用社会主义思想指引自己走向解放之路
B. 十月革命后,苏维埃俄国号召反对帝国主义,以平等姿态对待中国,推动了社会主义思想在中国的传播
C. 十月革命中工人和士兵的广泛发动并由此赢得胜利的事实昭示中国先进分子以新的方法开展革命
D. 十月革命一声炮响,给我们送来了马克思列宁主义
【多选题】
李大钊讴歌十月革命的著作有 ___
A. 《法俄革命之比较观》
B. 《庶民的胜利》
C. 《Bolshevism的胜利》
D. 《我的马克思主义观》
【多选题】
早期共产党组织成员与反马克思主义者进行的论战主要有 ___
A. 同胡适围绕“问题与主义”的论战
B. 同张东荪、梁启超关于社会主义的论战
C. 同无政府主义者的论战
D. 同社会民主主义的论战
【多选题】
1926年,国民政府进行北伐的主要对象是 ___
A. 吴佩孚
B. 张作霖
C. 冯玉祥
D. 孙传芳
【多选题】
1926年3月、5月,蒋介石打击共产党员和工农革命群众力量的事件是 ___
A. 中山舰事件
B. 整理党务案
C. “四一二”反革命政变
D. “七一五”分共
【多选题】
中国工人阶级的特殊优点是 ___
A. 分布集中,易于形成一支重要的政治力量
B. 深受帝国主义、封建主义、资本主义的三重压迫,反抗性和革命性极强
C. 和农民有着天然联系,易于结成亲密的工农联盟
D. 不占有任何生产资料,革命最彻底,并且与先进的经济形式相联系,纪律性最强
【多选题】
中国共产党在国民革命中的重要作用表现为 ___
A. 大革命中”反对帝国主义”“反对军阀”的政治口号是中国共产党提出的
B. 中国共产党是国共合作的倡导者和统一战线的组织者
C. 中国共产党是群众运动的发动者和领导者
D. 中国共产党帮助和推动了国民革命军的建立并在战斗中起了表率作用