相关试题
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
推荐试题
【单选题】
[1]配制酚酞指示剂选用的溶剂是___。
A. 水一甲醇
B. 水一乙醇
C. 水
D. 水一丙酮
【单选题】
[1]酸碱滴定曲线直接描述的内容是___。
A. 指示剂的变色范围
B. 滴定过程中pH变化规律
C. 滴定过程中酸碱浓度变化规律
D. 滴定过程中酸碱体积变化规律
【单选题】
[1]已知0.10mol/L一元弱酸溶液的pH=3.0,则0.10mol/L共轭碱NaB溶液的pH是___。
【单选题】
[2]多元酸能分步滴定的条件是___。
A. Kal/Ka2≥106
B. Kal/Ka2≥l05
C. Kal/Ka2≤106
D. Ka1/Ka2≤105
【单选题】
[2]若弱酸HA的Ka=1.0×10-5,则其0.l0mol/L溶液的pH为___。
A. 2.0
B. 3.0
C. 5.0
D. 6.0
【单选题】
[2]酸碱滴定中指示剂选择依据是___。
A. 酸碱溶液的浓度
B. 酸碱滴定pH突跃范围
C. 被滴定酸或碱的浓度
D. 被滴定酸或碱的强度
【单选题】
[2]中性溶液严格地讲是指___。
A. pH=7.0的溶液
B. [H+]=[OH]的溶液
C. pOH=7.0的溶液
D. pH+pOH=14.0的溶液
【单选题】
[1]按酸碱质子理论,下列物质是酸的是___。
A. NaCl
B. [Fe(H2O)6]3+
C. NH3
D. H2N-CH2COO-
【单选题】
[3]物质的量浓度(以其化学式为基本单元)相同的情况下,下列物质的水溶液pH最高的是___。
A. NaAc
B. Na2CO3
C. NH4Cl
D. NaCl
【单选题】
[2]欲配制pH=5的缓冲溶液,应选用下列___共轭酸碱对。
A. NH2OH2+-NH2OH(NH20H的pKb=3.38)
B. HAc-Ac(HAc的pKa=4.74)
C. NH4+-NH3·H2O(NH3·H2O的pKb=4.74)
D. HCOOH-HCOO-(HCOOH的pKa=3.74)
【单选题】
[2]测定某混合碱时,用酚酞作指示剂时所消耗的盐酸标准溶液比继续加甲基橙作指示剂所消耗的盐酸标准溶液多,说明该混合碱的组成为___。
A. Na2CO3+NaHCO3
B. Na2CO3+NaOH
C. NaHCO3+NaOH
D. Na2CO3
【单选题】
[2]下列溶液稀释10倍后,pH值变化最小的是___。
A. 1mol/L HAc
B. 1mol/L HAc和0.5mol/L NaAc
C. 1mol/L NH3
D. lmol/L NH4C1
【单选题】
[3] HAc-NaAc缓冲溶液pH值的计算公式为___。
A. [H+]=(KHAcc(HAc))1/2
B. [H+]=(KHAc×c(HAc)) / (c(NaHAc))
C. [H+]=(Ka1Ka2)1/2
D. [H+]=c(HAc)
【单选题】
[1]NaOH溶液标签浓度为0.3000mol/l.,该溶液从空气中吸收了少量的CO2,现以酚酞为指示剂,用标准HC1溶液标定,标定结果比标签浓度___。
【单选题】
[2]在酸平衡表示叙述中正确的是___。
A. 平衡常数值越大则溶液的酸度越小
B. 平衡常数值越大则溶液的酸度越大
C. 平衡常数值越大则溶液的浓度越小
D. 平衡常数值越大则溶液的浓度越大
【单选题】
[2]某酸在18℃时的平衡常数为1.84×10-5,在25℃时的平衡常数为1.87×10-5,则说明该酸___。
A. 在18℃时溶解度比25℃时小
B. 酸的电离是一个吸热过程
C. 温度高时电离度变小
D. 温度高时溶液中的氢离子浓度变小
【单选题】
[2]0.10mol/L乙酸溶液的pH值为(已知KHAc=1.8×10-5)___。
A. 2.8
B. 2.87
C. 2.872
D. 5.74
【单选题】
[1]0.10mol/L三氯乙酸溶液的pH值为(已知Ka=0.23)___。
A. 0.82
B. 1.12
C. 0.10
D. 1.00
【单选题】
[2]0.20mol/L的某碱溶液,其溶液的pH值为(Kb=4.2×10-4)___。
A. 2.04
B. 11.96
C. 4.08
D. 9.92
【单选题】
[2]0.1mol/LH3PO4涪液的pH值为___。(Ka1=7.6×10-3,Ka2=6.3×10-8,Ka3=4.4×10-13)
A. 1.56
B. 1.62
C. 2.61
D. 3.11
【单选题】
[1]下列有关Na2CO3在水溶滚中质子条件的叙述中,正确的是___。
A. [H+]+2[Na+]+[HCO3-]=[OH-]
B. [H+]+2[H2CO3]+[HCO3-]=[OH-]
C. [H+]+[H2CO3]+[HCO3-]=[OH-]
D. [H+]+[HCO3-]=[OH]+2[CO32-]
【单选题】
[1]有一碱液,可能为NaOH、NaHCO3或Na2CO3或它们的混合物,用HC1标准滴定溶液滴定至酚酞终点时耗去HCI的体积为Vl,继续以甲基橙为指示剂又耗去HC1的体积为V2,且Vl<V2,则此碱液为___。
A. Na2CO3
B. Na2CO3+NaHCO3
C. NaHCO3
D. NaOH+Na2CO3
【单选题】
[1]在酸碱滴定中,选择强酸强碱作为滴定剂的理由是___。
A. 强酸强碱可以直接配制标准溶液
B. 使滴定突跃尽量大
C. 加快滴定反应速率
D. 使滴定曲线较完美
【单选题】
[1]测得某种新合成的有机酸的pKa值为12.35,其Ka值应表示为___。
A. 4.467×10-13
B. 4.5×10-13
C. 4.46×10-13
D. 4.4666×10-13
【单选题】
[2]用0.l000mol/IJ NaOH滴定0.1000mol/L HAc(pKa=4.7)时的pH突跃范围为7.7~9.7,由此可以推断用0.1000mol/L NaOH滴定pKa为3.7的0.1mol/L某一元酸的pH突跃范围为___。
A. 6.7~8.7
B. 6.7~9.7
C. 8.7~10.7
D. 7.7~10.7
【单选题】
[1]0.050mol/L联氨溶液的pH值为(Kb1=3.0×10-6,K b2=7.6×10-15)___。
A. 10.95
B. 10.59
C. 9.95
D. 9.59
【单选题】
[2]0.10mol/L NaF溶液的pH值为(Ka1=6.6×10-4)___。
A. 10.09
B. 8.09
C. 9.09
D. 9.82
【单选题】
[1]用0.1000mol/L的NaOH标准滴定溶液滴定0.1000mol/L的HC1至pH=9.00,则终点误差为___。
A. 0.0l%
B. 0.02%
C. 0.05%
D. 0.1%
【单选题】
[3]下列各组酸碱对中,不属于共轭酸碱对的是___。
A. H2CO3-HCO3-
B. H3O+-OH-
C. HPO42--PO43-
D. NH3-NH2
【单选题】
[2]配制pH=7的缓冲溶液时,选择最合适的缓冲对是___。[Ka(HAc)=1.8×10-5,Kb(NH3)=1.8×l0-5;H2CO3:Kal=4.2×10-7,Ka2=5.6×10-11;H3PO4:Ka1=7.6×10-3,Ka2=6.3×10-8,Ka3=4.4×10-13]
A. HAc-NaAc
B. NH3-NH4C1
C. NaH2PO4-Na2HPO4
D. NaHCO3-Na2CO3
【单选题】
[2]NH3的Kb=1.8×10-5,0.lmol/LNH3溶液的pH为___。
A. 2.87
B. 2.22
C. 11.13
D. 11.78
【单选题】
[1]在共轭酸碱对中,酸的酸性越强,其共轭碱的___。
A. 碱性越强
B. 碱性强弱不定
C. 碱性越弱
D. 碱性消失
【单选题】
[2]非水滴定法测定糖精钠所用指示剂是___。
A. 皿甲基蓝
B. 溴酚蓝
C. 结晶紫
D. 酚酞
【单选题】
[2]在酸平衡表示叙述中不正确的是___。
A. 酸的强弱与酸的平衡常数有关,相同条件下平衡常数越大则酸度越大
B. 酸的强弱与溶剂的性质有关,溶剂接受质子的能力越大则酸度越大
C. 酸的强弱与溶剂的性质有关,溶剂接受质子的能力越小则酸度越大
D. 酸的强弱与酸的结构有关,酸越易给出质子则酸度越大
【单选题】
[2]在碱平衡表示叙述中不正确的是___。
A. 碱的强弱与碱的平衡常数有关,相同条件下平衡常数越大则碱度越大
B. 碱的强弱与溶剂的性质有关,溶剂给出质子的能力越大则碱度越大
C. 碱的强弱与溶剂的性质有关,溶剂给出质子的能力越小则碱度越大
D. 碱的强弱与碱的结构有关,碱越易接受质子则碱度越大
【单选题】
[3]0.10mol/L.NaAc溶液的pH值为___。(Ka=l.8×10-5)
A. 2.87
B. 11.13
C. 8.87
D. 9.87
【单选题】
[2]用NaOH滴定盐酸和醋酸的混合液时会出现___个突跃。
【单选题】
[2]用HC1标准滴定溶液滴定Na2CO3和NaOH的混合溶液,可得到___个滴定突跃。
【单选题】
[3]下列各组酸碱对中,属于共轭酸碱对的是___。
A. H2CO3-CO32-
B. H3O+-OH-
C. HPO42--PO43-
D. NH3+CH2COOH-NH2CH2COO-
【单选题】
[1]已知Kb(NH3)=1.8×10-5,则其共轭酸的Ka值为___。
A. 1.8×10-9
B. 1.8×10- l0
C. 5.6×10 -10
D. 5.6×10 -5