【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
推荐试题
【单选题】
下列各项急性炎症反应,按出现顺序哪一种最先出现( )
A. 血管扩张
B. 血流缓慢
C. 白细胞附壁
D. 白细胞游出
E. 血流停滞
【单选题】
炎症时,引起白细胞渗出最重要的因素是( )
A. 血管壁通透性升高
B. 白细胞附壁
C. 炎症介质起作用
D. 白细胞的阿米巴运动
E. 血管内压力升高
【单选题】
下列哪项是变质性炎( )
A. 流行性脑脊髓膜炎
B. 细菌性痢疾
C. 大叶性肺炎
D. 阿米巴肝脓肿
E. 化脓性胆囊炎
【单选题】
肉芽肿指( )
A. 结缔组织增生而形成境界清楚的结节状病灶
B. 淋巴、网状组织增生形成的结节状病灶
C. 多核巨噬细胞形成的结节状病灶
D. 巨噬细胞及其演化细胞呈局部浸润和增生形成的境界清楚的结节状病灶
E. 黏膜上皮、腺体和结缔组织增生并向黏膜表面突出的蒂状肿物
【单选题】
炎症时白细胞定向移动的主要原因是( )
A. 白细胞的阿米巴样运动
B. 轴流消失
C. 化学刺激物
D. 血管壁的通透性增高
E. 血管内压增高
【单选题】
在大多数类型的组织损伤中血管通透性升高的速发反应主要是下列哪种因素影响
A. 补体
B. 细菌毒素
C. 过敏毒素
D. 组胺
E. 坏死分解产物
【单选题】
炎症局部疼痛的主要原因是( )
A. 细胞增生压迫神经末梢
B. 局部组织变性坏死
C. 局部充血及血流量增多
D. 组织分解代谢增强
E. 渗出物压迫及炎症介质刺激
【单选题】
炎症时液体渗出的部位是( )
A. 细静脉和毛细血管
B. 细动脉和细静脉
C. 毛细血管
D. 细静脉和淋巴管
E. 细动脉和毛细血管
【单选题】
在慢性炎症中,下列哪种细胞最常见
A. 嗜酸性粒细胞
B. 淋巴细胞
C. 嗜中性粒细胞
D. 肥大细胞
E. 巨噬细胞
【单选题】
急性炎症反应中出血的机制是( )
A. 化学介质引起的血管通透性增高
B. 白细胞释放的溶酶体酶
C. 纤维蛋白溶解
D. 血管壁的损伤
E. 凝血因子缺乏
【单选题】
同时累及脑膜、肾、肺、肠及骨的肉芽肿性病变常是( )
A. 风湿小体
B. 伤寒小体
C. 麻风小结
D. 矽结节
E. 结核结节
【单选题】
下列哪一项不是渗出性炎( )
A. 卡他性炎症
B. 乙型脑炎
C. 白喉
D. 肾盂肾炎
E. 小叶性肺炎
【单选题】
关于炎症的叙述,下列哪项是正确的( )
A. 炎症对机体均有利
B. 任何机体都会发生炎症反应
C. 急性炎症也可出现以增生为主的病变
D. 慢性炎症均由急性炎症发展而来
E. 炎症反应不会损伤机体
【单选题】
大量细菌毒素入血,导致实质细胞变性、坏死及全身中毒症状的称( )
A. 菌血症
B. 毒血症
C. 败血症
D. 白血病
E. 脓毒血症
【单选题】
下列哪项不具有防御作用( )
A. 纤维蛋白渗出
B. 白细胞游出
C. 血浆渗出
D. 炎性增生
E. 红细胞漏出
【单选题】
关于嗜酸性粒细胞下列哪一种是错误的( )
A. 来源于骨髓
B. 运动能力弱
C. 无吞噬功能
D. 见寄生虫病及过敏性疾病
E. 见于某些部位的亚急性或者慢性炎症
【单选题】
炎症灶内有较多红细胞说明( )
A. 局部血管受损严重
B. 局部血管内静水压较高
C. 局部血管内渗透压较低
D. 局部有较多的内毒素
E. 局部有较多的外毒素
【单选题】
肺炎双球菌感染最常引起肺的( )
A. 蜂窝织炎
B. 脓肿
C. 纤维素性炎
D. 伪膜性炎
E. 出血性炎
【单选题】
炎症早期出现炎性充血时,最先累及的血管为( )
A. 细动脉
B. 小动脉
C. 细静脉
D. 小静脉
E. 毛细血管
【单选题】
败血症指的是( )
A. 细菌大量入血,血中可查到细菌,但可无中毒症状
B. 细菌毒素入血,引起中毒症状
C. 细菌产物被吸收入血引起中毒症状
D. 细菌入血繁殖并产生毒素从而引起中毒症状,并在一些器官形成脓肿
E. 细菌入血,繁殖并产生毒素,并有中毒症状
【单选题】
下列哪项肉芽肿中无多核巨细胞( )
A. 风湿小体
B. 伤寒小结
C. 血吸虫卵结节
D. 矽结节
E. 树胶肿
【单选题】
下列哪项是变质性炎症?
A. 肾盂肾炎
B. 菌痢
C. 大叶性肺炎
D. 阿米巴肝脓肿
E. 阑尾炎
【单选题】
多核细胞不见于下列哪项疾病( )
A. 伤寒
B. 结核
C. 霍奇金病
D. 血吸虫虫卵结节
E. 异物肉芽肿
【单选题】
关于败血症,以下哪项不准确( )
A. 血液中有细菌生长繁殖
B. 常有较重的全身症状
C. 在皮肤、黏膜处可发现出血点
D. 血培养是最有价值的诊断
E. 常形成转移性脓肿
【单选题】
炎症反应的中心环节是( )
A. 白细胞的渗出
B. 吞噬作用
C. 血管反应
D. 坏死溶解
E. 免疫反应
【单选题】
脓肿最常见的致病菌是( )
A. 溶血性链球菌
B. 志贺菌
C. 白色葡萄球菌
D. 金黄色葡萄球菌
E. 草绿色链球菌
【单选题】
白细胞在游出时会引起( )
A. 血管扩张
B. 血管内皮细胞损伤
C. 血管基底膜损伤
D. 血管无明显变化
E. 整个血管壁受损
【单选题】
下列哪项不是败血症的表现( )
A. 细菌入血并产生毒素
B. 高热寒战
C. 一些内脏器官的多发性小脓肿
D. 皮肤、黏膜点状出血
E. 脾肿大
【单选题】
下列哪项不是炎性息肉的特点( )
A. 突出于黏膜表面
B. 仅由实质细胞增生形成
C. 属于慢性炎症
D. 常有蒂与黏膜相连
E. 常发生于鼻黏膜和子宫颈
【单选题】
炎症灶内红细胞是( )
A. 主动渗出
B. 主动漏出
C. 被动渗出
D. 被动漏出
E. 有时是主动渗出,有时是被动漏出
【单选题】
炎症灶内下述哪种成分不是由血液中渗出来的( )
A. 浆液
B. 淋巴细胞
C. 浆细胞
D. 单核细胞
E. 纤维蛋白原
【单选题】
速发性短暂反应时血管壁通透性增高的机制是( )
A. 细静脉内皮细胞收缩
B. 细动脉内皮损伤
C. 基膜降解
D. 内皮细胞胞饮作用增强
E. 以上都不是
【单选题】
白细胞渗出与红细胞漏出是( )
A. 同时在相同的机制下发生
B. 相互独立的两个过程
C. 先有白细胞渗出再有红细胞漏出
D. 白细胞渗出后产生炎症介质可对红细胞漏出产生趋化作用
E. 同时渗出
【单选题】
下列疾病或病变中属于化脓性炎的是( )
A. 结肠嗜酸性脓肿
B. 肝阿米巴脓肿
C. 脊柱旁冷脓肿
D. 睾丸树胶样肿
E. 淋病尿道炎
【单选题】
具有高比重,静置凝固,黄色浑浊等性状的腹水见于( )
A. 门静脉高压
B. 右心衰竭
C. 慢性肾炎
D. 低蛋白血症
E. 腹膜炎
【单选题】
炎症的全身反应中下列哪项是不正确的( )
A. 发热
B. 外周血中性粒细胞增多
C. 单核巨噬细胞系统增生
D. 抗体形成增强
E. 实质器官变性、坏死、功能降低
【单选题】
关于浆细胞下列哪项是错的( )
A. 正常时不存在于血液中
B. 无吞噬功能
C. 来源于T淋巴细胞
D. 椭圆形,核位于胞质一端,核染色呈车轮状分布
E. 胞质内有丰富的粗面内质网
【单选题】
下列哪一种不是渗出性炎症
A. 卡他性炎症
B. 乙型脑炎
C. 流行性脑膜炎
D. 肾盂肾炎
E. 脓肿
【单选题】
白细胞游出前必有的过程是( )
A. 血流加快
B. 血流变慢甚至停滞
C. 白细胞边集
D. 白细胞附壁,粘着
E. 血管通透性升高
【单选题】
下列哪项不属肉芽肿性炎( )
A. 风湿病
B. 伤寒
C. 矽肺
D. 乙脑
E. 麻风