相关试题
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
推荐试题
【单选题】
商品二因素中的价值是( )?
A. 商品的自然属性
B. 商品的社会属性
C. 交换价值的物质承担者
D. 交换价值的表现形式
【单选题】
理解马克思主义政治经济学的枢纽是( )?
A. 剩余价值学说
B. 生产价格理论
C. 劳动二重性学说
D. 劳动力商品理论
【单选题】
货币具有五种职能( )?
A. 价值尺度.流通手段.贮藏手段.支付手段.世界货币
B. 价值尺度.流通手段.贮藏手段.支付手段.协调手段
C. 世界货币.流通手段.贮藏手段.支付手段.协调手段
D. 价值尺度.流通手段.贮藏手段.支付手段.干预手段
【单选题】
生产商品的劳动二重性是指( )?
A. 简单劳动和复杂劳动
B. 私人劳动和社会劳动
C. 具体劳动和抽象劳动
D. 生产劳动和非生产劳动
【单选题】
商品生产者要获得更多的收益,必须使生产商品的个别劳动时间( )?
A. 大大高于社会必要劳动时间
B. 低于社会必要劳动时间
C. 等于社会必要劳动时间
D. 略高于社会必要劳动时间
【单选题】
资本家改进技术提高劳动生产率的直接目的是( )?
A. 提高产品的质量
B. 减轻劳动强度
C. 获取相对剩余价值
D. 获取超额剩余价值
【单选题】
相对剩余价值的获得是( )?
A. 延长工人劳动时间的结果
B. 社会普遍提高劳动生产率的结果
C. 普遍提高工人劳动强度的结果
D. 个别资本家提高劳动生产率的结果
【单选题】
当代资本主义国家政治制度的核心内容是( )?
A. 政党制度
B. 国家制度
C. 文官制度
D. 议会制度
【单选题】
资产阶级意识形态的核心是( )?
A. 利己主义
B. 利他主义
C. 集体主义
D. 享乐主义
【单选题】
马克思说:“一切商品对它们的所有者是非使用价值,对它们的非所有者是使用价值。”对这句话应理解为( )?
A. 商品不可能既有使用价值又有价值
B. 商品所有者同时获得使用价值和价值
C. 使用价值是商品的本质属性
D. 商品的使用价值和价值是相互排斥的
【单选题】
某工厂原工作日为八小时,必要劳动时间和剩余劳动时间各为四小时,若采用绝对剩余价值生产方法,增加剩余劳动时间二小时,则剩余价值率为( )?
A. 120%
B. 150%
C. 180%
D. 200%
【单选题】
某工厂原工作日为八小时,必要劳动时间和剩余劳动时间各为四小时,若采用相对剩余价值生产方法,增加剩余劳动时间二小时,则剩余价值率为( )?
A. 100%
B. 300%
C. 200%
D. 250%
【单选题】
在简单商品经济中,价值规律作用的表现形式是( )?
A. 商品价格与价值经常保持一致
B. 商品价格围绕价值上下波动
C. 商品价格围绕生产价格上下波动
D. 商品价格围绕垄断价格上下波动
【单选题】
资本主义扩大再生产的重要源泉是( )?
A. 剩余价值
B. 可变资本
C. 资本积累
D. 剩余劳动
【单选题】
货币的本质是( )?
A. 价值符号
B. 流通手段
C. 支付手段
D. 固定充当一般等价物的特殊商品
【单选题】
资本的有机构成可表示为( )?
A. c∶v
B. m∶c
C. c∶m
D. m∶v
【单选题】
马克思主义政治经济学的直接理论来源是( )?
A. 重商主义
B. 古典政治经济学
C. 庸俗政治经济学
D. 空想社会主义的经济理论
【单选题】
解决商品内在使用价值和价值矛盾的关键是( )?
A. 货币的出现
B. 私人劳动与社会劳动的划分
C. 商品交换的实现
D. 社会分工的不断发展
【单选题】
形成商品价值量的劳动,是以( )?
A. 社会劳动为尺度
B. 私人劳动为尺度
C. 简单劳动为尺度
D. 抽象劳动为尺度
【单选题】
价值规律在对经济活动进行自发调节时,产生的消极后果,不包括( )?
A. 导致社会资源浪费
B. 阻碍技术的进步
C. 导致收入两极分化
D. 自发的刺激生产力的发展
【单选题】
货币是在长期的交换过程中形成的固定充当( )?的商品
A. 一般等价物
B. 等价交换
C. 交换价值
D. 使用价值
【单选题】
资本主义社会中工人的工资是( )?
A. 工人全部劳动的报酬
B. 劳动价值或价格的转化形式
C. 劳动力价值或价格的转化形式
D. 工人在剩余劳动时间内创造的新价值
【单选题】
社会生产过程包括的环节是( )?
A. 购买.生产和销售
B. 生产.分配.交换和消费
C. 循环.周转和社会资本再生产
D. 危机.萧条.复苏和高涨
【单选题】
在商品经济中,价值规律的表现形式是( )?
A. 商品价格总是高于价值
B. 商品价格围绕价值上下波动
C. 价格总是等于价值
D. 商品价格总是低于价值
【单选题】
劳动力商品与其他商品不同的最根本特征是( )?
A. 劳动力存在于人的身体之内
B. 劳动力在一定条件下可以转化为商品
C. 劳动力使用价值是价值与剩余价值的源泉
D. 劳动力价值受历史道德因素影响
【单选题】
在资本主义生产过程中,生产资料的价值( )?
A. 随着生产耗费而逐渐消失
B. 能够发生价值增殖
C. 借助具体劳动转移到产品中去
D. 借助抽象劳动而再生产出来
【单选题】
不同的商品之所以能按一定的量的比例相交换,其原因在于它们( )?
A. 有不同的使用价值
B. 可以满足人们不同的需要
C. 都是具体劳动的产物
D. 都凝结了一般人类劳动
【单选题】
商品使用价值.交换价值和价值的关系是( )?
A. 使用价值是交换价值的物质承担者,交换价值是价值的表现形式
B. 交换价值是价值的物质承担者,使用价值是价值的表现形式
C. 使用价值是价值的表现形式,交换价值是价值的基础
D. 使用价值是价值的基础,价值是交换价值的表现形式
【单选题】
具体劳动和抽象劳动是 ( )?
A. 两次劳动
B. 同一劳动的两种规定
C. 各自独立的
D. 没有关系的
【单选题】
使用价值和价值的关系是( )?
A. 使用价值的大小决定价值的大小
B. 价值的大小决定使用价值的大小
C. 使用价值与价值两者互相决定
D. 既对立又统一的关系
【单选题】
资本积累的实质是( )?
A. 资本家为了社会进步
B. 资本家省吃俭用的结果
C. 剩余价值资本化
D. 资本家用无偿占有的剩余价值榨取更多的剩余价值
【单选题】
剩余价值是工人在( )?创造的价值
A. 必要劳动时间
B. 剩余劳动时间
C. 社会必要劳动时间
D. 业余劳动时间
【单选题】
在生产过程中,劳动力商品所创造的新价值是指( )?
A. 剩余价值
B. 商品价值
C. 劳动力自身的价值
D. 劳动力价值和剩余价值
【单选题】
商品的使用价值和价值的矛盾,其完备的外在表现形式是( )?
A. 商品与商品的对立
B. 商品与货币的对立
C. 资本与雇佣劳动的对立
D. 生产者与消费者的对立
【单选题】
以下关于绝对剩余价值的生产,说法正确的是( )?
A. 工人的必要劳动时间不变
B. 使资本家的剥削变得更加隐蔽
C. 延长工人的工作日的长度.提高工人的劳动强度
D. 工人的剩余必要劳动时间不变
【单选题】
资本主义工资之所以掩盖了剥削,是由于它( )?
A. 表现为劳动的价值或价格
B. 是劳动力的价值或价格
C. 采取了支付的形式
D. 是劳动者必要劳动时间创造的价值
【单选题】
剩余价值率和利润率的关系是 ( )?
A. 剩余价值率等于利润率
B. 利润率小于剩余价值率
C. 剩余价值率是利润率的转化形式
D. 都表示资本家对工人的剥削程度
【单选题】
在私有制经济中价值规律的作用会导致小商品生产者 ( )?
A. 都成为资本家
B. 都成为雇佣工人
C. 两极分化
D. 彻底破产
【单选题】
一个资本家通过提高效率加强管理等方法所获得的剩余价值或利润是 ( )?
A. 绝对剩余价值
B. 相对剩余价值
C. 超额利润
D. 垄断利润
【单选题】
资本主义国家的选举的实质是( )?
A. 资产阶级和无产阶级分权
B. 每个公民都能通过竞选参与政治活动,表达自己的愿望和要求
C. 协调统治阶级内部利益关系和矛盾的重要措施
D. 人民当家作主