刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
B
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
推荐试题
【单选题】
教师提出申诉,应当以()形式提出。___
A. 口头
B. 书面或口头;
C. 自己认为合适的;
D. 书面
【单选题】
我国教育民事法律责任的基本归责原则是___
A. 无过错责任;
B. 过错责任;
C. 公平原则;
D. 推定责任
【单选题】
在我国现行教育法对我国教育方针规定的是;___
A. 教育必须为社会主义现代化建设服务,;
B. 教育必须面向现代化、面向世界、面向未来;
C. 必须与生产劳动相结合;
D. 培养德、智、体等方面全面发展的社会主义事业的建设者和接班人;
【单选题】
根据我国《高等教育自学考试暂行条例》规定,开考新专业应由哪个部门审批?___
A. 教育部;
B. 省、自治区、直辖市教育厅;
C. 省级高等教育自学考试委员会;
D. 全国高等教育自学考试委员会;
【单选题】
设立独立设置的学院应符合以下规定;___
A. 主要培养专科及专科以上专门人才;
B. 有2个国家规定的学科门类为主要学科;
C. 全日制在校学生计划规模在6000人以上;
D. 专任教师在1000人以上。
【单选题】
建国以来我国的教育行政管理体制围绕着中央与地方教育行政权力、职责的划分问题,经历的发展历程是;___
A. 由放到收、由收到放、收放结合;
B. 由收到放、由放到收、收放结合;
C. 由放到收、由收到放;
D. 由收到放、由放到收
【单选题】
学生应征参加中国人民解放军(含中国人民武装警察部队),学校应当保留其学籍;___
A. 2年;
B. 3年;
C. 退役当年;
D. 退役后一年。
【单选题】
明确规定“高等教育由高等学校和其他高等教育机构实施”的法律是___
A. 《教育法》;
B. 《高等教育法》;
C. 《宪法》;
D. 《普通高等学校设置暂行条例》
【单选题】
教育对象的身心发展必须经历一个不断积累的过程,同时也会不断地出现反复,这就决定教师的劳动具有___特点。
A. 长期性;
B. 迟效性;
C. 长期性和迟效性;
D. 周期性
【单选题】
教师资格一经取得,非依___不得丧失和被撤销。
A. 学校规定;
B. 法律规定;
C. 教育行政部门规定;
D. 主管部门规定
【单选题】
学生无故缺课累计超过该科教学时数___者,不得参加本门课的考核。
A. 12;
B. 13;
C. 14;
D. 15
【单选题】
根据《教师法》的规定,教师是___
A. 普通劳动者;
B. 公务员;
C. 专业人员;
D. 自由职业者
【单选题】
提出“国将兴,必贵师而重傅”观点的是___
A. 孔子;
B. 孟子;
C. 墨子;
D. 苟子
【单选题】
关于高校教师聘任制度的叙述,不正确的是___
A. 以岗位为基础;
B. 遵循自愿平等、双向选择的原则;
C. 双方在平等基础上签订的聘任合同具有法律效力;
D. 教师聘任制度包括招聘和续聘两种
【单选题】
在我国的实践中,国家规定高等学校的经费开支标准的途径是___
A. 综合定额;
B. 普通基金;
C. 综合定额加专项补助;
D. 普通基金加专项基金;
【单选题】
根据《中外合作办学条例》规定,举办颁发外国教育机构的本科学历、学位证书的中外合作办学机构和项目,中方合作办学者;___
A. 可以是具有雄厚经济实力的企业;
B. 可以是实施专科层次学历教育的普通高校;
C. 必须是实施本科层次学历教育的高等教育机构
D. 必须是具有硕士学位授权资格的普通高校;
【单选题】
根据《中外合作办学条例》规定,中外合作办学机构必须以何种货币计收学费和其他费用?___
A. 由中外合作办学机构自行决定;
B. 美元;
C. 合作外方所在国货币;
D. 人民币;
【单选题】
当今世界各国公认的国际交往的基本准则是___
A. 独立自主、平等互利、相互尊重;
B. 遵守国家法律;
C. 维护国家主权和安全;
D. 维护社会公共利益
【单选题】
下列属于法的社会作用的是___
A. 依照法律的导向来约束自己的行为;
B. 根据法律规范来判断买卖行为是否合法;
C. 通过实施法律规范来提高社会民众的法律意识;
D. 协调各种利益关系,促进经济发展
【单选题】
将“实行依法治国,建设社会主义法治国家”写入宪法的是___
A. 2004年宪法修正案;
B. 1999年宪法修正案;
C. 1993年宪法修正案;
D. 1988年宪法修正案;
【单选题】
我国教育法规的体系的核心是___
A. 《宪法》;
B. 《高等教育法》;
C. 《教育法》;
D. 《教师法》
【单选题】
下列属于教育法规表现形式的是___
A. 决议;
B. 决定;
C. 通知;
D. 实施细则
【单选题】
《义务教育法》规定;“招收少数民族学生为主的学校,可以用少数民族通用的语言文字教学。”这一规定,属于教育法律规范的类别是___
A. 义务性规范;
B. 授权性规范;
C. 制裁性规范;
D. 奖励性规范;
【单选题】
法律作为调整社会关系的社会规范,与道德等其他调整社会关系的社会规范不同的地方在于___
A. 法律是由国家强制力保证实施的;
B. 法律可以调整市场经济关系;
C. 违反法律会受到舆论或内心信念的谴责;
D. 违反法律会受到党纪、政纪处分的;
【单选题】
下列论述错误的是()___
A. 法是统治阶级意志的体现,只能由国家制定;
B. 法律是规定权利和义务的行为规范
C. 法律依靠国家强制力来得以实施;
D. 法的规范作用主要包括指引、评价、预测、教育等方面
【单选题】
根据我国民法通则的规定,学校及其他教育机构应属于___
A. 企业法人;
B. 社会团体法人;
C. 机关法人;
D. 事业单位法人;
【单选题】
提出依法治国,建设社会主义法治国家的治国基本方略是在___
A. 1982年宪法
B. 1978年党的十一届三中全公
C. 党的十四大
D. 党的十五大
【单选题】
从逻辑的角度上看,任何单一、完整的法律规范都应包含法定条件、行为准则和___这三个组成部分。
A. 法律后果;
B. 法律责任;
C. 行为结果;
D. 法律依据;
【单选题】
对教育法律责任特征的论述,不正确的是___
A. 法律规定性;
B. 道德自觉性;
C. 归责特定性;
D. 追究专权性
【单选题】
动态意义的教育法制,其核心在于___
A. 教育立法;
B. 教育执法;
C. 教育普法;
D. 依法治教
【单选题】
教育法律草案交付表决前,最后一稿(即法律草案表决稿)通常是由哪个机构修改完成的?___
A. 全国人大主席团;
B. 全国人大常委会委员长会议;
C. 全国人大法律委员会
D. 国务院;
【单选题】
根据我国《立法法》规定,行使国家立法权的机关是___
A. 中共中央总书记,中国国家主席;
B. 全国人大,全国人大常委会
C. 全国人大,全国政协;
D. 全国人大和中共中央
【单选题】
不属于我国教育法规实施内容的是___
A. 教育执法;
B. 教育司法;
C. 教育守法;
D. 教育普法
【单选题】
教育法律救济的目的在于___
A. 补救合法权益受损害者;
B. 解决法定权益的纠纷;
C. 惩治侵权行为;
D. 维护国家教育法律的尊严
【单选题】
《教育法》规定,明知校舍或者教育教学设施有危险而不采取措施,造成人员伤亡或者重大财产损失的,对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员,依法追究___
A. 民事责任;
B. 刑事责任;
C. 一般责任;
D. 行政责任;
【单选题】
在众多教育法律责任主体中,最主要、最常见的一种教育法律责任主体是___
A. 学生;
B. 教师;
C. 学校;
D. 教育行政机关
【单选题】
根据我国《学位条例》规定,学位授予单位如发现已授予学位的学生有舞弊作伪等严重违反《学位条例》规定的情况,可以;___
A. 经学位评定委员会复议,撤销其获得的的学位;
B. 向国务院学位委员会报请撤销其获得的学位
C. 向学位授予单位的主管部门申请撤销其获得的学位;
D. 向法院申请,由法院裁决撤销其获得的学位;
【单选题】
高等学校的法定代表人是___
A. 校党委书记;
B. 校长;
C. 校工会主席;
D. 校友会会长。
【单选题】
设立独立设置的学院,其全日制在校学生计划规模应为;___
A. 2000人以上;
B. 3000人以上;
C. 5000人以上;
D. 7000人以上。
【单选题】
设立高等学校及其他高等教育机构的基本原则,不包括___
A. 举办高等学校及其他高等教育机构是国家的责任;
B. 国家鼓励社会力量依法举办高等学校及其他高等教育机构
C. 举办高等学校及其他高等教育机构不得以营利为目的;
D. 保证每个适龄人员接受高等教育
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用