刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
B
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
推荐试题
【单选题】
下列属于舆情信息数据库中表的类型的是。___
A. 站点信息表
B. 个人信息表
C. 分析信息表
D. 信息统计表
【单选题】
下列不属于突发公共事件的舆论引导策略的“四讲”的是?___
A. 尽早讲
B. 及时讲
C. 准确讲
D. 反复讲
【单选题】
下列哪项技术演变成了Web信息挖掘?___
A. Web资源分析技术
B. 数据库挖掘技术
C. 信息采集技术
D. 信息过滤技术
【单选题】
下列网络爬虫技术工作原理步骤中错误的是___
A. 初始URL
B. 抓取网页
C. 查看网页
D. 抓取新的URL
【单选题】
以下属于舆情类型的是___
A. 物理舆情
B. 公共舆情
C. 社会舆情
D. 新闻舆情
【单选题】
下列属于网络舆情监测系统构成的是___
A. 网络爬虫
B. 数据挖掘
C. 文本聚类与分类
D. 以上都是
【单选题】
舆情分析中的检索方法有以下特点。___
A. 起点是关键词或者排行榜,检索的内容是信息的属性,包括转发量、点击量、评论量、传播关键点
B. 机器检索无需事先设定一个目录
C. 机器检索负责数据的精细检索,人工检索负责数据的粗检索
D. 实际操作中自主研发的检索工具使用频率较高,普通商业搜索引擎的使用率不高检索的
【单选题】
人工检索是指。___
A. 借助完全性工具
B. 借助间接性工具
C. 借助直接性工具
D. 借助不完全性工具
【单选题】
以下不是典型的舆情分析法的是?___
A. 双层分析法
B. 基于excel的文本挖掘技术的分析方法
C. 情感倾向分析方法
D. 语义统计分析方法
【单选题】
以下关于归档管理的说法错误的是?___
A. 数据存储是整个舆情监控与分析系统中所有数据和功能的基础
B. 在系统数据库中一般划分为4个数据表,分别为站点信息表、文档信息表、话题信息表、话题发现结果表
C. 数据库表设计的好坏直接关系着系统的功能和性能的好坏
D. 数据存储在舆情监控与分析系统中具有非常重要的地位
【单选题】
以下不属于舆情监控系统中决策支持层的主要功能的是___
A. 利用现有模型对舆情信息进行分析、掌控舆情的热度和发展态势
B. 自动生成各类统计数据和舆情报告辅助决策、实时监控
C. 发现重要信息和敏感信息并保留信息
D. 在当前舆情监控系统中,舆情的对应策略最终由人制定、相对缺少智能化的策略推荐系统
【单选题】
下面不是网络舆情监测系统的主要作用的是___
A. 及时、全面地收集舆情
B. 收集数据
C. 检测结果将不成为重要决策依据
D. 分析舆情
【单选题】
网络舆情系统化技术包括___
A. 互联网舆情监测Beehoo系统
B. 方正智思预警辅助决策支持系统
C. TRS网络舆情监测系统
D. 以上都是
【单选题】
下列关于基于数据失真的技术的有关说法,错误的是___
A. 基于数据失真的隐私保护技术包括随机化、阻塞与凝聚、交换等
B. 数据失真技术是通过扰动原始数据来实现隐私保护,它要使扰动后的数据同时满足攻击者不能发现真实的原始数据和失真后的数据仍保持某些性质不变
C. 在隐私披露风险和数据精度间进行折中,从而有选择地发布敏感数据及可能披露敏感数据的信息,但保证对敏感数据及隐私的披露风险在可容忍范围内
D. 通过扰动使敏感数据失真,同时保持某些数据或数据属性不变
【单选题】
在传统领域,隐私信息一般不包括个人的哪些信息?___
A. 身份信息
B. 位置数据
C. 工作信息
D. 家庭信息
【单选题】
数据生命周期指数据从生产到销毁的整个过程,通常分为7个阶段,下列数字与阶段相对应的正确的是___
A. 5——数据归档阶段
B. 2——数据使用阶段
C. 1——数据生成阶段
D. 7——数据使用阶段
【单选题】
常见的密码设置策略有几种。___
A. 6
B. 7
C. 5
D. 4
【单选题】
下列关于物联网位置隐私保护技术的说法中,错误的是___
A. 基于启发式隐私度量的位置服务隐私保护技术
B. 基于隐私信息检索的位置服务隐私保护技术
C. 匿名化方法
D. 基于概率推测的位置服务隐私保护技术
【单选题】
下列有关于区块链隐私保护需求的相关说法,哪个选项是正确的?___
A. 不允许非信任节点获得区块链交易信息的需求的核心是避免攻击者通过交易信息得到交易者的真实身份
B. 允许非信任节点获得交易信息,并参与验证工作,但是不知道交易细节希望达到的目标是允许非信任节点获得交易信息,并参与验证工作,但是不知道具体的交易细节
C. 允许非信任节点获得交易信息,并参与验证工作,但是不知道交易细节这种需求主要来自于银行等对交易信息敏感的团体
D. 不允许非信任节点获得区块链交易信息的核心是避免攻击者通过交易信息得到交易者的真实身份
【单选题】
常用于数据发布的匿名化方法有很多,大致包括去标识、数据泛化、()、子抽样、()、插入噪音、()这七种。___
A. 数据抑制、数据交换、分解
B. 数据抑制、数字交换、分解
C. 抑制、交换、分解
D. 抽样调查、数据交换、分解
【单选题】
从密码安全性考虑,在设置密码上,以下说法不正确的是。___
A. 不要使用过于复杂繁冗的口令
B. 不要直接使用与个人信息的有关的口令
C. 不要使用空口令或者与用户名相同的口令
D. 不要选择简单的单字符组成的口令
【单选题】
以下不是针对感知层特点隐私保护划分的方法是___
A. 匿名化方法
B. 加密方法
C. 转换协议方法
D. 路由协议方法
【单选题】
区块链技术的特点包括___
A. 去中心化
B. 健壮化
C. 透明性
D. 以上都是
【单选题】
以下哪个方式是最简单直接获取用户隐私的方式?___
A. 通过诱导输入搜集隐私
B. 通过用户账号窃取隐私
C. 通过终端设备提取隐私
D. 通过黑客攻击获得隐私
【单选题】
数据生命周期通常分成几个阶段___
A. 5
B. 6
C. 7
D. 8
【单选题】
以下哪项位置服务的隐私保护技术的本质是通过抑制某些位置信息的发布保护位置隐私。___
A. 基于概率推测的位置服务隐私保护技术
B. 基于启发式隐私度量的位置服务隐私保护技术
C. 基于隐私信息检索的位置服务隐私保护技术
D. 基于地区概率推测的位置服务隐私保护技术
【单选题】
关于区块链说法不正确的是。___
A. 区块链的特点不包括透明性
B. 区块链是由所有节点共同参与维护的分布式数据库系统
C. 区块链储存所有交易信息,通过查看区块链上的信息,可以找到每一个账户在历史上任何时刻拥有的价值
D. 区块链技术来源于中本聪设计的比特币系统,目前影响力已经超过比特币
【单选题】
什么方式是窃取用户隐私最简单直接的方式?___
A. 通过诱导输入搜集隐私
B. 通过用户账号窃取隐私
C. 通过终端设备提取隐私
D. 通过黑客攻击获得隐私
【单选题】
从用户自身的角度看,导致大量的隐私泄露事件的根源是___
A. 网站设计缺陷
B. 黑客恶意攻击
C. 不安全的密码
D. 网络安全技术差
【单选题】
为提升账户信息的安全性,用户应采用一定策略,下列不属于策略的是___
A. 提高密码的安全性
B. 注意对密码的保护
C. 不登陆安全性较低的网站
D. 定期检查密码的安全性
【单选题】
物联网面临更严重的隐私安全威胁,下列原因中不正确的是什么。___
A. 物联网不容易做管理
B. 物联网很多设备都是自动运行的,不受个人控制
C. 在物联网中,即是是没有使用物联网服务的用户,也存在隐私问题
D. 物联网感知终端的种类更多,且数量庞大
【单选题】
基于启发式隐私度量的隐私保护技术的优点是哪个?___
A. 位置信息准确,完全保证数据的准确性和安全性
B. 效率通常比较高
C. 提供相对平衡的隐私保护程度
D. 提供较高的运行效率
【单选题】
基于隐私信息检索的位置服务隐私保护技术的缺点是哪个。___
A. 计算开销和时间开销比较大
B. 位置信息存在一定程度的不准确性
C. 运行效率低
D. 隐私保护程度低
【单选题】
下列有关隐私保护方法中的匿名化方法,哪个不是其优点___
A. 计算简单
B. 延时少
C. 隐私保护程度好
D. 资源消耗较低
【单选题】
下列关于区块链说法正确的是___
A. 区块技术的特点包括:边缘化,健壮性,透明性
B. 区块链不允许非信任节点获取交易信息
C. 区块链是由所有节点共同参与维护的数据库
D. 区块链的每两个节点储存一个冗余副本
【单选题】
加密机制的缺点。___
A. 计算延时长
B. 存在一定程度的数据缺失
C. 不可以在隐私数据处于加密的情况下进行处理
D. 隐私保护不高
【单选题】
感知网络的组成___
A. 传感器网络
B. RFID
C. 条码和二维码
D. 以上都是
【单选题】
数据生命周期过程___
A. 生成、传输、储存、使用、共享、归档、销毁
B. 生成、传输、储存、共享、使用、归档、销毁
C. 生成、传输、使用、共享、储存、归档、销毁
D. 生成、传输、归档、使用、储存、共享、销毁
【单选题】
数据发布的匿名化方法有什么?___
A. 数据生成
B. 数据抑制
C. 数据变化
D. 数据更新
【单选题】
采用数据加密的技术保护隐私的难题。___
A. 数据在传输过程中不能被外部读取
B. 数据在传输过程中很容易被外部读取
C. 节点只能知道离它最近的节点的数据信息
D. 节点知道其他节点的数据信息
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用