【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
推荐试题
【单选题】
一个人身高160cm,体重50kg,那么他的体重指数是___
A. 5.12
B. 12.8
C. 19.53
D. 24.11
E. 31.25
【单选题】
医院感染可发生于下列哪些人群中___
A. 患者
B. 探视者
C. 陪护人员
D. 医务人员
E. 以上都是
【单选题】
在输血前后和在两瓶血输入之间应输入少量___
A. 5%GS
B. 4%SB
C. 5%GNS
D. 0.9%NS
E. 平衡液
【单选题】
ABO血型不合引起的新生儿溶血病最常见于___
A. 母亲血型为A,新生儿血型为B
B. 母亲血型为 B,新生儿血型为A
C. 母亲血型为O,新生儿血型为A或B
D. 母亲血型为AB,新生儿血型为 A或B&nbsp
E. 以上都错
【单选题】
烧伤休克补液治疗,第1个8小时输入24小时补液计划总量的___
A. 2018/1/4
B. 2018/1/3
C. 2018/1/2
D. 2018/2/3
E. 2018/1/5
【单选题】
胆道梗阻病人的大便可呈___
A. 黑色
B. 暗绿色
C. 暗红色
D. 白陶土色
E. 鲜红色
【单选题】
法洛四联症常见并发症为___
A. 心力衰竭
B. 脑血栓
C. 肺水肿
D. 肺炎
E. 脑膜炎
【单选题】
黄疸是由于血液中哪种物质升高引起的___
A. 胆红素
B. 胆绿素
C. 血清转氨酶
D. 碱性磷酸酶
E. 以上都错
【单选题】
决定分娩的因素为___
A. 产力、产道、胎儿和精神因素
B. 子宫肌肉收缩、规律性、对称性、缩复作用
C. 第一产程、第二产程、第三产程
D. 潜伏期、活跃期、分娩期
E. 以上都错
【单选题】
皮下脂肪消失的一般顺序___
A. 躯干、四肢、臀部、腹部、面颊
B. 腹部、躯干、臀部、四肢、面颊
C. 躯干、臀部、四肢、面颊、腹部
D. 面颊、腹部、躯干、四肢、臀部
E. 以上都错
【单选题】
白内障的最佳手术前为___
A. 初发期
B. 未成熟期
C. 成熟期
D. 过成熟期
E. 以上都错
【单选题】
老年人口的界定依据是___
A. 心理年龄
B. 日历年龄
C. 社会年龄
D. 生理年龄
E. 以上都错
【单选题】
欲配制1%过氧乙酸1000ml,需要20%的过氧乙酸原液和灭菌蒸馏水的ml数分别为___
A. 50ml,950ml
B. 100ml,900ml
C. 150ml,850ml
D. 200ml,800ml
E. 250ml,750ml
【单选题】
不符合医院洗手设备的是___
A. 设有流动水设施
B. 采用脚踏式、肘式或感应式开关
C. 尽量选用液体皂
D. 准备擦手毛巾擦干双手
E. 不便于洗手时应备无菌蒸馏水冲洗双手
【单选题】
为防止被污染的利器刺伤,正确的做法是___
A. 小心处理用过的尖锐物品和设备
B. 使用后的针头重复使用需严格筛选
C. 用手去除针头时务必小心谨慎
D. 废弃的针头需立即复帽
E. 用后的针和手术刀应弃于黄色双层塑料袋内
【单选题】
患者女性,59岁。因甲状腺腺瘤入院手术治疗,术后3天仍有中等热度并出现肺部感染的症状和体征,该患者属于___
A. 医院感染
B. 院外感染
C. 合并症
D. 难治疗性感染
E. 特殊感染
【单选题】
下列叙述错误的是___
A. 高度危险物品必须用灭菌方法处理
B. 部分中度危险物品可选用中水平消毒法
C. 胃镜必须采用高水平消毒方法
D. 低度危险物品一般可采用低水平消毒方法
E. 受到一般细菌污染的物品,必须选用高水平消毒方法
【单选题】
留置套管针患者发生静脉炎后,对患者的护理错误的是___
A. 抬高患肢
B. 减慢输液速度
C. 更换注射部位
D. 局部50%硫酸镁湿热敷
E. 送导管尖端进行培养
【单选题】
大便隐血提示上消化道出血量___
A. >2ml
B. <5-10ml
C. >5-10ml
D. 超过15ml
E. 达50ml
【单选题】
呕血提示上消化道出血量在___
A. <100ml
B. 100-200ml
C. 200-250ml
D. 250ml-300ml
E. >300ml
【单选题】
黑便提示上消化道出血量在___
A. 10-20ml
B. 20-30Ml
C. 40-50ml
D. 50-70ml
E. 100ml
【单选题】
咯血量的评估,正确的是___
A. 小量咯血为每日咯血量在10ML以内
B. 中等量咯血为每日咯血量100ml
C. 中等量咯血为每日咯血量500ml
D. 大咯血为每日咯血量达1000ml以上
E. 大咯血为一次咯血量100-500ml
【单选题】
乙醇擦浴浓度、温度、擦浴时间各多少___
A. 25~30%,30℃,≤20min
B. 25~35%,30℃,≤20min
C. 20~30%,30℃,≤30min
D. 20~30%,35℃,≤20min
E. 20~30%,30℃,≤30min
【单选题】
高热病人给予酒精擦浴后,如体温降至多少应取下头部冰袋___
A. 38℃以下
B. 38.5℃以下
C. 39℃以下
D. 39.5℃以下
E. 40℃以下
【单选题】
速脉是指成人每分钟脉搏超过___
A. 80次
B. 90次
C. 100次
D. 110次
E. 120次
【单选题】
属于意识障碍的早期表现,呈现病理倦睡,唤醒后定向力基本完整,能配合检查___
A. 嗜睡
B. 昏睡
C. 浅昏迷
D. 谵妄
E. 深昏迷
【单选题】
患者处于较深睡眠,较重疼痛和言语刺激可唤醒,模糊地作答后又入睡,各种反射均存在___
A. 嗜睡
B. 昏睡
C. 浅昏迷
D. 谵妄
E. 深昏迷
【单选题】
患者对强烈刺激有痛苦表情和躲避反应,无言语应答,不能执行简单命令,各种反射无明显改变___
A. 嗜睡
B. 昏睡
C. 浅昏迷
D. 谵妄
E. 深昏迷
【单选题】
患者自发性动作完全消失,对任何刺激无反应,各种反射均消失,生命征有改变___
A. 嗜睡
B. 昏睡
C. 浅昏迷
D. 谵妄
E. 深昏迷
【单选题】
患者意识不清,定向力丧失,伴有躁动不安、错觉、幻觉和胡言乱语等精神症状___
A. 嗜睡
B. 昏睡
C. 浅昏迷
D. 谵妄
E. 深昏迷
【单选题】
以兴奋性增高为主的高级神经中枢急性失调状态是指___
A. 嗜睡
B. 昏睡
C. 浅昏迷
D. 谵妄
E. 深昏迷
【单选题】
以下哪种疾病引起吸气性呼吸困难___
A. 肺气肿
B. 哮喘
C. 气胸
D. 气管肿瘤
E. 肺不张
【单选题】
支气管哮喘发作时常出现___
A. 进行性呼吸困难
B. 吸气性呼吸困难
C. 呼气性呼吸困难
D. 夜间阵发性呼吸困难
E. 混合性呼吸困难
【单选题】
某肺心病患者近3日来呼吸困难加重,血气分析示PaO52mmHg,PaCO67mmHg,此时给氧宜采用___
A. 间歇给氧
B. 酒精湿化给氧
C. 高压给氧
D. 低浓度持续给氧
E. 高浓度持续给氧
【单选题】
支气管哮喘出现___
A. 肺源性呼吸困难
B. 心源性呼吸困难
C. 血源性呼吸困难
D. 中毒性呼吸困难
E. 神经、精神性呼吸困难
【单选题】
自发性气胸出现___
A. 肺源性呼吸困难
B. 心源性呼吸困难
C. 血源性呼吸困难
D. 中毒性呼吸困难
E. 神经、精神性呼吸困难
【单选题】
急性左心衰出现___
A. 肺源性呼吸困难
B. 心源性呼吸困难
C. 血源性呼吸困难
D. 中毒性呼吸困难
E. 神经、精神性呼吸困难
【单选题】
脑血管意外出现___
A. 肺源性呼吸困难
B. 心源性呼吸困难
C. 血源性呼吸困难
D. 中毒性呼吸困难
E. 神经、精神性呼吸困难
【单选题】
氰化物中毒出现___
A. 肺源性呼吸困难
B. 心源性呼吸困难
C. 血源性呼吸困难
D. 中毒性呼吸困难
E. 神经、精神性呼吸困难
【单选题】
再生障碍性贫血出现___
A. 肺源性呼吸困难
B. 心源性呼吸困难
C. 血源性呼吸困难
D. 中毒性呼吸困难
E. 神经、精神性呼吸困难