相关试题
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
推荐试题
【单选题】
一切唯物主义都坚持___
A. 物质决定意识,意识具有能动性
B. 物质是运动的,运动形式具有多样性
C. 物质第一性,意识第二性
D. 社会存在第一性。社会意识第二性
【单选题】
物质的唯一特性是客观实在性,它是指___
A. 看得见、摸得着的实物
B. 物质的具体形态和结构
C. 不以人的意志为转移
D. 不能被人们所认识
【单选题】
从本质上说,意识是___
A. 绝对精神的表现
B. 人脑对客观世界的反映
C. 人脑的主观创造
D. 人脑分泌的特殊物质
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是指___
A. 矛盾的主要方面和非主要方面的关系
B. 根本矛盾和非根本矛盾的关系
C. 主要矛盾和非主要矛盾的关系
D. 矛盾的共性和个性、绝对和相对的关系
【单选题】
下列命题中,体现量变引起质变观点的是___
A. 兼听则明,偏信则暗
B. 社稷无常奉,群臣无常位
C. 城门失火,殃及池鱼
D. 长堤溃蚁穴,君子慎其微
【单选题】
对一个复杂事物的正确认识往往需要经过___
A. 由感性认识到理性认识、再由理性认识回到实践的两次飞跃
B. 由实践到认识、由认识到实践的一次完成
C. 由感性认识到理性认识、再由理性认识回到感性认识
D. 由实践到认识、由认识到实践的多次反复
【单选题】
辩证唯物主义认为认识的本质是___
A. 主体对客体的自由选择
B. 主体对客体的能动反映
C. 主体对客体的主观创造
D. 主体对客体的科学评价
【单选题】
地理环境和人口因素在社会发展中的作用是可以___
A. 制约和影响社会发展
B. 决定国家的贫富强弱
C. 决定社会制度的性质
D. 决定社会制度的更替
【单选题】
社会政治结构的核心是___
A. 国家政权
B. 党派组织
C. 社群组织
D. 法律设施
【单选题】
生产关系对生产力的反作用表现在___
A. 决定生产力的性质
B. 决定生产力的发展水平
C. 促进或阻碍生产力发展
D. 决定生产力的构成
【单选题】
阶级社会发展的直接动力是___
A. 社会基本矛盾
B. 物质资料生产方式
C. 阶级斗争
D. 科学技术的发展
【单选题】
马克思主义同中国实际相结合的第二次历史性飞跃产生的理论成果是___
A. 毛泽东思想
B. 中国特色社会主义理论体系
C. 社会主义初级阶段理论
D. 改革开放的理论
【单选题】
造成近代中国贫穷落后的总根源是___
A. 官僚资本主义的压迫
B. 清王朝的封建统治
C. 帝国主义的侵略和封建主义的压迫
D. 民族资本主义的软弱
【单选题】
中国工人阶级成为中国革命的基本动力和领导阶级是在___
A. 辛亥革命之后
B. 新文化运动之后
C. 五四运动之后
D. 国民革命运动之后
【单选题】
新民主主义文化中居指导地位的思想是___
A. 民主主义的思想
B. 共产主义的思想
C. 民族主义的思想
D. 封建主义的思想
【单选题】
新民主主义革命的政治目标是___
A. 建立资产阶级专政
B. 建立新民主主义共和国
C. 建立无产阶级专政
D. 建立社会主义共和国
【单选题】
资产阶级共和国道路在中国行不通的最根本原因是___
A. 帝国主义破坏
B. 封建主义的根深蒂固
C. 无产阶级不允许
D. 中国民族资产阶级的软弱性、妥协性
【单选题】
1930年5月,毛泽东写的从思想路线的高度为开创农村包围城市道路指明方向,并将农村包围城市理论建立在坚实的唯物主义哲学基础之上的文章是___
A. 《中国的红色政权为什么能够存在?》
B. 《井冈山的斗争》
C. 《反对本本主义》
D. 《星星之火,可以燎原》
【单选题】
我国对农业社会主义改造的循序渐进的步骤是___
A. 初级社、互助组、高级社
B. 高级社、初级社、互助组
C. 互助组、初级社、高级社
D. 互助组、高级社、初级社
【单选题】
中国共产党的根本路线是___
A. 群众路线
B. 实事求是
C. 自力更生
D. 改革开放
【单选题】
中华人民共和国最高权力机关是___
A. 国务院
B. 全国人民代表大会
C. 全国政治协商会议
D. 人大常委会
【单选题】
邓小平理论的精髓是___
A. 什么是社会主义,怎样建设社会主义
B. 社会主义初级阶段理论
C. 理论联系实际
D. 解放思想,实事求是
【单选题】
我国社会主义初级阶段的主要矛盾是___
A. 发展生产力与政治体制之间的矛盾
B. 人民日益增长的物质文化需要同落后的社会生产的矛盾
C. 发展生产力与科技、教育体制之间的矛盾
D. 发展生产力与经济体制不相适应之间的矛盾
【单选题】
我国社会主义初级阶段开始于___
A. 新中国成立
B. 社会主义改造基本完成
C. 十一届三中全会
D. 实行改革开放
【单选题】
邓小平曾说:现在我们虽说也在搞社会主义,但事实上不够格。这说明___
A. 我国实际上还处于向社会主义社会过渡的时期
B. 我国搞的社会主义事实上是在补资本主义的课
C. 我国的生产力不发达,还没有摆脱贫困,而贫穷不是社会主义
D. 我国还严重地存在封建残余、小生产习惯势力和资本主义腐朽思想的影响
【单选题】
邓小平首次提出社会主义本质的概念是在___
A. 1980年
B. 1982年
C. 1987年
D. 1992年
【单选题】
社会主义的根本任务是___
A. 消灭剥削
B. 政治经济体制改革
C. 发展生产力
D. 实现共同富裕
【单选题】
我们党的立党之本、执政之基、力量之源是___
A. 加强党的建设
B. 建设高素质的党员队伍
C. 始终做到“三个代表”
D. 全心全意为人民服务
【单选题】
我国现阶段的非公有制经济是___
A. 社会主义经济的主体形式
B. 资本主义性质的经济
C. 社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分
D. 社会主义性质的经济
【单选题】
社会主义民主的本质是___
A. 人民参与国家管理
B. 社会主义物质文明建设的政治保证
C. 人民群众当家作主
D. 社会主义精神文明建设的政治保证
【单选题】
我国人民民主专政的实质是___
A. 共产党专政
B. 无产阶级专政
C. 工农联盟专政
D. 新民主主义专政
【单选题】
十二届六中全会把革命理想划分为共同理想和最高理想,现阶段我国人民的共同理想是___
A. 建立共产主义社会
B. 把我国建设成为富强、民主、文明的社会主义现代化国家
C. 统一祖国,实现四个现代化
D. 赶上并超过发达国家
【单选题】
下列关于我国经济特区的正确说法有___
A. 它是实行一国两制的特别行政区
B. 它是中华人民共和国行使部分主权的区域
C. 其社会性质是两种社会制度并存
D. 它同样要坚持四项基本原则,建设社会主义的两个文明
【单选题】
为了坚持党的领导,必须努力___
A. 重视党的领导
B. 服从党的领导
C. 统一党的领导
D. 改善党的领导
【判断题】
中华人民共和国的成立,标志着半殖民地半封建社会的结束,实现了新民主主义向社会主义的转变。
【单选题】
消防救援队伍执行灭火与应急救援任务,应当坚持“救人第一,科学施救”的指导思想,按照___的要求,组织实施灭火与应急救援行动。
A. “第一时间到场展开,第一时间调集足够警力和有效装备,第一时间实施救人,第一时间进行排烟降毒,第一时间控制灾情发展,最大限度地减少损失和危害”。
B. “第一时间调集足够警力和有效装备,第一时间到场展开,第一时间实施救人,第一时间进行排烟降毒,第一时间控制灾情发展,最大限度地减少损失和危害”。
C. “第一时间进行排烟降毒,第一时间调集足够警力和有效装备,第一时间实施救人,第一时间到场展开,第一时间控制灾情发展,最大限度地减少损失和危害”。
D. “第一时间进行排烟降毒,第一时间调集足够警力和有效装备,第一时间到场展开,第一时间实施救人,第一时间控制灾情发展,最大限度地减少损失和危害”。
【单选题】
消防救援队伍的灭火与应急救援组织指挥通常分为___层次。
【单选题】
组织指挥一般按照下列程序进行:迅速调集作战力量,启动指挥决策系统,侦察掌握现场情况,___。
A. 部署作战任务,制定作战方案,指挥战斗行动,落实战勤保障。
B. 部署作战任务,指挥战斗行动,制定作战方案,落实战勤保障。
C. 指挥战斗行动,部署作战任务,制定作战方案,落实战勤保障。
D. 制定作战方案,部署作战任务,指挥战斗行动,落实战勤保障。
【单选题】
灭火救援组织指挥程序具有___,贯穿于灭火救援战斗的始终。
A. 一致性
B. 合理性
C. 连续性
D. 阶段性