刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
D
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
推荐试题
【单选题】
老年人作热敷时重点应注意 ___
A. 预防压疮
B. 避免烫伤
C. 皮肤弹性
D. 防止着凉
E. 皮肤有无出血点
【单选题】
酒精拭浴降温的原理是 ___
A. 传导
B. 折射
C. 辐射
D. 对流
E. 蒸发
【单选题】
冰槽防治脑水肿的低温疗法的机制为___
A. 降低颅内压防止呕吐
B. 降低呼吸中枢兴奋性
C. 降低脑组织代谢
D. 减轻头痛和头昏
E. 增加散热中枢的兴奋性10146
【单选题】
用冷疗降温时,肛温不能低于多少___
A. 25℃
B. 28℃
C. 30℃
D. 31℃
E. 35℃
【单选题】
用冷时间过长可导致___
A. 强痛觉神经的兴奋性
B. 部营养、细胞代谢障碍,以致组织坏死
C. 肤抵抗力降低
D. 强局部免疫力
E. 肉、肌腱和韧带等组织松弛
【单选题】
持续用冷疗1小时后,局部皮肤由白转为红润,称为___
A. 远处效应
B. 后续效应
C. 继发效应
D. 局部效应
E. 反射效应
【单选题】
痔疮术后热水坐浴的做法不妥的是___
A. 浴盆和溶液需无菌
B. 操作前需排空膀胱
C. 坐浴时间为15~20分钟
D. 坐浴后应更换敷料
E. 水温调节至60~70℃10469
【单选题】
有伤口的部位做热敷时应___
A. 将敷料去掉再热敷
B. 先伤口换药再热敷
C. 在敷料上面直接放热水袋
D. 先热敷后换药
E. 其余选项都不是
【单选题】
一患者突然面色苍白,大汗淋漓,腹痛难忍,拒按。在医生到来前,当班护士不应采取的措施是___
A. 观察生命体征
B. 立即通知医生
C. 安慰患者,加强病情观察
D. 腹部热敷缓解疼痛
E. 了解询问病史
【单选题】
炎症早期用热可___
A. 促进炎症局限
B. 促进炎性渗出物的吸收和消散
C. 使白细胞吞噬功能下降
D. 使新陈代谢降低
E. 使组胺类物质堆积
【单选题】
休克患者使用热水袋保暖时,应加强观察___
A. 意识
B. 生命体征
C. 缺氧状况
D. 局部皮肤反应
E. 药物疗效
【单选题】
物理降温拭浴时,禁擦的部位为___
A. 头部及四肢
B. 腋窝.腹股沟.腘窝
C. 前胸.腹部.后颈
D. 下腹部及两侧肾区
E. 会阴部
【单选题】
冷疗制止炎症扩散的机制是 ___
A. 解除神经末梢的压迫
B. 降低组织新陈代谢和细菌的活力
C. 降低体温,减少渗出
D. 使肌肉.肌腱等组织松弛
E. 加速坏死组织清除
【单选题】
酒精拭浴的浓度是___
A. 25%~35%
B. 30%~50%
C. 60%~70%
D. 75%~85%
E. 其余选项都不是
【单选题】
应用烤灯照射治疗时的灯距和照射时间为___
A. 15~25cm,20~25分钟
B. 25~30cm,20~30分钟
C. 30~50cm,20~30分钟
D. 30~50cm,30~45分钟
E. 50~60cm,45~60分钟
【单选题】
炎症初期用冷的目的是___
A. 解除疼痛
B. 使炎症消散
C. 促进愈合
D. 血管扩张
E. 闭塞血管
【单选题】
热水坐浴的适应证是___
A. 会阴部充血疼痛
B. 阴道出血
C. 急性盆腔炎症
D. 妊娠8个月
E. 月经量过多
【单选题】
反复使用冷.热疗法时,中间必须间隔___
A. 20分钟
B. 30分钟
C. 50分钟
D. 1小时
E. 2小时
【单选题】
为减轻牙痛可用___
A. 冷疗法
B. 持续热疗法
C. 冷.热疗法反复交替使用
D. 先用冷疗法再用热疗法
E. 先用热疗法再用冷疗法
【单选题】
冷湿敷时更换敷布间隔的时间为___
A. 1~2分钟
B. 3~5分钟
C. 6~10分钟
D. 10~12分钟
E. 12~15分钟
【单选题】
使用冰袋时哪项操作不妥___
A. 将冰块砸成小块,用水冲去棱角
B. 将小冰块装满水袋即拧紧袋口
C. 擦干袋外水渍,检查有无漏水
D. 将冰袋装入布套
E. 置于患者需要部位
【单选题】
热水袋的保存方法是___
A. 袋内储存1/4的水,防粘连
B. 将水倒出晾干
C. 将水倒出后平放
D. 将水倒出后旋紧塞子倒挂
E. 倒挂.晾干后吹气旋紧塞子
【单选题】
温水擦浴的水温是___
A. 22~26℃
B. 24~27℃
C. 28~31℃
D. 32~34℃
E. 36~40℃
【单选题】
适应热敷的患者是___
A. 急性阑尾炎
B. 脑出血
C. 牙痛
D. 踝关节扭伤早期
E. 术后尿潴留
【单选题】
以下移植方法存活率最高的是___
A. 自体移植
B. 同质移植
C. 充分配血及组织配型后移植
D. 同种异体移植
E. 异种异体移植
【单选题】
游离植皮术后下列最重要的是___
A. 绷带包扎压力均匀
B. 可在术后1周换药
C. 植皮区多层敷料加压包扎
D. 局部抬高以利静脉回流
E. 植皮区肢体制动
【单选题】
男性,47岁。车祸后一前臂断离,尚有几厘米皮肤相连,正确的急救措施___
A. 无菌敷料包扎,抗休克转送
B. 抗休克治疗,将断肢浸入冰水中
C. 保护相连皮肤,无菌包裹,抗休克转送
D. 切下断肢无菌包裹,干冻冷藏
E. 结扎止血托扶断肢急速转送
【单选题】
游离性植皮术前准备,下列哪项不对___
A. 常规备皮
B. 受皮区如为肉芽创面,术前几天用抗生素液湿敷
C. 受皮区创面,不可有溶血性链球菌存在
D. 大面积烧伤切痂,备足血液
E. 供皮区常规碘伏消毒
【单选题】
下列哪种移植不会发生排斥反应___
A. 心脏移植
B. 断肢再植
C. 同种异体肾移植
D. 异体肝移植
E. 库存骨移植
【单选题】
移植后成活率高但容易出现色素沉着的是___
A. 表层皮片
B. 中厚皮片
C. 全厚皮片
D. 点状皮片
E. 其余选项都不是
【单选题】
肾移植的患者术前饮食最好是 ___
A. 高糖.高脂肪.低蛋白
B. 高糖.高蛋白.控制脂肪
C. 每天摄入食盐<9g
D. 低蛋白.高糖.高维生素.低盐
E. 蛋白质以每天每公斤体重1g较为适宜
【单选题】
下列哪种属于第三代免疫抑制剂___
A. 硫唑嘌呤
B. 糖皮质激素
C. 抗淋巴细胞球蛋白
D. 环磷酰胺
E. 环孢素A
【单选题】
下列皮片移植成活后性能最好的是___
A. 表层皮片
B. 中厚皮片
C. 全厚皮片
D. 点状皮片
E. 其余选项都不是
【单选题】
下列哪项移植必须是自体供给移植物___
A. 吻合移植
B. 游离移植
C. 同质移植
D. 带蒂移植
E. 同种异体移植
【单选题】
断离肢体的保护方法应 ___
A. 浸泡在2~4℃的冰水
B. 无菌敷料包扎后置入冰块容器
C. 无菌包扎置入塑料袋封口后干冻冷藏
D. 无菌包扎后置入冰冻生理盐水容器
E. 结扎止血点,无菌敷料包扎冷藏
【单选题】
急性排斥反应多发生在移植后___
A. 1~2个月内
B. 3~4周内
C. 1~2周内
D. 2~3天内
E. 24小时内
【单选题】
按移植物来源将移植分为 ___
A. 自体移植
B. 同质移植
C. 同种异体移植
D. 异种异体移植
E. 其余四项都对
【单选题】
不属于免疫抑制剂的是___
A. 环磷酰胺
B. 硫唑嘌呤
C. 肾上腺素
D. 皮质激素
E. 环孢素
【单选题】
最早运用的移植术是___
A. 肝移植
B. 肾移植
C. 心脏移植
D. 骨移植
E. 血细胞移植
【单选题】
患者,男,20岁。伤寒,体温38.0℃,应禁用下列哪一种食物___
A. 豆腐
B. 蒸鸡蛋
C. 粥
D. 笋
E. 鱼
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用