相关试题
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举
【单选题】
任何一个社会成员,无论具有何种身份、职业和地位,都必须在公共生活中遵守社会公德。这体现了社会公德具有的___特点。
A. 继承性
B. 基础性
C. 广泛性
D. 简明性
【单选题】
影响公共生活、公共秩序、文明礼貌、清洁卫生以及其他影响社会生活的最主要行为规范是___
A. 社会公德
B. 家庭道德
C. 职业道德
D. 个人道德
推荐试题
【单选题】
238.(A320)黄系统面板内的手摇泵用于:___
A. A.增压油箱
B. B.操纵舵面
C. C.操作货舱门
D. D.给油箱加油
【单选题】
239.(A320)火警关断valve何时关闭:___
A. A.主电门置OFF位时
B. B.火警按钮按出时
C. C.如果探测到火警,自动关闭
D. D.任何时候都不能关闭
【单选题】
240.(A320)驾驶舱没有接通电源时能否操作货舱门:___
A. A.能,只要接通勤务电源
B. B.不能
C. C.如电瓶有电,可由热汇流条供电
D. D.可以用摇把人工转动开关
【单选题】
241.(A320)减载功能储压器为哪些部件供压?___
A. A.所有液压部件
B. B.减载功能舵面
C. C.缝翼/襟翼
D. D.升降舵
【单选题】
242.(A320)壳体回油滤的作用___
A. A.壳体回油到油箱前除去油液中的杂质
B. B.检查液压泵的状况
C. C.A和B
D. D.以上说法都不对
【单选题】
243.(A320)可否在空中收回冲压涡轮?___
【单选题】
244.(A320)蓝系统电动泵什么时候工作?___
A. A.只需一台大发工作
B. B.只需蓝系统超控电门ON位。
C. C.蓝系统电动泵AUTO位,APU供电且前起减震支柱未压缩。
D. D.蓝系统超控电门ON位且一台大发工作。
【单选题】
245.(A320)蓝系统供压给:___
A. A.襟翼
B. B.缝翼
C. C.襟翼和缝翼
D. D.以上都不对
【单选题】
246.(A320)绿系统操纵:___
A. A.扰流板3
B. B.扰流板2和4
C. C.扰流板1和5
D. D.扰流板2和3
【单选题】
247.(A320)绿系统操纵:___
A. A.反推1
B. B.反推2
C. C.上述两者
D.
【单选题】
248.(A320)哪些液压系统由发动机驱动泵供压?___
A. A.蓝系统和绿系统
B. B.蓝系统和黄系统
C. C.蓝系统,绿系统和黄系统
D. D.绿系统和黄系统
【单选题】
249.(A320)能否在绿系统和黄系统之间交换液压油:___
A. A.不能
B. B.能,通过动力转换组件
C. C.能,通过反推系统
D. D.能,通过刹车系统
【单选题】
250.(A320)如果蓝电动泵故障,当冲压空气涡轮人工接通按钮按下时:___
A. A.蓝液压系统由冲压空气涡轮增压
B. B.应急发电机供电
C. C.蓝液压系统增压且应急发电机工作
D. D.动力转换组件(PTU)向蓝系统供压
【单选题】
251.(A320)如果失去黄系统,缝翼操纵:___
A. A.正常
B. B.变慢
C. C.失去
D.
【单选题】
253.(A320)如果失去绿系统,襟翼操作:___
A. A.变慢
B. B.正常
C. C.失去
D.
【单选题】
548.(A320)在什么情况下,冲压空气涡轮自动放出:___
A. A.失去交流汇流条1和2且速度大于100节
B. B.蓝电动泵故障
C. C.只能人工放出
D. D.蓝泵供压低于1750PSI
【单选题】
734.(A320)黄系统供压给:___
A. A.左和右升降舵
B. B.仅仅左升降舵
C. C.仅仅右升降舵
D. D.以上都不对
【单选题】
890.(A320)地面蓝电动泵电门置AUTO位,蓝电动泵何时工作?___
A. A.一个电瓶置于AUTO时
B. B.地面电源接通时
C. C.一台发动机工作或蓝泵超控按钮按下时
D. D.此时已在工作
【单选题】
965.(A320)系统输出低压设定是___
A. A.1350
B. B.1400
C. C.1450
D. D.1500
【单选题】
966.(A320)以下那种故障会点亮红色主警告灯?___
A. A.绿系统EDP输出低压
B. B.黄系统油箱过热
C. C.RAT故障
D. D.绿和黄系统低压
【单选题】
967.(A320)LAF储压器提供压力至___?___
A. A.所有操纵面
B. B.LAF操纵面
C. C.襟/缝翼
D. D.副翼
【单选题】
968.(A320)假如飞机前顶点被顶起,此时飞机由APU提供电源,蓝系统电动泵电门在AUTO位,此时,泵是否会自动工作?___
【单选题】
储压器预充压力是:___
A. A.3000PSI
B. B.1885PSI
C. C.低于3000PSI的任意值
D. D.没有必要预充
【单选题】
液压油箱增压主要由哪里供气?___
A. A.左发
B. B.右发
C. C.APU
D. D.气源总管
【单选题】
液压系统PTU(动力传输组件)___
A. 可以在篮系统和绿系统之间互相传输
B. 可以在篮系统和黄系统之间互相传输
C. 可以在三个系统之间互相传输
D. 可以在篮系统和绿系统之间互相传输
【单选题】
RAT放出后给哪个系统增压?___
A. 黄系统
B. 篮系统
C. 绿系统
D. 黄和绿系统
【单选题】
在一发动机启动时,PTU___
A. 自动工作
B. 被抑制
C. 被测试
D. 以上都错
【单选题】
放出的冲压涡轮(RAT)什么时候可以被收起?___
A. 只能在地面时
B. 只能在空中时
C. 在地面和空中时都可以
D. 以上都不对
【单选题】
在空中RAT自动放出后___
A. 篮系统增压
B. 黄系统增压
C. 应急发电机工作
D. 以上A、C是正确的
【单选题】
能不能在黄系统和绿系统之间互相串油?___
A. 能,通过PTU
B. 能,通过刹车系统
C. 不能,因为液压系统时相互独立的系统
D. 以上都不正确
【单选题】
在地面篮系统的控制电门放置于自动位时___
A. 一通地面电源,篮系统增压
B. 篮系统操控电门设置到操控位时,篮系统增压
C. 一台发动机工作时,篮系统增压
D. 以上BC是正确的
【单选题】
RAT何时自动放出___
A. 汇流条1和2掉电时
B. 单发失效时
C. 只能人工放出
D. 以上AB是正确的
【单选题】
电控操作货舱门时___
A. 绿系统自动工作
B. 黄系统自动
C. 篮系统自动工作
D. 和液压系统无关
【单选题】
PTU设在自动为时,满足什么条件后自动工作?___
A. 篮系统失效时
B. 黄系统和篮系统之间压差大于500PSI时
C. 黄系统和绿系统之间压差大于500PSI时
D. 只要黄系统和绿系统之间有压差时
【单选题】
正常使用中,篮系统由什么来增压___
A. 左发动机驱动泵
B. 右发动机驱动泵
C. 电动泵
D. 冲压涡轮
【单选题】
一个液压系统低压时___
A. 主警告灯亮,连续铃声响
B. 主注意灯亮,连续铃声响
C. 主注意灯亮,响铃一声
D. 无警告
【单选题】
黄系统失效时:___
A. 正常刹车系统失效
B. 备用刹车系统失效
C. 停留刹车系统失效
D. 对刹车系统没影响
【单选题】
绿系统失效时:___
A. 正常刹车系统失效
B. 备用刹车系统失效
C. 停留刹车系统失效
D. 对刹车系统没影响
【单选题】
篮系统优先valve的作用是什么?___
A. 在系统低压时优先供压给缝翼和应急发电机系统
B. 在系统低压时切断供给缝翼和应急发电机系统的压力
C. 在系统压力正常时优先供压给缝翼和应急发电机系统
D. 在系统压力正常时切断供给缝翼和应急发电机系统的压力
【单选题】
手摇泵给哪个系统增压?___
A. 篮系统
B. 绿系统
C. 黄系统
D. 黄和绿系统