刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
B
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
推荐试题
【多选题】
凭证调拨设___级
A. 总行
B. 分行
C. 支行
D. 网点
E. 柜员
【多选题】
以下可以购买支票账户的有:___
A. 基本存款账户
B. 一般存款账户
C. 保证金账户
【多选题】
柜员在操作业务时,系统不能自动处理表外账务的,需要使用“1209凭证付出/作废”交易可单独办理凭证付出,这些凭证有___等。
A. 代扣印花税
B. 预留印鉴卡
C. 代保管凭证
D. 残破币兑换单
【多选题】
不支持出售凭证的账户___
A. 地方财政存款
B. 保证金账户
C. 应解汇款
D. 同业活期存款
【多选题】
下列账户中,支持出售凭证的有___
A. 应解汇款账户
B. 集中支付账户
C. 同业活期存款账户
D. 保证金账户
【多选题】
关于凭证出售说法正确的有___
A. 单位客户提供票据凭证申购单并加盖预留印鉴,并出示经办人身份证件,验印通过;
B. 如为个人客户,应核验申购人签名及身份证件(如有预留印鉴的同时校验签章);
C. 调换份数以支付0金额为限;
D. 对于专用账户,目前都设为不能取现,要根据人行系统查询其可取现标志,先行维护取现标志,再行购买支票。
【多选题】
以下___是系统不能自动处理表外账务的,需要单独使用凭证付出交易办理凭证付出的凭证。
A. 预留印鉴卡;
B. 代扣印花税;
C. 单位定期存单;
D. 增值税发票。
【多选题】
为不在本行开立账户的客户提供单笔___以上一次性金融服务时,应识别客户身份,留存有效身份证件复印件。
A. 人民币1万元(含)
B. 外币等值1000美元(含)
C. 人民币1万元(不含)
D. 外币等值1000美元(不含)
【多选题】
以下哪些情况出现时,营业机构应当重新识别客户?___
A. 客户要求变更姓名或者名称、身份证件
B. 客户行为或者交易情况出现异常的
C. 客户有洗钱、恐怖融资活动嫌疑的
D. 获得的客户信息与先前已经掌据的相关信息存在不一致或者相互矛盾的
【多选题】
法人、其他组织和个体工商户客户的“身份基本信息”包括___
A. 客户的名称、住所、经营范围、组织机构代码、税务登记证号码
B. 可证明该客户依法设立或者可依法开展经营、社会活动的执照、证件或者文件的名称、号码和有效期限
C. 控股股东或者实际控制人、法定代表人、负责人的姓名、身份证件或者身份证明文件的种类、号码、有效期限
D. 授权办理业务人员的姓名、身份证件或者身份证明文件的种类、号码、有效期限
【多选题】
我行反洗钱工作平台中的用户角色主要分为___
A. 编辑岗
B. 审核岗
C. 审批岗
D. 操作岗
【多选题】
符合大额交易报告标准的有哪些?___
A. 当日单笔或者累计交易人民币5 万元以上(含5万元)、外币等值1 万美元以上(含1万美元)的现金缴存、现金支取、现金结售汇、现钞兑换、现金汇款、现金票据解付及其他形式的现金收支。
B. 非自然人客户银行账户与其他的银行账户发生当日单笔或者累计交易人民币200 万元以上(含200万元)、外币等值20 万美元以上(含20万美元)的款项划转。
C. 自然人客户银行账户与其他的银行账户发生当日单笔或累计交易人民币50 万元以上(含50万元)、外币等值10 万美元以上(含10万美元)的境内款项划转。
D. 自然人客户银行账户与其他的银行账户发生当日单笔或者累计交易人民币20万元以上(含20万元)、外币等值1万美元以上(含1万美元)的跨境款项划转。
【多选题】
营业机构在履行客户身份识别义务时,应向中国反洗钱监测分析中心和人民银行当地分支机构报告以下哪些可疑行为___
A. 客户拒绝提供有效身份证件或者其他身份证明文件的。
B. 对向境内汇入资金的境外机构提出要求后,仍无法完整获得汇款人姓名或者名称、汇款人账号和汇款人住所及其他相关替代性信息的。
C. 客户无正当理由拒绝更新客户基本信息的。
D. 采取必要措施后,仍怀疑先前获得的客户身份资料的真实性、有效性、完整性的。
【多选题】
以下哪些情况不得为客户开立账户?___
A. 未按要求提供身份证明文件的
B. 国务院有关部门、机构和司法机关发布的,以及联合国决议所列的恐怖组织、恐怖分子
C. 身份不明的客户
D. 要求开立匿名账户和假名账户
【多选题】
在办理以下哪些业务时,需要持续识别客户身份信息?___
A. 单位客户在办理支取现金(5万元及以上)
B. 购买重要空白凭证等业务
C. 办理变更预留印鉴
D. 办理电子银行变更业务
【多选题】
出现以下情况时,营业机构应当重新识别客户___
A. 客户要求变更姓名或者名称、身份证件或者身份证明文件种类、身份证件号码、注册资本、经营范围、法定代表人或者负责人的。
B. 客户行为或者交易情况出现异常的。
C. 客户有洗钱、恐怖融资活动嫌疑的。
D. 先前获得的客户身份资料的真实性、有效性、完整性存在疑点的。
E. 获得的客户信息与先前已掌握的相关信息存在不一致或者相互矛盾的。
【多选题】
营业机构除核对有效身份证件或者其他身份证明文件外,可以采取以下的一种或者几种措施,进一步识别或者重新识别客户身份___
A. 要求客户补充其他身份资料或者身份证明文件
B. 回访客户
C. 实地查访
D. 向公安、工商行政管理等部门核实
E. 其他可依法采取的措施,如要求客户完整填写基本信息、认真填写业务合同、单据、凭证等
【多选题】
对单位提供开户资料真实性,应采取以下措施进行核实___
A. 登录“信用浙江”网站,查询并核对单位注册状态
B. 登陆“机构信用代码管理系统”、“人行账户管理系统”
C. 核对不一致时,应采取电话或专人到工商局、当地人民银行进行现场核实
D. 通过“公民身份信息联网核查系统”对法人和授权经办人居民身份证进行联网核查
【多选题】
一次性金融服务是指:为不在本机构开立账户的客户提供___等金融业务且交易金额单笔人民币1万元以上(含)或者外币等值1000美元以上(含)。
A. 现金汇款
B. 现钞兑换
C. 票据兑付(仅限于以现金方式进行票据兑付的业务)
【多选题】
自然人客户办理___,应核查客户本人的有效身份证件或者其他身份证明文件,并留存客户本人的身份证件复印件和核查结果。
A. 外汇业务、理财业务、基金业务
B. 第三方存管签约、贵金属业务
C. 挂失解挂、账户信息变更
D. 网上银行等电子银行功能变更业务
【多选题】
营业机构为单位客户开立结算账户时,客户应按有关规定提供有效开户资料原件和复印件,并对其___进行双人审核,同时签章予以确认。
A. 真实性
B. 完整性
C. 时效性
D. 合规性
【多选题】
公司客户经理应全面了解___真实情况,及时掌握客户大额资金支付动态。
A. 单位法人素质、诚信度
B. 业务经营范围
C. 资金流向、交易目的
D. 交易实际受益人等
【多选题】
人民币贷款类业务终止环节,客户身份识别的要点有___
A. 对单位非经营所得或非正常渠道收入用于偿还贷款或提前还款的,银行应调查其还款资金来源,是否存在可疑情况。
B. 对客户未说明偿还贷款来源或与借款人资产状况不符的,银行应调查还贷资金来源与借款人的权属关系。
C. 由其他单位或他人代办分期还款的,应注意调查贷款是否被挪用,资金来源是否合法。
【多选题】
下列哪些选项属于自然客户身份基本信息九要素。___
A. 姓名
B. 国籍
C. 民族
D. 职业
【多选题】
金融机构反洗钱工作的三项基本制度为___。
A. 保密制度
B. 客户身份识别制度
C. 客户身份资料和交易记录保存制度
D. 大额交易和可疑交易报告制度
【多选题】
以下___情形发生后,可直接将其风险等级确定为最高,而无需逐一对照各项风险要素及其子项进行评级。
A. 客户因为涉嫌洗钱、恐怖融资或其他违法犯罪行为被行内其他机构或本行代理行查询。
B. 客户多次被本行报送可疑交易报告,并有合理理由怀疑其涉嫌洗钱、恐怖融资或其他违法犯罪行为。
C. 客户被当地监管列为高风险。
D. 各级机构认可的其他情形。
【多选题】
各分支机构对高风险客户采取强化的客户尽职调查及其他风险控制措施,有效预防风险。可酌情采取的措施包括但不限于___
A. 进一步调查客户及其实际控制人、实际受益人情况
B. 对交易及其背景情况做更为深入的调查,询问客户交易目的,核实客户交易动机
C. 经批准或者授权后,再为客户办理业务或建立新的业务关系
D. 按照法律规定或与客户的实现约定,对客户的交易方式、交易规模、交易频率等实施合理限制
【多选题】
由他人(非职业性中介)代办业务导致本行较难与客户直接接触,进行客户身份识别与尽职调查。重点审查以下情况___
A. 客户的账户是由经常代理他人开户人员或经常代理他人转账人员代为开立的;
B. 客户由他人代办的业务多次涉及可疑交易报告的;
C. 同一代办人同时或分多次代理多个账户开立的;
D. 客户信息显示紧急联系人为同一人或者多个客户预留电话为同一号码等异常情况。
【多选题】
我行应根据评估客户所处行业、身份与洗钱、职务犯罪等的关联性,合理预测某些行业客户的经济状况、金融交易需求,酌情考虑某些职业技能被不法分子用于洗钱的可能性。以下属于客户所处行业风险子项包括___
A. 现金密集型行业
B. 房地产行业
C. 旅游、餐饮、零售行业
D. 境外慈善团体或非营利组织
【多选题】
对于高风险客户、高风险账户持有人,在核对客户有效身份证件外,还应了解哪些方面的信息?___
A. 了解实际控制客户的自然人和交易的实际受益人
B. 资金来源
C. 资金用途
D. 经济状况或者经营状况
【多选题】
对于未按规定报告可疑交易的金融机构,中国人民银行可以进行___等处罚措施。
A. 情节严重的,处20万元以上50万元以下罚款
B. 情节严重的,对直接负责的董事、高级管理人员和其他直接责任人员,处1万元以上5万元以下罚款
C. 致使洗钱后果发生的,处50万元以上500万元以下罚款
D. 致使洗钱后果发生的,对直接负责的董事、高级管理人员和其他直接责任人员,处5万元以上50万元以下的罚款
E. 情节特别严重的,建谇有关金融监督管理机构责令停业整顿或吊销其经营许可证.
【多选题】
下列支付行为哪些属于可疑交易?___
A. 提前偿还贷款,与其财务状况明显不符
B. 资金收付频率及金额与企业经营规模明显不符
C. 相同收付人之间短期内频繁发生资金收付
D. 企业日常收付与企业经营特点明显不符
【多选题】
可疑交易是指可疑交易主体办理的资金收付事项的金额、___等方面具有异常情形。
A. 频率
B. 流向
C. 用途
D. 性质
【多选题】
营业网点设置网点编辑岗、网点审核岗,主要从事本网点反洗钱系统中非信贷企业业务的___等操作。
A. 采集
B. 分析
C. 排除
D. 上报
【多选题】
我国关于大额和可疑交易报告制度的规定,主要体现在___等法律和部门规章中。
A. 《反洗钱法》
B. 《金融机构反洗钱规定》
C. 《金融机构大额交易和可疑交易报告管理办法》
D. 《金融机构客户身份识别和客户身份资料及交易保存管理办法》
【多选题】
开立外国投资者账户,银行应审核___。
A. 投资项目所在地外汇管理局核发的“国家外汇管理局资本项目外汇业务核准件”的要项是否为“账户开立”
B. 境外法人当商业登记证明或境外自然人身份证明是否真实、有效
C. 工商部门出具的公司名称预先核准通知书上投资人、投资额、投资比例与外汇管理局和相关部门的文件是否相符
D. 商务部门对外资非法人项目的批复文件
E. 外国投资者委托境内自然人或法人申请开户的,其依法办理涉外公证的授权委托书是否有效
【多选题】
可疑交易符合___之一的,各营业机构应当向中国反洗钱监测中心提交可疑交易报告的同时,以电子形式或书面形式向总行会计结算(分行运营管理部门)提交重大可疑交易报告,由总行会计结算部(分行运管部门)向所在地中国人民银行分支机构提交相关报告,并配合反洗钱调查:
A. 明显涉嫌洗钱、恐怖融资等犯罪活动的。
B. 严重危害国家安全或者影响社会稳定的。
C. 其他情节严重或者情况紧急的情形。
【多选题】
对符合下列条件之一的大额交易,如未发现该交易可疑的,可以不报告大额交易报告:___
A. 同业拆借、在银行间债券市场进行的债券交易
B. 内部调拨资金
C. 本行办理的税收、错账冲正、利息支付
D. 自然人实盘外汇买卖过程中不同外币币种间的转换
E. 中国人民银行确定的其他情形。
【多选题】
可疑交易报送方向___
A. 报告中国反洗钱监测分析中心;
B. 报告中国反洗钱监测分析中心和人民银行当地分支机构;
C. 报告中国反洗钱监测分析中心和当地公安机关;
D. 报告中国反洗钱监测分析中心、人民银行当地分支机构和当地公安机关。
【多选题】
对重大可疑交易报告所涉及的客户或账户,相关营业机构应当采取合理的后续控制措施,包括但不限于___
A. 调高客户洗钱和恐怖融资风险等级;
B. 以客户为单位限制账户的非柜面交易功能、调低交易限额等;
C. 取消开户。
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用