相关试题
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
推荐试题
【多选题】
灭火救援指挥系统由哪几部分组成___
A. 消防接处警子系统
B. 跨区域指挥调度子系统
C. 灭火救援业务管理子系统
D. 一体化综合业务平台
【多选题】
灭火救援业务管理系统中业务训练能实现哪些功能___
A. 对训练科目的设置及维护
B. 训练计划上报下达,中队对训练计划实施情况进行记录,供上级查看
C. 制定训练考核方案(科目、对象),录入考核成绩,并根据预先设定的评定标准,生成单位及个人考评结果
D. 对训练开展过程录像的查看
【多选题】
IOC控制软件连接的IP为 模块的IP地址,默认端口号为___
A. DSP
B. CPM
C. 23
D. 80
【多选题】
以下属于IOC 1200接口模块的是 ___
A. HSP-2A语音提示模块
B. CPM: 控制处理模块
C. DSP-2: 无线接口模块
D. PSTN-2 模块
【多选题】
应急通信对网络和设备提出哪些特殊要求___
A. 组网灵活
B. 快速布设
C. 小型化;节能型;
D. 简单易操作
E. 具有良好的服务质量保障。
【多选题】
应急通信包括___两方面的内容
A. 技术层面
B. 管理层面
C. 应用层面
D. 开发层面
【多选题】
应急通信的特点有___、通信保障的业务多样化、现场应用的高度自主性.
A. 时间的突发性
B. 地点的不确定性
C. 地理环境的复杂性
D. 容量需求的不确定性;。
【多选题】
应急通信遂行战斗任务的特点有___
A. 部队参战人员多,通信方向多,应急通信分队担负的指挥、协同通信任务繁重复杂
B. 突发性强,机动性大,应急通信分队必须具有很强的快速反应能力和机动通信能力
C. 通信联络、通信设施特别是无线电通信设施,易遭电子干扰,应急通信分队通信电子防护任务艰巨
D. 投入的通信手段多,装备器材多,通信设备复杂,应急通信分队实施通信器材和技术保障难度大。
【多选题】
华平3G单兵接入图像综合管理平台,有哪几种接入模式 ___
A. 设备模式,
B. 对讲模式
C. 双流模式
D. 会议模式。
【多选题】
下列关于语音综合集成远程互联终端前面板信号灯含义表述正确的是___?
A. MAIN POWER:电源供电指示灯
B. LINK ACTIVE:IP链路活跃指示灯,网络对端NXU-2A与本端NXU-2A建立连接后,指示灯亮
C. CHANNEL ACTIVE:指示灯亮起时,说明连接NXU-2A的电台正在通话,NXU-2A正在向网络端发送音频
D. AUDIO INPUT:当连接NXU-2A的电台正在通话时,指示灯应闪烁,说明从电台到到NXU-2A的输入电平调整合适
【多选题】
关于图像综合管理平台MCU的功能表述正确的是___
A. 图像综合管理平台的核心设备
B. 具备平台资源目录树、用户、设备的管理功能
C. 是实现系统内信令转发、流媒体分发的服务器
D. 具有调度、音视频流路由规划及音视频流转发功能
【多选题】
关于图像综合管理平台流媒体分发服务器MTS的功能表述正确的是___
A. 它是图像综合管理平台的流媒体接收、转发的核心设备
B. 具备多级树状级联、跨网传输等功能
C. 用于非指挥视频流和视频网关服务器接入的视频流的转发
D. 以上表述都不正确
【多选题】
关于图像综合管理平台视频网关服务器MGS的功能表述正确的是___
A. 它是将第三方厂商网络编解码器接入图像综合管理平台的关键设备
B. 具备编解码器的控制信令的转发功能
C. 实现对前端编解码设备云台控制及语音对讲功能
D. 以上表述都不正确
【多选题】
关于简述图像综合管理平台电视墙终端的功能表述正确的是___
A. 用于指挥中心的图像集中显示,可以集中显示指挥视频、电视电话会议视频、营区监控、卫星、3G终端等图像
B. 支持多台设备的级联使用
C. 支持与灭火救援系统等其他系统的报警视频联动功能
D. 以上表述都不正确
【多选题】
关于图像综合管理平台电视电话会议网关的功能表述正确的是___
A. 用于将原有H.323电视电话会议系统接入图像综合管理平台,实现两个系统内的音视频相互调用;
B. 内置SIP协议,可将语音综合管理平台接入图像综合管理平台,实现两个平台的音频交互。
C. 可以将现有的类型的会议终端接入图像综合平台
D. 以上表述都不正确
【多选题】
___网络设置、文件浏览、备份及关机
A. 管理工具
B. 音视频设置
C. 一键恢复
D. 显示设置、
【多选题】
指挥视频终端登陆后图像资源浏览界面共分为哪几个操作区___
A. 功能操作区
B. 图像资源目录树
C. 常用资源区
D. 图像显示区
E. 系统状态区。
【多选题】
中队级电视电话系统视频终端连接的摄像机一般控制方法___
A. 通过摄像机遥控器控制
B. 通过会议终端遥控器控制
C. 通过终端控制台MTC控制
D. 上级通过会议控制台MCS控制
【多选题】
中队级电视电话系统视频终端佩带的遥控器主要有哪些功能___
A. 可以完成会议呼叫
B. 音量调节
C. 摄像机控制(摄像头视野、对焦、方向)
D. 菜单选择、
E. 文本输入。
【多选题】
中队级电视电话系统视频终端使用前需要用遥控器对视频会议终端必须进行哪几项网络参数设置___
A. IP地址、
B. 子网掩码、
C. 默认网关
D. DNS
【多选题】
中队级电视电话系统视频终端连接的摄像机佩带的遥控器主要控制摄像机的哪些方面___
A. 方向、
B. 焦距、
C. 预置位
D. 亮度等。
【多选题】
调音台主要作用有___
A. 对多路输入信号进行放大、混合、分配、音质修饰
B. 对音响效果加工
C. 是播送和录制节目的重要设备
D. 控制会议终端
【多选题】
电视电话系统视频终端常用的视频接口有___、色差分量、SDI
A. HDMI
B. DVI
C. VGA
D. AV。
【多选题】
麦克风没有声音___
A. 查看卡农头连接是否牢靠
B. 检查混响器是否有故障
C. 检查电源是否开启
D. 检查灯控盒开关
【多选题】
麦克风由___组成。
A. 麦克管体
B. 麦克音头
C. 麦克开关
D. 麦克网罩
【多选题】
常用的音频接头有___
A. 卡农头
B. 大三芯
C. RJ45水晶头
D. 莲花接头
【多选题】
麦克风声音要做到以下几项___
A. 清晰
B. 自然
C. 圆满
D. 尾音清楚
【多选题】
目前消防部队电视电话会议系统分为那几级网络___
A. 一级网为公安部消防局至消防总队的电视电话会议网,
B. 二级网为消防总队至消防支队的电视电话会议网,
C. 三级网为消防支队至消防大队的电视电话会议网
D. 四级网为消防支队至当地公安局电视电话会议网
【多选题】
目前公安消防部队视频会议系统主要有哪几部分组成___
A. 多点控制单元
B. 视频会议终端
C. 视频录播服务器
D. 摄像机、麦克风等辅助设备
【多选题】
视频会议系统会议中终端开启后没有声音输出,需要进行那些操作排除故障___
A. 请检查线音频线缆是否连接正确,音频外设是否工作正常;
B. 检查音频输入线路异常;
C. 检查音频输出线路异常;
D. 终端的音量是否太低或为静音状态
E. 通过“诊断”界面,进行声音测试,检查声音的输入输出是否正常。
【多选题】
192语音综合管理平台关键设备有___
A. 语音综合管理平台主机
B. 远程互联终端
C. 录音终端。
D. VOIP
【多选题】
灭火救援指挥系统在警情受理方面的“多个突破”有___
A. 手机报警定位,地图直观判断。
B. 支队大集中受理警情模式改革(与中队远程接警混合) 。
C. 接警软件与硬件系统接口标准化。
D. 跨区域、跨警种的警情转接和语音联合调度。
【多选题】
消防接处警系统出现中队与支队或支队与总队系统无法链接,在确保指挥网整体正常的情况下,应怎么处理___
A. 进行互ping操作
B. 排查链路故障
C. 排查交换机故障
D. 排查服务器故障
【多选题】
通过消防接处警系统选择调派车辆,点击【出车】后,系统将产生哪些动作___
A. 系统会向所有的车辆所属中队子系统发送派车命令和出车单,自动拨打主管中队电话。
B. 如果派车命令正常下发,并且中队确认,在“中队反馈信息栏”中将显示反馈信息。
C. 如果中队收到派车命令但未确认,将出现中队未确认的提示框。
D. 如果派车命令未正常下发,将出现中队未收到的提示框。
【多选题】
接警员通过消防接处警系统接报群众报警,摘机后须确认哪些基本案情信息___
A. 报警人联系方式
B. 案件地址
C. 案件类型
D. 主管中队。
【多选题】
抢险救援案件现场信息栏须填写的内容包括哪些___
A. 抢险救援种类
B. 现场情况
C. 被困人员
D. 案件等级。
【多选题】
灭火救援指挥系统指挥决策管理子系统具有哪些功能___
A. 提供了丰富的数学应用计算公式模型,
B. 为指挥调度系统和预案管理系统提供了车辆调集接口功能
C. 实现了和预案、水源、执勤实力等的无缝集成
D. 提供了化学危险品查询功能,以及消防知识库建设管理功能。
【多选题】
灭火救援指挥系统灭火救援圈分析包括哪些分析?___
A. 车辆圈分析
B. 药剂圈分析
C. 器材圈分析
D. 人员圈分析
【多选题】
信息加密的目的是为了保护网络内的___。(难)(基础知识)
A. 数据
B. 文件
C. 口令
D. 控制信息
E. 网络设备
【多选题】
程控交换机的控制系统包括___。(难)(基础知识)
A. 微处理机
B. 程序模块
C. 信令设备
D. 用户集线器
E. 各种中继器