刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
B
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
推荐试题
【单选题】
___0326.遇有( )以上大风天气不得进行土方回填、转运以及其他可能产生扬尘污染的施工。
A. 六级
B. 四级
C. 五级
D. 三级
【单选题】
___0327.拆模过程中如遇中途停歇,应将已松扣的钢模板及支撑件( )。
A. 拆下运走
B. 架空支撑
C. 专人看管
D. 简单连接
【单选题】
___0328.伸缩缝和后浇带处,应加( )防护,并加警示标识。
A. 钢筋网
B. 活动盖板
C. 固定盖板
D. 脚手板
【单选题】
___0329.装载机铲斗下方严禁有人,严禁用铲斗( )。
A. 载人
B. 载物
C. 载器材
D. 载机械
【单选题】
___0330.施工现场临时架空线路必须采用( )和专用电杆,严禁采用裸导线架设在树木上、脚手架上。
A. 绝缘导线
B. 铁导线
C. 铝导线
D. 双绞线
【单选题】
___0331.在建筑安装过程中,如果上下两层同时工作,上下两层间必须设有( )或者其他隔离设施。
A. 专用的防护棚
B. 专用的防护罩
C. 专用的防护顶板
D. 专用的防护脚手板
【单选题】
___0332.遇有( )以上大风天气不得进行土方回填、转运以及其他可能产生扬尘污染的施工。
A. 六级
B. 四级
C. 五级
D. 三级
【单选题】
___0333.拆模过程中如遇中途停歇,应将已松扣的钢模板及支撑件( )。
A. 拆下运走
B. 架空支撑
C. 专人看管
D. 简单连接
【单选题】
___0334.伸缩缝和后浇带处,应加( )防护,并加警示标识。
A. 钢筋网
B. 活动盖板
C. 固定盖板
D. 脚手板
【单选题】
___0335.装载机铲斗下方严禁有人,严禁用铲斗( )。
A. 载人
B. 载物
C. 载器材
D. 载机械
【单选题】
___0336.物料提升机必须设置( )等安全装置。
A. 超力矩保护装置
B. 行走限位
C. 变幅限位器
D. 超高限位装置
【单选题】
___0337.施工现场临时架空线路必须采用( )和专用电杆,严禁采用裸导线架设在树木上、脚手架上。
A. 绝缘导线
B. 铁导线
C. 铝导线
D. 双绞线
【单选题】
___0338.在建筑安装过程中,如果上下两层同时工作,上下两层间必须设有( )或者其他隔离设施。
A. 专用的防护棚
B. 专用的防护罩
C. 专用的防护顶板
D. 专用的防护脚手板
【单选题】
___0339.人员密集场所需要使用易燃易爆化学物品时,应根据需要限量使用,存储量不应超过( )的使用量,且应由专人管理、登记。
A. 一天
B. 两天
C. 三天
D. 四天
【单选题】
___0340.《体育场馆公共安全通用要求》(GB 22185—2008)规定,按照体育场馆的规模及举办活动的级别、可能产生的危害程度等将体育场馆单位风险等级分为( )。
A. 两级
B. 三级
C. 四级
D. 五级
【单选题】
___0341.《体育场馆公共安全通用要求》(GB 22185—2008)规定,体育场馆消防安全系统不包括( )。
A. 火灾自动报警子系统
B. 自动灭火系统
C. 紧急广播
D. 应急指挥中心
【单选题】
___0342.电影院建筑的等级可分为特、甲、乙、丙四个等级,其中特级、甲级和乙级电影院建筑的设计使用年限不应小于( )年。
A. 25
B. 30
C. 40
D. 50
【单选题】
___0343.丙级电影院建筑的设计使用年限不应小于( )年。
A. 10
B. 15
C. 20
D. 25
【单选题】
___0344.电影院建筑外部设有突出的广告牌等设施时,应( ),且不应( )和人员疏散。
A. 安全可靠;影响消防车辆的通行
B. 安全可靠;影响内部员工车辆通行
C. 定期更换;影响消防车辆的通行
D. 定期更换;影响内部员工车辆通行
【单选题】
___0345.电影院设置电梯或自动扶梯( )贴邻观众厅设置。当贴邻设置时,应采取( )等措施。
A. 宜;隔声、减振
B. 不宜;隔声、减振
C. 宜;除湿
D. 不宜;除湿
【单选题】
___0346.电影院各类用房应按其噪声等级分区布置。有噪声的用房不宜与( )贴邻设置。
A. 售票处
B. 卫生间
C. 消防通道
D. 观众厅
【单选题】
___0347.电影院观众厅的设计应与银幕的设置空间统一考虑,观众厅的长度不宜大于( )。
A. 25m
B. 30m
C. 35m
D. 40m
【单选题】
___0348.《电影院建筑设计规范》(JGJ 58—2008)规定,银幕边框、银幕后墙及附近的侧墙和银幕前方的顶棚应采用无光( )或( )装修材料。
A. 白色;浅色
B. 白色;深色
C. 黑色;浅色
D. 黑色;深色
【单选题】
___0349.电影院银幕后墙面应( )。
A. 设置立体音响
B. 设置安全出口
C. 做吸声处理
D. 设置疏散指示标志
【单选题】
___0350.当电影院建在( )时,应形成独立的防火分区。
A. 综合建筑内
B. 古建筑
C. 露天
D. 仓库
【单选题】
___0351.电影院观众厅疏散门应为( )门。
A. 自动推闩式外开
B. 卷帘
C. 推拉
D. 折叠
【单选题】
___0352.电影院观众厅疏散门的数量不应少于( )个。
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
【单选题】
___0353.《电影院建筑设计规范》(JGJ 58—2008)规定,乙级及乙级以上电影院应设踏步灯或座位排号灯,其供电电压应为不大于( )。
A. 12 V
B. 24 V
C. 36 V
D. 220 V
【单选题】
___0354.( )可能会导致硫化氢中毒,甚至发生“闪电型”死亡。
A. 煤气制造
B. 制造合成氨
C. 炼铁
D. 清理阴沟
【单选题】
___0355.一深7m左右的电力井内有多台柴油抽水机在工作,3名工人下到井内巡检时,发生一起2人中毒窒息死亡的事故。最有可能引起该事故的物质是 ( )。
A. 放射性物质
B. 一氧化碳
C. 硫化氢
D. 二氧化碳
【单选题】
___0356.某物业公司组织工人进入下水道和化粪池进行疏通作业时,由于未采取有效的安全防护措施,导致多人中毒死亡。此类场所最常见的,可导致人员中毒的有害物质是( )。
A. 硫化氢
B. 一氧化碳
C. 放射性物质
D. 二氧化碳
【单选题】
___0357.《尾矿库建设生产安全规范》(DB11/T 1252—2015)规定,尾矿库企业应对每座尾矿库设置生产运行作业班组,实行24小时值班制,每班值班人数不少于( )人。
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
【单选题】
___0358.《尾矿库建设生产安全规范》(DB11/T 1252—2015)规定,尾矿库建设项目安全设施试运行时间不应超过( ),且尾矿排放不应超过初期坝坝顶标高。
A. 1个月
B. 3个月
C. 6个月
D. 9个月
【单选题】
___0359.根据《尾矿库建设生产安全规范》(DB11/T 1252—2015),关于尾矿库封堵作业应注意的事项说法错误的是( )。
A. 作业人员应穿戴救生衣等安全防护用具
B. 安装前应检查吊装装置可靠性
C. 封堵时作业人员不少于3人
D. 封堵施工应按设计的位置、数量封堵
【单选题】
___0360.《尾矿库建设生产安全规范》(DB11/T 1252—2015)规定,尾矿库滩顶高程测点应当布设于滩顶较低处,测点数量应不少于( ),且尽量沿坝轴线均匀设置。
A. 2个
B. 3个
C. 4个
D. 5个
【单选题】
___0361.《尾矿库建设生产安全规范》(DB11/T 1252—2015)规定,暴雨期间停止向库内排尾,应24小时不间断巡查,至少每间隔( )向值班调度报告尾矿库运行情况一次。
A. 1小时
B. 2小时
C. 3小时
D. 4小时
【单选题】
___0362.根据《金属非金属矿山建设生产安全规范》(DB11/T 1251—2015),下列关于金属非金属矿山说法错误的是( )。
A. 进行爆破作业时,应有安全管理人员在爆破作业现场监督整个爆破作业过程
B. 应配备地质、采矿、通风、测量、安全工程等与矿山生产相匹配的专业技术人员
C. 监测设备、设施不应破坏、移动、覆盖
D. 应对边坡和排土场进行统一管理,设立专职维护管理部门
【单选题】
___0363.根据《金属非金属矿山建设生产安全规范》(DB11/T 1251—2015),金属非金属矿山企业应配备专职安全生产管理人员,人数不少于( )人,其中是注册安全工程师的人员不少于( )人。
A. 2;1
B. 3;1
C. 3;2
D. 4;2
【单选题】
___0364.根据《金属非金属矿山建设生产安全规范》(DB11/T 1251—2015),金属非金属矿山企业应定期组织安全生产管理人员、专业技术人员和其他相关人员集中开展隐患排查,每月不少于( )。
A. 1次
B. 2次
C. 3次
D. 4次
【单选题】
___0365.《纺织工业企业安全管理规范》(AQ 7002—2007)规定,企业安全生产委员会应当( )至少召开一次安全工作会议。遇到较重大的安全问题,应当随时召开安全工作会议。
A. 一个月
B. 三个月
C. 每半年
D. 每年
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用