相关试题
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
推荐试题
【多选题】
领导十三亿多人的社会主义大国,我们党既要政治过硬,也要本领高强。要___。
A. 增强学习本领,增强政治领导本领
B. 增强改革创新本领,增强科学发展本领
C. 增强依法执政本领,增强群众工作本领
D. 增强狠抓落实本领,增强驾驭风险本领
【多选题】
10改革全面发力、多点突破、纵深推进,着力增强改革___。
A. 系统性
B. 整体性
C. 协同性
D. 持续性
【多选题】
全面深化改革总目标是___。
A. 发挥市场在资源配置中的决定性作用
B. 全面建成小康社会
C. 完善和发展中国特色社会主义制度
D. 推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化
【多选题】
坚持___有机统一是社会主义政治发展的必然要求。
A. 党的领导
B. 人民当家作主
C. 依法治国
D. 民主协商
【多选题】
我们党面临的执政环境是复杂的,影响党的先进性、弱化党的纯洁性的因素也是复杂的,党内存在的___等突出问题尚未得到根本解决。
A. 思想不纯
B. 组织不纯
C. 道德不纯
D. 作风不纯
【多选题】
全面推进党的政治建设、思想建设、___,把制度建设贯穿其中,深入推进反腐败斗争,不断提高党的建设质量。
A. 组织建设
B. 作风建设
C. 纪律建设
D. 廉政建设
【多选题】
树立___是核心战斗力的思想,推进重大技术创新、自主创新,加强军事人才培养体系建设,建设创新型人民军队。
【多选题】
中央军事委员会负责军队中___,对军队中党的组织体制和机构作出规定。
A. 一切工作和思想工作
B. 一切工作和政治工作
C. 党的工作和思想工作
D. 党的工作和政治工作
【多选题】
中国共产党坚持对人民解放军和其他人民武装力量的___。
A. 主要领导
B. 原则领导
C. 基本领导
D. 绝对领导
【多选题】
适应世界新军事革命发展趋势和国家安全需求,提高建设质量和效益,确保到二〇二〇年基本实现_____,______建设取得重大进展,______有大的提升。___
A. 现代化 信息化 战斗能力
B. 机械化 信息化 战斗能力
C. 机械化 信息化 战略能力
D. 现代化 信息化 战略能力
【多选题】
党的十九大报告指出,必须全面贯彻党领导人民军队的一系列根本原则和制度,确立 ___在国防和军队建设中的指导地位。
A. 新时代党的建军思想
B. 新时期党的建军思想
C. 新时代党的强军思想
D. 新时期党的强军思想
【多选题】
党的十九大报告中指出,组建___机构,维护军人军属合法权益,让军人成为全社会尊崇的职业。
A. 退伍军人管理保障
B. 退伍军人社会保障
C. 退役军人管理保障
D. 退役军人社会保障
【多选题】
力争到二〇三五年______国防和军队现代化,到本世纪中叶把人民军队______世界一流军队。___
A. 全面实现;基本建成
B. 全面实现;全面建成
C. 基本实现;基本建成
D. 基本实现;全面建成
【多选题】
国家安全是安邦定国的重要基石,___是全国各族人民根本利益所在。
A. 加快经济发展
B. 维护国家统一
C. 促进国际合作
D. 维护国家安全
【多选题】
军队是要准备打仗的,一切工作都必须坚持___标准,向能打仗、打胜仗聚焦。
A. 战斗力
B. 斗争力
C. 战争力
D. 硬实力
【多选题】
党的十九大报告中指出,军队将开展___主题教育。
A. “继承红色传统、勇挑强军重担”
B. “继承红色基因、担当强军重任”
C. “传承红色传统、勇挑强军重担”
D. “传承红色基因、担当强军重任”
【多选题】
国防和军队改革取得历史性突破,形成军委管总、战区主战、___新格局,人民军队组织架构和力量体系实现革命性重塑。
A. 党委领导
B. 战区主建
C. 军种主战
D. 军种主建
【多选题】
加强练兵备战,有效遂行海上维权、反恐维稳、抢险救灾、国际维和、___、人道主义救援等重大任务,武器装备加快发展,军事斗争准备取得重大进展。
A. 利比亚撤侨
B. 湄公河行动
C. 亚丁湾护航
D. 也门撤侨
【多选题】
___,是决定军队建设的政治方向。
A. 军民融合是关键
B. 能打胜仗是核心
C. 听党指挥是灵魂
D. 作风优良是保证
【多选题】
坚持走中国特色军民融合式发展路子,军民融合源于党的___。
A. “军民结合、寓军于民”的思想
B. “人民战争”的思想
C. “军民鱼水情、患难与共”的思想
D. “军民一体、平战结合”的思想
【多选题】
___是军队最重要的战略资源。
A. 武装装备
B. 优良传统
C. 军事人才
D. 战斗精神
【多选题】
国防是___的全面体现。
A. 国家军事力量
B. 国家经济实力
C. 国家综合力量
D. 国家科技实力
【多选题】
国防教育以___为核心内容。
A. 理想信念教育
B. 爱国主义教育
C. 军事理论教育
D. 军事技能教育
【多选题】
全面从严治军,推动治军方式的根本转变,提高国防和军队现代化建设___水平。
A. 法治化
B. 科学化
C. 现代化
D. 信息化
【多选题】
建设一支 ____、 ____、 ____的人民军队,是实现“两个一百年”奋斗目标、实现中华民族 伟大复兴的战略支撑。___
A. 听党指挥
B. 骁勇善战
C. 能打胜仗
D. 作风优良
【多选题】
党的十九大提出的巩固国防和强大军队的战略任务是___。
A. 保卫传统的领土领海领空安全
B. 保护海洋、太空、网络电磁空间等新型安全领域
C. 维护国家安全利益和国家发展利益
D. 维护国际和地区的安全和稳定
【多选题】
紧跟世界新军事革命加速发展的潮流,积极稳妥进行国防和军队改革,推动中国特色军事变革深入发展。就必须___。
A. 坚持以创新发展军事理论为先导
B. 着力提高国防科技工业自主创新能力
C. 深入推进军队组织形态传统化
D. 构建中国特色现代军事力量体系
【多选题】
走中国特色军民融合式发展路子,关键是建立和完善___。
A. 军民结合、寓军于民的武器装备科研体系
B. 军队人才培养体系
C. 军队保障体系
D. 国防动员体系
【多选题】
坚持政治建军、改革强军、科技兴军、依法治军,建设一支___的人民军队,切实保证人民解放军有效履行新时代军队使命任务。
A. 听党指挥
B. 能打胜仗
C. 作风优良
D. 保障有力
【多选题】
军队是要准备打仗的,一切工作都必须坚持战斗力标准,向能打仗、打胜仗聚焦,要___。
A. 扎实做好各战略方向军事斗争准备
B. 统筹推进传统安全领域和新型安全领域军事斗争准备
C. 发展新型作战力量和保障力量
D. 开展实战化军事训练
【多选题】
世界面临的___,恐怖主义、网络安全、重大传染性疾病、气候变化等非传统安全威胁持续蔓延,人类面临许多共同挑战。
A. 不稳定性不确定性突出
B. 世界经济增长动能不足
C. 贫富分化日益严重
D. 地区热点问题此起彼伏
【多选题】
坚持走中国特色强军之路,全面推进国防和军队现代化,同国家建设化进程相一致,全面推进___
A. 军事理论现代化
B. 军队组织形态现代化
C. 军事人员现代化
D. 武器装备现代化
【多选题】
坚持总体国家安全观,要统筹___。
A. 外部安全和内部安全
B. 国土安全和国民安全
C. 传统安全和非传统安全
D. 自身安全和共同安全
【多选题】
我们要继承和弘扬联合国宪章的宗旨和原则,构建以___为核心的新型国际关系,打造人类命运共同体。
A. 合作共赢
B. 互惠互利
C. 强权政治
D. 和平发展
【多选题】
联合国恢复中华人民共和国的合法席位是___。
A. 1949年10月
B. 1971年10月
C. 1973年11月
D. 1979年1月
【多选题】
当今时代的主题是___。
A. 战争与革命
B. 和平与发展
C. 强权政治
D. 霸权主义
【多选题】
推动建立新型国际关系,中国与俄罗斯发展___伙伴关系。
A. 战略合作
B. 建设性
C. 互利合作
D. 全面战略协作
【多选题】
十九大报告中指出,坚持和平发展道路,推动构建人类命运共同体,中国共产党是为中国人民谋幸福的政党,也是为人类进步事业而奋斗的政党。中国共产党始终把___作为自己的使命。
A. 为人类作出新的更大的贡献
B. 为中国人民谋发展,为中华民族谋复兴
C. 全心全意为人民服务
D. 人民对美好生活的向往
【多选题】
中国外交政策的宗旨是___。
A. 维护世界和平,促进共同发展
B. 通过武力解决国际争端
C. 不放弃使用武力
D. 反对霸权主义
【多选题】
___是我国多边外交工作的核心
A. 联合国
B. WTO
C. 发展中国家
D. 亚非论坛