【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
推荐试题
【单选题】
一建筑工地因野蛮施工使煤气管破裂,煤气外溢,致使多名工人及附近居民中毒。此时最有效的抢救措施是___
A. 血液透析
B. 20%甘露醇快速静脉滴
C. 亚冬眠治疗
D. 鼻导管吸氧
E. 以上都不是
【单选题】
暴发型流脑抗休克扩容治疗时,应进行病情观察的内容是___
A. 血压改变
B. 有无肺底啰音
C. 有无呼吸困难
D. 准确记录24小时出入量
E. 有无泡沫痰
【单选题】
诊断呼吸衰竭的血气标准是___
A. PaO<8.6kPa(65mmHg)和(或)伴有PaCO>7.3kPa(55mmHg)
B. PaO<6.7kPa(50mmHg)和(或)伴有PaCO>8.0kPa(60mmHg)
C. PaO<8.0kPa(60mmHg)和(或)伴有PaCO>7.3kPa(55mmHg)
D. PaO<8.0kPa(60mmHg)和(或)伴有PaCO>6.7kPa(50mmHg)
E. PaCO<8.6kPa(65mmHg)和(或)伴有PaCO>6.7kPa(50mmHg)
【单选题】
慢性肺源性心脏病的X线表现,哪项错误___
A. 常有肺、胸基础疾病表现
B. 可有急性肺部感染的表现
C. 肺动脉段明显突出或其高度≥3mm
D. 右心室肥大征
E. 右下肺动脉干扩张,其横径>10mm,其横径与血管横径之比≥1.07
【单选题】
男性,30岁,与别人打赌而大量进食后上腹部痛1天入院。查血淀粉酶为。700u/dl,诊断为急性胰腺炎,经治疗痊愈,为预防本病复发,进行健康教育时下列哪项措施是不恰当的___
A. 避免暴饮暴食
B. 避免酗酒
C. 忌食油腻食物
D. 积极治疗胆石症
E. 定期预防性应用抑肽酶
【单选题】
原发性肝癌患者疼痛护理哪项不正确___
A. 使用镇痛泵
B. 提供舒适,安静的环境
C. 与别人交谈分散患者的注意力
D. 遵照医嘱应用止痛药
E. 限制止痛药的应用
【单选题】
慢性粒细胞白血病最有特征性的体征是___
A. 胸骨压痛
B. 浅表淋巴结肿大
C. 巨脾
D. 皮肤紫癜
E. 贫血貌
【单选题】
急性肺脓肿最主要的临床表现是___
A. 畏寒、高热
B. 不同程度咯血
C. 胸痛与呼吸运动相关
D. 肺部干湿性啰音
E. 咳大量脓臭痰
【单选题】
流行性乙型脑炎的传播途径是___
A. 粪-口传播
B. 密切接触
C. 气溶剂
D. 虫媒传播
E. 其他
【单选题】
胸12椎体压缩性骨折石膏固定的方法为___
A. 石膏腰围
B. 石膏背心
C. 头颈胸石膏
D. 石膏床
E. 塑形石膏
【单选题】
甲状腺手术后导致呼吸困难和窒息的原因中,哪一项是错误的___
A. 伤口内出血压迫血管
B. 急性喉头水肿
C. 双侧喉返神经损伤
D. 双侧喉上神经损伤
E. 气管软化塌陷
【单选题】
男性,35岁,阑尾切除术后第5天,体温升高,大便次数增多,解黏液便,有里急后重,考虑并发了盆腔脓肿,首选的检验方法是___
A. 腹部B超
B. 腹腔穿刺
C. 直肠指检
D. 大便细菌培养
E. X线腹部透视
【单选题】
关于B超检查在诊断尿路结石方面的价值,下列哪项是错误的___
A. 能发现尿路平片不能显示的小结石和透光结石
B. 能发现结石所致的肾脏结构改变
C. 可直接显示双肾功能改变
D. 可用于无尿、慢性肾衰竭患者
E. 可用于对碘剂过敏或孕妇合并结石患者
【单选题】
一般病人术前血红蛋白大于多少方可手术___
A. 6g/L
B. 8g/L
C. 10g/L
D. 12g/L
E. 14g/L
【单选题】
一侧全肺切除术后输液速度应控制在___
A. 10~20滴/分
B. 20~30滴/分
C. 30~40滴/分
D. 40~50滴/分
E. 50~60滴/分
【单选题】
急性胰腺炎发病的主要病理过程是___
A. 胰酶自体消化的过程
B. 磷脂酶自体消化的过程
C. 弹力纤维酶自体消化的过程
D. 胶原酶自体消化的过程
E. 胰脂肪酶自体消化的过程
【单选题】
下列因素与肺癌的病因无关的是___
A. 长期大量吸烟
B. 长期接触石棉、铬、镍、锡、砷及放射性物质
C. 城市环境污染
D. 人体营养状态
E. 遗传因素
【单选题】
反常呼吸运动可见于___
A. 单根单处肋骨骨折
B. 单根多处肋骨骨折
C. 多根多处肋骨骨折
D. 血气胸
E. 胸壁软组织损伤
【单选题】
骨折临床愈合后,骨痂的改造塑形决定于___
A. 外固定的牢固性
B. 肢体活动和负重所形成的应力
C. 局部血液供应情况
D. 骨痂的多少
E. 是否配合治疗
【单选题】
急性血源性化脓性骨髓炎多见于___
A. 10岁以下儿童
B. 10~19岁青少年
C. 20~35岁青年
D. 40~50岁壮年
E. 60以上老年
【单选题】
脑血管造影过程中,并发症不包括___
A. 癫痫发作
B. 尿潴留
C. 脑栓塞
D. 颅内出血
E. 血管痉挛
【单选题】
下列哪项不宜施行甲状腺大部切除术___
A. 青少年甲亢
B. 继发性甲亢
C. 妊娠期甲亢
D. 甲亢有气管压迫症状
E. 中度原发性甲亢并发心律不齐
【单选题】
男性,70岁,良性前列腺增生3年,近1年出现尿潴留3次,均已留置导尿管缓解,身体状况尚佳,心肺功能无异常,首选治疗是___
A. 激素治疗
B. α-受体阻滞剂治疗
C. 手术治疗
D. 射频治疗
E. 微波治疗
【单选题】
男性,40岁,左下肢静脉曲张10年,内踝上方溃疡反复发作4年,下列哪些治疗是错误的___
A. 积极治疗患肢静脉曲张
B. 休息时抬高患肢,下地前用弹力袜
C. 温盐水湿敷创面
D. 溃疡创面使用5%鱼肝油酸钠
E. 切除溃疡并植皮
【单选题】
男性,30岁,右腰被重物击伤,自觉疼痛。查体见右腰部压痛、叩击痛,血压、脉搏正常,尿液镜检红细胞10~15个/高倍视野,应想___
A. 腰部挫伤
B. 肾挫伤
C. 肾全层裂伤
D. 肾部分裂伤
E. 肾蒂裂伤
【单选题】
终末血尿提示出血部位在___
A. 前尿道
B. 后尿道
C. 肾脏
D. 输尿管
E. 膀胱
【单选题】
男性,68岁,脊柱手术后3日伤口轻度发红,体温37.8℃。下列哪项处理较为合适___
A. 考虑伤口感染,即换广谱抗菌药
B. 考虑伤口感染,加大抗菌药物剂量
C. 无特殊处理,密切观察病情变化
D. 做血液细菌培养
E. 伤口探查冲洗
【单选题】
门静脉高压症术前防止出血的措施应除外___
A. 避免劳累
B. 避免腹压增加
C. 避免食物过热、硬、刺激
D. 不放胃管
E. 绝对卧床
【单选题】
下列属于紫绀型即右向左分流型先天性心脏病的是___
A. 动脉导管未闭
B. 房间隔缺损
C. 室间隔缺损
D. 法洛四联症
E. 二尖瓣狭窄
【单选题】
何种腹腔内脏损伤检查时腹膜刺激征不明显___
A. 肝破裂
B. 脾破裂
C. 胰破裂
D. 肠穿孔
E. 胃穿孔
【单选题】
提示膀胱损伤的表现是___
A. 血尿
B. 假性尿失禁
C. 排尿障碍而膀胱空虚
D. 导尿管不易插入
E. 下腹部腹膜刺激征
【单选题】
治疗脑水肿,下列药物哪一种最常用且效果较好___
A. 50%葡萄糖
B. 30%尿素
C. 25%山梨醇
D. 20%甘露醇
E. 浓缩血清白蛋白
【单选题】
休克病人有效循环血量恢复的征象哪项表述是错误的___
A. 皮肤黏膜红润
B. 四肢温暖
C. 血压正常或回升
D. 肺水肿
E. 静脉充盈,尿量正常
【单选题】
男性,砷岁,良性前列腺增生术后,气囊导尿管拨出时间是术后___
A. 10日
B. 5日
C. 7日
D. 15日
E. 3日
【单选题】
休克病人微循环衰竭期典型临床表现___
A. 表情淡漠,皮肤苍白
B. 尿量减少
C. 血压下降
D. 脉搏增快
E. 弥漫性血管内凝血
【单选题】
有一名颅底骨折病人,以下哪项是正确的___
A. 血性脑脊液病人,腰穿放脑脊液
B. 脑脊液耳漏,需尽早修补硬膜漏口
C. 伤后视力减退,超过一个月可手术减压
D. 颅底骨折,需手术治疗,以便神经减压
E. 着重观察有无脑损伤,并处理脑脊液漏、神经损伤
【单选题】
颅内压增高产生脑水肿多数为___
A. 细胞毒性脑水肿
B. 血管源性脑水肿
C. 混合性脑水肿
D. 白质性脑水肿
E. 灰质性脑水肿
【单选题】
女性,43岁,门静脉高压症多年,拟行分流术,为防止肠道产氨应于术前___
A. 静滴抗生素
B. 肌肉注射抗生素
C. 口服肠道抗生素
D. 禁食2日
E. 禁食3日
【单选题】
甲状腺功能亢进病人最具特征性的心血管体征___
A. 睡觉时心率仍快
B. 心律失常
C. 脉压增大
D. 水冲脉
E. 毛细血管搏动征
【单选题】
机械瓣膜替换术后,患者需要抗凝治疗的时间是___
A. 1~3个月
B. 3~6个月
C. 6~8个月
D. 1年
E. 终生抗凝