相关试题
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
推荐试题
【判断题】
员工在生产过程中发现不安全隐患应及时报告,且有权制止违反消防法规的行为
【判断题】
灭火器材设置点附近不能堆放物品,以免影响灭火器的取用
【判断题】
二氧化碳灭火器使用不当,可能会冻伤手指
【判断题】
任何单位发生火灾,必须等待消防救援机构的专业扑救,不必立即组织力量扑救
【判断题】
若逃生门外已被大火封死,要紧闭房门,用湿毛巾等堵塞门缝,在室内等待救援
【单选题】
___是社会主义法治的本质要求,是社会主义法治理念的本质特征。
A. 执法为民
B. 依法治国
C. 民主自由
D. 服务大局
【单选题】
公平正义的首要内容是确保___。
A. 一切行为让群众满意
B. 一切结果符合法律规定
C. 一切行为让领导满意
D. 一切行为符合法律规定
【单选题】
我国《立法法》规定,行使国家立法权的国家机关是___
A. 全国人大和地方人大
B. 全国人大和国务院
C. 全国人大及其常委会
D. 全国人大及其常委会、国务院及其各部委
【单选题】
下列关于法律责任的说法错误的是___
A. 法律责任的归结要讲求责任法定原则、公正原则、效益原则
B. 法律责任的免除即无责任
C. 法律责任体现了国家的强制
D. 法律责任产生的主要原因是违法与违约
【单选题】
全国人民代表大会常务委员会不能够行使哪项职权?___
A. 解释宪法,监督宪法的实施
B. 解释法律
C. 修改法律
D. 制定宪法
【单选题】
人民检察院依照法律规定独立行使___,不受行政机关、社会团体和个人的干涉。
A. 审判权
B. 检查权
C. 监督权
D. 检察权
【单选题】
下列选项中不属于公安机关的人民警察的法定职责的是___
A. 组织、实施消防工作
B. 管理法律、法规规定的特种行业
C. 管理集会、游行、示威活动
D. 管理劳动教养执行场所
【单选题】
公安机关因侦查犯罪的需要,在使用了公民个人的交通或通信工具后,___
A. 归还即可
B. 应予及时归还,并支付适当费用
C. 可不予归还但必须支付适当费用
D. 可变价折抵收购
【单选题】
___经上级公安机关和同级人民政府批准,对严重危害社会治安秩序的突发事件,可实行现场管制。
A. 只有县级公安机关
B. 各级公安机关派出机构
C. 县级以上人民政府公安机关
D. 只有地级以上人民政府公安机关
【单选题】
人民警察依法执行逮捕时,遇有犯罪嫌疑人可能自杀的,可以使用___
A. 驱逐性警械
B. 武器
C. 约束性警械
D. 制服性警械
【单选题】
甲因盗窃被公安机关查获,决定治安拘留15日,同时查明其还有抢夺行为,决定治安拘留10日,根据《治安管理处罚法》规定,甲应执行治安拘留___。
A. 10日
B. 15日
C. 20日
D. 30日
【单选题】
甲,现年71岁,因嫖娼被查获,对甲应当___。
A. 不予处罚
B. 不给予拘留处罚
C. 裁决行政拘留但不执行
D. 可减轻处罚
【单选题】
下列治安管理处罚中可以由公安派出所决定的是___。
A. 警告和罚款
B. 警告和600元以下的罚款
C. 警告和500元以下的罚款
D. 警告、罚款和行政拘留
【单选题】
违法事实确凿,对违反治安管理行为人或者道路交通违法行为人处以___以下罚款或者警告的行政处罚,可以由办案人员当场作出行政处罚决定。
A. 300元
B. 1000元
C. 200元
D. 500元
【单选题】
对询问的叙述,正确的是___。
A. 询问证人时,可以有一名民警进行
B. 询问不满16周岁的未成年人时,应当通知其教师到场
C. 对于投案自首或者群众扭送的违法嫌疑人,不需要补办传唤证
D. 被询问人确认询问笔录无误后,应当在询问笔录的末页上签名或者捺指印
【单选题】
机关办理行政案件中,对于被侵害人或者善意第三人合法占有的财产,不得扣押,应当予以___。
A. 先行登记保存
B. 登记
C. 就地封存
D. 扣押
【单选题】
除违反治安管理行为外,一般违法行为在___内未被公安机关发现的,不再给予行政处罚。
A. 3个月
B. 6个月
C. 1年
D. 2年
【单选题】
被处罚人确有经济困难,经被处罚人申请和作出行政处罚决定的公安机关批准,可以___。
A. 暂缓缴纳或者分期缴纳
B. 暂缓缴纳或者免予缴纳
C. 分期缴纳或者部分缴纳
D. 部分缴纳或者免予缴纳
【单选题】
公安机关在刑事侦查过程中,国家对下列哪种行为应承担赔偿责任?___
A. 因公民自己故意作虚伪供述被羁押的
B. 因公民伪造有罪证据被羁押的
C. 因公民拒不作有罪供述被刑讯逼供造成身体伤害的
D. 因公民自伤、自残等故意行为致使损害发生的
【单选题】
市西区公安分局治安联防队队员周某抓获了有行窃嫌疑人盖某,盖某拒不说出自己的真实姓名,周某用木棍将盖某殴打致伤。依照《国家赔偿法》的规定,应由___承但国家赔偿义务。
A. 市公安局
B. 区公安分局
C. 区治安联防队
D. 联防队队员周某
【单选题】
县级以上地方人民政府公安机关在___领导下,负责本行政区域的公安工作,是本行政区域公安工作的领导、指挥机关。
A. 上级公安机关
B. 本级人民政府
C. 本级人民代表大会常务委员会
D. 上一级公安机关 [解析]考点:公安机关组织管理条例—公安机关的管理体制
【单选题】
下列警务活动中,属于督察机构职责的是___。
A. 勘查刑事犯罪现场
B. 办理出国护照
C. 纠正民警违反警容风纪的行为
D. 监管犯罪嫌疑人
【单选题】
督察机构认为公安机关的人民警察违反纪律需要___的,由督察机构作出决定,报本级公安机关行政首长批准后执行。
A. 采取停止执行职务、禁闭措施
B. 给予行政处分
C. 追究法律责任
D. 降低警衔、取消警衔
【单选题】
下列情形中,属于自首的是___。
A. 甲杀人后其父主动报案并将甲送到派出所,甲当即交代了杀人的全部事实和经过
B. 甲和乙共同贪污之后,主动到检察机关交代自己的贪污事实,但未提及乙
C. 甲和乙共同盗窃之后,主动向公安机关反映乙曾经诈骗数千元,经查证属实
D. 甲给监察局打电话,承认自己收受他人1万元贿赂,并交代了事情经过,然后出走不知所踪
【单选题】
甲欲杀乙,故意将下了毒的饭菜让丙(丙不知情)给乙送去,结果乙吃了下毒的饭菜中毒身亡。甲与丙___。
A. 构成共同犯罪
B. 不属于共同犯罪
C. 以共同过失犯罪论处
D. 甲构成教唆罪
【单选题】
李某系某单位司机,一日因受到领导批评,为发泄不满,驾驶车辆驶入闹市区冲向人群,造成2人死亡,3人重伤。李某的行为构成___。
A. 交通肇事罪
B. 以危险方法危害公共安全罪
C. 重大责任事故罪
D. 故意杀人罪
【单选题】
王某假冒公安人员,以抓流氓为名,强迫妇女李某与其发生性关系。对王某应当___。
A. 以招摇撞骗罪定罪处罚
B. 以强制侮辱妇女罪定罪处罚
C. 以招摇撞骗罪和强制侮辱妇女罪定罪处罚
D. 以强奸罪定罪处罚
【单选题】
甲伪造古代货币若干,并用伪造的古代货币从他人手中购买摩托车一辆。甲的行为构成___。
A. 持有、使用假币罪
B. 诈骗罪
C. 伪造货币罪和诈骗罪
D. 伪造货币罪和持有、使用假币罪
【单选题】
在公安机关侦查过程中,对鉴定人、记录人、侦查人员的回避,由___作出决定。
A. 同级政法委
B. 同级人民检察院检察委员会
C. 同级人民政府
D. 县级以上公安机关负责人
【单选题】
公安机关在侦查阶段询问证人时,应当___。
A. 让目睹了同一事件的证人集体回忆
B. 让证人和犯罪嫌疑人面对面地对质
C. 告知证人隐匿罪证应负的法律责任
D. 让证人了解案件性质和简要案情
【单选题】
一切依靠人民,集中体现在搞好政法工作必须___。
A. 加强服务意识
B. 走群众路线
C. 端正执法理念
D. 提高法律素养
【单选题】
公安机关和民警在执法中处理局部与全局的关系时应当做到___。
A. 协调好党和国家与地方、部门、单位之间的利益矛盾
B. 解决好党和国家与地方、部门、单位之间的利益关系
C. 要从全局出发,使地方、部门、单位的局部利益服从大局利益
D. 优先保护地方或部门、单位的利益
【单选题】
把法律划分为根本法和普通法的主要依据是___。
A. 适用范围不同
B. 制定和表达方式不同
C. 制定和实施的主体不同
D. 规定的内容、法律地位和制定的程序不同
【单选题】
从违法行为的构成要素看,判断某一行为是否违法的关键因素是___。
A. 该行为在法律上被确认为违法
B. 该行为有故意或者过失的过错
C. 该行为由具有责任能力的主体作出
D. 该行为侵犯了法律所保护的某种社会关系和社会利益