相关试题
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
推荐试题
【多选题】
江泽民在十六大报告中指出,一个国家兴旺发达的不竭动力,一个政党永葆生机的源泉是___。
【多选题】
“三个代表”重要思想坚持把___作为出发点和归宿。
A. 马克思主义
B. 党的领导
C. 人民的根本利益
D. 实现中华民族伟大复兴
【多选题】
“三个代表”重要思想强调社会主义社会是全面发展、全面进步的社会,衡量党的方针政策的成败得失,必须坚持___的标准。
A. 时代性
B. 全面性
C. 阶段性
D. 有效性
【多选题】
___是决定我国前途和命运的根本力量,是历史的真正创造者
A. 人民
B. 共产党
C. 工人阶级
D. 知识分子
【多选题】
促进先进生产力的发展,就要使生产关系和上层建筑的各个方面不断体现先进生产力的发展要求。下面表述不正确的是___。
A. 必须敏锐把握我国社会生产力的发展趋势
B. 坚持以经济建设为中心,制定和实施正确的路线方针政策
C. 从根本是改变社会主义的生产关系和上层建筑
D. 不断为生产力的解放和发展打开更广阔的通途
【多选题】
___是经济工作和其他一切工作的生命线,是我们党和社会主义国家的重要政治优势。
A. 思想政治工作
B. 文化教育工作
C. 科技创新工作
D. 理论创新工作
【多选题】
我们党作为执政党,面临的最根本的课题,是___。
A. 能不能始终代表先进生产力的发展方向
B. 能不能始终代表先进文化的发展方向
C. 能不能与时俱进提高执政能力
D. 能不能始终代表最广大人民的根本利益
【多选题】
我们党始终坚持___的利益高于一切。
A. 工人阶级
B. 人民
C. 集体
D. 组织
【多选题】
“三个代表”重要思想形成的时代背景是___。
A. 国内发生严重政治风波
B. 东欧剧变、苏联解体,世界社会主义出现严重曲折
C. 我国社会主义事业的发展面临空前巨大的困难和压力
D. 我们党和国家处在决定前途命运的重大历史关头
【多选题】
“三个代表”重要思想的形成条件是___。
A. 是在对冷战结束后国际局势科学判断的基础上形成的
B. 是在科学判断党的历史方位和总结历史经验的基础上提出来的
C. 是在社会主义社会主要矛盾发生变化的基础上形成的
D. 是在建设中国特色社会主义伟大实践基础上形成的
【多选题】
“三个代表”重要思想是在科学判断党的历史方位基础上提出来的___。
A. 我们党是领导人民为夺取全国政权而奋斗的党
B. 我们党是领导人民掌握全国政权并长期执政的党
C. 我们党是在受到外部封锁和实行计划经济条件下领导国家建设的党
D. 我们党是在对外开放和发展社会主义市场经济条件下领导国家建设的党
【多选题】
我们党必须解决好的两大历史性课题是___。
A. 进一步增强党的阶级基础
B. 进一步提高党的领导水平和执政水平
C. 提高拒腐防变和抵御风险的能力
D. 进一步扩大党的群众基础
【多选题】
总结党的历史,可以得出一个重要的结论,党所以赢得人民的拥护,是因为我们党___。
A. 总是代表中国先进生产力的发展要求
B. 总是代表着中国先进文化的前进方向,
C. 总是代表着中国最广大人民的根本利益
D. 总是正确
【多选题】
与时俱进,就是党的全部理论和工作要___。
A. 体现时代性
B. 忠于实践性
C. 把握规律性
D. 富于创造性
【多选题】
始终做到“三个代表”是我们党的___。
A. 强国之路
B. 执政之基
C. 力量之源
D. 立党之本
【多选题】
在新的历史条件下做到与时俱进,就要做到“三个解放出来”,即自觉地把思想认识___。
A. 从那些不合时宜的观念、做法和体制的束缚中解放出来
B. 从对马克思主义的错误教条式理解中解放出来
C. 从主观主义和形而上学的桎梏中解放出
D. 从脱离群众的官僚主义中解放出来
【多选题】
我们党要始终代表中国先进文化的前进方向,就要___。
A. 坚持以马克思列宁主义、毛泽东思想、邓小平理论和“三个代表”重要思想为指导;
B. 大力培养一代又一代“四有”新人
C. 加强社会主义思想道德建设
D. 继承和发扬中华民族的优秀文化传统
【多选题】
“三个代表”重要思想的主要内容包括: 发展是党执政兴国的第一要务、___。
A. 建设社会主义政治文明
B. 建立社会主义市场经济体制
C. 全面建设小康社会
D. 推进党的建设新的伟大工程
【多选题】
江泽民在“七一”讲话中,要求全党要不断深化对“三个规律”的认识:___。
A. 共产党执政的规律
B. 社会主义建设的规律
C. 人类社会发展的规律
D. 改革开放的规律
【多选题】
江泽民指出,加强文化建设,必须___。
A. 以科学的理论武装人
B. 以正确的舆论引导人
C. 以高尚的精神塑造人
D. 以优秀的作品鼓舞人
【多选题】
发展社会主义先进文化,就是发展___的社会主义文化。
A. 面向现代化
B. 面向世界
C. 面向未来的
D. 民族的科学的大众
【多选题】
我们党代表中国先进生产力发展要求必须履行的重要职责包括:___。
A. 大力推动科技进步和创新
B. 保持国民经济高速增长
C. 不断用先进科技改造和提高国民经济
D. 努力实现我国生产力发展的跨越
【多选题】
科学的本质是创新。要大力发展社会主义生产力,必须___。
A. 大力推进知识创新、科技创新,才能实现技术的跨越式发展
B. 加强国家创新体系建设
C. 持续增强科技创新力和竞争力
D. 深化科技体制改革,加速科技成果向现实生产力转化
【多选题】
科学发展观提出的根本依据是___。
A. 我国社会主义初级阶段基本国情
B. 我国在新世纪新阶段的阶段性特征
C. 当代世界的发展实践和发展理念
D. 我国改革开放和建设中国特色社会主义的伟大实践
【多选题】
科学发展观的第一要义是___。
A. 发展
B. 以人为本
C. 全面协调可持续发展
D. 立党为公、执政为民
【多选题】
科学发展观的基本要求是___。
A. 以人为本
B. 立党为公、执政为民
C. 面协调可持续发展
D. 发展为了人民、发展依靠人民、发展成果由人民享有
【多选题】
科学发展观的核心是 ___。
A. 立党为公
B. 执政为民
C. 和谐发展
D. 以人为本
【多选题】
我国在新世纪新阶段的___是提出科学发展观的现实基础。
A. 阶段性特征
B. 现实性特征
C. 发展性特征
D. 持续性特征
【多选题】
中国共产党在发展问题上的经验总结和思想结晶是___。
A. 五个“统筹”
B. 西部大开放战略
C. “三步走”战略
D. 科学发展观
【多选题】
以人为本、全面协调可持续的科学发展观的主题是___。
A. 为什么发展和怎样发展
B. 以人为本
C. 可持续发展
D. 全面协调发展
【多选题】
胡锦涛在党的十七大报告中提出,发展中国特色社会主义的一大法宝是___。
A. 实事求是
B. 解放思想
C. 理论联系实际
D. 与时俱进
【多选题】
党的十七大报告指出,新时期以来我们取得的一切成绩和进步的根本原因,集中到一点,就是___。
A. 开通过辟了中国特色社会主义道路
B. 坚持了实事求是的思想路线
C. 形成了中国特色社会主义理论体系
D. 高举了中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜
【多选题】
党的第___次代表大会,将科学发展观写入了党章。
【多选题】
胡锦涛指出:“___是马克思主义政党的本质属性,是马克思主义政党的生命所系、力量所在。”
A. 先进性
B. 革命性
C. 纯洁性
D. 正确性
【多选题】
党的___以来,我们党从中国特色社会主义事业总体布局和全面建设小康社会全局出发,提出了构建社会主义和谐社会的重大战略任务。
A. 十五大
B. 十六大
C. 十七大
D. 十八大
【多选题】
十六届六中全会强调构建社会主义和谐社会的根本着眼点是___。
A. 解决执政能力建设的关键问题
B. 解决人民群众最关心、最直接、最现实的利益问题
C. 解决新世纪、新阶段的不和谐问题
D. 解决中国经济增长和社会发展的可持续问题
【多选题】
构建社会主义和谐社会的工作方针是___。
A. 科学发展
B. 诚信友爱
C. 充满活力
D. 民主法治
【多选题】
构建社会主义和谐社会的主要动力是___。
A. 人与自然和谐相处
B. 社会安定
C. 民主法治
D. 改革开放
【多选题】
胡锦涛在___,深刻阐明了科学发展观提出的背景、意义,明确界定了“以人为本”“全面发展”“协调发展”“可持续发展”的深刻内涵和基本要求,标志着科学发展观的形成。
A. 2003年7月,在全面总结抗击非典斗争经验时
B. 2003年10月,党的十六届三中全会上
C. 2004年3月,中央人口资源环境座谈会上
D. 2004年5月,胡锦涛在江苏考察工作时
【多选题】
社会主义民主政治的本质和核心是___。
A. 党的领导
B. 人民当家作主
C. 政治协商
D. 马克思主义中国化