刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
D
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
推荐试题
【判断题】
地市公司配改办负责编制辖区不良分包商、不良人员名录,递交省公司配改办统一发布。
A. 对
B. 错
【判断题】
归档的文件材料应字迹清晰,图标整洁,签字盖章手续完备。书写字迹应符合耐久性要求,不能用易褪色的书写材料(红色墨水、纯蓝墨水、铅笔、圆珠笔、复写纸等)书写、绘制。
A. 对
B. 错
【判断题】
各种原材料及构件出厂证明、质保书、出厂试验报告、复测报告要齐全、完整;证明材料字迹清楚、内容规范、数据准确,以复印件归档。
A. 对
B. 错
【判断题】
按施工图施工没有变动的图纸,由设计单位在施工图上加盖竣工图章,并在蓝图目录上签署施工图的编制日期。
A. 对
B. 错
【判断题】
在可研基础上,设计单位按照初设批复意见,进行工程设计,出具施工蓝图,编制详细的计划拆旧物资清单,其中对于架空线缆类,应该换算至千米数;项目实施单位(部门)审核计划拆旧物资清单,并提供计划拆除物资利旧或报废的处置建议。
A. 对
B. 错
【判断题】
对于水泥电杆特殊类废旧物资,不具备再利用价值,也需要鉴定和回收。
A. 对
B. 错
【多选题】
信用货币制度的特点有( )。
A. 黄金作为货币发行的准备
B. 贵金属非货币化
C. 国家强制力保证货币的流通
D. 金银储备保证货币的可兑换性
E. 货币发行通过信用渠道
F.
【多选题】
银行提高贷款利率有利于( )。
A. 抑制企业对信贷资金的需求
B. 刺激物价上涨
C. 刺激经济增长
D. 抑制物价上涨
E. 减少居民个人的消费信贷
F.
【多选题】
汇率变化与资本流动的关系是。( )
A. 汇率变动对长期资本的影响较小。
B. 本币汇率大幅度贬值会引起资本外逃。
C. 汇率升值会引起短期资本流入。
D. 汇率升值会引起短期资本流出。
E.
F.
【多选题】
下列属于货币市场金融工具的是( )。
A. 商业票据
B. 股票
C. 短期公债
D. 公司债券
E. 回购协议
F.
【多选题】
治理通货膨胀的可采取紧缩的货币政策,主要手段包括( )
A. 通过公开市场购买政府债券
B. 提高再贴现率
C. 通过公开市场出售政府债券
D. 提高法定准备金率
E. 降低再贴现率
F. 降低法定准备金率
【多选题】
我国货币制度规定人民币具有以下的特点( )。
A. 人民币是可兑换货币
B. 人民币与黄金没有直接联系
C. 人民币是信用货币
D. 人民币具有无限法偿力
E. 人民币具有有限法偿力
F.
【多选题】
银行信用的特点包括( )。
A. 买卖行为与借贷行为的统一
B. 以金融机构为媒介
C. 借贷的对象是处于货币形态的资金
D. 属于直接信用形式
E. 属于间接信用形式
F.
【多选题】
影响利率变动的因素有( )。
A. 资金的供求状况
B. 国际经济政治关系
C. 利润的平均水平
D. 货币政策与财政政策
E. 物价变动的幅度
F.
【多选题】
金融发展对经济发展的作用体现在( )。
A. 有助于资本积累
B. 有助于提高资源的使用效率
C. 有助于提高金融资产储蓄比例
D. 有助于提高经济效率
E.
F.
【多选题】
金本位制下国际货币体系具有哪些特征。( )
A. 黄金充当世界货币
B. 两种货币兑换以铸币平价为基准
C. 外汇收支具有自动调节机制
D. 汇率波动以黄金输送点为限
E.
F.
【多选题】
可贷资金论认为,利率的决定因素包括( )。
A. 利润率水平
B. 储蓄
C. 投资
D. 货币供给
E. 货币需求
F.
【多选题】
信用行为的基本特点包括( )。
A. 以收回为条件的付出
B. 贷者有权获得利息
C. 无偿的赠与或援助
D. 平等的价值交换
E. 极高的利率水平
F.
【多选题】
信用货币包括( )。
A. 银行券
B. 支票
C. 活期存款
D. 商业票据
E. 定期存款
F.
【多选题】
以美元为中心的国际货币体系的主要内容有。( )
A. 确立了美元与黄金挂钩、其他货币与美元挂钩的汇兑体系。
B. 成员国货币的含金量不能随便改动。
C. 汇率只能围绕平价上下1%幅度内波动。
D. 成员国可以按照黄金与美元之间的官价向美国政府兑换黄金。
E.
F.
【多选题】
中央银行对金融机构的信用进行直接控制时通常采用下列手段( ):
A. 信用配额
B. 规定商业银行的流动性比率
C. 直接干预
D. 规定存贷款利率高限
E. 优惠利率
F. 窗口指导
【多选题】
凯恩斯认为,人们持有货币的动机有( )。
A. 投资动机
B. 消费动机
C. 交易动机
D. 预防动机
E. 投机动机
F.
【多选题】
中央银行是( )。
A. 发行的银行
B. 国家的银行
C. 银行的银行
D. 监管的银行
E.
F.
【多选题】
商业银行的资产业务包括( )。
A. 现金
B. 贷款
C. 证券投资
D. 资本
E.
F.
【多选题】
以下属于利率衍生工具的有( )。
A. 债券期货
B. 债券期权
C. 外汇期货
D. 外汇期权
E. 货币互换
F.
【多选题】
在世界经济发展中,国际金融机构所起的作用包括( )。
A. 在重大国际经济金融事件中协调统一行动。
B. 提供短期资金,平衡国际收支逆差。
C. 干预稳定汇率。
D. 提供长期资金,促进欠发达国家经济发展。
E.
F.
【多选题】
中央银行的三大政策工具是( )。
A. 法定准备金率
B. 再贴现
C. 公开市场业务
D. 信用配额
E.
F.
【多选题】
研究货币需求的微观模型有( )。
A. 马克思的货币必要量公式
B. 费雪方程式
C. 剑桥方程式
D. 凯恩斯函数
E. 平方根法则
F.
【多选题】
若货币供给为内生变量,则意味着该变量的决定因素可以是( )。
A. 消费
B. 储蓄
C. 公开市场业务
D. 再贴现率
E. 投资
F.
【多选题】
由供给因素变动形成的通货膨胀可以归结为两个原因( )。
A. 工资推进
B. 价格推进
C. 利润推进
D. 结构调整
E. 生产效率
F.
【多选题】
公开市场业务的特点有( )。
A. 中央银行具有主动性
B. 可以对货币供应量进行微调
C. 中央银行处于被动地位
D. 有利于进行经常性、连续性操作
E. 政策效果比较猛烈
F. 需要有一个发达的金融市场
【多选题】
对货币单位的理解正确的有( )。
A. 国家法定的货币计量单位
B. 规定了货币单位的名称
C. 规定本位币的币材
D. 确定技术标准
E. 规定货币单位所含的货币金属量
F.
【多选题】
现代信用形式中两种最基本的形式是( )。
A. 商业信用
B. 国家信用
C. 消费信用
D. 银行信用
E. 民间信用
F.
【多选题】
中央银行的‘银行的银行’的职能体现在( )。
A. 集中存款准备
B. 金融监管
C. 最终的贷款人
D. 组织全国的清算
E.
F.
【多选题】
根据“平方根法则”,交易性货币需求( )。
A. 是利率的函数
B. 与利率同方向变化
C. 与利率反方向变化
D. 变动幅度比利率变动幅度小
E. 变动幅度比收入变动幅度大
F.
【多选题】
金汇兑本位下的国际货币体系具有哪些特点。( )
A. 本币不能自由兑换黄金
B. 汇率实际上是钉住汇率
C. 国际储备资产多元化,包括黄金和外汇
D. 国际收支调节具有对称性
E.
F.
【多选题】
中央银行对某些特殊领域的信用进行调节时通常采用下列措施( )。
A. 消费者信用控制
B. 信用配额
C. 不动产信用控制
D. 优惠利率
E. 证券市场信用控制
F. 窗口指导
【多选题】
研究货币需求的宏观模型有( )。
A. 马克思的货币必要量公式
B. 费雪方程式
C. 剑桥方程式
D. 凯恩斯函数
E. 平方根法则
F.
【多选题】
中央银行公开市场业务较其他货币政策工具的优越性明显体现在( )。
A. 直接性强
B. 主动性好
C. 作用力大
D. 灵活性好
E.
F.
【多选题】
商业银行进行存款创造的前提条件是( )。
A. 部分准备金制度
B. 非现金结算制度
C. 自身拥有银行券发行权
D. 全部都是
E.
F.
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用