刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
中美贸易摩擦甚至有可能将世界经济拖入新一轮的衰退。___
A. 对
B. 错
C.
D.
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
A
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
经济体制改革是全面深化改革的重点,其核心问题是___。
A. 处理好政府和市场关系
B. 处理好竞争和垄断关系
C. 处理好积累与消费关系
D. 处理好出口和进口的关系
【单选题】
2019年6月3日电,中共中央总书记习近平近日对( )工作作出重要指示。习近平指出,推行___,关键是要加强科学管理、形成长效机制、推动习惯养成。
A. 垃圾分类
B. 乡村振兴战略
C. 脱贫攻坚
D. 禁毒
【单选题】
2019年6月2日电,中方再度就中美经贸问题发表白皮书——《关于中美___的中方立场》白皮书。这份白皮书是中国政府关于中美经贸的正式官方声明,意义非常重要。
A. 经贸摩擦
B. 经贸协商
C. 经贸合作
D. 经贸磋商
【单选题】
2019年6月3日电,日前,中国世界贸易组织研究会举办了首届___研讨会。标志着开启了世界贸易组织框架下实际问题专项研究工作的里程碑。
A. WTO改革问题专家
B. 贸易组织年鉴
C. 服务贸易数字化
D. 中欧文化贸易
【单选题】
“一带一路”陆海联动发展论坛于2019年6月3日在重庆举行,主题为___,旨在探讨如何在“一带一路”框架下进一步构建全球互联互通伙伴关系。
A. “发挥智库作用,推动陆海联动”
B. “共筑一带一路 同创陆海联动”
C. “一带一路开创陆海联动新时代”
D. “共创陆海联动发展新未来”
【单选题】
当地时间2019年6月4日,在法国巴黎举行的2019年亚足联特别代表大会上,经全体会议代表一致鼓掌通过,中国获得了___亚洲杯主办权。
A. 2023年
B. 2024年
C. 2025年
D. 2026年
【单选题】
2019年6月4日电,中共中央政治局常委韩在上海主持召开推动长三角发展领导小组会议,提出要充分发挥长三角优势,紧扣___和( )两个关键。
A. “全面化” “高效率”
B. “持续性” “新想法”
C. “一体化” “高质量”
D. “绿色性” “新科技”
【单选题】
某品牌汽车在德国设计,在美国生产燃油泵,在澳大利亚生产发动机……从设计到装配,涉及8个国家。这反映了___
A. 生产的全球化
B. 市场的全球化
C. 资金的全球化
D. 科技开发和应用的全球化
【单选题】
某投资机构可以在30分钟内把资金撤出美国股市而进入英国的原油期货市场。这体现了___
A. 生产的全球化
B. 资本的全球化
C. 贸易的全球化
D. 技术的全球化
【单选题】
中国加入世界贸易组织的时间是___
A. 1995年
B. 1997年
C. 2000年
D. 2001年
【单选题】
十九大报告首次提出建设___体系,指出我国经济已由高速增长阶段转向高质量发展阶段,必须坚持质量第一.效益优先。
A. 市场经济
B. 现代化经济
C. 全球化经济
D. 开放经济
【单选题】
世界上公认的基尼系数“危急线”是___
A. 0.5
B. 0.6
C. 0.7
D. 0.8
【单选题】
经济全球化以___为基础
A. 市场
B. 先进科技和生产力
C. 发达国家
D. 最大利润
【单选题】
博鳌亚洲论坛全球健康论坛首届大会将于2019年6月10日-12日在___举办。
A. 山东青岛
B. 海南海口
C. 上海
D. 北京
【单选题】
第73届联合国大会在2019年6月4日在纽约联合国总部举行全体会议,选举尼日利亚常驻联合国代表___为第74届联合国大会主席。
A. 埃斯皮诺萨
B. 穆罕默德班德
C. 莱恰克
D. 彼得汤姆森
【单选题】
2019年6月5日12时6分,我国在黄海海域成功发射___运载火箭,标志着中国航天首次海上发射技术试验圆满成功。
A. 风暴一号
B. 神州十号
C. 长征十一号
D. 风云三号
【单选题】
在相互投资方面,2017年,中国是全球第___大外资流入国和第( )大对外投资国。
A. 一.二
B. 二.三
C. 三.四
D. 四.五
【单选题】
___事件使我们所处的经济全球化呈现新的历史特征
A. 亚洲金融危机
B. 2008年国际金融危机
C. 911恐怖事件
D. 苏联解体
【单选题】
中国特色社会主义进入新时代,我国社会主要矛盾已经转化为人民日益增长的___需要和()的发展之间的矛盾。( )
A. 美好生活 不充分不平衡
B. 幸福生活 不平衡不充分
C. 幸福生活 不充分不平衡
D. 美好生活 不平衡不充分
【单选题】
我国经济已由___阶段转向( )阶段,正处在转变发展方式.优化经济结构.转换增长动力的攻关期,建设现代化经济体系是跨越关口的迫切要求和我国发展的战略目标。( )
A. 高速增长高水平发展
B. 高速发展高水平发展
C. 高速增长高质量发展
D. 高速发展高质量发展
【单选题】
贯彻新发展理念,建设现代化经济体系,必须坚持质量第一.效益优先,以___为主线。
A. 转变发展方式
B. 优化经济结构
C. 供给侧结构性改革
D. 转换增长动力
【单选题】
2019年6月5日是世界环境日。正在杭州举行的世界环境日全球主场活动,以___为主题。
A. “改善环境质量 推动绿色发展”
B. “蓝天保卫战,我是行动者”
C. “绿水青山就是金山银山”
D. “人与自然,相联相生”
【单选题】
2019年6月6日,国家发改委等发布《推动重点消费品更新升级 畅通资源循环利用实施方案》,其中重点提出各地不得对___实行限行、限购政策,已实行的应当取消。
A. 电动汽车
B. 氢动力汽车
C. 新能源汽车
D. 混合动力汽车
【单选题】
2019年6月12日至14日,习近平主席展开对吉尔吉斯共和国的国事访问时在吉尔吉斯斯坦媒体发表的署名文章中写道,“吉尔吉斯斯坦有句谚语,‘兄弟情谊胜过一切财富’,中国人也常说,‘___’。
A. 谁无兄弟,如足如手
B. 兄弟同心,其利断金
C. 骨肉天亲,同枝连起
D. 打虎亲兄弟,上阵父子兵
【单选题】
联合国贸易发展会议2019年6月12日发布的年度报告显示,中国吸引外资总量逆势上涨,继续成为全球___大外资流入国。
A. 第一
B. 第二
C. 第三
D. 第四
【单选题】
2019年6月16日出版的第12期《求是》杂志发表国家主席习近平的重要文章《坚定___,建设社会主义文化强国》。
A. 科技自信
B. 文化自信
C. 政治自信
D. 经济自信
【单选题】
2019年6月16日,全国政协主席汪洋在厦门出席第十一届海峡论坛并致辞。汪洋强调在坚持“___”、反对“台独”的基础上,我们愿与台湾一步一步向和平统一的目标迈进。
A. 一国两制
B. 一个中国
C. 和平共处五项原则
D. 九二共识
【单选题】
2019年6月20日,中国国务院总理李克强出席“全球首席执行官委员会”第七届圆桌峰会。李克强表示中方愿秉持___原则,确保各国合作的可持续性。
A. 共商共享共赢
B. 共商共建共享
C. 协调合作稳定
D. 协调稳定平等
【单选题】
2019年6月21日中午,习近平在锦绣山迎宾馆会见金正恩。在会见中,习近平继去年6月第三次会晤时提出“___”之后,表达了“( )”
A. 四个坚定支持 四个不会变
B. 四个不会变 四个坚定支持
C. 三个坚定支持 三个不会变
D. 三个不会变 三个坚定支持
【单选题】
2019年6月24日凌晨,2019FIBA3X3篮球世界杯决赛在荷兰结束,中国女篮19-13战胜___,夺得冠军!这是篮球1896年传入中国以来,中国人夺得篮球史上的( )世界冠军。
A. 匈牙利 第一个
B. 荷兰 第一个
C. 匈牙利 第二个
D. 荷兰 第二个
【单选题】
2019年6月27日,中国国家主席习近平在大阪会见日本首相安倍晋三。两国领导人认为,中日同为亚洲重要国家和世界主要经济体,应共同维护___和( )体制,积极引领区域一体化,推动构建开放型世界经济,促进世界各国共同发展。
A. 双边主义自由贸易
B. 双边主义保护贸易
C. 多边主义自由贸易
D. 多边主义保护贸易
【单选题】
下列选项中不是金砖国家主要城市的是___
A. 开普敦
B. 科伦坡
C. 圣保罗
D. 加尔各答
【单选题】
以下___国家不属于“金砖五国”成员国?
A. 中国
B. 巴西
C. 南非
D. 澳大利亚
【单选题】
赋予自由贸易试验区更大改革自主权,探索建设___
A. 自由贸易城
B. 自由贸易区
C. 自由贸易港
D. 自由贸易市
【单选题】
“一带一路”倡议___年提出。
A. 2013年
B. 2012年
C. 2015年
D. 2011年
【单选题】
“一带一路”贯穿___,一头是活跃的东亚经济圈,一头是发达的欧洲经济圈,中间广大腹地国家经济发展潜力巨大。
A. 亚欧非大陆
B. 亚欧非
C. 亚非拉
D. 亚欧
【单选题】
“一带一路”在投资贸易中要突出___理念,加强生态环境.生物多样性和应对气候变化合作,共建绿色丝绸之路。
A. 绿色环保
B. 低碳环保
C. 生态文明
D. 循环经济
【单选题】
以下选项不符合“一带一路”建设理念___
A. 自由的
B. 开放的
C. 包容的
D. 半封闭的
【单选题】
以共建“一带一路”为实践平台推动___,这是从我国改革开放和长远发展出发提构建出来的,也符合中华民族历来秉持的天下大同理念。
A. 人类命运共同体
B. 和平和发展
C. 中华民族伟大复兴
D. 改革开放
【单选题】
中非合作论坛成立于___
A. 2000
B. 2001
C. 2002
D. 1999
推荐试题
【单选题】
“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___
A. 形而上学片面的、孤立的观点
B. 辩证法普遍联系的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 诡辩论的观点
【单选题】
唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___
A. 事物数量的增加
B. 事物根本性质的变化
C. 事物的一切运动变化
D. 新事物的产生和旧事物的灭亡
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用