刷题
导入试题
【多选题】
封闭式理财产品销售文件应当载明收取___等相关收费项目、收费条件、收费标准和收费方式。
A. 销售费
B. 认申赎费
C. 投资管理费
D. 手续费
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
AC
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
客户在下列哪些情况下可申请变更签约账号___
A. 仅有封闭期产品
B. 无任何在途产品
C. 募集期无认购
D. 募集期有认购但无封闭期产品
【多选题】
据我行理财质押贷款管理办法和规程,必须由贷款承办行出具有___
A. 理财产品权利凭证
B. 理财产品权利凭证委托书
C. 理财产品止付联系函
D. 理财产品解除止付联系函
【多选题】
下列符合监管当局对个人理财业务规定的有___
A. 商业银行不得承诺或变相承诺除保证收益以外的任何可获得收益
B. 商业银行不得销售不能独立测算收益率的理财计划
C. 商业银行无需为理财计划制作明细记录
D. 商业银行应明确个人理财业务人员与一般产品销售人员的工作界限,禁止一般产品销售人员向客户提供咨询顾问意见、销售理财计划和产品
【多选题】
与理财顾问服务相比,综合理财服务的特点体现在___
A. 综合理财服务是指商业银行向客户提供财务分析与规划、投资建泌、个人投资产品推介等专业化服务
B. 综合理财服务活动中客户授权银行代表客户按合同约定的投资方式和方向,进行投资和资产管理
C. 在综合理财服务中产生的投资收益和风险由客户自行承担
D. 综合理财服务更强调个性化的服务
【多选题】
商业银行个人理财业务中的理财计划包括的种类有___
A. 保证收益理财计划
B. 保证最高收益理财规划
C. 投资保险理财计划
D. 保本浮动收益理财计划
【多选题】
下列关于封闭式基金的说法,正确的有___
A. 在我国,封闭式基金一般采用网上发行方式
B. 投资者在存续期内可随时申购基金单位
C. 所募集到的资金可以用于长期投资
D. 基金的资金规模基本不变
【多选题】
商业银行应当根据有关规定建立健全个人理财业务人员资格考核与认定、继续培训、跟踪评价等管理制度,相关人员必须具备的条件有___
A. 具备必要的专业知识、行业经验和管理能力
B. 充分了解所从事业务的有关法律法规和监管规章
C. 理解所推介产品的风险特性
D. 遵守从业人员职业道德
【多选题】
下列关于我行客户风险承受力测评有效期的说法,正确的是___
A. 基金 6 个月
B. 基金 12 个月
C. 理财 6 个月
D. 理财 12 个月
【多选题】
按照销售管理办法,以目前我行发售的金兰花-共享智富理财产品的风险等级来看,适合购买的客户风险承受能力评级包括___
A. 中低
B. 中
C. 中高
D. 高
【多选题】
以下关于基金销售费用的说法,不正确的是___
A. 应在招募说明书中载明费率标准
B. 代销机构可以向投资人收取基金合同未约定的手续费用
C. 基金的申购费必须在申购时收取
D. 赎回费在扣除手续费后,余额可归入风险准备金。
【多选题】
客户非首次在我行柜面购买理财产品时,应填写___
A. 理财财产品风险揭示书
B. 理财产品协议书
C. 理财产品说明书
D. 理财业务申请表
【多选题】
以下金融工具中,货币市场基金不可以投资于___
A. 可转换债券
B. 剩余期限在 397 天以内(含 397 天)的资产支持证券
C. 国家信用评级机构评定的 A-1 级或相当于 A-1 级的短期信用级别及该标准下的短期融资券
D. 流通受限的债券
【多选题】
以下属于非系统性风险的是___
A. 利率风险
B. 信用风险
C. 经营风险
D. 财务风险
【多选题】
理财购买校验理财销售系统___,购买失败时应判断核心客户信息与理财销售系统客户信息是否一致,不一致时需理财客户信息同步后再进行购买。
A. 客户名称
B. 证件类型
C. 证件号码
D. 账号/卡号
【多选题】
以下哪几种情况客户不可办理理财账号变更___?
A. 客户原账号内有募集期产品的购买申请
B. 客户原账号内有理财份额
C. 客户原账号内有冻结份额
D. 客户原账号状态属性异常
【多选题】
机构客户购买理财需提供哪些资料___?
A. 营业执照
B. 法定代表人身份证
C. 属法定代表人委托他人代理的,还须提供授权书和代理人身份证原件
D. 单位结算账号
【多选题】
客户银行账户为___等不正常状态时无法购买理财产品?
A. 全部冻结、
B. 部分止付
C. 挂失
D. 久悬
【多选题】
某理财产品为嘉兴分行专享,以下不允许购买的情况有___?
A. 持台州分行的卡在嘉兴分行一级支行购买
B. 持嘉兴分行的卡在台州分行营业部购买
C. 持台州分行的卡在手机银行购买
D. 持嘉兴分行的卡在网上银行购买
【多选题】
某封闭式理财产品按金额设置分段收益,5-20万对应的预期年化收益率为4.1%,20-50万对应的预期年化收益率4.2%,50万以上对应的预期年化收益率为4.3%,期限90天,以下情况正确的是___?
A. 小李柜面购买6万元,打印凭证的预期年化收益率为4.1%,柜面追加15万时打印凭证的预期年化收益率为4.2%
B. 小王柜面购买6万元,打印凭证的预期年化收益率为4.1%,柜面追加45万时打印凭证的预期年化收益率为4.2%
C. 小张柜面购买6万元,手机银行追加15万元,如该理财产品按预期年化收益率兑付,该客户到期本息和为212174.79元
D. 小赵柜面购买6万元,手机银行追加45万元,如该理财产品按预期年化收益率兑付,该客户到期本息和为515266.84元
【多选题】
某封闭式理财产品目前处于募集期,该理财按渠道设置分段收益,柜面对应的预期年化收益率为4.1%,手机银行和网银对应的预期年化收益率4.15%,期限45天,起售金额5万,1万递增,A客户柜面已购买该理财10万元,以下操作可行的是___?(以下选择无关联性)
A. A客户通过手机银行查询后发现,手机银行上该理财的预期年化收益率高于柜面,于是在手机银行撤销原柜面购买的10万元理财产品后手机银行再次购买10万元
B. A客户又在网银成功购买5万元,产品成立后,在网银当前持仓查询到两笔该理财产品,份额分别为10万和5万
C. A客户又在网银成功购买5万元,当即可在交易明细查询中查询到柜面渠道购买10万元该理财产品,预期年化收益率为4.1%,网银渠道购买5万元该理财产品,预期年化收益率为4.15%
D. A客户又在柜面和手机银行分别购买2万元和4万元后,撤销原柜面购买的10万元理财产品,该产品到期后,理财本息和为60305.76
【多选题】
办理“理财交易撤单”,个人客户需提供以下___资料?
A. 个人客户本人有效身份证件
B. 签约兰花借记卡(或存折)
C. 理财协议书
D. 理财购买凭证
【多选题】
个人客户柜面办理理财购买时,业务流程正确的是___?
A. 首次购买我行理财产品的个人客户须在我行网点进行风险评估
B. 客户在销售人员的指导下仔细阅读并签署拟购买的理财产品销售文件
C. 需提供本人有效身份证件或代理人及本人有效身份证件和签约兰花借记卡(或存折)
D. 理财业务人员核对申请资料无误后进行系统录入,交易成功后打印二联通用凭证,并请客户签名确认
【多选题】
预约变更可变更以下哪几种情况___?
A. 变更预约额度
B. 转换预约额度的所属人
C. 同时变更预约额度和所属人
D. 变大预约额度
【多选题】
理财客户信息同步用于核心客户信息替换理财销售系统客户信息,个人理财客户信息同步时,凭证类型可选择___?
A. 卡
B. 折
C. 账号
D. 以上都可以
【多选题】
产品销售过程采取标准化流程操作,严格按照下列步骤___进行,不得出现逆流程操作、不合规操作等行为。
A. 客户进入网点向销售人员询问产品,表达购买意向
B. 销售人员履行告知义务,告知客户销售过程将进行全程同步录音录像
C. 销售过程的全程同步录音录像,按照产品销售话术要求,录音录像过程应当覆盖业务或产品营销推介、风险及关键信息提示、客户确认及反馈等重要销售环节
D. 录制完成后系统自动上传至录音录像系统,如遇特殊情况,完成的录音录像资料自动存储在终端机中,存储在终端机的录音录像资料应及时补上传至录音录像系统
【多选题】
录音录像是指通过在销售专区内安装配备的录音录像设备,对销售人员自有理财产品和代销产品销售过程进行全程同步录音录像,完整客观地记录___等重点销售环节的行为。
A. 营销推介
B. 相关风险提示
C. 关键信息提示
D. 消费者确认和反馈
【多选题】
根据产品销售专区的标准要求,银行业金融机构应当在网点专门区域销售自有理财产品与代销产品,同时达到以下要求___。
A. 产品销售专区应有明显标识
B. 产品销售专区内应建立统一的产品信息查询平台并于销售专区内公示查询渠道,平台内应收录全部在售自有理财及代销产品信息
C. 产品销售专区内应长期公示咨询举报电话,便于消费者确认产品属性及信息,举报银行员工参与民间融资、违规误导销售、私售产品等行为
D. 产品销售专区的营销人员须具备相应的产品销售资格,并在专区内对销售人员及其销售资格进行公示
【多选题】
可在___交易中查看客户理财产品可用份额。
A. 交易明细查询
B. 当前持仓
C. 理财持有证明
D. 认购交割单
【多选题】
商业银行个人理财业务是指商业银行为个人客户提供的___等专业化服务活动
A. 财务分析
B. 财务规划
C. 投资顾问
D. 资产管理
【多选题】
目前,我行通过银银合作可以签约的证券公司包括___等10家。
A. 海通证券
B. 浙商证券
C. 国信证券
D. 申万宏源证券
【多选题】
电子渠道理财业务操作不正确的有___
A. 新客户理财签约及首次风险测评需在柜面完成,后续风险测评可在电子渠道完成
B. 新客户完成兰花卡并绑定电子银行开户后即可在电子渠道认购我行的理财产品
C. 电子银行渠道支持银行卡客户和存折客户办理理财业务
D. 电子银行渠道可以撤销所有渠道发起的认购
【多选题】
客户至我们柜台办理银银转帐业务需提供的资料包括___
A. 本人有效身份证
B. 证券公司《客户交易结算资金三方存管协议书》“兴业银行联”
C. 绍兴银行兰花卡或个人结算存折
D. 证券资金账号
【多选题】
贵金属代理业务是我行依托兴业银行银银平台理财门户,接受客户委托,代理其在上海黄金交易所内进行___等交易的业务。
A. 贵金属买卖
B. 资金清算
C. 实物交割
D. 黄金定投
【多选题】
客户办理我行贵金属代理业务签约理财门户时需填写签署的凭证包括___
A. 《兴业银行银银平台理财账户开户申请书》
B. 《客户交易结算资金三方存管协议书》
C. 《银银平台理财门户客户签约三方协议》
D. 《个人银行结算账户开立暨客户资金转账服务申请书》
【多选题】
我行贵金属代理业务可以交易的品种包括___等。
A. Au99.99
B. Au100g
C. Au(T+D)
D. Ag(T+D)
【多选题】
按照发售对象的不同,我行理财产品可分为___
A. 个人客户产品
B. 高资产净值客户产品
C. 私人银行产品
D. 机构客户产品
【多选题】
按照收益表现方式的不同,理财产品可以分为___
A. 净值型理财产品
B. 预期收益率型理财产品
C. 其他收益表现方式理财产品
D. 开放式理财产品
【多选题】
本行销售理财产品应遵循的原则包括___
A. 守法合规
B. 卖者有责、买者自负
C. 客户需求导向
D. 风险匹配、风险揭示
【多选题】
理财人员在向客户销售理财产品时,应对产品的风险做充分的披露,向客户揭示可能产生的___,并进行投资者风险教育,实现风险与收益向投资者的充分传递。
A. 市场风险
B. 信用风险
C. 操作风险
D. 流动性风险
【多选题】
理财产品销售文件应当包含专页客户权益须知,客户权益须知应当至少包括___
A. 客户办理理财产品的流程
B. 客户风险承受能力评估流程、评级具体含义以及适合购买的理财产品等相关内容
C. 本行向客户进行信息披露的方式、渠道和频率等
D. 客户向本行投诉的方式和程序,本行联络方式及其他需要向客户说明的内容
推荐试题
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用