毛泽东思想是___，是党必须长期坚持的指导思想。

新民主主义革命经历了___。

毛泽东思想科学体系的包括以下哪些内容有___。

毛泽东思想的活的灵魂___。

坚持实事求是，就要___。

群众路线，就是___，把党的正确主张变为群众的自觉行动。

坚持群众路线，就要___。

如何科学认识毛泽东思想的历史地位___

毛泽东认为，充分调动一切积极因素，尽可能地克服消极因素，并且努力化消极因素为积极因素，这是社会主义事业前进的需要。这里讲的积极因素与消极因素，包括以下哪些方面？___

毛泽东认为，充分调动一切积极因素，尽可能地克服消极因素，并且努力化消极因素为积极因素，这是社会主义事业前进的需要。这里讲的积极因素与消极因素，包括以下哪些方面？___

构建人类命运共同体是中国外交的崇高目标，也是世界各国的共同责任和历史使命。从中国人实际出发，为了实现这一崇高目标，我们要___

1：空白成品卡丢失10张以下，受理机具被侧录致使银行卡账户信息泄露3张以下，特约商户发生涉嫌欺诈交易金额10万元以下的属于___。

2：银行卡风险二类事件认定中，特约商户发生涉嫌欺诈交易金额为 元。___

3：金燕卡不具备___功能。

4：同一持卡人在本行开立金燕借记卡数量原则上不得超过___张

5：查询密码遗忘或锁定时，直接___。

6：个人卡持卡人资料变更时，须凭本人有效身份证件到___申请办理。

7：补登圈存的资金来源是___

8：指定账户圈存的资金来源是___

9：员工私自篡改或伪造申请人资料进行伪冒办卡的，给予___处分。

10：单笔电子现金消费额度最大值是___

11：河南省农村信用社客服电话96288的主要功能不包括___

12：金燕卡持卡人遗失或被盗时应及时办理挂失手续，挂失前所发生的损失由___承担。

1：___负责特约商户资料的审核 报送和保管，负责特约商户的日常管理 结算资金的监控分析，负责布放POS机具和对POS机具的检查 维护 监控。

2：各种表格中，商户开户名称的填写一定要和___一致。

3：对强制退出的特约商户，应及时停止该商户交易，否则造成的损失，由___承担。

4：___在获取收单业务收益的同时，承担由此项业务带来的全部风险。

5：特约商户发生套现 洗单的，收单行可要求商户___。

6：特约商户多次无故拒绝受理银联卡，经指证拒不改正的，收单行可要求商户___。

7：收单业务中出现的跨行差错 争议通过省银行卡中心协商解决无效时，可向___申请仲裁。

8：由特约商户受理银行卡业务过程中违反有关操作流程的行为造成的损失由___承担。

9：对于商户或商户负责人被中国银联列入不良信息系统的商户申请收单业务的，收单行应___。

10：持卡人进行消费时，除刷卡时系统没有响应外，只要有操作过程，即收银员输入相关信息，并提交，没有打印签购单。此时商户或持卡人都应打___银联客服进行查询。

1：手机银行客户自助签约账户数量___。

2：手机银行贴膜卡通过什么渠道实现银行业务的操作___

3：客户如何开通手机银行贴膜卡业务？___

4：手机贴膜卡的初始密码是___。

5：手机贴膜卡收取的短信费是多少___元。

6：手机银行支付时产生的费用是什么？___

7：贴膜卡是通过什么渠道来实现银行业务功能___

时间___

“机不可失，时不再来”指的是___

是 ___

在客观规律面前，人的主观能动性表现在___

事物的联系和运动之间的关系___

唯物辩证法的总特征是___

___

“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___

唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___

区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___

质量互变规律揭示了___

质和事物的存在是___

在实际工作中，要注意掌握分寸，防止“过”或“不及”，其关键在于___

区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___

量变的复杂性是指___

量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___

量变中的局部性部分质变是___

揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___

“肯定和否定相互渗透，在一定意义上，肯定就是否定。”这是一种___

事物的否定方面是指___

作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___

辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___

否定之否定规律___

事物发展的周期性体现了___

直线论的错误在于只看到___

循环论的错误在于___

对立统一规律揭示了___

唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___