某省人大常务委员会公布实施了《某省安全生产条例》，随后省政府公布实施了《某省生产经营单位安全生产主体责任规定》，下列关于两者法律地位和效力的说法，正确的是___

移居《职业病防治法》的规定，下列关于职业病病人享受国家规定的职业病待遇的说法，正确的是___

某贸易公司.煤业公司.当地投资公司分4:3:3的比例共同成立一家化工公司。该化工公司的董事长由常住海外的贸易公司张某担任，总经理由贸易公司王某担任，全面负责生产经营活动，副总经理由煤业公司孙某担任，负责日常生产管理;安全总监由投资赵某担任，负责安全管理，依据《安全生产法》的规定，负责组织制定并实施该化工公司安全生产应急预案的是___

某企业有基层员工146人，管理人员10人，主要经营环氧乙烷，并提供运输服务，依据《安全生产法》的规定，下列关于该企业安全生产管理机构设置和人员配备的说法，正确的是___。

依据《安全生产法》的规定，企业与职工订立合同，免除或者减轻其职工因生产安全事故伤亡依法应承担的责任，该合同无效，对该违法行为应当实施的处罚是___

烟花爆竹色和年国产企业危险工序的作业人员应当接受专业技术培训，并经设区的市人民政府安全监管部门考核合格，方可上岗作业。依据《烟花爆竹安全管理条例》的规定，下列各组烟花爆竹生产工序中，各工序都属于危险工序的是___

甲公司将其实施工项目发包给乙公司，丙公司将其中部分业务分包给丙公司，丙公司又装包给挂靠在丁公司的蔡某，依据《安全生产法》的规定，负责统一协调.管理各个方面的安全生产工作的责任主体是___

某厂焊接工张某因生产安全事故受到伤害，依据《安全生产法》的规定，下列关于张某获取赔偿的说法中，正确的是___。

某生产经营单位一职工周日加班时发现危化品仓库存在安全隐患，可能引发重大事故。一句《安全生产法》的规定，下列关于该职工隐患报考的说法，正确的是___

依据《安全生产法》的规定，安全生产监管部门有着依法对生产经营单位执行安全生产法律.法规和国家标准或者行业标准的情况进行监督检查，并行使现场检查权.现场处置权.紧急处置权的___。

某省建设行政管理部门在对一给大型施工工地进行安全检查时发现，有两个施工单位在一个作业区域进行可能含有危及对本安全生产的施工作业，这两个施工单位未签订安全生产管理协议。而且未确定专职安全生产管理人员进行安全检查与协调。该省建设行政管理部门当即下达逾期整改通知书，但这个两个施工单位逾期仍未改正。依据《安全生产法》的规定，该省建设行政管理部门应当___。

某安全监测中介机构在对某钢铁厂新安装的设备进行检测验收时，未按规定进行检验，便出具了检测验收xx，致使设备投入使用后不久因其存在的重大隐患引发事故，造成多人死亡。依据《安全生产法》的规定，安全监管部门对该安全监测中介机构除处以罚款、对相关责任者追究行政责任外，还应给予的行政处罚是___。

依据《消防法》的规定。商场营业期间发生严重火灾时。下列灭火救援的做法，错误的是___。

甲企业与乙企业相邻，甲企业发生火灾后乙企业立即给予支援，最终在公安消防队的带领下成功扑灭大火，依据《消防法》的规定，乙企业损耗的灭火剂、器材及装备等应由___给予补偿。

依据《道路交通安全法》的规定，下列车辆通行的说法，正确的是___。

依据《道路交通安全法》的规定，下列道路通行条件的说法，正确的是___。

依据《突发事件应对法》的规定，下列关于突发事件预警级别的说法，正确的是___。

依据《突发事件应对法》的规定，下列有关应急监测与预警的说法中，正确的是___

陈某承包经营电镀厂，未按照国家标准为电镀设备安装漏电保护装置，导致两名工人作业时触电死亡。根据《刑法》的规定，陈某的行为构成___。

某煤矿发生透水事故，当场死亡5人，主管安全生产的副总经理李某未向有关部门报告，贻误了事故抢险救援的时机，又导致3人死亡，依据《刑法》及相关规定，对李某的处罚，下列说法正确的是___。

电磁辐射包括射频辐射、红外线、可见光、紫外线等，由于其频率、波长不同，对人体的危害作用也不同。下列工种中，易受到红外线辐射的是___。

依据《行政处罚法》的规定，当事人逾期不缴纳行政处罚决定的，下列执行措施中，处罚机关可以采取的是___。

依据《行政许可法》的规定，被许可人以欺诈、贿赂等不正当手段取得行政许可的，行政机关除依法给予行政处罚外，如取得的行政许可直接关系公共安全、人身健康、生命财产安全事故的，则申请人___年内不得再次申请该行政许可.

企业拟建设一个危险化学品仓库。根据《职业病防治法》的规定，受理其职业病危害项目申报的部门是___。

依据《职业病防治法》的规定，国内首次进口与职业病危害有关的化学材料，进口单位应当向有关部门报送该化学材料的毒性鉴定以及登记注册或者批准进口的文件等资料。受理上述文件资料的有关部门是___。

依据《职业病防治法》的规定，下列关于职业病人保障的说法，正确的是___。

依据《职业病防治法》的规定，职业病诊断除了应当综合分析病人的临床表现、辅助检查结果外，还应当分析的因素包括___。

依据《劳动法》的规定，下列企业对女职工的工作安排，符合女职工特殊保护规定的是___

依据《劳动合同法》的规定，劳动者与用人单位签订劳动合同后，如果劳动者不能从事或者胜任工作，致使劳动合同无法履行的，用人单位额外支付劳动者最低___个月工资后，可以解除劳动合同。

依据《劳动合同法》的规定，对于从事接触职业病危害作业的劳动者，下列情形中，用人单位不得解除或终止劳动合同的是___

危险源辨识的范围是人的不安全行为和物的不安全状态。

风险与危险源之间既有联系又有本质区别。风险是危险源的载体，没有风险就没有危险源。

任何危险源都会伴随着风险。只是危险源不同，其伴随的风险大小往往不同。

排查风险点是风险管控的基础。对风险点内的不同危险源或危险有害因素进行识别、评价，并根据评价结果、风险判定标准认定风险等级。

风险度越大，说明该系统危险性大。

风险不可以避免，但是风险有大小。

隐患信息是指包括隐患名称、位置、状态描述、可能导致后果及其严重程度、治理目标、治理措施、职责划分、治理期限等信息的总称。

隐患的分级是根据隐患的整改、治理和排除的难度及其导致事故后果和影响范围为标准而进行的级别划分。

一件事件发生的可能性很大或者频率很高，我们就可以理解为这个事件的风险很大。

一件事件可能的后果造成多人伤亡，我们就可以理解为这个事件的风险就很大。

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___

大学生的成才目标是___。

现代人才素质的灵魂是___。

___是人才素质的基础.

世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。

在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可，统一存在的，其中处于主导地位的是___。

时代精神的内涵十分丰富，其中___居于核心地位。

民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。

下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。

___是人才素质的基本内容

10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想

衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___

独立生活意识指___

___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓，解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。

___是人才素质的综合体现.

人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___

人生观的核心是___

人的本质属性是___

社会主义社会人生价值标准是___

回答人为什么活着___

表明人应当怎样对待生活___

判别什么样的人生才有意义___

下列人生态度中正确的是___

下列属于正确的人生目的的是___

___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.