相关试题
【多选题】
职工有下列情形之一的,视同上伤而不是认定为工伤的___。
A. 在工作时间和工作场所内,因工作原因受到事故伤害
B. 工作时间前后在工作场所内,从事与工作有关的预备性或者收尾性工作受到事故伤害的
C. 在工作时间和工作岗位,突发疾病死亡或者在48小时之内经抢救无效死亡的
D. 在抢险救灾等维护国家利益、公共利益活动中受到伤害的
E. 职工原在存军队服役,因战、因公负伤致残,已取得革命伤残军人证,到用人单位后旧伤复发的
【多选题】
工伤职工有下列情形___,停止享受工伤保险待遇。
A. 丧失享受待遇条件的
B. 拒不接受劳动能力鉴定的
C. 拒绝治疗的
D. 被判刑正在收监执行的
E. 事故鉴定错误的
【多选题】
事故的分析处理要理守“四不放过原则”是___:
A. 事故原因没有查清不放过
B. 事故责任者没有严肃处理不放过
C. 生命和财产损失不公示不放过
D. 广大职工没有受到教育不放过
E. 防范措施没有落实不放过
【多选题】
在施上现场发生气体中毒事故的部位主要是___。
A. 人工挖孔桩挖掘孔井时,孔内常有一氧化碳、硫化氰等毒气溢出。特别是在旧河床,有腐殖土等地层挖孔,更容易散发出有毒气体,稍一疏忽会造成作业人员中毒
B. 在地下室、水池、化粪池等部位作业时,作业人员也要注意有害气体的伤害
C. 夏天中午暴晒时作业
D. 冬季施工中常在混凝土或砂浆里掺放添加剂。常用的是亚硝酸钠,它属于剧毒品
E. 施工队伍宿舍需要取暖时,常在宿舍内生煤火,或用焦炭作燃料取暖,容易产生一氧化碳
【多选题】
建筑施工企业主要负责人,是指对本企业日常生产经营活动和安全生产工作全面负责、有生产经营决策权的人员,包括___等。
A. 企业法定代表人
B. 经理
C. 企业分管安全生产工作的副经理
D. 安全员
E. 项目负责人
【多选题】
建筑施工企业专职安全生产管理人员,是指在企业专职从事安全生产管理工作的人员,包括___。
A. 企业法定代表人
B. 企业分管安全生产工作的副经理
C. 经理
D. 企业安全生产管理机构的负责人及其工作人员
E. 施工现场专职安全生产管理人员
【多选题】
施工单位应当在___ 、爆破物及有害危险气体和液体存放处等危险部位,设置明显的安全警示标志。
A. 施工围墙
B. 施工起重机械
C. 临时用电设设施
D. 脚手架
E. 基坑边沿
【多选题】
特种作业人员具备的条件___:
A. 年龄满18岁
B. 身体健康、无妨碍从事相应工种作业的疾病和生理缺陷
C. 初中以下文化程度,具备相应工种的安全技术知识
D. 符合相应工种作业特点需要的其他条件
E. 参加企业制定的安全技术理论和实际操作考核并成绩合格
【多选题】
施工单位进行施工时,发现___等,应当保护好现场并按规定及时报告有关部门。
A. 文物
B. 古化石
C. 爆炸物
D. 放射性污染源
E. 不规则物体
【多选题】
5l. 安全检查根据检查内容和检查形式可分为 ___。
A. 日常安全检查
B. 定期安全检查
C. 专业性安全检查
D. 季节性及节假日前后安全检查
E. 个人检查和集体复查
【多选题】
高大模板工程是指___。
A. 水平混凝土构件模板支撑系统高度超过8m,或跨度超过18m的模板支撑系统
B. 施工总荷载大于10kN/㎡的模板支撑系统
C. 集中线荷载大于15kN/㎡的模板支撑系统
D. 梁截面尺寸300×500mm的模板支撑系统
E. 梁截面尺寸600×1200mm的模板支撑系统
【多选题】
深基坑工程是指:___。
A. 开挖深度超过5m(含5m)的基坑工程
B. 地下室三层以上(含三层)的基坑工程
C. 深度虽未超过5m(含5m),但地质条件和周围环境及地下管线极其复杂的工程
D. 地下水位较高的基坑工程
E. 两层地下室的工程
【多选题】
建筑材料、设备器材、现场制品、半成品、成品、构配件等严格按照按现场平面布置图指定位置堆放并挂上标牌,注明___。
A. 尺寸
B. 名称
C. 品种
D. 规格
E. 颜色
【多选题】
___等每25㎡配备一只种类合适的灭火机,油库危险品仓库应配备足够数量、种类合适的灭火机。
A. 临时木工间
B. 油漆间
C. 木、机具间
D. 钢筋加工间
E. 设备间
【多选题】
施工单位应当在施工现场建立消防安全责任制度,确定消防安全责任人,制定动火、用电、使用易燃易爆材料等各项消防安全管理制度和操作规程,___。
A. 设置消防通道
B. 设置消防水源
C. 每周进行一次防火演练
D. 在施工现场入口处设置明显标志
E. 配备消防设施和灭火器材
【多选题】
施工现场坑、井、沟和___周围,夜间要设红灯示警。
A. 混凝土搅拌站
B. 孔洞
C. 易燃易爆场所
D. 变压器
E. 钢筋切断机
【多选题】
施工现场的围挡要做到___
A. 稳定
B. 整洁
C. 美观
D. 坚固
E. 透空绿化
【多选题】
建设工程施工现场场容场貌方面主要包括___。
A. 道路通畅
B. 排水沟、排水设施通畅
C. 工地地面硬化处理
D. 绿化
E. 材料堆放
【多选题】
《建筑施工安全检查标准》JGJ59—99标准文明施工检查表规定料堆应挂标牌标明材料的___。
A. 名称
B. 品种
C. 大小
D. 规格
E. 产地
【多选题】
《建筑施工安全检查标准》JGJ59—99标准文明施工检查表规定现场设置___等宣传教育场所。
A. 宣传栏
B. 读报栏
C. 黑板报
D. 游戏栏
E. 企业自编的报纸
【多选题】
项目的主要工种应有相应的安全技术操作规程,一般包括___工种:
A. 砌筑、拌灰、混凝土
B. 钢筋、机械、电气焊、起重司索
C. 信号指挥、塔司、架子
D. 木作、水暖、油漆
E. 特种作业应另行补充
【多选题】
下列属于建筑企业负责人的安全教育培训内容的是:___
A. 国家有关安全生产方针、政策、法律和法规及有关行业的规章、规范和标准
B. 典型事故案例分析
C. 重、特大事故防范、应急救援措施及调查处理方法,重大危险源管理与应急救援预案编制原则
D. 建筑施工企业安全生产管理的基本知识、方法与安全生产技术,有关行业安全生产管理专业知识
E. 企业安全生产责任制和安全生产规章制度的内容、制定和方法;国内外先进的安全生产管理经验
【多选题】
建筑施工企业应当加强对本企业和承建工程安全生产条件的日常动态检查,发现不符合法定安全生产条件的,应当:___
A. 立即进行整改
B. 做好自查和整改记录
C. 停止施工
D. 向监理单位报告
E. 在项目竣工后系统整改
【多选题】
出租单位出租的建筑起重机械和使用单位购置、租赁、使用的建筑起重机械应当具有:___
A. 特种设备制造许可证
B. 产品合格证
C. 制造监督检验证明
D. 监理单位证明
E. 使用记录
【多选题】
建筑起重机械有下列哪些情形之一的,出租单位或者自购建筑起重机械的使用单位应当予以报废,并同原备案机关办理注销手续。___
A. 属国家明令淘汰或者禁止使用的
B. 超过安全技术标准或者制造厂家规定的使用年限的
C. 经检验达不到安全技术标准规定的
D. 没有完整安全技术档案的
E. 没有齐全有效的安全保护装置的
【多选题】
建筑起重机械安装、拆卸工程档案应当包括以下资料:___
A. 安装、拆卸合同及安全协议书
B. 安装、拆卸工程生产安全事故应急救援预案
C. 安全施工技术交底的有关资料
D. 安装工程验收资料
E. 安装、拆卸工程专项施工方案
【单选题】
土石根据其坚硬程度和开挖方法及使用工具可分为___类。
【单选题】
野外鉴别人工填土,它的颜色为___。
A. 固定的红色
B. 无固定颜色
C. 有固定颜色
D. 都是黄色
【单选题】
在斜坡上挖土方,应做成坡势,以利___。
【单选题】
在滑坡地段挖土方时、不宜在___季节施工。
【单选题】
湿土地区开挖时,若为人工降水,降至坑底___时方可开挖。
A. 0.2m以下
B. 0.5m以下
C. 0.2m以上
D. 0.5~1.0m
【单选题】
在膨胀土地区开挖时,开挖前要做好___。
A. 堆土方案
B. 回填土准备工作
C. 排水工作
D. 边坡加固工作
【单选题】
采用钢筋混凝土灌注桩时,开挖标准是桩身混凝土达到___。
A. 设计强度后
B. 混凝土灌注
C. 混凝上灌注24h
D. 混凝土凝固后
【单选题】
人工开挖土方时,两个人的操作间距应保持___。
A. 1m
B. 1~2m
C. 2~3m
D. 3.5~4m
【单选题】
在临边堆放弃土、材料和移动施工机械应与坑边保持一定距离,当土质良好时,要距坑边___。
A. 0.5m以外/高度不超0.5m
B. 0.8m以外/高度不超1.5m
C. 1m以外/高度不超1m
D. 按施工方案规定堆放
【单选题】
对于___的基坑(槽)开挖时严禁采用天然冻结施工。
A. 黏土
B. 软土
C. 老黄土
D. 干燥的砂土
【单选题】
对于高度在5m以内的挡土墙一般多采用___。
A. 重力式挡土墙
B. 钢筋混凝土挡土墙
C. 锚杆挡土墙
D. 锚定板挡上墙
【单选题】
基坑(槽)四周排水沟及集水井应设置在___。
A. 基础范围以外
B. 堆放土以外
C. 围墙以外
D. 基础范围以内
【单选题】
明排水法由于设备简单和排水方便,所以较为普遍采用,但它只宜用于___。
A. 松软土层
B. 黏土层
C. 细砂层
D. 粗粒土层
【单选题】
轻型井点一般用于土壤渗透系数K=___的土壤。·
A. <10-6(cm/s)
B. 10-5(cm/s)
C. 10-2~10-5(cm/s)
D. 10-1(cm/s)
推荐试题
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用