作业过程中需进行工艺隔离，由___操作做好相关工艺隔离；若不能有效隔 离，各项补充安措落实后，须由运行人员全程现场监护。

___应按公司QHSE管理要求，对所属站场的重点作业进行监督检查，并做好安全监督检查记录。

只有在现场可燃气体浓度低于爆炸下限的___时方可启动车辆 和使用通讯、照相器材。

动火作业现场应按动火方案规定的___配备消防器材。

动火作业坑除满足施工作业要求外, 应分别有上、下通道，通道坡度宜小于___度。

如遇有___以上大风不宜进行动火作业，特殊情况需动火时，应采取围隔措施。

___应采取防止火花溅落措施，并应在火花可能溅落的部位安排监护人。

使用便携式可燃气体报警仪或其他类似手段进行分析时，可燃气体浓度应低于其与空气混合爆炸下限值的___(LEL)

对于采用___或其它惰性气体对可燃气体进行置换后的密闭空间内作业前应进行含氧量检测。

凡盛有或盛过化学危险品的___等生产、储存装置，必须在动火作业前进行清洗 置换，经分析合格后方可动火作业

使用气焊焊割动火作业时，氧气瓶与乙炔气瓶间距应不小于___m。

使用气焊焊割动火作业时，氧气瓶、乙炔气瓶二者与动火作业地点的水平距离均不应小于 ___m，并不准在烈日下爆晒。

高度在___以上的高处作业还应编制专项施工方案，方案中应有专门的风险控制措施。

施工现场临时用电设备在___台及以上或设备总容量在 50kW 及以上还应编制专项施工方案，方案中应有专门的风险控制措施。

采用非常规起重设备、方法，且单件起吊重量在___及以上的起重吊装工程还应编制专项施工方案，方案中应有专门的风险控制措施。

开挖深度超过___米（包含本数）或虽未超过（A ）米但地质条件和周边环境复杂的基坑（槽）支护、降水工程还应编制专项施工方案，方案中应有专门的风险控制措施。

在空气不流通的狭小地方使用二氧化碳灭火器可能造成的危险是___。

经医师鉴定，无妨碍工作的病症，并应至少每___进行一次体检，特殊岗位，按国家相应规定执行。

管道企业应___进行一次本规程的考试。

中断工作连续___以上者，必须重新学习本规程，并经考试合格后，方可恢复工作。

凡停供气、回路切换等涉及调度部门管辖范围的设备设施上的工作均应向___申请并得到批准。

___：可能直接造成输气管道输气中断或全线通讯数据中断或对人身安全、设备安全有严重威胁的工作。

输气管道设备设施上的一、二类工作必须提前___由工作部门向调度部门书面申请。

三类工作由工作部门提前向___书面申请。

应急类工作由工作部门向___电话申请。

输气管道设备设施上工作至少应有___人一起工作

所有工作开始前，___应向工作班全体成员进行安全交底。

一类、二类工作和应急类工作开始和结束后，相关站场工作许可人均应向___及时报告。

工作票各栏目应如实填写，某项栏目如无内容应填写“___”字。

《二级工作票》由___签发。

签发后的工作票需增加工作项目或变更安全措施的，应向___报告并经同意后，重新填写新的工作票。

在全部工作完成后方可向___办理工作终结手续。

《一级工作票》由 ___签发

___负责适用《临时/应急抢修单》工作申请的审批。

工作任务不能按批准期限完成时，工作负责人应在计划结束时间___前向工作许可人提出申请，由工作许可人向调度门办理延期手续，在没有批准以前，不得擅自延长工作时间。

一张工作票工作负责人允许变更___次。

工作涉及设备异动的，工作负责人应在工作票完成情况栏中说明，并与___双方签字确认。

对验收存在遗留问题但不影响复役的，___应在工作票中作出说明。

外检测作业应至少安排___人进行检测作业。

一级动火作业许可证有效期一般不得超过___小时。

时间___

“机不可失，时不再来”指的是___

是 ___

在客观规律面前，人的主观能动性表现在___

事物的联系和运动之间的关系___

唯物辩证法的总特征是___

___

“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___

唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___

区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___

质量互变规律揭示了___

质和事物的存在是___

在实际工作中，要注意掌握分寸，防止“过”或“不及”，其关键在于___

区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___

量变的复杂性是指___

量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___

量变中的局部性部分质变是___

揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___

“肯定和否定相互渗透，在一定意义上，肯定就是否定。”这是一种___

事物的否定方面是指___

作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___

辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___

否定之否定规律___

事物发展的周期性体现了___

直线论的错误在于只看到___

循环论的错误在于___

对立统一规律揭示了___

唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___