加快建设国家自主创新示范区，在创新创业方面打破禁区，在全国全面推进创新改革试验，并向全国推广。

人民当家作主是社会主义民主政治的本质和核心。

市场经济是中国特色社会主义的经济运行基础。

民主政治是中国特色社会主义的重要保障。

一个民族，一个国家都有它自己的文化。我们中华民族有优秀的文化，应当继承发扬，同时要创新先进的文化，并吸收国外优秀的文化。

实现共同富裕，要解决资本主义制度下生产的社会化和私人占有的矛盾。我们要实行生产社会化和劳动者共同占有生产资料相结合。

以人民为本位，一切权力属于人民，是中国特色社会主义的出发点和落脚点。

和谐社会的建设包括两个层面的内容:一是人与自然的和谐，一是人和人之间的和谐。

当代中国共产党人和中国人民应该而且一定能够担负起新的文化使命，在实践创造中进行文化创造，在历史进步中实现文化进步。

繁荣发展社会主义文艺，要发扬学术民主、艺术民主，提升文艺原创力，推动文艺创新。

繁荣发展社会主义文艺，加强文艺队伍建设，造就一大批德艺双馨名家大师，培育一大批高水平创作人才。

增进民生福祉、促进人的全面发展，朝着共同富裕方向稳步前进，是经济发展的出发点和落脚点，是发展的根本目的。

可持续发展、科学发展观、生态文明建设、循环经济等都与绿色发展的观念和原则相一致。

中国梦是和平、发展、合作、共赢的梦，与世界各国人民的美好梦想息息相通。

中国梦指明了全党全国各族人民共同奋斗的目标。

中国梦为坚持和发展中国特色社会主义注入崭新内涵。

中国梦最大的特点,就是把国家民族个人作为一个命运共同体。

实现中国梦，意味着中国将成为世界第一超级大国。

只有中国特色社会道路，才能发展中国、稳定中国。

中国越发展,对世界和平与发展就越有利。

实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦是各民族共同的梦，也是各民族自己的梦。

1997年党的十五大正式宣布，人民生活总体达到了小康。

2002年党的十六大提出了全面建设小康社会的奋斗目标。

党的19大报告提出，全面建设社会现代化强国的进程分三个阶段来安排。

从全面建成小康社会，到基本实现现代化，再到全面建成社会主义现代化强国，是新时代，中国特色社会主义发展的战略安排。

从2035年到本世纪中叶, 建成社会主义现代化强国时，我国的核心竞争力名列世界前茅，经济总量和市场规模超越其他国家。

距离实现中华民族伟大复兴的目标越来越近，我们的梦想将一夜成真。

中国梦是人民的梦，也是世界的梦。

实现祖国的完全统一是近代以来中华民族最伟大的梦想。

实现中华民族伟大复兴是海内外中华儿女的共同梦想。

改革开放之后，在解决人民温饱问题、人民生活总体上达到小康水平这两个目标提前实现的基础上，我们党又提出“两个一百年”奋斗目标。

从十九大到二十大，是“两个一百年”奋斗目标的历史交汇期。

中华民族伟大复兴，绝不是轻轻松松、敲锣打鼓就能实现的。

受各种因素的影响，党的领导被忽视、淡化、削弱的状况还未得到明显改变。

我国人口面临严重的老龄化问题，养老金和农村低保标准增幅难以超越GDP增速。

中国特色社会主义法治体系日益完善，加快建设法治政府进入新阶段，但全社会法制观念还很差。

中国文化走出去步伐加快，中国故事吸引世界目光。

2014年10月底，全军政治工作会议在遵义召开，习近平同志带领中央军委全体成员和会议代表，一起重温了我党我军光荣历史和优良传统。

我国目前人均国民生产总值，相当于世界平均水平的80%左右，按国家和独立经济体排位，大致处在世界底层。

中国特色社会主义进入新时代，为解决人类问题贡献了中国智慧和中国方案。

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___

大学生的成才目标是___。

现代人才素质的灵魂是___。

___是人才素质的基础.

世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。

在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可，统一存在的，其中处于主导地位的是___。

时代精神的内涵十分丰富，其中___居于核心地位。

民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。

下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。

___是人才素质的基本内容

10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想

衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___

独立生活意识指___

___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓，解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。

___是人才素质的综合体现.

人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___

人生观的核心是___

人的本质属性是___

社会主义社会人生价值标准是___

回答人为什么活着___

表明人应当怎样对待生活___

判别什么样的人生才有意义___

下列人生态度中正确的是___

下列属于正确的人生目的的是___

___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.

___ 认为，社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。

___认为，人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。

马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___

人与自然关系的实质是___

在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___

社会公德最基本的要求是___

通过其规定和实施，影响人们思想，培养和提高人们法律意识，引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___

有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___

一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯，看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___

任何一个社会成员，无论具有何种身份、职业和地位，都必须在公共生活中遵守社会公德。这体现了社会公德具有的___特点。

影响公共生活、公共秩序、文明礼貌、清洁卫生以及其他影响社会生活的最主要行为规范是___

《公民道德建设实施纲要》明确指出，社会公德涵盖了___

为调整和规范人类社会生活三大领域，相应分别形成了___

公共生活中的道德和___所追求的目标是一致的，都是通过规范人们的行为来维护公共生活中的秩序，实现社会稳定和经济发展。