刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
紧急逆变器为下列哪些负载供电___。
A. 空调通风机
B. 牵引逆变器风扇
C. 制动电阻风扇
D. 空调冷凝风机
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
A
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
在长沙地铁2号线列车中用于列车在紧急牵引超速保护的继电器为___。
A. =22-K145
B. =22-K108
C. =22-K126
D. =22-K125
【单选题】
长沙地铁2号线车辆主牵引系统的控制方式采用了当今世界先进的微机控制的___技术。
A. 直流调频调压
B. 交流调频调压
C. 交流调幅调压
D. 直流调幅调压
【多选题】
可压溃管的行程包括___。
A. 100mm
B. 200mm
C. 300mm
D. 400mm
【多选题】
下面哪些属于车钩锁的操作位置。___
A. 解钩
B. 连挂
C. 准备连挂
D. 准备解钩
【多选题】
空调制冷设备主要由___等部件组成。
A. 压缩机
B. 冷凝器
C. 蒸发器
D. 节流装置
【多选题】
空调手动温度设置___等档位。
A. 自动
B. 24℃
C. 26℃
D. 28℃
【多选题】
紧急制动的制动缓解施加方式,下列说法正确的是___
A. 失电制动
B. 失电缓解
C. 得电缓解
D. 得电制动
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线踏面制动单元主要由___等部件组成。
A. 制动缸
B. 活塞
C. 间隙调整装置
D. 闸瓦托及托吊
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线采用的风源系统由___主要部件构成。
A. 整体吊架
B. 空气压缩机
C. 空气净化处理装置
D. 电控单元
【多选题】
长沙轨道交通1号线制动控制模块集成了电子制动控制单元、电子中继阀、变载荷阀、___等设备。
A. 风缸
B. 停放脉冲阀
C. 压力开关
D. 压力传感器
【多选题】
下列属于空气悬挂系统的功能的是___。
A. 吸收冲击和振动
B. 控制车体高度水平
C. 提供一个载重信号
D. 传递纵向牵引力和制动力
【多选题】
察看司机室双针压力表,可以了解___。
A. 动车单元制动缸的压力
B. 拖车单元制动缸的压力
C. 拖车主风管压力
D. 拖车停放制动缸的压力
【多选题】
下列部件中___为供风和制动系统的组成部分。
A. 踏面制动单元
B. 受电弓执行机构
C. 受电弓
D. EBCU
【多选题】
在长沙地铁1号线一期车辆中关于主风缸压力控制功能的说法正确的为___。
A. 空压机主风管压力降到7BAR后将启动两台空压机
B. 空压机主风管压力降到7.5BAR后将启动当日工作为主的空压机
C. 空压机主风管压力降到6BAR后将启动激活单元车组的空压机
D. 空压机主风管压力升到9BAR后将自动停止空压机打风
E. 空压机主风管压力升到10BAR后将自动停止空压机打风
【多选题】
车辆乘客信息系统主要包括___三部分。
A. 广播对讲系统
B. 多媒体播放系统
C. 视频监控系统
D. 自动报站系统
【多选题】
车辆乘客信息系统主要包括___三部分。
A. 广播对讲系统
B. 多媒体播放系统
C. 视频监控系统
D. 自动报站系统
【多选题】
每个摄像头的监看画面都叠加有___信息。
A. 时间
B. 位置
C. 文件大小
D. 视频类型
【多选题】
PIS系统中,RS485故障可能影响___功能。
A. 乘客报警
B. PDU显示
C. 紧急报站
D. IDU显示
【多选题】
司机室扬声器可监听包括___的内容,
A. OCC广播
B. 人工广播
C. 报站广播
D. 紧急广播
【多选题】
在长沙地铁1号线车辆在运行中可自动施加的制动类型为___。
A. 停放制动
B. 紧急制动
C. 快速制动
D. 保持制动指令
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线风源系统中空气滤清器主要由___组成。
A. 空滤芯
B. 前盖
C. 后盖
D. 外壳
【多选题】
贯通道主要由下面哪些部分组成。___
A. 车体框
B. 折棚
C. 顶护板
D. 侧护板
E. 踏板
【多选题】
车辆车门开启的先前条件有___
A. 车门开启允许信号
B. 零速信号
C. 开门信号
D. 牵引信号
【多选题】
每个门控器都配有下列部件___
A. 逻辑模块
B. 电源模块
C. 电控模块
D. 数据模块
【多选题】
可供选择的开关门模式有___
A. 自动
B. 半自动
C. 手动
D. 半联动
【多选题】
车门橙色指示灯什么情况下保持常亮。___
A. “车门处于打开位置
B. 开门过程中
C. 车门处于紧急操作状态下
D. 门关好
【多选题】
车门橙色指示灯什么情况下保持常亮。___
A. 车门处于打开位置
B. 开门过程中
C. 车门处于紧急操作状态下
D. 门关好
【多选题】
网络硬线切换定义正确的是:___
A. 硬线:此时EDCU 响应列车硬连线发出的车门开关指令
B. 网络:此时EDCU 响应列车MVB 网络发出的车门开关指开门过程中
C. 硬线:此时EDCU 响应列车MVB 网络发出的车门开关指开门过程中
D. 网络:此时EDCU 响应列车硬连线发出的车门开关指令
【多选题】
每个门控器都配有下列部件___
A. 逻辑模块
B. 电源模块
C. 电控模块
D. 数据模块
【多选题】
车门关闭过程中,可通过下列方式探测到障碍物:___
A. 力矩监控
B. 位移/时间监控
C. 电机电流监控
D. 电机电压监控
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线车辆的转向架驱动装置主要功能是:产生( )、();将驱动力矩、电制动力矩传递到( )上。 ___
A. 驱动力矩
B. 电制动力矩
C. 轮对
D. 受电弓
【多选题】
下面哪些属于一系悬挂装置。___
A. 螺旋钢弹簧
B. 抗侧滚扭杆
C. 一系垂向止挡
D. 一系垂向减振器
【多选题】
牵引梁用于安装车辆的车钩缓冲器,用来传递___。
A. 车体重力
B. 车辆间的牵引力
C. 车体横向冲击力
D. 车辆间的制动力
【多选题】
车体底架的主要作用是承受 ___。
A. 车体上部载荷
B. 因各种原因而引起的横向力
C. 走行部传递来的各种振动和冲击
D. 传递列车的牵引力
E. 传递列车的制动力。
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线车辆的转向架承载方式是()和()。 ___
A. 中心牵引装置
B. 空气弹簧
C. 钢板
D. 油缸
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线车辆的转向架侧梁上有___。
A. 垂向减振器安装座
B. 抗侧滚扭杆安装座
C. 金属螺旋弹簧座
D. 横向减振器安装座
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线车辆轮对主要功能有___。
A. 车辆与轨道的接触部分,引导车辆安全地沿轨道运行
B. 承载车辆重量
C. 排除轨道上的障碍
D. 将牵引力和制动力传递到轨道
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线车辆的转向架轴箱组装由( )、( )、轴承压盖、( )外端盖及电气部件组成。___
A. 轴箱体
B. 轴承
C. 轴圈
D. 油缸
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线车辆的转向架构架型式由( )、()焊接而成H型构架和。___
A. 两根侧梁
B. 三根侧梁
C. 四根侧梁
D. 中间横梁
【多选题】
长沙地铁1号线车辆的转向架轴箱主要功能是:传递( )和();将轮对的旋转运动转换为车辆的直线运动;支撑( )上载荷。 ___
A. 牵引力
B. 制动力
C. 二系簧
D. 一系簧
推荐试题
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用