刷题
导入试题
【多选题】
调节系统最重要的品质指标是___。
A. 稳定性;
B. 准确性;
C. 快速性;
D. 可靠性。
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
A
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
下列能引起电磁流量计输出晃动的是___。
A. 流量本身不稳定;
B. 放大器有故障;
C. 管道内有气泡或介质系数不稳定;
D. 外界有强磁场干扰。
【多选题】
集散控制系统的生产管理级,是整个___的协调者和控制者。
A. 工艺系统;
B. 调节系统;
C. 控制系统;
D. 数据处理系统。
【多选题】
下列___部分属于可编程控制器。
A. 中央处理器;
B. 通信接口;
C. 编程器;
D. 编码器。
【多选题】
涡街流量计的频率和流体的___成正比。
A. 压力;
B. 密度;
C. 流速;
D. 温度。
【多选题】
质量流量计的主要特点之一是可直接测量___,与被测介质的温度、压力、粘度、密度变化无关。
A. 体积流量;
B. 质量流量;
C. 批量流量;
D. 累积流量。
【多选题】
非线性误差是指检验曲线与相应直线之间的___。
A. 最小偏差;
B. 最大偏差;
C. 平均偏差;
D. 百分偏差。
【多选题】
零漂是指仪表在参比工作条件下,输入一个恒定的值(零或测量范围的下限值)时的___。
A. 重复性;
B. 再现性;
C. 输出变化;
D. 可变性。
【多选题】
以下叙述中错误的是___。
A. 回差包括滞环和死区,并按输出量程的百分数表示;
B. 仪表的灵敏度越大,则仪表越灵敏;
C. 仪表的灵敏限数值越小则仪表越灵敏;
D. 仪表的重复性误差和再现性误差是同一概念。
【多选题】
有一个变化范围为150--450℃的温度,则用以下哪个温度仪表测量准确度最高___。
A. 1级0--600℃;
B. 0.5级200--450℃
C. 0.5级0--600℃;
D. 1级200--450℃。
【多选题】
在测量某些变化较快的温度时,采用无保护套管的热电偶,目的在于减小仪表的___。
A. 系统误差;
B. 滞后时间;
C. 时间常数;
D. 阻尼时间。
【多选题】
在节流装置的流量测量中进行温度、压力等修正是修正___。
A. 疏忽误差;
B. 系统误差;
C. 偶然误差;
D. 附加误差。
【多选题】
一般压力变送器只有当被测压力高于___时,仪表才有输出。
A. 大气压;
B. 绝对零压;
C. 真空度;
D. 表压。
【多选题】
压力由受力的面积和___的大小决定。
A. 垂直作用力;
B. 水平作用力;
C. 垂直与水平的合力;
D. 截面积。
【多选题】
当压力表测量高于___℃的热介质时,一般在压力表可加冷凝弯。
A. 40℃;
B. 60℃;
C. 50℃;
D. 30℃。
【多选题】
在校验1151。A、P绝对压力变送器时,若仪表的测量范围位50--150KPA、当时的大气压为100KPA、则在通上电源时,仪表的输出为___。
A. 4mA;
B. 8mA;
C. 12mA;
D. 10mA、
【多选题】
测量液位用的差压计,其差压量程___。
A. 由介质密度决定与封液密度无关;
B. 由封液密度决定与介质密度无关;
C. 两者都有关;D、两者都无关。
【多选题】
用单法兰液面计测量开口容器液位,液面计已校好,后因维护需要,仪表位置下移了一段距离,则仪表指示___。
A. 上升;
B. 下降;
C. 不变;
D. 无关。
【多选题】
用双法兰液面计测量容器内的液位,液位计的零点和量程均已校对好,后因维护需要,仪表的安装位置上移一段距离,则液位计___。
A. 零点上升,量程不变;
B. 零点下降,量程不变;
C. 零点不变,量程增大;
D. 零点和量程都不变。
【多选题】
用差压变送器测量液位,仪表在使用过程中上移一段距离,量程大小___。
A. 增大;
B. 减小;
C. 不变;
D. 无关。
【多选题】
熔丝是___在电路中的。
A. 串联;
B. 并联。
【多选题】
用数字万用表测电阻时,___在通电回路中进行在线测量。
A. 允许;
B. 不允许。
【多选题】
气动调节阀的___称为阀体。
A. 阀杆、阀芯和阀座;
B. 阀杆和阀芯;
C. 阀杆和阀座。
【多选题】
仪表的精度级别指的是仪表的:___。
A. 误差;
B. 基本误差;
C. 最大误差;
D. 基本误差的最大值。
【多选题】
在管道上安装孔板时,如果将方向装反了会造成:___。
A. 差压计倒指示;
B. 差压计变小;
C. 差压计指示变大;
D. 对差压计指示无影响。
【多选题】
氧化锆分析器在以下两种温度下才能正常工作:___
A. 600℃以下;
B. 600-850℃;
C. 850℃以下。
【多选题】
手持通讯器的两根通讯电缆不分正负的是___。
A. HART;
B. SFC;
C. FLUKE;
D. BT200
【多选题】
标定分析仪表零位用的气体多为高纯度的___
A. 氢气;
B. 氮气;
C. 氧气;
D. 一氧化碳气体。
【多选题】
流量是指___。
A. 单位时间内流过管道某一截面的流体数量;
B. 单位时间内流过某一段管道的流体数量;
C. 一段时间内流过管道某一截面的流体数量;
D. 一段时间内流过某一段管道的流体数量。
【多选题】
热电偶的热电特性是由___所决定的。
A. 热电偶的材料;
B. 热电偶的粗细;
C. 热电偶长短;
D. 热电极材料的化学成分和物理性能。
【多选题】
评价一个过渡过程的好坏主要从___指标来考虑。
A. 稳定性;
B. 准确性;
C. 快速性;
D. 稳定性、准确性、快速性。
【多选题】
气动调节阀当信号增加,阀杆向上移动,阀芯与阀座之间的流通面积减小的是___。
A. 正作用风关阀;
B. 正作用风开阀;
C. 反作用风关阀;
D. 反作用风开阀。
【多选题】
常规控制仪表的选择时一般应考虑___因素。
A. 市场要求;
B. 价格因素;
C. 管理的需要;
D. 工艺的要求。
【多选题】
___在阀芯行程比较小时,流量就比较大,随着行程的增加,流量很快地达到最大。
A. 快开流量特性;
B. 线性流量特性;
C. 抛物线流量特性;
D. 等百分比流量特性。
【多选题】
由于微分调节规律有超前作用,因此调节器加入微分作用主要是用来___。
A. 克服调节对象的惯性滞后(时间常数T)、容量滞后τC和纯滞后τ0;
B. 克服调节对象的纯滞后;
C. 克服调节对象的惯性滞后(时间常数T)、容量滞后τC;
D. 克服调节对象的容量滞后τC。
【多选题】
某控制系统采用比例积分作用调节器。某人用先比例后加积分的凑试法来整定调节器的参数。若比例带的数值已基本合适,再加入积分作用的过程中,则___。
A. 应适当减少比例带;
B. 适当增加比例带;
C. 无需改变比例带;
D. 与比例带无关。
【多选题】
同轴电缆与双绞线相比优点为___。
A. 成本低;
B. 短距离时传输速度快;
C. 支持的节点数多;
D. 购买容易。
【多选题】
开关量的输出一般不用于控制___。
A. 报警器;
B. 调节阀;
C. 指示灯;
D. 继电器。
【多选题】
集散控制系统具有___控制功能。
A. 连续量;
B. 干扰量;
C. 离散量;
D. 批量E.信息量。
【多选题】
对于不可压缩气体,在稳态流动时,如果体积流量一定,流速与管径的平方成___。
A. 应变片;
B. 压电片;
C. 弹性元件;
D. 单晶硅片。
【多选题】
压阻式压力传感器是利用单晶硅的压阻效应而构成,采用___为弹性元件。
A. 应变片;
B. 压电片;
C. 弹性元件;
D. 单晶硅片。
推荐试题
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举
【单选题】
任何一个社会成员,无论具有何种身份、职业和地位,都必须在公共生活中遵守社会公德。这体现了社会公德具有的___特点。
A. 继承性
B. 基础性
C. 广泛性
D. 简明性
【单选题】
影响公共生活、公共秩序、文明礼貌、清洁卫生以及其他影响社会生活的最主要行为规范是___
A. 社会公德
B. 家庭道德
C. 职业道德
D. 个人道德
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用