按照《中国银监会关于规范信贷资产转让及信贷资产类理财业务有关事项的通知》规定，信贷资产类理财产品应符合整体性原则，投资的信贷资产应包括全部未偿还本金及应收利息，不得有下列＿＿＿等情形。___

按照《中国银监会关于规范信贷资产转让及信贷资产类理财业务有关事项的通知》规定，＿＿＿信贷资产类理财产品的期限应与该信贷资产的剩余期限一致。___

大华银行与某信托公司进行银信合作业务，合作产品投资于权益类金融产品，收益率为8.5%，吸引了众多客户，依据《中国银监会关于规范信贷资产转让及信贷资产类理财业务有关事项的通知》规定，以及下述财产信息，下列第 投资者可以购买上述合作产品。___

按照《中国银监会关于加强银行卡安全管理有关问题的通知》规定，各商业银行在建立健全银行卡风险管理制度的基本上，必须建立银行卡违法犯罪案件的相关制度有＿＿＿___

按照《中国银监会关于加强银行卡安全管理有关问题的通知》规定，下列说法正确的是＿＿＿。___

按照《银监会关于加强银行卡安全管理有关问题的通知》规定，为加强对银行卡持卡人账户信息的保护，各商业银行应当对ATM进行改造，改造要求包括：＿＿＿。 ___

按照《中国银监会关于加强银行卡安全管理有关问题的通知》规定，各商业银行应注重对银行卡持卡人有效身份的确认，对于持卡人在进行电子银行交易时，可以采取＿＿＿等方法增强交易的安全性。___

按照《中国银监会关于加强银行卡安全管理有关问题的通知》规定，各商业银行应加强对持卡人安全用卡的知识宣传，可以通过＿＿＿等渠道进行安全用卡的宣传。___

按照《中国银监会关于加强银行卡安全管理有关问题的通知》规定，对于银行卡交易数据的安全管理，下列说法正确的是＿＿＿。___

某银行解放路支行工作人员在受理银行卡业务过程中发现孙某伪造学生档案信息，利用他人名义办理银行卡，骗取国家助学金。该行立即将情况报告给了公安机关，公安机关立即将孙某控制同时抓获其他同案犯罪嫌疑人两人，经审讯发现孙某伙同他人以开办学校为名并伪造学生档案、户籍等方式从该支行骗取国家助学金30余万元。依据《中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强银行卡安全管理有关问题的通知》规定，以下说法是正确的是_________

最近A市银行卡犯罪案件频发，为了加强对银行卡的风险管理、创造安全的用卡环境，A市某大型商业银行牵头研发了本市范围内的不良持卡人风险预警系统，并邀请市内各商业银行及分支机构将本行不良客户的有关信息在该系统共享。B是某商业银行A市分行，收到该通知后不置可否。依据《中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强银行卡安全管理有关问题的通知》规定，下列说法正确的是_________

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于加强银行卡发卡业务风险管理的通知》规定，对于高风险持卡人，可采取下列＿＿＿等措施，以有效控制银行卡业务风险水平。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于加强银行卡发卡业务风险管理的通知》规定，商业银行开展银行卡业务，面临的主要风险有＿＿＿。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于加强银行卡发卡业务风险管理的通知》规定，各商业银行应遵循＿＿＿等原则，注重对银行卡持卡人有效身份的确认。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于加强银行卡发卡业务风险管理的通知》规定，银行卡业务人员对客户进行资信调查，应从＿＿＿等方面进行。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于加强银行卡发卡业务风险管理的通知》规定，下列关于银行卡发卡业务合规性管理的说法，正确的是＿＿＿。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于加强银行卡发卡业务风险管理的通知》规定，下列选项中，＿＿＿属于银行卡业务风险指标。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于加强银行卡发卡业务风险管理的通知》规定，出现下列＿＿＿等情形的持卡人，属于高风险持卡人。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于加强银行卡发卡业务风险管理的通知》规定，银行机构应采取下列＿＿＿等方式，密切监测和防范银行卡欺诈交易。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，银行卡发卡机构要严格执行反洗钱规定，履行大额、可疑交易报告义务，加强对银行卡资金交易的监测，同一持卡人存在下列＿＿＿等异常情形的，要及时进行反洗钱报送。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，银行要严把特约商户准入关，落实特约商户实名制。收单机构发展特约商户要建立严格的＿＿＿和＿＿＿制度。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，银行要严把特约商户准入关，充分利用＿＿＿等核查方式，核实商户法定代表人或负责人、授权经办人的个人身份，了解商户的经营背景、营业场所、经营范围、财务状况、资信等，必要时，要向公安部门、工商行政管理部门、商户开户行或其他单位进一步核实。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，银行发展特约商户过程中，特别要关注＿＿＿等低扣率、零扣率商户的审查。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，发现有关商户涉嫌违规受理银行卡的行为时，收单机构要及时调查核实，并予以纠正。对有疑似＿＿＿行为的，收单机构可暂停其银行卡交易。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，严禁收单机构为了自身短期利益而出现＿＿＿等非理性竞争行为。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，收单机构发展特约商户要建立严格的实名审核和现场调查制度，充分利用联网核查身份信息系统、人民银行征信系统、中国银联银行卡风险信息共享系统等核查方式，核实商户法定代表人或负责人、授权经办人的个人身份，了解商户的＿＿＿。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，建立对特约商户的定期现场检查制度，对于新签约商户、出售易变现金商品(如珠宝、电脑等)商户，以及发生过可疑交易、涉嫌欺诈交易或涉嫌协助持卡人套现等有不良记录的高风险商户，要提高现场检查频率，严格对＿＿＿等高风险业务的交易授权管理。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，中国银联要加强对其分公司和子公司的规范管理，严格执行银行卡相关业务规范和技术标准，将＿＿＿等业务分离，对因收单和外包服务业务管理不善造成案件和损失的，须承担赔偿责任。___

按照《关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，＿＿＿等部门要深刻认识加强银行卡安全管理、防范和打击银行卡违法犯罪的重要性和紧迫性，充分发挥各有关部门的职能作用和部门间的协同作用，共同采取有效措施，从源头上防范、治理银行卡违法犯罪行为，建立健全银行卡违法犯罪的联合防控机制。___

甲、乙、丙、丁四家单位分别从事不同的行业，均为A银行的客户，现四人分别都向A银行申请安装移动POS机。依据《中国人民银行、中国银行业监督管理委员会、公安部、国家工商总局关于加强银行卡安全管理预防和打击银行卡犯罪的通知》规定，哪些商户的申请可以获得A银行批准_________

按照《电子银行业务管理办法》的规定，电子银行业务包括＿＿＿。___

按照《电子银行业务管理办法》的规定，金融机构开展电子银行业务违反审慎经营规则但尚不构成违法违规，并导致电子银行系统存在较大安全隐患的，中国银监会将责令限期改正；逾期未改正，或者其安全隐患在短时间难以解决的，中国银监会可以区别情形，采取＿＿＿等措施。 ___

按照《电子银行业务管理办法》的规定，金融机构应当按照＿＿＿的原则，开展电子银行业务，保证电子银行业务的健康、有序发展。___

金融机构甲向客户乙提供跨境电子银行服务，签订相关服务协议，依据《电子银行业务管理办法》规定此份服务协议文本应当使用____ 国家或地区文字，并且文字的文本应具有同等的法律效力。___

金融机构甲由于业务外包、系统测试、数据恢复与救援等情况而向非金融机构乙转移电子银行业务数据，依据《电子银行业务管理办法》规定，甲乙双方应当事先签订书面保密合同，并指派专人负责监督有关数据的____ ，以确保甲电子银行业务数据的安全并恰当使用。___

按照《商业银行金融工具公允价值估值监管指引》规定，商业银行金融工具公允价值估值应当遵守＿＿＿等原则。___

按照《商业银行金融工具公允价值估值监管指引》规定，商业银行公允价值估值的内控制度和程序包括但不限于＿＿＿。___

按照《商业银行金融工具公允价值估值监管指引》规定，商业银行应当定期评估公允价值估值的不确定性，对估值模型及假设、主要估值参数及交易对手等进行敏感性分析。主要考虑但不限于以下因素＿＿＿。___

按照《商业银行金融工具公允价值估值监管指引》规定，商业银行在参考第三方估值机构的估值结果时，应当评估第三方估值机构的＿＿＿。___

按照《商业银行金融工具公允价值估值监管指引》规定，商业银行在年度财务报表附注中应当披露的金融工具公允价值估值信息包括但不限于＿＿＿等内容。___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___

大学生的成才目标是___。

现代人才素质的灵魂是___。

___是人才素质的基础.

世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。

在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可，统一存在的，其中处于主导地位的是___。

时代精神的内涵十分丰富，其中___居于核心地位。

民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。

下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。

___是人才素质的基本内容

10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想

衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___

独立生活意识指___

___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓，解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。

___是人才素质的综合体现.

人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___

人生观的核心是___

人的本质属性是___

社会主义社会人生价值标准是___

回答人为什么活着___

表明人应当怎样对待生活___

判别什么样的人生才有意义___

下列人生态度中正确的是___

下列属于正确的人生目的的是___

___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.

___ 认为，社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。

___认为，人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。

马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___

人与自然关系的实质是___

在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___

社会公德最基本的要求是___

通过其规定和实施，影响人们思想，培养和提高人们法律意识，引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___

有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___

一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯，看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___

任何一个社会成员，无论具有何种身份、职业和地位，都必须在公共生活中遵守社会公德。这体现了社会公德具有的___特点。

影响公共生活、公共秩序、文明礼貌、清洁卫生以及其他影响社会生活的最主要行为规范是___

《公民道德建设实施纲要》明确指出，社会公德涵盖了___