刷题
导入试题
【多选题】
施工时和施工完成后,铺设管线的上覆土层及相邻建筑物不得___,相邻或相交管线及地下构筑物不受损坏。
A. 沉陷
B. 坍塌
C. 隆起
D. 凹陷
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
ABC
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
定向钻铺管___等单位必须具有专业资质。
A. 操作
B. 设计
C. 施工
D. 监理
【多选题】
定向钻铺管施工操作人员必须经___考核合格后,方能上岗操作施工,同时应遵守相应的()技术规程。
A. 考试
B. 培训
C. 安全操作
D. 规范训练
【多选题】
定向钻铺管___应符合各类地下管线的()。
A. 工程质量
B. 技术水平
C. 技术要求
D. 质量标准
【多选题】
定向___施工前应进行()。工程勘察应符合《岩土工程勘察规范》GB50021、《岩土工程勘察规范》DBJ13-84和《城市地下管线探测技术规程》CJJ61的规定。
A. 钻铺管
B. 开挖
C. 现场勘察
D. 工程勘察
【多选题】
工程勘察时,应由建设单位(甲方或业主)提供___。
A. 管线工程平面图
B. 地形地貌图
C. 既有管线地下管网图
D. 工程技术要求
【多选题】
工程勘察应包括___等及既有地下管线探测、管线铺设路由勘察等。
A. 工程地质
B. 水文地质
C. 地形
D. 地貌
【多选题】
现场踏勘应查明地形、地貌、地面建(构)筑物对工程施工的不利条件,应查清___,应查实有无影响施工的干扰源。
A. 水域覆盖面积
B. 深度
C. 地下管线
D. 管线铺设路由
【多选题】
工程勘察报告中,水文地质内容应包括:___。
A. 地下水类型
B. 含水层性质
C. 测定初见水位
D. 稳定水位。
【多选题】
当场地存在多层对工程有影响的地下水时,应分层测量地下水位,并查明主要含水层的分布规律,地下水补给和排泄条件,提供___所需的其他水文地质参数。
A. 设计
B. 施工
C. 监理
D. 土建
【多选题】
需要进行___的项目应根据()和所铺设的生产管线的要求来确定,试验项目应按《岩土工程勘察规范》GB50021、《岩土工程勘察规范》DBJ13-84的规定执行。
A. 岩土试验
B. 现场勘察
C. 定向钻施工
D. 管线铺设路由
【多选题】
既有地下管线探测的范围应不小于穿越路由两侧5m,并查明既有___。
A. 地下管线的性质
B. 类型
C. 所在的地下空间位置
D. 地下管线位置
【多选题】
既有地下管线探测后,应通过地面___等进行复核。
A. 标志物
B. 检查井
C. 闸门井
D. 人孔和手孔
【多选题】
定向钻穿越路由勘察应先进行初步勘察,以判断路由的___,最后确定穿越()。
A. 可行性
B. 经济性
C. 路由
D. 路径
【多选题】
穿越路由应___,并明确起、止点位置及长度。
A. 安全适用
B. 经济合理
C. 符合要求
D. 技术可行
【多选题】
定向钻铺管工程一般情况下宜按两阶段设计:___。
A. 土建设计
B. 初步设计
C. 图件设计
D. 施工设计
【多选题】
对___的穿越工程应进行初步设计。
A. 重大的
B. 技术复杂
C. 影响范围大
D. 地下管线多
【多选题】
初步设计应根据国家现行标准、规范,在充分调查研究基础上,结合管线的___,优化设计方案。
A. 初步设计
B. 图件设计
C. 使用功能
D. 建设方意见
【多选题】
定向钻铺设钢管应具有___。
A. 足够强度
B. 韧性
C. 良好的焊接性能
D. 抗腐蚀能力
【多选题】
采用泥浆扩孔回拉的钢管,其壁厚应根据___等确定,钢管最小壁厚可按表5.2.2 选用。
A. 长度
B. 埋深
C. 回拉长度
D. 土层条件
【多选题】
定向钻铺设PE管的主要设计标准应满足在给定压力条件下的___和铺设过程中()的总应力以及回拉力的要求。
A. 流量要求
B. 荷载作用
C. 回啦长度
D. 埋深
【多选题】
定向钻导向孔轨迹设计应包括___。
A. 钻孔类型和轨迹形式
B. 选择造斜点
C. 确定曲线段的曲率半径
D. 计算各孔段钻孔轨迹参数
【多选题】
出土角应根据定向钻铺设管线___确定。
A. 轨迹
B. 类型
C. 材质
D. 管径
【多选题】
在地面上采用始钻式钻机钻进导向孔时,第一直线段轨迹应是___的斜直线段,该段()不应小于一根钻杆长度;大型设备该段距离不宜小于10m。
A. 入土角
B. 出土角
C. 最小距离
D. 最大距离
【多选题】
定向钻穿越___时,最小覆土深度应符合专业规范要求;当专业规范无特殊要求时,最小覆土深度应符合表5.3.7 的规定。
A. 公路
B. 铁路
C. 河流
D. 地面建筑物
【多选题】
遇___应考虑加大水平和垂直净距。若达不到上述距离时,应增设有效的技术安全防护措施。
A. 可燃性管道
B. 特殊管线
C. 垂直孔段
D. 弯曲孔段
【多选题】
定向钻铺管应根据场地条件、管线类型、管径、材质、埋深、地质条件、既有地下管线分布情况及定向钻施工的设计参数确定工作坑的___。
A. 长度
B. 形状
C. 大小
D. 深度
【多选题】
工作坑支护形式分有___等,支护方法和适用条件可按表5.4.2选用。
A. 钢板桩
B. 钢筋混凝土排桩
C. 喷锚支护
D. 放坡支护
【多选题】
定向钻铺管施工应符合设计要求,技术措施要___。
A. 符合要求
B. 安全可行
C. 减少环境污染
D. 不破坏相邻管线与建筑物
【多选题】
定向钻铺管施工前,应制订___或(),并做好技术交底。
A. 施工组织设计
B. 施工技术设计
C. 专题汇报
D. 专项施工方案
【多选题】
材料进场时,应进行___,并附有()合格文件。
A. 材料检验
B. 材料证明
C. 质量检验
D. 质量证明
【多选题】
孔底钻具组合应按采用___等要求确定;孔底钻具组合形式可参照表6.3.3选用。
A. 定向钻铺
B. 导向系统
C. 土层条件
D. 穿越深度
【多选题】
导向钻头类型和尺寸应按岩土类型、岩土层造斜能力、造斜配套工具等要求确定钻头___和(),可参照表6.3.4选用。
A. 类型
B. 尺寸
C. 型号
D. 大小
【多选题】
扩孔中出现钻机___异常时,应进行“洗孔”。
A. 运行
B. 检修
C. 扭矩
D. 拉力
【多选题】
回拉生产管进入钻孔时___应和()钻杆出土角一致,回拉作业应连续进行。
A. 出孔角
B. 入孔角
C. 导向孔
D. 导入孔
【多选题】
应根据___等因素,确定是否需要开挖发送沟(道)或设置钢托架。
A. 地形地貌
B. 铺管长度
C. 材质
D. 管径
【多选题】
管材环___,可采用加大管内气压以()环刚度,并匀速拉管,避免出现孔内瞬间真空现象,造成孔内坍塌。
A. 刚度不足
B. 刚度足够
C. 增加
D. 减少
【多选题】
___就位后,应对生产管()进行封堵,避免异物进入管内。
A. 拉管
B. 导管
C. 两端
D. 前端
【多选题】
完成连接、实验和检测后,应及时清理___,并按要求回填压实工作坑。
A. 现场泥浆
B. 渣土
C. 废弃物
D. 水
【多选题】
铺设给水、排水管道工程检测验收,轴线偏差小于___、管内底高程偏差小于()。管道严密性试验和允许渗水量应按《给水排水管道工程施工及验收规范》GB50268执行。
A. ±200mm
B. ±150mm
C. ±100mm
D. ±50mm
【多选题】
进入施工现场生产人员必须进行安全培训教育,并了解施工现场___的位置和类型,做好危险源辨识,消除事故隐患。
A. 地下设施
B. 高空设施
C. 地下管线
D. 高空线路
推荐试题
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举
【单选题】
任何一个社会成员,无论具有何种身份、职业和地位,都必须在公共生活中遵守社会公德。这体现了社会公德具有的___特点。
A. 继承性
B. 基础性
C. 广泛性
D. 简明性
【单选题】
影响公共生活、公共秩序、文明礼貌、清洁卫生以及其他影响社会生活的最主要行为规范是___
A. 社会公德
B. 家庭道德
C. 职业道德
D. 个人道德
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用