【多选题】
根据《中华人民共和国商标法》,禁止作为商标注册或使用的标志包括______。___
A. 中华人民共和国国徽标志
B. “红十字”标志
C. 夸大宣传并带有欺骗性的标志
D. 带有民族歧视性的标志
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【多选题】
合同履行应遵循的原则包括__________
A. 全面履行原则
B. 诚实信用原则
C. 协作履行原则
D. 过罚相当原则
【多选题】
下列各项不属于筹资活动产生的现金流量的有______。___
A. 处置固定资产所收回的现金
B. 偿还债务所支付的现金
C. 融资租赁所支付的租赁费
D. 销售商品、提供劳务收到的现金
【多选题】
应当先履行债务的当事人,有确切证据证明对方有下列情形之一的,可以中止履行______。___
A. 经营状况严重恶化
B. 转移财产以逃避债务
C. 抽逃资金以逃避债务
D. 丧失商业信誉
【多选题】
根据《中华人民共和国公司法》的规定,下列关于股份有限公司转让的说法中,正确的是______。___
A. 股东持有的股份可以依法转让
B. 股东转让其股份,应当在依法设立的证券交易场所进行或者按照国务院规定的其他方式进行
C. 记名股票,由股东以背书方式或者法律、行政法规规定的其他方式转让
D. 无记名股票的转让,由股东将股票交付给受让人后即发生转让的效力
【多选题】
根据《中华人民共和国公司法》,公司可以收购本公司股份的情形包括______。___
A. 减少公司注册资本
B. 股东因对股东大会作出的公司合并、分立决议持异议,要求公司收购其股份
C. 将股份奖励给本公司职工
D. 与持有本公司股份的其他公司合并
【多选题】
下列关于专利权的说法正确的是______。___
A. 发明人可以是自然人、单位或是课题组
B. 专利权的客体包括发现、实用新型和外观设计三种
C. 专利权的客体包括发明、实用新型和外观设计三种
D. 实用新型和外观设计专利权的期限是10年
【多选题】
会计要素的确定计量原则包括______。___
A. 权责发生制
B. 配比原则
C. 历史成本原则
D. 划分收益性支出与资产性支出原则
【多选题】
资产负债表中可以根据某一科目总账余额直接填列的有______。___
A. 应收账款
B. 短期借款
C. 实收资本
D. 盈余公职
【多选题】
下列有关资产净利润率指标的说法中,正确的有______。___
A. 资产净利润率越高,说明企业全部资产的盈利能力越差
B. 资产净利润率是用净利润除以资产平均总额再乘以100%计算的
C. 资产净利润率越高,说明企业全部资产的盈利能力越强
D. 资产净利润率与净利润成正比,与资产平均总额成反比
【多选题】
在经济调整对象中,市场管理关系的内容包括______。___
A. 合同法律关系
B. 维护公平竞争关系
C. 消费者权益保护关系
D. 产品质量管理关系
【多选题】
下列关于物权的说法中正确的有______。___
A. 物权的客体是人
B. 物权具有追及效力和优先效力
C. 一物一权原则是物权的基本原则之一
D. 物权和债权构成了市场经济社会的最基本的财产权利
【多选题】
按照《担保法》的相关规定,下列说法错误的有______。___
A. 定金是合同担保的一种方式
B. 定金具有预先给付和抵销的效力
C. 定金是在违约时支付的
D. 定金的数额不超过主合同总金额的10%
【多选题】
商业银行传统的组合营销因素包括__________
【多选题】
与债权相比,下列关于物权的特征表述正确的有 ___
A. 物权是对人权
B. 物权是法定的
C. 物权属于支配权
D. 当物权与债权并存时,物权优先于债权
【多选题】
根据《商标法》的规定,下列选项中关于注册商标的期限的表述正确的有______。___
A. 注册商标的期限为10年
B. 注册商标的续展没有次数限制
C. 超过宽展期仍未提出续展申请,注册商标将被注销
D. 商标仅人不能在规定的期限内提出续展申请的,可以给予6个月的宽展期
【多选题】
根据资产定价理论中的有效市场理论,资本市场可以分为弱式有效市场、半强式有效市场和强式有效市场。其中,半强式有效市场的信息集包括__________
A. 历史价格信息
B. 公司红利政策信息
C. 公司公告
D. 公司财务报告信息
【多选题】
金融期货最主要的功能有__________
A. 转移风险
B. 规避风险
C. 平衡权益
D. 价格发现
【多选题】
下列活动中,属于银行内部控制的要素有__________
A. 利润设定
B. 风险评估
C. 控制活动
D. 信息与沟通
【多选题】
中央银行在公开市场上买进证券,则__________
A. 形成多头市场
B. 刺激投资
C. 证券价格上升
D. 货币供应扩大
【多选题】
金融市场融通资金的途径有__________
A. 长期市场
B. 直接融资
C. 短期融资
D. 间接融资
【多选题】
再贴现政策作用于经济的主要途径有__________
A. 借款成本效果
B. 宣示效果
C. 对货币乘数影响
D. 结构调节效果
【多选题】
下列对股指期货表述正确的有___
A. 以股价指数为标的物的标准化期货保约
B. 双方约定在未来某个特定日期进行买卖
C. 大致可以分为两大类,商品期货与金融期货
D. 到期后通过现金结算差价来进行交割
【多选题】
下列情况中,可能会导致成本推进型通货膨胀的有__________
A. 垄断性大公司为获取垄断利润人为提高产品价格
B. 劳动力不能及时在不同部门之间转移
C. 有组织的工会会迫使工资的增长率超过劳动生产率的增长率
D. 汇率变动引起进出口产品和原材料成本上升
【多选题】
在银行业监管中,监管当局对即将倒闭银行的处置措施主要有__________
A. 收购
B. 兼并
C. 依法清算
D. 注资入股
【多选题】
在治理通货膨胀时,可以采用的紧缩性货币政策措施主要有__________
A. 提高法定存款准备金率
B. 提高再贴现率
C. 公开市场卖出业务
D. 减少储备存款
【多选题】
下列指标中,属于反映企业盈利能力的指标有 ___
A. 市盈率
B. 资产净利润率
C. 资本收益率
D. 主营业务净利润率
【多选题】
存款准备金政策是中央银行实施货币政策的重要工具,其主要内容包括__________
A. 规定存款准备金计提的基础
B. 规定法定存款准备金率
C. 规定存款准备金的构成
D. 规定存款准备金提取的时间
【多选题】
积极的外汇储备管理模式的实现路径主要有__________
A. 货币当局本身的外汇管理转型
B. 将外汇储备转交给商业银行管理
C. 将外汇储备转交给投资银行管理
D. 国家成立专门的投资公司来管理
【多选题】
基础货币是中央银行的货币负债,其具体构成要素有__________
A. 外汇储备
B. 法定存款准备金
C. 超额准备金
D. 流通中现金
【多选题】
间接标价法下,远期汇率计算正确的是__________
A. 即期汇率+升水数字
B. 即期汇率-升水数字
C. 即期汇率-贴水数字
D. 即期汇率+贴水数字
【多选题】
下列业务活动中,属于商业银行中间业务的有__________
A. 代理收费
B. 咨询顾问
C. 托管及支付结算业务
D. 基金和债券的代理买卖
【多选题】
根据麦金龙和肖对金融抑制表现的描述,在银行遵守贷款利率上限的情况下,金融抑制的主要危害有__________
A. 导致利率、汇率过度波动
B. 导致资源被错误配置
C. 导致生产和投资结构不合理
D. 导致可贷资金的非价格配给
【多选题】
通货膨胀目标制是中央银行直接以通货膨胀为目标并对外公布该目标的货币政策制度。一国实施通货膨胀目标制的条件主要有__________
A. 中央银行有较高的独立性
B. 货币政策有高度透明度
C. 实行浮动汇率制
D. 市场化的利率机制
【多选题】
相对比较合理的实施金融自由化的顺序应该是__________
A. 先国内实际部门的自由化,再国内金融部门的自由化
B. 先国内金融部门的自由化,再国内实际部门的自由化
C. 先国内金融部门的自由化,再对外金融部门的自由化
D. 先国外金融部门的自由化,再对内金融部门的自由化
【多选题】
国际收支不均衡的类型有__________
A. 收入性不均衡
B. 货币性不均衡
C. 结构性不均衡
D. 周期性不均衡
【多选题】
金融深化最直接的表现为__________
A. 金融机构数量的增加
B. 分工的专业化程度加深
C. 金融资产总规模的增长
D. 金融交易的方式变得更加多样、方便、有效
【多选题】
货币与财政政策实施双松配合方式,一般是在_______时。___
A. 供给短缺
B. 有效需求不足
C. 资源闲置
D. 经济萧条
【多选题】
对拟发行股票的合理估值是首次公开发行股票定价的基础。下列估值方法中,属于相对估值法的有__________
A. 市盈率倍数估值法
B. 市净率倍数估值法
C. 股利折现模型
D. 企业价值与利息、所得税、折旧、摊销前收益倍数估值法
【多选题】
政府在公共物品供给过程中的主要责任有______。___
A. 为公民获得基本公共物品与服务提供制度保障
B. 通过财政补贴和税收优惠方式,鼓励私人机构提供和生产公共物品
C. 通过征税直接为公共物品融资
D. 从事某些公共物品的生产或公共服务的递送
推荐试题
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举