【多选题】
实行柜员制的营业网点应遵循___的原则,确定本单位柜员制会计核算形式及柜员数量。
A. 有利于执行各项制度、规定和提高工作效率
B. 有利于凭证传递、方便客户和内部操作
C. 有利于分工明确、职责到位和监督制约
D. 有利于独立办理转账、现金收付和汇兑
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【多选题】
对账范围包括:___
A. 活期存款账户
B. 单位定期存款账户
C. 单位存折户
D. 单位通知存款账户
E. 贴现
F. 承兑业务
【多选题】
下列说法正确的是:___
A. 残缺、污损人民币兑换分为“全额”、“半额”两种情况
B. 纸币呈正十字形缺少四分之一的人民币,不能兑换。
C. 金融机构在兑换残缺、污损人民币时,应收受部分费用
D. 金融机构在办理残缺、污损人民币兑换业务时,要向残缺、污损人民币持有人说明认定的兑换结果,不能况换的残缺、污损人民币,应退回持有人。
【多选题】
综合柜员应严格遵守以下___操作准则:
A. 严格遵守业务权限和密码管理规定。
B. 严格签到签退手续。中途离岗严格柜员签退,现金、章戳、凭证入箱落锁。
C. 受理业务按照客户先后顺序依次逐笔办理,一笔业务未处理完毕不得离柜,更不得接受第二笔业务。
D. 柜员不得办理本人的存取款和结算业务。
E. 计算机终端确认的资料,不得擅自更改。
【多选题】
签发支票必须记载事项:___
A. 表明“支票”的字样;
B. 无条件支付的委托;
C. 确定的金额;
D. 收款人名称
【多选题】
单位银行结算账户,按用途可分为:___
A. 基本存款账户
B. 一般存款账户
C. 专用存款账户
D. 临时存款帐户
【多选题】
___等必须入库保管。
A. 现金
B. 金银
C. 外币
D. 有价证券
【多选题】
新准则交通工具耗用费包括___
A. 车船燃料费
B. 通行费
C. 验车费
D. 停车费
E. 修理费
F. 车用物品购置费
【多选题】
新准则公杂费包括___
A. 购置办公用品
B. 刻制印章
C. 电灯、电线
D. 办公场所保洁
E. 输水管道
F. 清洁卫生用具
【多选题】
关于大额交易报告的范围,下列说法正确的是:___
A. 单笔或当日累计人民币交易10万元能上或者外币交易等值1万美元以上的现金交存、现金支取、现金结售汇、现钞兑换、现金汇款、现金票据解付及其他形式的现金收支
B. 单笔或当日累计人民币交易20万元能上或者外币交易等值1万美元以上的现金交存、现金支取、现金结售汇、现钞兑换、现金汇款、现金票据解付及其他形式的现金收支
C. 自然人银行账户之间,以及自然人与法人、其他组织和个体工商户银行账户之间单笔或当日累计人民币50万元以上或者外币等值10万元美元以上的款项划转
D. 法人、其他组织和个体工商户银行账户之间单笔或者当日累计人民币200万元以上或者等值20万美元以上的款项划转。
【多选题】
残缺、污损人民币兑换说法正确的是___
A. 能辨别面额,票面剩余四分之三(含四分之三)以上,其图案、文字能按原样连接的残缺、污损人民币,应按原面额全额兑换
B. 能辨别面额,票面剩余二分之一(含二分之一)至四分之三以下,其图案、文字能按原样连接的残缺、污损人民币,应按原面额的兑换
C. 呈正十字形缺少四分之一的,按原面额的一半兑换
D. 额不足一分的,不予兑换;五分按半额兑换的,兑付二分
【多选题】
下列属于永久保管的会计档案有:___
A. 挂失申请书及登记簿
B. 开销户登记簿
C. 综合核算和明细核算的各种账、簿、日报表
D. 有权机关查询、冻结及扣划书
【多选题】
办理一般存款账户应提供的资料:___
A. 开立基本存款账户规定的证明文件。
B. 基本存款账户开户登记证。
C. 存款人因向银行借款需要,应出具借款合同。异地借款的应出具在异地取得贷款的借款合同。
D. 存款人因其他结算需要,应出具有关证明。
E. 开户许可证副本
F. 存款人信息
【多选题】
主管柜员负责每日___等工作。
A. 综合业务系统的机构签到,签退,封锁转汇
B. 营业柜员的尾箱出入库核对
C. 重要空白凭证的二次销号与结存核对
D. 对综合柜员、营业柜员日间办理的各项业务随时查询核对,对柜员每天交来的传票逐笔进行勾对审核。
E. 按时检查内外账务,按月勾对往来账务,负责每日账簿的打印、传票的装订与管理。
F. 负责组织营业室的日结、月结、试算与决算工作及各类会计报表的审查上报。
【多选题】
综合核算的内容包括___
A. 科目日结单
B. 余额表
C. 总账
D. 登记簿
E. 日计表
【多选题】
下面有权扣划单位和个人存款的是___。
A. 人民法院
B. 税务机关
C. 人民检查院
D. 海关
【多选题】
实行柜员制基本要求中正确的是___。
A. 柜台的高度应达到1.1米-1.2米,宽0.6米-0.8米,柜外设置客户1米线。
B. 原则上每个柜员间安装隔离板,形成每个柜员相对独立操作间。
C. 每个柜员配置一套电脑终端设备,一台打印机,防卫点钞机,专用钱箱等设备。
D. 营业室内配备电视监控录像设备,每天营业处于监控状态。
【多选题】
一般存款账户是存款人因借款或其他结算需要,在基本存款账户开户银行以外的银行营业机构开立的银行结算账户。办理一般存款账户应提供的资料:___
A. 开立基本账户规定的证明文件
B. 基本存款账户开户登记证
C. 存款人因向银行借款需要,应出具借款合同
D. 存款人因其他对算需要,应出具有关证明
E. 登记簿
【多选题】
下列哪些账户开立时必须经中国人民银行核准___
A. 基本存款账户
B. 临时存款账户
C. 一般存款账户
D. 预算单位开立的专用存款账户
【多选题】
允许挂失止付的票据是___
A. 支票
B. 未填明“现金”字样和代理付款人的银行汇票
C. 银行本票
D. 填明“现金”字样和代理付款人的银行汇票
【多选题】
银行汇票必须记载事项是___。
A. 表明“银行汇票”的字样
B. 无条件支付的承诺
C. 出票金额
D. 付款人名称、收款人名称
E. 出票日期
F. 出票人签章
【多选题】
印章保管人员因工作调动或短期休假,应履行交接手续不得私自授受重要印章,___共同在交接登记簿上签字。
A. 交接人
B. 接交人
C. 监交人
D. 保证人
【多选题】
实行柜员制的营业网点必须建立健全完整的监督检查与考核制度,按照___的要求,不断提高经营管理水平。
A. 服务规范
B. 管理科学
C. 核算准确
D. 风险防范
【多选题】
某金融机构建造一座营业大楼,2001年12月竣工验收,因网点迁置未批复,直到2002年6月方投入使用,则固定资产转入日期及计提折旧日期分别为___。
A. 37226
B. 37257
C. 37408
D. 37438
【多选题】
财务管理基本原则:___
A. 权责发生制原则
B. 真实性原则
C. 收入发生制原
D. 相关性原则
【多选题】
农村金融机构统一会计科目按会计要素分类,可分为___
A. 资产类
B. 负债类
C. 所有者权益类
D. 损益类
E. 共同类
【多选题】
开立对公基本账户时,下列说法正确的有:___
A. 企业法人,应出具企业法人营业执照正本或副本
B. 非企业法人,应出具企业营业执照正本
C. 民办非企业组织,应出具民办非企业登记书
D. 个体工商户应出具个体工商户营业执照正本
E. 居民委员会、村民委员会、社区委员会,应出具其主管部门的批文或证明
【多选题】
下列哪些特殊业务需要提供客户及代理人有效身份证件并进行有效身份证件验证核查。___
A. 开户
B. 挂失
C. 提前支取
D. 存折清户
【多选题】
填写票据和结算凭证,必须做到:___
A. 标准规范、要素齐全
B. 数字正确、字迹清楚
C. 不错漏、不潦草
D. 防止涂改
【多选题】
卡挂失正确的说法是___
A. 主卡办理挂失与止付后,附卡可以继续使用;
B. 附卡办理挂失与止付后,主卡仍然可以继续使用;
C. 卡折合一户,卡折挂失时,互不影响使用;
D. 附卡挂失不影响主卡,但主卡挂失附卡一同挂失;
E. 口头或正式挂失可在辖内所有联机网点办理;
【多选题】
柜员审查支票的要素有___。
A. 支票是否统一规定的凭证,是否真实,是否在有效期内;
B. 支票上的收款人名称与进帐单上的名称是否一致;
C. 出票人的签章是否符合规定,与预留银行的印鉴是否相符;
D. 支票的大小写金额是否一致,与进帐单上的金额是否相符;
【多选题】
综合柜员应具备的基本条件___。
A. 有良好的职业道德,忠于职守,敬业爱岗,廉洁奉公。
B. 能够认真贯彻执行《会计法》及《农村金融机构会计出纳基本制度》和有关金融法规条例,主动热情,准确、迅速、灵活地为客户办理相关业务。
C. 熟悉各项业务操作程序,掌握各项业务处理技能,能独立处理每一笔业务。 具备整点现金、识别假钞的基本技能;
D. 严格按规章制度办事,熟练掌握各项规定、办法以及操作要领,做到账、款、证章使用安全准确。
E. 具有综合业务系统培训合格证
【多选题】
支付结算办法所称退票理由书应当包括以下哪些事项?___
A. 所退票据的种类
B. 退票的事实依据和法律依据
C. 退票时间
D. 退票人签章
【多选题】
按货币收付的不同方式,结算分为___。
A. 现金结算
B. 同城结算
C. 转帐结算
D. 异地结算
【多选题】
按照现行的《银行帐户管理办法 》规定,用于结算的存款帐户由以下哪几类___。
A. 基本存款帐户
B. 一般存款帐户
C. 临时存款帐户
D. 专用存款帐户
【多选题】
根据《银行账户管理办法》的规定,下列存款人中,可以申请开立基本存款账户的是___
A. 企业法人
B. 机关、事业单位
C. 单位设立的独立核算的附属机构
D. 个体工商户
【多选题】
专用存款账户的特定用途的资金范围包括___
A. 银行存款转存
B. 基本建设的资金
C. 更新改造的资金
D. 工资、奖金
【多选题】
托收承付的付款人在承付期内,对下列款项,可以向银行提出全部或部分拒绝付款。___
A. 购销合同中未订明托收承付结算方式的款项
B. 货物已到,经查验货物与合同规定或发货清单不符的款项
C. 赊销商品的款项
D. 代销商品的款项
【多选题】
在汇兑结算方式下,如果收款人转账支付款项,该账户的款项可以转入___。
A. 单位的存款账户
B. 个体工商户的存款账户
C. 个人储蓄账户
D. 单位信用卡账户
【多选题】
根据《支付结算办法》的规定,信用卡的持卡人在还清透支本息后,存在___情形的,可以办理销户。
A. 信用卡被列入止付名单,发卡银行已收回其信用卡45天的
B. 持卡人死亡已满45天的
C. 持卡人要求销户或担保人撤销担保,并已交回全部信用卡45天的
D. 信用卡账户两年(含)以上未发生交易的
推荐试题
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往