刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
小肠腺特有的细胞 ___
A. :柱状细胞
B. :杯状细胞
C. :潘氏细胞
D. :淋巴细胞
E. :巨噬细胞
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
C
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
不属于胰岛细胞分泌的激素 ___
A. :胰岛素
B. :胰高血糖素
C. :胰多肽
D. :胰蛋白酶
E. :生长抑素
【单选题】
肝小叶的结构不包括 ___
A. :中央静脉
B. :肝板
C. :肝血窦
D. :胆小管
E. :小叶间胆管
【单选题】
分泌胃蛋白酶原的是 ___
A. :主细胞
B. :壁细胞
C. :颈粘液细胞
D. :干细胞
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
分泌盐酸和内因子的是 ___
A. :主细胞
B. :壁细胞
C. :颈粘液细胞
D. :干细胞
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
胰岛中分泌胰岛素的是 ___
A. :B细胞
B. :A细胞
C. :D细胞
D. :PP细胞
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
肝的基本结构和功能单位是 ___
A. :肝细胞
B. :肝板
C. :肝血窦
D. :肝小叶
E. :肝门管区
【单选题】
胃粘膜的上皮是 ___
A. :单层扁平上皮
B. :单层立方上皮
C. :单层柱状上皮
D. :假复层纤毛柱状上皮
E. :复层扁平上皮
【单选题】
吞咽时,遮盖喉口的是 ___
A. :甲状软骨
B. :环状软骨
C. :会厌软骨
D. :杓状软骨
E. :腭垂
【单选题】
上呼吸道是指 ___
A. :鼻
B. :鼻、咽
C. :鼻、咽、喉
D. :鼻、咽、喉、气管
E. :鼻、咽、喉、气管、主支气管
【单选题】
关于浆膜的组成,正确的是 ___
A. :内皮和结缔组织
B. :间皮和结缔组织
C. :白膜和结缔组织
D. :筋膜和结缔组织
E. :以上都不是
【单选题】
形成喉结的喉软骨是 ___
A. :甲状软骨
B. :杓状软骨
C. :环状软骨
D. :会厌软骨
E. :以上都不是
【单选题】
最大的鼻旁窦是 ___
A. :额窦
B. :蝶窦
C. :筛窦前、中群
D. :上颌窦
E. :乳突窦
【单选题】
不属于喉腔的结构是 ___
A. :喉咽部
B. :喉前庭
C. :喉中间腔
D. :喉室
E. :声门下腔
【单选题】
易出血区位于 ___
A. :上鼻甲
B. :上鼻道
C. :中鼻道
D. :鼻中隔前下部
E. :鼻中隔后上部
【单选题】
右主支气管的特点是 ___
A. :粗、长、水平
B. :粗、短、垂直
C. :细、短、垂直
D. :细、长、水平
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
开口位置高于窦底的鼻旁窦 ___
A. :额窦
B. :筛窦
C. :蝶窦
D. :上颌窦
E. :以上都是
【单选题】
气管切开的部位在 ___
A. :第1-3气管软骨环
B. :第3-5气管软骨环
C. :第5-6气管软骨环
D. :第4-7气管软骨环
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
喉腔最狭窄的部位是 ___
A. :喉前庭
B. :前庭裂
C. :声门裂
D. :声门下腔
E. :喉口
【单选题】
呼吸道唯一的一块完整的环形软骨是 ___
A. :甲状软骨
B. :杓状软骨
C. :会厌软骨
D. :环状软骨
E. :气管软骨
【单选题】
左主支气管的特点是 ___
A. :细、短、较垂直
B. :粗、短、较水平
C. :细、长、较水平
D. :粗、短、较垂直
E. :以上都不是
【单选题】
关于胸膜腔的叙述,错误的是 ___
A. :左、右各一,互不相通
B. :腔内呈负压
C. :内有少量浆液
D. :胸膜腔内有肺
E. :肋膈隐窝是胸膜腔的最低部位
【单选题】
在锁骨中线处,肺下界与肝上界的体表投影点分别为 ___
A. :第5肋与第6肋
B. :第6肋与第5肋
C. :第5肋与第7肋
D. :第7肋与第5肋
E. :第5肋与第5肋
【单选题】
坐位时胸膜腔的最低处 ___
A. :肋膈隐窝
B. :肋纵隔隐窝
C. :膈纵隔隐窝
D. :肝肾隐窝
E. :以上都不是
【单选题】
在肩胛线肺下界体表投影点为 ___
A. :第6肋
B. :第7肋
C. :第8肋
D. :第9肋
E. :第10肋
【单选题】
属于左肺的形态特点是 ___
A. :较宽短
B. :有水平裂
C. :分3叶
D. :前缘有心切迹
E. :以上都不是
【单选题】
关于肺的说法,错误的是 ___
A. :肺尖不高出锁骨
B. :肺底又称膈面
C. :外侧面又称肋面
D. :内侧面称纵隔面
E. :左肺2叶,右肺3叶
【单选题】
开口于上鼻道的是 ___
A. :额窦
B. :蝶窦
C. :筛窦前、中群
D. :筛窦后群
E. :上颌窦
【单选题】
在腋中线处,胸膜下界平对 ___
A. :第6肋
B. :第7肋
C. :第8肋
D. :第10肋
E. :第5肋
【单选题】
在右锁骨中线处,肺下界平对 ___
A. :第5肋
B. :第6肋
C. :第7肋
D. :第4肋
E. :第8肋
【单选题】
胸膜腔的描述,正确的是 ___
A. :脏胸膜与壁胸膜在肺底相互移行所围成的密闭的腔隙
B. :胸膜腔左、右各一,相互连通
C. :胸膜腔内呈负压
D. :胸膜腔内有少量的粘液
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
具有结节状膨大的结构是 ___
A. :细支气管
B. :呼吸性支气管
C. :肺泡管
D. :小支气管
E. :以上都不是
【单选题】
纵隔内的结构不包括 ___
A. :支气管
B. :气管
C. :肺
D. :食管
E. :心
【单选题】
胸膜腔位于 ___
A. :胸壁和膈之间
B. :肺和膈之间
C. :壁胸膜和脏胸膜之间
D. :胸膜和肺之间
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
肺和支气管的营养性动脉是 ___
A. :肺动脉
B. :肺静脉
C. :支气管动脉
D. :支气管静脉
E. :以上都不是
【单选题】
关于纵隔内器官的描述,正确的是 ___
A. :胸腺位于后纵隔
B. :食管位于中纵隔
C. :气管位于前纵隔
D. :心脏位于前纵隔
E. :心脏位于中纵隔
【单选题】
分泌表面活性物质的细胞 ___
A. :Ⅰ肺泡细胞
B. :Ⅱ肺泡细胞
C. :尘细胞
D. :巨噬细胞
E. :血管内皮细胞
【单选题】
关于肾的描述,正确的是 ___
A. :肾为腹膜外位器官
B. :右肾的位置高于左肾
C. :肾的外侧缘中部为肾门
D. :进出肾门的结构有肾动脉、肾静脉和输尿管等
E. :肾的被膜分为纤维囊和肾筋膜2层
【单选题】
关于肾区的描述,正确的是 ___
A. :是肾门在腹后壁的体表投影,位于竖脊肌外侧缘与第12肋的夹角内
B. :是肾门在腹后壁的体表投影,位于腰大肌外侧缘与第11肋的夹角内
C. :是肾门在腹后壁的体表投影,位于竖脊肌外侧缘与第11肋的夹角内
D. :是肾门在腹后壁的体表投影,位于腰大肌外侧缘与第12肋的夹角内
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
关于肾的位置的叙述,正确的是 ___
A. :肾位于腹膜后方,右肾高于左肾,肾门约平对第1腰椎水平
B. :肾位于腹膜后方,左肾高于右肾,肾门约平对第1腰椎水平
C. :肾位于腹膜前方,右肾高于左肾,肾门约平对第2腰椎水平
D. :肾位于腹膜后方,左肾高于右肾,肾门约平对第2腰椎水平
E. :以上都不对
【单选题】
肾囊封闭时,药物注入 ___
A. :纤维囊
B. :脂肪囊
C. :肾筋膜
D. :肾皮质
E. :肾髓质
推荐试题
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用