刷题
导入试题
【多选题】
在光缆敷设过程中,应严格注意光纤的( ),避免光纤被缠绕、扭转、损伤和踩踏。___
A. 拉伸强度
B. 弯曲半径
C. 接口干净
D. 放线长度
E.
F.
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
AB
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
缆线的布放应自然整齐,不得产生( )等现象,不要受外力的挤压和损伤。___
A. 扭绞
B. 打圈
C. 接头
D.
E.
F.
【多选题】
天线的安装方式上又分为( )和( )两种。___
A. 外置
B. 内置
C. 潜入式
D. 整合式
E. 组合式
F.
【多选题】
通信线路在施工与维护作业中,涉及到的工作有()等多种形式___
A. 打洞挖沟
B. 架设拆除线缆
C. 登高爬杆
D. 立杆换杆
E.
F.
【多选题】
基于铜缆的传统业务装维工具配备有()___
A. 电钻
B. RJ45和RJ11接头压线钳
C. 查线仪
D. 光纤清洁器具
E.
F.
【多选题】
对用户引入线的维护要求有()___
A. 对使用年久老化的用户引入线进行更换
B. 对属于影响宽带质量的平行线更换为双绞线
C. 接线端子无严重锈蚀
D. 保证用户引入线的接头良好、架设高度及与电力线的间距符合要求
E.
F.
【多选题】
对大楼通信综合布线系统的维护要求有()___
A. 机柜、机架安装牢固
B. 电缆桥架、线槽、吊架和支架安装牢固
C. 信息插座安装牢固
D. 资源标识完整、清晰、准确
E.
F.
【多选题】
网络/系统割接提前公告包括()等可预见原因的通知___
A. 检修线路
B. 设备搬迁
C. 工程割接
D. 网络及软件升级
E.
F.
【多选题】
在进行装拆移修工作的同时,要求对小区内的哪些设备进行巡查()___
A. 交接箱
B. 人(手)井
C. 管道
D. 光电缆
E.
F.
【多选题】
局外障碍一般包括()___
A. 交接箱障碍
B. 分线盒障碍
C. 用户引入线障碍
D. 测量室障碍
E.
F.
【多选题】
我国的安全生产方针是( )。___
A. 安全第一
B. 预防为主
C. 和谐发展
D. 综合治理
E.
F.
【多选题】
生产单位在施工及维护工作中必须正确处理好进度与安全、效益与安全的关系,实行( )。___
A. 安全第一的原则
B. 抓生产必须抓安全的原则
C. 安全优先的原则
D. 本质安全化原则
E.
F.
【多选题】
安全法规主要包括哪些方面的法律规范和规章制度( )。___
A. 安全管理
B. 安全技术
C. 工业卫生
D. 女职工和未成年工保护
E.
F.
【多选题】
下列说法正确的是()。___
A. 从业人员可享受工伤保险和因生产安全事故受到损害时要求赔偿的权利。
B. 从业人员发现直接危及人身安全的紧急情况时,无权停止作业。
C. 从业人员可以了解工作场所产生或者可能产生的职业病危害因素。
D. 作业人员应当遵守安全施工的强制标准、规章制度和操作规程,正确使用安全防护用具、机械设备等。
E.
F.
【多选题】
安全防护用品的安全防护用具三大类是( )。___
A. 防坠落安全防护用品
B. 防触电安全防护用品
C. 安全围栏
D. 其他安全用品
E.
F.
【多选题】
对待安全问题,职工有什么权利( )。___
A. 对违章指挥有权拒绝操作
B. 险情严重时,有权停止作业
C. 有权批评、检举和控告漠视安全的领导者
D. 边做边批评
E.
F.
【多选题】
新上岗作业人员的三级安全教育是指( )。___
A. 公司级
B. 部门级
C. 省级
D. 班组级
E.
F.
【多选题】
员工在施工及维护作业时必须穿戴和使用劳动防护用品,应做到三会,三会是指( )。___
A. 会选用性能合格的防护品
B. 会正确使用防护品
C. 会检查防护品的可靠性
D. 会维护保养防护品
E.
F.
【多选题】
登高作业时,必要的安全防护用品有( )。___
A. 安全帽
B. 安全带
C. 绝缘鞋
D. 防坠绳
E.
F.
【多选题】
遇有雷雨、( )时,不得进行高处作业及放紧线工作。___
A. 暴雨
B. 小雨
C. 四级以上大风
D. 五级以上大风
E.
F.
【多选题】
患有职业禁忌症和年老体弱、( )等人员,不得进行高处作业。___
A. 酒后
B. 饭后
C. 病愈
D. 视力不佳
E.
F.
【多选题】
普通物质发生火灾时,可采取( )灭火。___
A. 冷却法
B. 隔离法
C. 窒息法
D. 抑制法(化学灭火剂)
E.
F.
【多选题】
下列关于特殊化学品火灾扑救说法正确的是()。___
A. 扑救爆炸物品火灾时,水流应采用吊射
B. 扑救爆炸物品堆垛火灾时,切忌用沙土盖压 
C. 扑救压缩气体或液化气体类火灾时,应立即扑灭火焰
D. 扑救爆炸物品堆垛火灾时,可用沙土盖压 
E.
F.
【多选题】
按照爆炸产生的原因和性质,爆炸可分为()。___
A. 物理爆炸
B. 化学爆炸
C. 核爆炸
D. 分解爆炸
E.
F.
【多选题】
下列说法正确的是()。___
A. 在生产或者贮存易燃易爆物品场区内进行施工作业属一级动火区域。
B. 在施工现场燃煤茶炉处进行施工作业属三级动火区域。
C. 在木结构或砖木结构临时职工食堂的炉灶处进行施工作业属二级动火区域。
D. 在施工现场木工作业区,木器原料、成品堆放区进行施工作业属一级动火区域。
E.
F.
【多选题】
患有( )以及其他不适宜高空作业的人,严禁从事高空作业。___
A. 心脏病
B. 近视眼
C. 贫血
D. 高血压
E.
F.
【多选题】
现场急救的步骤是( )。___
A. 迅速使伤病员脱离危险场所
B. 初步检查伤病员
C. 呼救
D. 迅速清理现场
E.
F.
【多选题】
哪些气体吸入过量,能导致人体中毒( )。___
A. 一氧化碳
B. 沼气
C. 二氧化硫
D. 硫化氢
E.
F.
【多选题】
下面几点有关施工安全的说法正确的是( )。___
A. 登高作业、电源安装人员都要经专业培训、获有效证件
B. 铁塔施工区域、电缆人井周围、等级公路上施工等有碍安全的部位要按规定设置安全警示标志
C. 跨越公路、三电线路、繁华地段要派有专人负责安全
D. 项目经理施工现场技术规范安全交底告知书
E.
F.
【多选题】
高处作业按照高度共分为( )区域。___
A. 2-5米
B. 5-15米
C. 15-30米
D. 30米以上
E.
F.
【多选题】
下列属于不安全行为的是( )。___
A. 安全带破损
B. 梯子损坏
C. 将电动工具导线直接插入插
D. 在人孔内点燃喷灯
E.
F.
【多选题】
造成安全生产事故的因素有( )。___
A. 人
B. 物
C. 环境
D. 管理
E.
F.
【多选题】
伤亡事故是指企业职工在生产劳动过程中发生的( )。___
A. 人身伤亡
B. 设备损坏事故
C. 急性中毒事故
D. 环境破坏
E.
F.
【多选题】
事故发生后,事故现场有关人员应立即向单位负责人报告,报告的内容包括( )。___
A. 事故发生的时间、地点、原因
B. 事故经过、伤亡人数、损失情况
C. 事故教训
D. 已采取的措施
E.
F.
【多选题】
如需停电作业,采取的下列措施中哪些是正确的?( )___
A. 设专人看守电闸
B. 事先与电力部门联系停止送电
C. 使用绝缘工具
D. 在电力线路上临时采取断路措施
E.
F.
【多选题】
就通信施工生产而言,安全生产主要内容有( )。___
A. 施工车辆交通安全
B. 施工过程消防安全
C. 通信线路施工和交换、移动、传输、电源设备安装的安全
D. 天馈线安装作业安全
E.
F.
【多选题】
下列属于通信施工企业安全生产特点的有( )。___
A. 施工地点分散
B. 施工班组规模大
C. 操作技术性强
D. 涉电场合多
E.
F.
【多选题】
高处作业施工中操作人员使用小件材料物品、工具等极易散落,以下方法正确的是( )。___
A. 随手放在方便的地方
B. 放入工具袋后离手
C. 放入专门设置的材料箱或包
D. 放在腰间
E.
F.
【多选题】
为了确保上杆的安全,下列哪些说法是正确的?( )___
A. 雨雪天气、电杆潮湿时不上杆
B. 晴天天气良好时不上杆
C. 酒后不上杆心情烦躁者不上杆和
D. 穿着硬底鞋不上杆
E.
F.
【多选题】
高空作业时必须使用合格的安全带,且要注意哪些事项?( )___
A. 安全带要低挂高用
B. 安全带要高挂低用
C. 安全带要挂在坚实牢固、闭合的构件上
D. 安全带不能拴在有尖锐棱角的构件上
E.
F.
【多选题】
保安皮带必须经过严格检查,确保坚固可靠才能使用。如( )的均禁止使用,并即缴回修理或调换。___
A. 保安皮带扣环不牢
B. 皮带有折痕
C. 皮带上眼孔有裂缝
D. 皮带完好无损。
E.
F.
推荐试题
【单选题】
___
A. 事物的联系是普遍的、无条件的
B. 事物的联系是现实的、具体的
C. 事物的运动是客观的、绝对的
D. 事物发展的根本原因是事物的内部矛盾
【单选题】
“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___
A. 形而上学片面的、孤立的观点
B. 辩证法普遍联系的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 诡辩论的观点
【单选题】
唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___
A. 事物数量的增加
B. 事物根本性质的变化
C. 事物的一切运动变化
D. 新事物的产生和旧事物的灭亡
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用