参与A/P水平控制模式的舵面有()___

参与飞机俯仰轴方向的控制舵面有（）___

参与飞机横滚轴方向的控制舵面有（）___

侧杆上的优先选择按钮有什么功能___

当1号MCDU上的“MCDUMENU”白灯亮时，说明___

当2号MCDU上出现“OPPFMGCINPROGRESS”时，表示___

当A/P1接通时，关于FMA说法正确的是___

当A/P1、FD1+FD2、A/T1接通时，正常情况下FMGC如何工作___

当A/P2和FD1接通时，A/T接通状态为___

当FCU面板上的高度选择旋钮设置为管理方式时___

当FCU面板上的高度选择旋钮设置为人工方式时___

当FCU选择起飞或复飞模式时，速度窗口中的显示为___

当FD1+FD2接通和A/P2接通时，主FMGC是哪一个___

当FD未接通，A/P2衔接时，哪一部FMGC主用___

当LGCIU失效时，下列说法正确的是___

当PFD上出现红色的“SPDLIM”时，说明___

当按压FCU上的航向选择旋钮时，使用了什么参数___

当飞机在地面时，A/P在哪种情况下才能接通___

当接通A/P时，方向舵配平旋钮是否有效___

当两部A/P都接通时，谁的优先权大___

当偏航阻尼作动器工作时，脚蹬是否受影响___

当使用管理参数时，高度窗口上的显示为___

当使用人工选择参数时，速度窗口上的显示为___

导航设备的频率自动调谐由谁提供（）___

导航数据库必须满足以下哪个规范___

飞行阶段一般可分为几段___

飞行中A/P的横向方式指令由谁实施___

飞机在巡航阶段时A/P1工作，此时若接通A/P2会发生什么情况（）___

副驾驶的气压修正窗口由谁提供___

高度低于400英尺且截获ILS信号时，关于LAND方式说法正确的是___

关于A/P接通后显示情况的正确描述是___

关于FCU说法正确的是()___

关于FD在地面接通情况的正确描述是___

关于FPV说法正确的是___

关于MCDU描述正确的有（）___

关于MCDU1描述正确的有（）___

关于MCDU3描述正确的有（）___

关于MCDU说法正确的是()___

关于PFD速度带上的速度趋势描述正确的是()___

关于侧杆优先权说法正确的是___

时间___

“机不可失，时不再来”指的是___

是 ___

在客观规律面前，人的主观能动性表现在___

事物的联系和运动之间的关系___

唯物辩证法的总特征是___

___

“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___

唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___

区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___

质量互变规律揭示了___

质和事物的存在是___

在实际工作中，要注意掌握分寸，防止“过”或“不及”，其关键在于___

区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___

量变的复杂性是指___

量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___

量变中的局部性部分质变是___

揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___

“肯定和否定相互渗透，在一定意义上，肯定就是否定。”这是一种___

事物的否定方面是指___

作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___

辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___

否定之否定规律___

事物发展的周期性体现了___

直线论的错误在于只看到___

循环论的错误在于___

对立统一规律揭示了___

唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___