刷题
导入试题
【多选题】
报废物资入库时,物资使用管理部门应提交报废物资数量和重量,并经___共同过磅核实。
A. 物资部门仓管人员
B. 移交部门人员
C. 上级部门人员
D. 物资部门领导人员
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
AB
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
仓储业务流程包括___
A. 入库
B. 保管
C. 出库
D. 消防装置检查
【多选题】
物资验收的内容包括___
A. 外包装验收
B. 外观质量和规格尺寸
C. 内在质量验收
D. 数量验收
【多选题】
应急物资管理的原则是___,确保应急物资的紧急情况下的及时、准确供应。
A. 速度第一
B. 效率优先
C. 多种储备
D. 综合利用
E. 公开公平
【多选题】
对已削价、折价处理的库存物资,由企业有关部门出具情况说明,依据有关会计记录将___与 的差额部分,认定为损失。
A. 账面余额
B. 账面净值计价
C. 原账面价值
D. 已收回价值
【多选题】
逆向物资是指___、 、 、 等。
A. 退运物资(资产)
B. 工程结余物资
C. 工程余料
D. 达到轮换年限的储备物资
E. 账外物资
【多选题】
闲置设备再利用遵循“谁产生、谁负责利用”的原则,由设备专业管理部门协调相关部门在___和 安排利用。
A. 项目的计划
B. 开工阶段
C. 设计阶段
D. 验收阶段
【多选题】
闲置物资再利用方式,转变为___和
A. 项目物资
B. 退运物资
C. 储备物资
D. 报废物资
【多选题】
报废物资的处理方式分为___
A. 询价
B. 招标
C. 拍卖
D. 单一来源采购
【多选题】
报废物资管理遵循___的原则。
A. 集中处置
B. 程序规范
C. 周期清零
D. 效益优先
【多选题】
公司报废物资的处理方式有___。
A. 进场(产权交易机构)交易
B. 询价
C. 招标
D. 拍卖
【多选题】
关于闲置设备再利用管理,下列说法正确的是___
A. 闲置设备再利用遵循“谁产生、谁负责利用”的原则,由设备专业管理部门协调相关部门在项目的计划和申购阶段安排利用。
B. 对于确实无法在本单位再利用的,设备专业管理部门应向上一级设备专业管理部门提出申请,由上一级设备专业管理部门统筹安排,同时通报同级物资部门。
C. 物资部门根据设备专业管理部门再利用计划办理闲置设备调拨手续,设备调拨分为法人单位内部调拨和跨法人交易,设备调拨需办理相应的帐务处理手续。
D. 设备专业管理部门负责对闲置设备再利用情况进行统计评价。
【多选题】
逆向物资入库价值以经财务部门核定的___,由物资使用管理部门或项目管理部门移交入库时提供。
A. 物资账面价值
B. 账面物资原值
C. 物资账面余额
D. 账面净值计价
【多选题】
设备专业管理部门办理报废设备入库时,须向物资部门移交相关资料,包括但不限于___、报废设备转让审批表等。
A. 报废设备清册
B. 鉴定报告及审批表
C. 通过审批的实际回收报废设备数量与应回收数量差异报告
D. 入库单
【多选题】
物资管理信息系统,下面哪项在废旧物资处理流程中需进行报废物资出库___
A. 库存物资鉴定为闲置物资
B. 库存物资鉴定为报废物资
C. 工程余料鉴定为报废物资
D. 退运物资鉴定为报废物资
【多选题】
逆向物资入库后,仓库作业人员和移交人员应在___上签名确认。
A. 《闲置物资入库验收表》
B. 《报废物资入库验收表》
C. 《到货验收单》
D. 《配送单》
【多选题】
以下___是闲置物资管理原则。
A. 滚动鉴定
B. 分级管理
C. 程序规范
D. 调剂优先
E. 量化考核
【多选题】
储备物资实行清单管理,储备物资清单内容包括物资编码、物资名称、单位、规格型号,区分___和
A. 重要储备
B. 常用储备
C. 战略储备
D. 常规储备
【多选题】
物资需求单位(部门)在需求计划上报前应核实需求计划条目的___。
A. 合规性
B. 准确性
C. 及时性
D. 完整性
E. 合法性
F. 规范性
【多选题】
储备定额(定额)是指储备物资的存储数量标准,即___。
A. 最高储备量
B. 安全库存
C. 重购线
D. 重购量
【多选题】
储备管理人员汇总当期领用需求,应根据本单位的实际设定___流水节拍。
A. 需求处理
B. 备货
C. 配送
【多选题】
储备物资按储备方式分为___种。
A. 自购储备
B. 协议储备
C. 单购
【多选题】
储备物资配送分为___。
A. 第三方配送
B. 紧急配送
C. 一般需求配送
【多选题】
储备物资清单内容包括物资编码、物资名称、单位、规格型号。___
A. 物资编码
B. 物资名称
C. 单位
D. 规划型号
【多选题】
储备物资遵循___的原则,储备物资分级存储在一二级仓和急救包内,保障日常生产、运维和紧急情况下物资供应。
A. 多种方式
B. 定额存储
C. 动态补仓
D. 综合利用
【多选题】
各专业部门在公司储备清单范围提出储备定额需求,内容包括___、适用范围、单一来源物资的供应商名称、相关订货技术规范等。
A. 物资编码
B. 型号规格
C. 需求数量
D. 供应时效
E. 轮换年限
【多选题】
公司统筹储备物资以及___级应急响应下物资跨省调拨由公司物资部组织。
A. I
B. II
C. Ⅲ
D. Ⅳ
【多选题】
物资部门根据___因素编制本级统筹储备的储备方案
A. 储备定额需求
B. 历史用量
C. 配送能力
D. 仓库层级
E. 急救包设置
【多选题】
物资部门根据___等因素编制本级统筹储备的储备定额,确定重购线(二级仓、急救包物资为补货周期)、重购量,安全库存及最高储备量,报上级物资部门审核、公司批准后执行,各单位储备定额应控制在下达的指标额度以内。
A. 储备定额需求
B. 综合仓库层级
C. 急救包设置
D. 配送能力
E. 历史用量统计
【多选题】
定额物资的储备形式有___
A. 自购储备
B. 寄售储备
C. 第三方物流储备
D. 协议储备
【多选题】
物资储备管理遵循___的原则。
A. 集中计划、多种储备
B. 定额存储、动态补仓
C. 分级管理、先进先出
D. 满足急需、共享使用
【多选题】
储备配送方案包括___等内容。
A. 储备形式、
B. 存储地点、
C. 补货方式、
D. 配送组织、库存分析
【多选题】
储备物资是指公司为满足生产、经营、抢险、抢修等需要,实行定额存储的物资。按种类分有应急储备类、备品备件类、办公用品类、工器具类、低值易耗品类等;按储备方式分有___。
A. 自购储备
B. 协议储备
C. 战略储备
D. 常规储备
【多选题】
___。
A. 最高储备量
B. 安全库存
C. 重购线
D. 重购量
【多选题】
储备物资是指公司为满足生产、经营、抢险、抢修等需要,实行定额存储的物资。按种类分有应急储备类、备品备件类、办公用品类、工器具类、低值易耗品类等;按储备方式分有___。
A. 自购储备
B. 协议储备
C. 战略储备
D. 常规储备
【多选题】
___等属于日常生产经营、检修维护、抢险抢修等所需物资需求实行储备管理,对于需要检定的计量类项目物资、配网(含业扩)项目物资可逐步纳入储备管理。
A. 备品备件
B. 应急物资
C. 报废物资
D. 闲置物资
【多选题】
储备物资实行清单管理,按仓库级别和急救包类别,分别建立储备物资清单,储备物资清单内容包括___,区分战略储备和常规储备,清单每年动态修编统一发布,各单位在储备物资清单范围内开展储备管理。
A. 物资编码
B. 物资名称
C. 单位
D. 规格型号
【多选题】
遵循___的原则,储备物资分级存储在一二级仓和急救包内,保障日常生产、运维和紧急情况下物资供应。
A. 多种方式
B. 定额存储
C. 动态补仓
D. 综合利用
【多选题】
网统筹储备及110kV及以上主要一次设备储备具有___等特点,纳入战略储备物资清单管理
A. 价值高
B. 供货周期长
C. 使用频率低
D. 重要程度高
【多选题】
按统筹管理的主体分有___储备。
A. 地市局(厂)统筹
B. 县、区统筹
C. 省统筹
D. 公司统筹
【多选题】
储备定额遵循___的原则
A. 多种方式
B. 定额存储
C. 动态补仓
D. 充分利库
E. 综合利用
F. 定额补仓
推荐试题
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的总特征是___
A. 量变和质变的观点
B. 辩证否定的观点
C. 联系和发展的观点
D. 对立统一的观点
【单选题】
___
A. 事物的联系是普遍的、无条件的
B. 事物的联系是现实的、具体的
C. 事物的运动是客观的、绝对的
D. 事物发展的根本原因是事物的内部矛盾
【单选题】
“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___
A. 形而上学片面的、孤立的观点
B. 辩证法普遍联系的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 诡辩论的观点
【单选题】
唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___
A. 事物数量的增加
B. 事物根本性质的变化
C. 事物的一切运动变化
D. 新事物的产生和旧事物的灭亡
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用