【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 在改革开放新的历史时期,我国对外开放的大门毅然决然地打开了,其顺序是___ 中 4
A. 从城市到农村
B. 从经济领域到其他各个领域
C. 从沿海到沿江沿边
D. 从东部到中西部
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 把对外开放作为我国必须长期坚持的一项基本国策,所依据的邓小平提出的重要观点是___ 中 4
A. 发展是硬道理
B. 现在的世界是开放的世界
C. 科学技术是第一生产力
D. 中国的发展离不开世界
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 把对外开放作为一项基本国策,主要基于___考察把外开放的作为基本国策的理由 难 4
A. 对历史经验的总结
B. 对世界经济科技发展趋势的判断
C. 适应社会主义现代化建设的需要
D. 借鉴和吸收人类文明成果的需要
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 改革开放30多年来,我国逐步形成了开放型经济。其顺序是 ___ 考察开放性经济形成的顺序 难 4
A. 从建立经济特区到开放沿海、沿江、沿边、内陆地区再到加入世界贸易组织
B. 从大规模“引进来”到大踏步“走出去”
C. 从建立经济特区到开放沿海、内陆、沿边、沿江地区再到加入世界贸易组织
D. 从大踏步“走出去”到大规模“引进来”
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 改革开放30多年来,中国始终不渝地坚持对外开放基本国策,形成了具有中国特色的对外开放。具有中国特色的对外开放道路包括___ 中 4
A. 立足国情积极稳妥推进对外开放
B. 实现改革和开放良性互动
C. 统筹国内发展和对外开放
D. 坚持平等互利共赢的对外开放战略
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 全面提高开放型经济水平,要 ___中 4
A. 正确把握对外开放面临的新形势
B. 完善互利共赢、多元平衡、安全高效的开放型经济体系
C. 构建开放型经济新体制,形成竞争的新优势
D. 坚持平等互利共赢的对外开放战略
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 新常态下,我国经济发展的主要特点是___ 易 4
A. 增长速度要从高速转向中高速
B. 发展方式要从规模速度型转向质量效率型
C. 经济结构调整要从增量扩能为主转向调整存量、做优增量并举
D. 发展动力要从主要依靠资源和低成本劳动力等要素投入转向创新驱动
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 党的十八届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》提出,允许更多国有经济和其他所有制经济发展成为混合所有制经济,并将混合所有制经济明确为基本经济制度的重要实现形式。混合所有制经济___ 中 4
A. 有利于国有资本方法功能、保值增值、提高竞争力
B. 有利于各种所有制资本取长补短、相互促进、共同发展
C. 是新形势下坚持公有制主体地位的一个有效途径和必然选择
D. 是新形势下增强国有经济活力、控制力、影响力的一个有效途径和必然选择
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 从遥远的古代,我国各族人民共同开发祖国的河山,建立了紧密的___联系,两千多年前就形成了幅员辽阔的统一国家。 中 4
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 国家统一思想对推动我国多民族统一国家的形成和发展起到了巨大作用,强烈的国家统一观念逐渐成为中华民族的心理习惯,成为___的重要精神力量。 提干不涉及“世界” 难 4
A. 凝聚世界力量
B. 凝聚民族力量
C. 维护世界和平
D. 维护国家统一
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 实现祖国完全统一是中华民族伟大复兴的___ 易 4
A. 根本目的
B. 一般要求
C. 重要内容
D. 基本任务
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 中共十八届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》,把市场在资源配置中的“基础性作用”修改为“决定性作用”。对市场在资源配置中所起作用的这一新定位,有利于___ 中 4
A. 树立关于政府和市场关系的正确观念
B. 转变经济发展方式
C. 转变政府职能
D. 抑制消极腐败现象
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 中共十八届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》之所以把市场在资源配置中的“基础性作用”修改为“决定性作用”,是因为___ 中 4
A. 市场配置资源是最有效率的形式
B. 市场决定资源配置是市场经济的一般规律
C. 市场经济本质上就是市场决定资源配置的经济
D. 市场在资源配置中起全部作用
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 确立公有制为主体,多种所有制经济共同发展的基本经济制度的基本依据是___ 易 4
A. 由我国社会主义的社会性质决定的
B. 由我国社会主义初级阶段的生产力水平决定的
C. 一切符合“三个有利于”标准的所有制形式,都可以而且应该用来为发展社会主义服务
D. 我国按劳分配为主体、多种分配方式并存的分配制度的要求
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 中共十八届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》提出,坚持和完善公有制为主体、多种所有制经济共同发展的基本经济制度。以下关于这一基本经济制度的选项,内容正确的是___ 中 4
A. 非公有制经济不是为社会主义服务的
B. 这一基本经济制度是中国特色社会主义制度的重要支柱
C. 混合所有制经济是这一基本经济制度的重要实现形式
D. 这一基本经济制度是社会主义市场经济体制的根基
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 坚持稳步推进两岸关系全面发展,就要___ 易 4
A. 保持两岸分离局面
B. 要努力增进两岸民众福祉
C. 深化两岸经济合作
D. 扩大两岸文化交流
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 实现祖国完全统一是中华民族伟大复兴的___ 易 4
A. 根本目的
B. 一般要求
C. 重要内容
D. 基本任务
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 中共十八届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》,把市场在资源配置中的“基础性作用”修改为“决定性作用”。对市场在资源配置中所起作用的这一新定位,有利于___ 中 4
A. 树立关于政府和市场关系的正确观念
B. 转变经济发展方式
C. 转变政府职能
D. 抑制消极腐败现象
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 中共十八届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》之所以把市场在资源配置中的“基础性作用”修改为“决定性作用”,是因为___ 中 4
A. 市场配置资源是最有效率的形式
B. 市场决定资源配置是市场经济的一般规律
C. 市场经济本质上就是市场决定资源配置的经济
D. 市场在资源配置中起全部作用
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 确立公有制为主体,多种所有制经济共同发展的基本经济制度的基本依据是___ 易 4
A. 由我国社会主义的社会性质决定的
B. 由我国社会主义初级阶段的生产力水平决定的
C. 一切符合“三个有利于”标准的所有制形式,都可以而且应该用来为发展社会主义服务
D. 我国按劳分配为主体、多种分配方式并存的分配制度的要求
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 中共十八届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》提出,坚持和完善公有制为主体、多种所有制经济共同发展的基本经济制度。以下关于这一基本经济制度的选项,内容正确的是___ 中 4
A. 非公有制经济不是为社会主义服务的
B. 这一基本经济制度是中国特色社会主义制度的重要支柱
C. 混合所有制经济是这一基本经济制度的重要实现形式
D. 这一基本经济制度是社会主义市场经济体制的根基
【多选题】
/第八章/第二节 多选题 坚持稳步推进两岸关系全面发展,就要___ 易 4
A. 保持两岸分离局面
B. 要努力增进两岸民众福祉
C. 深化两岸经济合作
D. 扩大两岸文化交流
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 关于人民当家作主的说法正确的是___ 易 4
A. 是社会主义民主政治的本质和核心要求
B. 是社会主义政治文明的出发点
C. 是社会主义政治文明建设的归宿
D. 以上都对
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 人民民主专政实质上是无产阶级专政,原因在于它与无产阶级专政在___方面相同 易 4
A. 性质相同
B. 作用相同
C. 职能相同
D. 历史使命相同
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 关于中国特色社会主义民主政治,以下说法正确的是___ 易 4
A. 中国共产党的领导是人民当家作主和依法治国的根本保证
B. 人民当家作主是社会主义民主政治的本质和核心要求
C. 依法治国是党领导人民治理国家的基本方略
D. 党的领导、人民当家作主和依法治国统一于建设中国特色社会主义民主政治的伟大实践
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 中国现阶段的人民民主专政实质上是无产阶级专政,这主要表现在人民民主专政与无产阶级专政___ 易 4
A. 性质相同
B. 作用、职能相同
C. 历史使命相同
D. 政体相同
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 在中国实行人民代表大会制度,是___ 易 4
A. 中国人民在人类政治制度史上的伟大创造
B. 深刻总结近代以后中国政治生活惨痛教训得出的基本结论
C. 是符合中国国情的选择
D. 中国人民翻身作主、掌握自己命运的必然选择
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 在中国实行人民代表大会制度,符合中国国情。作为我国政体和人民当家作主的根本政治制度的人民代表大会制度___ 易 4
A. 是中国社会主义政治文明的重要制度载体
B. 体现中国社会主义国家性质
C. 能使广大人民在国家政治生活中直接行使民主权利
D. 是党在国家政权中充分发扬民主、贯彻群众路线的最好实现形式
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 做好人民政协工作,必须坚持人民政协的性质定位。人民政协是___ 易 4
A. 中国人民爱国统一战线的组织
B. 中国共产党领导的多党合作和政治协商的机构
C. 中国政治生活中发扬社会主义民主的重要形式
D. 中国特色国家行政机构的组成部分
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 实践证明,中国共产党领导的多党合作和政治协商制度能够在中国特色社会主义共同目标下,把中国共产党领导和多党派合作有机结合起来,实现___ 易 4
A. 广泛参与与集中领导的统一
B. 社会进步与国家稳定的统一
C. 充满活力与富有效率的统一
D. 立法与行政的统一
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 在当今世界许多地区民族冲突迭起的情况下,我国各族人民和睦相处,共同建设有中国特色的社会主义,这是因为我国___ 易 4
A. 消除了民族间在经济、文化发展水平方面的差距
B. 形成了平等、团结、互助、和谐的社会主义民族关系
C. 社会主义制度的确立消灭了民族压迫
D. 实行了民族区域自治制度
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 新疆和西藏几十年来的发展证明,民族区域自治制度符合各民族人民的共同利益和发展要求。民族区域自治制度___ 易 4
A. 体现了我国坚持实行各民族平等、团结、合作和共同繁荣的原则
B. 体现了民族因素与区域因素、政治因素与经济因素、历史因素与现实因素的结合
C. 核心是保障少数民族当家作主,管理本民族、本地方事务的权利
D. 是历史的人民的选择
【多选题】
/第十章/第二节 多选题 改革开放以来,我国已经建立了基层民主自治体系,其主要内容有___ 易 4
A. 农村村民委员会
B. 城市居民委员会
C. 企业职工代表大会
D. 妇女联合会
【多选题】
/第十章/第三节 多选题 下列构成社会主义核心价值体系的基本内容的有___ 易 4
A. 以爱国主义为核心的民族精神
B. 以民族团结为主题的中华精神
C. 以经济发展为核心的时代精神
D. 以改革创新为核心的时代精神
【多选题】
/第十章/第三节 多选题 下列属于社会主义核心价值体系的基本内容的是___ 中 4
A. 马克思主义指导思想
B. 中国特色社会主义共同理想
C. 以爱国主义为核心的民族精神
D. 以改革创新为核心的时代精神
【多选题】
/第十章/第三节 多选题 发挥人民在文化建设中的主体作用,坚持___ 易 4
A. 文化发展为了人民
B. 文化发展信赖人民
C. 文化发展依靠人民
D. 文化发展成果由人民共享
【多选题】
/第十章/第三节 多选题 建设社会主义文化强国,需要发挥文化的___作用。 文化的作用 难 4
A. 引领社会风尚
B. 教育人民
C. 服务社会发展
D. 建设法治社会
【多选题】
/第十章/第三节 多选题 坚持中国特色社会主义文化发展道路,必须___如何坚持中国特色社会主义文化发展道路 难 4
A. 坚持以马克思主义为指导
B. 坚持自己的民族特色
C. 坚持采用西方的先进制度
D. 坚持发挥人民的主体地位
【多选题】
/第十章/第三节 多选题 建设社会主义文化强国,是___ 难 4
A. 与开展社会主义革命的根本需要
B. 满足人民精神文化需要的必然要求
C. 实现中国梦的重要内容
D. 构建中国国际话语权的现实需要
【多选题】
/第十章/第三节 多选题 社会主义核心价值体系与社会主义核心价值观方向一致,表现在___ 易 4
A. 体现了社会主义意识形态的本质要求
B. 凝聚了社会主义先进文化的精髓
C. 体现了社会主义制度在思想和精神层面的质的规定性
D. 是实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦的价值引领
【多选题】
/第十章/第三节 多选题 核心价值观和核心价值体系都坚持重在建设,就是要___ 细节理解 难 4
A. 坚定共产主义远大理想
B. 弘扬共同理想
C. 凝聚精神力量
D. 建设道德风尚
推荐试题
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐