刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
党风问题的实质是___
A. 权力如何运用的问题
B. 党和人民群众的关系问题
C. 党的先锋队性质问题
D. 党的生死存亡问题
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
B
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
反对腐败与经济建设的关系是___
A. 两者是矛盾的
B. 两者是对立的
C. 两者是脱节的
D. 两者是统一的
【单选题】
保持党的先进性和纯洁性,增强党的凝聚力和战斗力的保证是___
A. 从严治党
B. 发扬民主
C. 党要管党
D. 加强思想教育
【单选题】
全国人民团结奋斗的共同利益基础是___
A. 建设有中国特色社会主义
B. 实现中华民族全面振兴
C. 四项基本原则
D. 共同富裕
【单选题】
党的建设的首要任务是___
A. 思想建设
B. 组织建设
C. 政治建设
D. 执政能力建设
【单选题】
在毛泽东关于党的建设思想中,提到世界观和党性原则的高度的思想是___
A. 强调从思想上建党
B. 坚持党的民主集中制
C. 强调党的纪律原则
D. 强调党的作风建设
【单选题】
早在民主革命时期,毛泽东在回答民主人士黄炎培提出的中国共产党如何跳出历史上历代封建王朝“其兴也勃焉”,“其亡也忽焉”的“周期律”问题时,提出我们的方法是___
A. 整风的方法
B. 整党的方法
C. 民主的方法
D. 教育的方法
【多选题】
党的十八大提出了把党建设成为___的马克思主义执政党的战略目标。
A. 学习型
B. 服务型
C. 创新型
D. 廉政型
【多选题】
党的各级领导班子建设的基本要求是___
A. 坚决贯彻党的基本理论和基本路线
B. 全心全意为人民服务
C. 具有领导现代化建设能力
D. 团结坚强
【多选题】
党的优良作风是___
A. 理论联系实际
B. 密切联系群众
C. 批评和自我批评
D. 艰苦奋斗
【多选题】
党的优良作风是___
A. 党的性质的体现
B. 党的宗旨的体现
C. 党的组织原则的体现
D. 党的政治路线的体现
【多选题】
马克思主义政党的本质属性是___
A. 先进性
B. 辩证性
C. 纯洁性
D. 创造性
【多选题】
当前,世情、国情、党情发生了深刻变化,党的建设面临着许多新的考验,包括___
A. 执政考验
B. 改革开放考验
C. 市场经济考验
D. 外部环境的考验
【多选题】
党的监督体系包括___
A. 党内监督
B. 群众监督
C. 舆论监督
D. 民主党派和无党派人士监督
【多选题】
20世纪50年代中期,邓小平多次强调,执政的中国共产党必须接受来自几个方面的监督,具体包括___
A. 党内的监督
B. 人民群众的监督
C. 海外人士的监督
D. 民主党派和无党派民主人士的监督
【多选题】
反腐败斗争___
A. 关系到党和国家的生死存亡
B. 教育是基础
C. 制度是保证
D. 监督是关键
【多选题】
中国共产党以___作为自己的行动指南
A. 马克思列宁主义
B. 毛泽东思想、邓小平理论
C. “三个代表”重要思想、科学发展观
D. 中国梦
【多选题】
新形势下,中国共产党面临着以下危险___,这些危险更加尖锐地摆在全党面前,必须对此保持清醒认识。
A. 精神懈怠的危险
B. 能力不足的危险
C. 脱离群众的危险
D. 消极腐败的危险
【多选题】
在新的历史下,广大人民的根本利益,从根本上说,就是要解放和发展生产力,实现国家的繁荣富强和人民的共同富裕,实现中华民族的伟大复兴。在中国能够团结和带领全国各族人民实现这个宏伟目标的政治力量,只有中国共产党,这是因为___
A. 坚持中国现代化建设的正确方向,需要中国共产党的领导。
B. 维护国家统一、社会和谐稳定,需要中国共产党的领导
C. 正确处理各种复杂的社会毛段,把亿万人民团结凝聚起来,共同建设美好未来,需要中国共产党的领导。
D. 应对复杂的国际环境的挑战,需要中国共产党的领导。
【多选题】
要坚持党的领导,就必须改善党的领导,当前改善党的领导,应着力解决以下问题___
A. 正确处理党的领导和依法治国的关系
B. 要改革、完善党和国家的领导制度
C. 要不断提高党的领导水平和执政水平、提高拒腐防变和抵御风险的能力。
D. 密切联系实际,一切从实际出发
【多选题】
加强党的执政能力建设,必须着力建设高素质的领导班子,把___作为各级领导班子建设的核心内容。
A. 提高领导水平
B. 提高决策水平
C. 提高执政能力
D. 提高服务效能
【多选题】
新时期中国共产党面临三大历史任务是___
A. 反腐败
B. 全面建设小康社会
C. 完成祖国统一
D. 维护世界和平和促进共同发展
【单选题】
“总体小康”和“全面建设小康社会”并无区别。___
A. 正确。两者无区别,同处于第二步到第三步的战略阶段,同处于小康阶段。
B. 正确。两者无区别,“总体小康”是指我们现在已达到的小康现状,而“全面建设小康社会”是21世纪头20年将要达到的目标,尚未见晓。
C. 错误。两者有区别,全面建设小康是将目前低水平、不全面、发展很不平衡的总体小康社会,发展成为更高水平、内容比较全面、发展较为均衡的小康社会。
【单选题】
中国共产党对台湾的方针政策一直没有改变。___
A. 正确。因为中国共产党对台湾的方针政策一直是武力解决。
B. 正确。因为中国共产党对台湾的方针政策一直是和平解决。
C. 错误。以毛泽东为主要代表的中国共产党人在解决台湾问题的方针上,经历了从武力解放到和平解放台湾的过程。以邓小平为核心的第二代中央领导集体创造性地提出了“一国两制”的科学构想。随后,逐步形成了“和平统一、一国两制”的基本方针。
【单选题】
1917年十月革命的胜利开辟了世界无产阶级社会主义革命的新时代,标志着人类历史开始了由资本主义向社会主义转变的进程,因此,中国新民主主义革命实质上是无产阶级社会主义革命。___
A. 正确,因为中国新民主主义革命以马克思列宁主义为指导、由无产阶级领导、以社会主义为前途。
B. 不完全正确(结论错误),前面两句是正确的,但结论不能说中国新民主主义革命是无产阶级革命,中国社会性质和革命任务决定了中国革命实质上是资产阶级民主革命。
C. 错误,十月革命开辟了世界资产阶级革命的新时代,因此中国新民主主义革命实际上是资产阶级民主革命。
【单选题】
毛泽东曾总结指出:中国共产党区别于其他政党的显著标志是理论和实践相结合的作风,和人民群众紧密联系在一起的作风,以及独立自主的作风。___
A. 正确
B. 错误,应该是实事求是、群众路线、独立自主
C. 错误,应该是统一战线、武装斗争、党的建设
D. 不完全正确,应将最后一条改为自我批评(或批评与自我批评)的作风
【单选题】
中央提出:毛泽东思想的活的灵魂是贯穿在其全部内容中的立场、观点和方法,主要有三个基本方面,即实事求是、群众路线、自我批评。___
A. 正确
B. 错误,应该是统一战线、武装斗争、党的建设
C. 错误,应该是实事求是、群众路线、独立自主
D. 错误,应该是理论和实践相结合、密切联系群众、批评与自我批评
【单选题】
“三个代表”重要思想的集中概括是中国共产党必须始终代表先进生产力,代表先进文化的前进方向,代表中国最广大人民的根本利益。___
A. 正确
B. 错误,应该是:“三个代表”重要思想的集中概括是中国共产党必须始终中国代表先进生产力的发展要求,代表中国先进文化的前进方向,代表中国最广大人民的根本利益。
C. 错误,应该是:“三个代表”重要思想的集中概括是中国共产党必须始终中国代表先进生产力,代表中国先进文化的前进方向,代表中国最广大人民的根本利益。
D. 错误,应该是:“三个代表”重要思想的集中概括是中国共产党必须始终代表世界先进生产力的发展要求,代表世界先进文化的前进方向,代表中国最广大人民的根本利益。
【单选题】
小资产阶级是资产阶级的一部分,因此最终也是中国革命的敌人。___
A. 正确
B. 错误,小资产阶级不是资产阶级的一部分,因为它是自食其力的劳动者,而资产阶级是剥削阶级,因此小资产阶级是中国革命的动力之一。
C. 错误,小资产阶级虽然是资产阶级的一部分,但深受帝国主义、封建主义和大资产阶级的压迫,具有革命要求,因而不是革命的敌人,而是革命的动力之一。
D. 错误,小资产阶级是资产阶级的一部分,它具有两面性,即积极革命的一面和可能妥协动摇投降的一面,因此党的政策是又联合又斗争。
【单选题】
“三大优良作风”是中国共产党区别于其他一切政党的显著标志。___
A. 正确。这就是理论和实践相结合的作风,和人民群众密切地联系在一起的作风,以及自我批评的作风。它是中国共产党人在长期革命中形成的,是中国共产党所特有的,因而是中国共产党区别于其他一切政党的显著标志,
B. 正确。三大作风是毛泽东在1956年中共“八大”总结中国革命经验基础上形成的,其他政党没有这样的经历,因而是中国共产党区别于其他一切政党的显著标志。
C. 错误。三大作风只是中国共产党区别于资产阶级政党的显著标志,并不能说是区别于其他一切政党的显著标志。
【单选题】
大资产阶级是中国民主革命的主要对象之一,因此它始终被排除在统一战线之外。___
A. 错误。大资产阶级不是中国民主革命的主要对象,中国革命的动力就包括了工人、农民、城市小资产阶级、民族资产阶级和大资产阶级,因而更不能说将之始终被排除在统一战线之外。
B. 错误。近代中国社会的主要矛盾决定了大资产阶级是中国民主革命的主要对象,但在特定条件下中国的大资产阶级有时也是民主革命的团结对象。
C. 正确。大资产阶级是中国三座大山之一,因此,它始终被排除在统一战线之外。
【单选题】
毛泽东思想就是毛泽东个人的思想___
A. 正确。毛泽东思想就是毛泽东个人思想的总和。
B. 正确。毛泽东思想指的是毛泽东个人思想中正确内容的总和。
C. 错误。毛泽东思想是中国共产党人集体智慧的结晶,毛泽东是毛泽东思想的主要创立者。
D. 错误。毛泽东思想与毛泽东个人的思想没有关系。
【单选题】
毛泽东思想是关于中国革命的正确理论原则和经验总结___
A. 正确。毛泽东为中国革命做出了重要贡献,在社会主义建设方面犯了严重错误。
B. 正确。毛泽东思想的全部内容都是关于中国革命的经验总结。
C. 错误。毛泽东关于社会主义建设的思想观点才是毛泽东思想。
D. 错误。毛泽东思想是关于中国革命和建设的正确理论原则和经验总结。
【单选题】
毛泽东思想与中国特色社会主义理论体系是两个相互独立的理论体系___
A. 正确。毛泽东思想是关于中国革命的思想,中国特色社会主义理论体系是关于社会主义建设和改革的理论。
B. 正确。毛泽东思想是马克思主义与中国革命实际相结合的产物,中国特色社会主义理论体系是马克思主义与中国社会主义建设和改革实际相结合的产物。
C. 错误。毛泽东思想与中国特色社会主义理论体系都是马克思主义与中国实际相结合的产物,马克思主义是二者共同的理论基础,中国特色社会主义理论体系是对毛泽东思想的继承和发展。
D. 错误。除了创立的时期不同以外,他们所面临的历史任务、具体内容、历史地位和指导意义都是一致的。
【单选题】
“三个代表”重要思想就是指“三个代表”三句话。___
A. 正确。“三个代表”重要思想就是指中国共产党要始终代表中国先进生产力发展的要求,代表中国先进文化前进的方向,代表中国最广大人民群众的根本利益。
B. 错误。“三个代表”重要思想是江泽民全部思想的总和。
C. 错误。“三个代表”重要思想不仅仅是指“三个代表”,它是江泽民关于党的建设思想的总和。
D. 错误。“三个代表”是对“三个代表”重要思想的集中概括,“三个代表”重要思想包含着包括经济政治文化社会、内政国防外交等各个方面的重要思想观点,是一个科学的理论体系。
【单选题】
“以人为本”与“以经济建设为中心”是完全一致的___
A. 正确。经济利益是核心利益,以人为本就是以要保障人民群众的经济利益为根本。
B. 正确。以经济建设为中心,就是要不断满足人民群众日益增长的物质文化生活的需要,就是以人为本。
C. 错误。以人为本,是要在满足人民群众日益增长的物质文化生活需要的基础上,促进人的全面发展。
D. 错误。“以人为本”与“以经济建设为中心”不存在任何联系。
【单选题】
教条主义和经验主义都是主观主义的表现___
A. 正确。教条主义和经验主义都是理论和实际相脱离的结果,都是主观主义。
B. 正确。马克思主义的基本原理,十月革命的斗争经验对于指导中国革命没有任何意义,指导中国革命的理论和经验,全部来自于中国革命的实践。
C. 错误。教条主义是主观主义,经验主义则强调从经验出发,是客观的。
D. 错误。经验主义是从狭隘的经验出发,是主观的。教条主义强调马克思主义对中国革命实际的指导作用,是客观的。
【单选题】
解放思想就是要敢于否定一切___。
A. 正确。邓小平说,解放思想就是要打破习惯势力和主观偏见的束缚,就是要敢于否定一切。
B. 正确。解放思想就是要放飞思想,打破一切束缚,干预否定一切。
C. 错误。解放思想是指在马克思主义指导下,打破习惯势力的束缚,破除迷信,使理论与实际,认识与实践,主观与客观相符合。
D. 错误。解放思想必须坚持马克思主义为指导,马克思主义的文本是最高权威,不能有任何质疑。
【单选题】
标新立异不等于理论创新___
A. 不准确。并非所有的标新立异都属于理论创新,那些在发达国家已经经过实践检验的理论,如果应用到中国,才可以称得上真正的理论创新。
B. 正确。理论创新必须服务于、落脚于实践,脱离实践的所谓“创新”,不是真正的理论创新。
C. 错误。理论创新就是要在理论上标新立异,否则就谈不上创新。
D. 错误。理论创新的价值不在于是否能够服务于实践,关键在于是否“新”、“异”。
【单选题】
解放思想等同于实事求是___
A. 正确。邓小平说,解放思想,就是使思想和实际相符合,使主观和客观相符合,就是实事求是。
B. 正确。解放思想是实事求是的前提,解放思想就是为了实事求是,解放思想就是实事求是。
C. 错误。解放思想是实事求是的前提,实事求是是解放思想的归宿。实事求是包含着解放思想的内容,还包含这一切从实际出发、理论联系实际、在实践中检验真理和发展真理等内容。
D. 错误。解放思想是邓小平理论的精髓,实事求是是毛泽东思想的精髓,二者是两个不同的概念。
【单选题】
中华人民共和国的成立,标志着我国已进入社会主义初级阶段。___
A. 错误。我国在十一届三中全会之后才迈入社会主义初级阶段。
B. 正确。中华人民共和国的成立本身就标志着我国已进入社会主义阶段,而且由于当时经济文化落后,所以只能是社会主义初级阶段。
C. 错误。1956年,社会主义改造基本完成后,才标志着我国已进入社会主义初级阶段。
推荐试题
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用