刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
___贯穿于中华民族社会生活的各个领域,体现在中华民族德行的各个方面,鲜明地体现了中华民族的民族性格和道德精神。
A. 国际主义
B. 维护民族利益
C. 勤劳勇敢
D. 艰苦创业
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
C
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
增强国防观念,不仅是保障国防安全的需要,也是增强民族___和向心力的“粘合剂”。
A. 战斗力
B. 凝聚力
C. 军事力
D. 安全性
【单选题】
爱国主义的落脚点和归宿是___
A. 爱国情感
B. 爱国行为
C. 爱国思想
D. 爱国意识
【单选题】
维护___和领土完整,是国家的核心利益。
A. 国家主权
B. 国家地位
C. 民族团结
D. 国家安全
【单选题】
日本政要祭拜所谓的“靖国神社”,本质上属于___
A. 爱国主义
B. 狭隘的民族主义
C. 大国沙文主义
D. 国际主义
【单选题】
___制度的实行,对于维护和巩固祖国的统一,维护各民族的利益和权利,促进各民族的共同奋斗和共同繁荣发展,发挥了极其重要的作用。
A. 国防教育法
B. 宪法
C. 民族区域自治
D. 反分裂国家法
【单选题】
真正的爱国者,在任何时候、任何情况下都要把___放在第一位,把民族自尊心和自豪感体现在爱国的实际行动中。
A. 维护国家的安全、荣誉和利益
B. 义务
C. 爱国主义情感
D. 爱国主义思想
【单选题】
应充分认识和尊重人类文化的___,虚心学习和借鉴别国的长处和经验,并积极承担国际责任,为世界的和平与发展做出贡献。
A. 统一性
B. 民族性
C. 人类性
D. 多样性
【单选题】
阿尔伯特·哈伯德曾经说过:“如果说,智慧和勤奋像金子一样珍贵的话,那么还有一种东西更为珍贵,那就是忠诚。”检验一个人对祖国忠诚程度的试金石是___
A. 对祖国大好河山的热爱程度
B. 对祖国灿烂文化的热爱程度
C. 对祖国悠久历史的了解程度
D. 对人民群众感情的深浅程度
【单选题】
“苟利国家生死以,岂因祸福避趋之”、“鞠躬尽瘁,死而后已”、“捐躯赴国难,视死忽如归”反映的中华民族爱国主义优良传统是___
A. 热爱祖国,始终不渝
B. 天下兴亡,匹夫有责
C. 维护统一,反对分裂
D. 同仇敌忾,抵御外辱
【单选题】
邓小平指出,对香港地区的人民来说,“爱国者的标准是,尊重自己民族,诚心诚意拥护祖国恢复行使对香港的主权,不损害香港的繁荣和稳定。只要具备这些条件,不管他们相信资本主义,还是相信封建主义,甚至相信奴隶主义,都是爱国者。我们不要求他们都赞成中国的社会主义制度,只要求他们爱祖国,爱香港。”这说明___
A. 爱国主义与社会主义是没有关联的
B. 爱国主义有不同的层次
C. 爱国主义与社会主义是等同的
D. 爱国主义要求必须爱社会主义
【单选题】
在五千多年的发展史中,中华民族形成了以爱国主义为核心的团结统一、爱好和平、勤劳勇敢、自强不息的伟大民族精神。其中。中华民族创造一个又一个人间奇迹的重要精神动力是___
A. 团结统一
B. 爱好和平
C. 勤劳勇敢
D. 自强不息
【单选题】
《周易》曰:“天行健,君子自强不息”。自古以来,自强不息就是中华民族精神的重要内容。下列选项充分体现了这一精神的是___
A. 化干戈为玉帛
B. 民生在勤,勤则不匮
C. 赖其力者生,不赖其力者不生
D. 亲仁善邻
【单选题】
邓小平曾告诫我们:“谈到人格,但不要忘记还有一个国格。特别是像我们这样第三世界的发展中国家,没有民族自尊心,不珍惜自己民族的独立,国家是立不起来的”。这说明,自觉维护国家利益就要___
A. 承担对国家应尽的义务
B. 维护改革发展稳定的大局
C. 树立民族自尊心和自豪感
D. 同一切损害国家利益的行为做斗争
【单选题】
不同时代有不同时代的任务,这一任务反映到爱国主义的内容上就是特定时代条件下爱国主义的主题,这说明爱国主义___
A. 是无条件的
B. 是具体的
C. 是变化的
D. 是有阶级性的
【单选题】
在中华民族悠久的历史上,启迪和指引历代优秀人物壮丽人生的一个共同思想因素是___
A. 功利主义
B. 爱国主义
C. 民主主义
D. 社会主义
【单选题】
把握经济全球化趋势与爱国主义的相互关系的问题上,需要着重树立一些观念,其中不包括___
A. 人有地域和信仰的不同,但报效祖国之心不应有差别
B. 科学没有国界,但科学家有祖国
C. 顺应经济全球化,适时改变爱国主义立场
D. 经济全球化过程中要始终维护国家的主权和尊严
【单选题】
下列选项中,体现了中华民族爱国主义优良传统中“心系民生苦乐,推动历史进步”的高尚品质的是___
A. 君使臣以礼,臣事君以忠
B. 先天下之忧而忧,后天下之乐而乐
C. 知之为知之,不知为不知,是知也
D. 老吾老,以及人之老;幼吾幼,以及人之幼
【单选题】
一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支柱是___
A. 民族荣誉感
B. 民族精神
C. 民族价值
D. 民族道德
【单选题】
爱国主义的基本要求不包括___
A. 爱祖国的大好河山
B. 爱自己的骨肉同胞
C. 爱自己的本职工作
D. 爱自己的国家
【单选题】
爱国主义与个人实现人生价值的关系___
A. 爱国主义阻碍个人实现人生价值
B. 爱国主义是个人实现人生价值的力量源泉
C. 爱国主义与个人实现人生价值无关
D. 爱国主义有时会帮助个人实现人生价值
【单选题】
实现中华民族伟大复兴的动力是___
A. 强大国防
B. 强大外交
C. 爱国主义
D. 强大的经济实力
【单选题】
以下表述错误的是___
A. 时代精神是民族精神的时代性体现
B. 民族精神是时代精神形成的重要基础和依托
C. 时代精神的核心是爱国主义
D. 时代精神的核心是改革创新
【单选题】
国家的核心利益是___
A. 维护国家经济利益
B. 维护国家文化利益
C. 维护国家主权和领土完整
D. 维护国家政治利益
【单选题】
中华民族精神源远流长,昭君出塞、鉴真东渡、郑和下西洋等,体现的中华民族精神是___
A. 勤劳勇敢
B. 团结统一
C. 自强不息
D. 爱好和平
【单选题】
当今世界的时代主题是___
A. 冲突和战乱
B. 打击恐怖主义与经济发展
C. 和平与发展
D. 经济全球化
【单选题】
以下表述正确的是___
A. 古今中外爱国主义的含义是一致的
B. 爱国主义与拥护祖国统一不同
C. 当前爱国主义与爱社会主义具有一致性
D. 爱国主义对港澳台同胞和海外侨胞来说,就是爱社会主义
【单选题】
以下表述正确的是___
A. 为维护国家主权,要坚决抵制经济全球化
B. 政治一体化和文化一体化在经济全球化过程中是必要的
C. 可以用一种政治制度、价值观念和意识形态来衡量世界
D. 在经济全球化时代,应该继续发扬爱国主义精神
【单选题】
国防教育的核心是___
A. 军事理论教育
B. 爱国主义教育
C. 近现代史教育
D. 法律意识教育
【单选题】
改革创新不包括___
A. 制度创新
B. 理论创新
C. 科技文化创新
D. 生活方式创新
【单选题】
在经济全球化时代,应该发扬___
A. 爱“球”主义精神
B. 大国主义精神
C. 民族主义精神
D. 爱国主义精神
【单选题】
国家安全的支柱与核心是___
A. 政治安全和国防安全
B. 文化安全
C. 科技安全
D. 经济安全
【单选题】
当前,维护祖国统一,首要的、也是最重要的是___
A. 保持港、澳地区繁荣稳定局面
B. 解决台湾问题
C. 解决钓鱼岛问题
D. 解决南海问题
【单选题】
张学良在关键时刻决定“改旗易帜”,使得日本把中国东三省分裂出去的阴谋破产,反映出中华民族精神中的___
A. 勤劳勇敢
B. 团结统一
C. 自强不息
D. 爱好和平
【单选题】
之所以强调“科学家有祖国”,是因为___
A. 科学有国界
B. 科学家有民族性、无国际性
C. 科学有阶级利益
D. 科学家的科学成果与祖国利益休戚相关
【单选题】
中国古代,班超出使西域、苏武牧羊等故事,反映的中华民族爱国主义优良传统是___
A. 热爱祖国,始终不渝
B. 天下兴亡,匹夫有责
C. 维护统一,反对分裂
D. 同仇敌忾,抵御外辱
【单选题】
岳母刺字、“狼牙山五壮士”等英雄壮举,反映的中华民族爱国主义优良传统是___
A. 热爱祖国,始终不渝
B. 天下兴亡,匹夫有责
C. 维护统一,反对分裂
D. 同仇敌忾,抵御外辱
【单选题】
七七事变以后,国共两党弥合阶级对立,实现第二次合作,共同抗日,反映出爱国主义___
A. 没有阶级性
B. 虽有阶级性,但也有超越阶级对立的一致性的一面
C. 具有民族性
D. 是高度抽象的、统一的
【单选题】
“飞流直下三千尺,疑是银河落九天”反映出李白对祖国的热爱,主要指___
A. 爱祖国的大好河山
B. 爱自己的骨肉同胞
C. 爱祖国的灿烂文化
D. 爱自己的国家
【单选题】
五千年文明史有力地弘扬了爱国主义精神,具体体现在___
A. 爱祖国的大好河山
B. 爱自己的骨肉同胞
C. 爱祖国的灿烂文化
D. 爱自己的国家
【单选题】
美国“棱镜”事件暴露出美国在网络信息窃听方面的丑闻,具体反映出当前___安全非常突出。
A. 金融安全
B. 信息安全
C. 经济安全
D. 社会公共安全
推荐试题
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用