相关试题
【多选题】
“自竞争人权之说兴,机械资本之用广,其害遂演而日深;政治之不平等,一变而为社会之不平等;君主贵族之压制,一变而为资本家之压制。此近世文明之缺点,无容讳言者也。”___
A. 对西方文化盲目崇拜
B. 某种程度的保留
C. 某种程度的怀疑
D. 对资本主义完全失去信心
【多选题】
1947年10月10日、中国人民解放军总部发表宣言,正式提出___的口号。
A. 打倒蒋介石
B. 后方挖蒋根
C. 前方打老蒋
D. 解放全中国
【多选题】
《马关条约》签订后,干涉日本退还辽东半岛的三国是___
【多选题】
参加1945年重庆谈判的中共代表有___
A. 张闻天
B. 王若飞
C. 周恩来
D. 毛泽东
【多选题】
1935年遵义会议后,中共中央成立的全权负责红军军事行动的新三人团的成员是___
A. 周恩来
B. 张闻天
C. 王稼祥
D. 毛泽东
【多选题】
通过重庆谈判和签订的“双十协定”,中共取得的成果有___
A. 迫使国民党承认和平建国的基本方针
B. 实现了中共在国家政治生活中的合法地位
C. 团结了民主力量
D. 在全国人民面前表现了和平诚意
【多选题】
北洋军阀集团在袁世凯死后分裂为三大派系,它们是___
A. 以段祺瑞为首的皖系
B. 以张作霖为首的奉系
C. 以冯国璋为首的直系
D. 以陈炯明为首的粤系
【多选题】
在1927年大革命失败以后,国民党的性质发生转变,它代表___的利益。
A. 地主阶级
B. 工人阶级
C. 民族资产阶级
D. 买办性的大资产阶级
【多选题】
中国各民主党派形成时的社会基础,主要是___
A. 城市小资产阶级及与其相联系的知识分子
B. 其他爱国分子
C. 民族资产阶级及与其相联系的知识分子
D. 地方实力派
【多选题】
1911年武昌起义中,决定联合行动进行武装反抗的两个资产阶级革命团体是___
A. 光复会
B. 文学社
C. 同盟会
D. 共进会
【多选题】
中国共产党主办的___在国民党统治区公开发行,及时宣传党的主张,鼓舞和激励群众的抗战热情
A. 《群众》周刊
B. 《热血日报》
C. 《向导》周报
D. 《新华日报》
【多选题】
太平天国后期,洪秀全提拔了一批具有军事才能的青年将领,以图挽救危局。___是其中的主要代表人物
A. 李秀成
B. 冯云山
C. 杨秀清
D. 陈玉成
【多选题】
1936年12月,爱国将领___为了实现停止内战、共同抗日,毅然发动了西安事变。
A. 蔡廷锴
B. 杨虎城
C. 张学良
D. 冯玉祥
【多选题】
两个“务必”是___
A. 务必使同志们继续保持密切联系群众的作风
B. 务必使同志们继续保持团结协作的作风
C. 务必使同志们继续地保持谦虚,谨慎,不骄,不躁的作风
D. 务必使同志们继续地保持艰苦奋斗的作风
【多选题】
1928年12月29日,张学良在东北发出通告,宣布___,这样,国民党就在全国范围内建立了自己的统治。
A. 消灭共产党
B. 遵守三民主义
C. 改易旗帜
D. 服从国民政府
【多选题】
在抗日统一民族战线中,中间势力主要指的是 ___
A. 开明绅士
B. 上层小资产阶级
C. 地方实力派
D. 民族资产阶级
【多选题】
20世纪40年代前期,中国共产党在全党范围内开展整风运动,其主要内容是 ___
A. 反对主观主义以整顿党风
B. 反对宗派主义以整顿党风
C. 反对党八股以整顿文风
D. 反对主观主义以整顿学风
【多选题】
58五四爱国运动的左翼骨干包括___
A. 周恩来
B. 杨匏安
C. 毛泽东
D. 蔡和森
【多选题】
在辛亥革命以后,孙中山继续革命,试图挽救共和的努力有___
A. 在广州建立护法军政府,出师北伐
B. 发动“二次革命”
C. 发起护国运动
D. 举行黄花岗起义
【多选题】
中共早期与反马克思主义思潮进行的论战有___
A. 关于无政府主义的论战
B. 社会主义讨论
C. 关于社会性质的论战
D. 问题与主义论战
【多选题】
我国对资本主义工商业改造的个别企业公私合营阶段,企业利润的分配方面包括___
A. 股金红利
B. 国家所得税
C. 企业公积金
D. 工人福利费
【多选题】
毛泽东从1928年到1930年提出并阐述了农村包围城市、武装夺取政权道路理论的主要文章是___
A. 《中国的红色政权为什么能够存在》
B. 《井冈山的斗争》
C. 《反对本本主义》
D. 《星星之火,可以燎原》
【多选题】
中国民族资产阶级的两面性是指 ___
A. 是革命的力量之一
B. 与帝国主义和封建主义并未完全断绝经济上的联系
C. 既有矛盾斗争的一面,又有依赖妥协的一面
D. 没有彻底的反帝反封建的勇气
【多选题】
中国共产党早期组织的主要活动有___
A. 同反马克思主义思潮展开论战
B. 在工人中进行组织和宣传工作
C. 研究和宣传马克思主义
D. 进行建党的讨论和组织工作
【多选题】
下列选项中,属于对早期新文化运动的正确认识的是___
A. 在当时的社会环境中,要想从根本上改造国民,仅依靠少数人的呐喊是不可能的
B. 新文化运动的参加者基本局限在知识分子的范围内
C. 新文化运动的倡导者们,形式主义地看问题
D. 为中国人民提供一种正确认识中国国情的思想武器
【多选题】
毛泽东在《论人民民主专政》一文中指出,由新民主主义到社会主义主要依靠___
A. 农民阶级
B. 民族资产阶级
C. 工人阶级
D. 城市小资产阶级
【多选题】
1901年,清政府宣布实行“新政”。改革内容包括___
A. 鼓励留学,颁布新学制
B. 颁布商法、商律,奖励工商
C. 裁撤绿营,建立新军
D. 设立商部、学部、巡警部等中央行政机构
【多选题】
近代中国的主要矛盾是___
A. 反动统治阶级内部的矛盾
B. 封建主义和人民大众的矛盾
C. 帝国主义和中华民族的矛盾
D. 资产阶级和无产阶级的矛盾
【多选题】
我国对资本主义工商业的社会主义改造的经验有___
A. 用和平赎买的方法改造资本主义工商业
B. “先合作化,后机械化”
C. 采取从低级到高级的国家资本主义的过渡形式
D. 把资本主义工商业者改造成为自食其力的社会主义劳动者
【多选题】
___属于洋务运动时期创办的新式学堂。
A. 福州船政学堂
B. 天津北洋水师学堂
C. 京师大学堂
D. 京师同文馆
【多选题】
帝国主义瓜分中国图谋破产的原因是___
A. 列强之间的矛盾和相互制约
B. 帝国主义国家中正义力量的干涉
C. 中国自给自足的经济社会结构
D. 中国人民的反侵略斗争
【多选题】
近代中国反侵略战争一再失败的原因有___
A. 民族意识的未觉醒
B. 帝国主义列强的强大
C. 综合实力的落后
D. 腐败的社会制度
【多选题】
七届三中全会指出,争取国家财政经济状况根本好转的条件是___
A. 国家机构所需经费的大量节减
B. 官僚资本的没收
C. 土地改革的完成
D. 现有工商业的调整
【多选题】
下列各项活动为中国共产党的诞生创造条件的有___
A. 党的早期组织的成立
B. 中国工人阶级的成长、壮大;工人运动的发展及其水平的提高
C. 马克思主义在中国的广泛传播
D. 一批具有初步共产主义思想的知识分子的日益成熟
【多选题】
1905至1907年间,革命派与改良派展开了大论战,其主要舆论阵地是___
A. 《新青年》
B. 《民报》
C. 《新民丛报》
D. 《时务报》
【多选题】
1922年7月中共二大明确提出了反帝反封建的民主革命纲领,这个纲领的基本点包括___
A. 渐次实现社会主义,共产主义
B. 推翻国际帝国主义的压迫,达到中华民族完全独立
C. 统一中国为真正的民主共和国
D. 消除内乱,打倒军阀,建设国内和平
【多选题】
中国共产党发动南昌起义的历史意义主要体现在___
A. 开始了独立领导革命战争和创建人民军队
B. 走上了农村包围城市的革命道路
C. 打响了武装反抗国民党反动派的第一枪
D. 揭开了土地革命战争的序幕
【多选题】
从19世纪70年代到90年代,洋务派创办的民用企业主要形式有___
A. 官督商办
B. 官办
C. 商办
D. 官商合办
【多选题】
历史上的“戊戌六君子”是 ___
A. 杨锐 康广仁
B. 林旭 杨深秀
C. 谭嗣同 刘光第
D. 康有为 梁启超
【多选题】
下列选项关于《天朝田亩制度》的评价正确的是___
A. 它以解决土地问题为中心
B. 未能从根本上否定封建地主土地所有制
C. 未能冲破传统自然经济体制
D. 《天朝田亩制度》是最能体现太平天国社会理想的纲领文件
推荐试题
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举