【多选题】
中国共产党建党以来领导人民进行了三次历史性伟大革命,完成三件历史大事是指___
A. 推翻清王朝,结束封建帝制
B. 完成了新民主主义革命,建立中华人民共和国
C. 完成了社会主义革命,确立社会主义基本制度
D. 进行了改革开放新的伟大革命,开创、坚持、发展了中国特色社会主义
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【多选题】
中国特色社会主义理论体系的形成,表明党对___的认识达到了新的理论高度
A. 共产党的执政规律
B. 社会主义建设规律
C. 人类社会发展规律
D. 自然界的发展规律
【多选题】
我们党提出的“两个一百年”的奋斗目标中,“两个一百年”是指___
A. 建党 100 周年
B. 建国 100 周年
C. 社会主义建立 100 周年
D. 改革开放 100 周年
【多选题】
坚持以人为本就是要___
A. 发展为了人民
B. 发展依靠人民
C. 发展成果由人民共享
D. 不断推动人的全面发展
【多选题】
构建社会主义和谐社会的总要求是___
A. 以人为本、百姓为先
B. 民主法治、公平正义
C. 诚信友爱、充满活力
D. 安定有序、人与自然和谐相处
【单选题】
首次提出了“三个代表”重要思想是在___年
A. 1997
B. 1999
C. 2000
D. 2001
【单选题】
全面阐述了“三个代表”要求的科学内涵和基本内容是在___年
A. 1999
B. 2000
C. 2001
D. 2002
【单选题】
将“三个代表”重要思想与马克思列宁主义、毛泽东思想和邓小平理论一道确立为党必须长期坚持的指导思想,并写入党章,是在___年
A. 1999
B. 2000
C. 2001
D. 2002
【单选题】
___是先进生产力的集中体现和主要标志
A. 工人农民
B. 知识分子
C. 先进设备
D. 科学技术
【单选题】
___是发展先进文化的重要内容和中心环节
A. 教育科学文化建设
B. 思想道德建设
C. 法制建设
D. 精神文明建设
【单选题】
江泽民指出:___是决定一个政党、一个政权兴亡的根本性因素”
A. 经济发展水平
B. 人心向背
C. 国际地位
D. 生活水平
【单选题】
___通过的《关于建立社会主义市场经济体制若干问题的决定》,勾画了建立社会主义市场经济体制的蓝图和基本框架
A. 十二届三中全会
B. 十三届三中全会
C. 十四届三中全会
D. 十五届三中全会
【单选题】
坚持党的领导,核心是坚持党的___
A. 群众性
B. 先进性
C. 人民性
D. 阶级性
【单选题】
江泽民强调推进党的建设新的伟大工程,重点是加强党的___能力建设
A. 执政
B. 驾驭市场经济
C. 科学判断形势
D. 总揽全局
【单选题】
“三个代表”重要思想的主要内容有___个方面。
【单选题】
“三个代表”重要思想创造性回答的根本问题是___
A. 什么是马克思主义、怎样坚持和发展马克思主义
B. 什么是社会主义、怎样建设社会主义
C. 什么是小康社会、怎样全面建设小康社会
D. 建设什么样的党、怎样建设党
【单选题】
江泽民对党的思想路线作出的新贡献是强调___
A. 解放思想
B. “三讲”
C. 与时俱进
D. “三个代表”重要思想
【单选题】
提出“发展是党执政兴国第一要务”的论断是___
A. 毛泽东
B. 邓小平
C. 江泽民
D. 胡锦涛
【单选题】
社会主义初级阶段的基本经济制度是___
A. 以公有制为主体,多种所有制经济共同发展
B. 以计划经济为主体,市场经济为补充
C. 以市场经济为主体,宏观调控为补充
D. 以宏观调控为指导,市场经济为主体
【单选题】
决定一个社会经济制度性质的是___
A. 国家性质
B. 阶级关系
C. 所有制关系
D. 分配关系
【单选题】
国有经济的主导作用体现在___
A. 数量上
B. 质量上
C. 控制力上
D. 盈利能力上
【单选题】
社会主义初级阶段我国对待各种非公有制经济的政策是___
A. 毫不动摇地鼓励支持和引导其发展
B. 毫不留情地进行社会主义改造
C. 先鼓励支持和引导,待其成长壮大后再改造
D. 放任自流,任其自生自灭
【单选题】
把“依法治国”正式写入宪法是在___
A. 1999 年 3 月九届人大二次会议
B. 2002 年 10 月党的十六大通过的报告
C. 2011 年 3 月十一届人大四次会议审议通过的全国人大常委会工作报告
D. 2012 年党的十八大
【单选题】
明确把依法治国确立为治理国家的基本方略,把建设社会主义法治国家确定为社会主义一体化建设重要目标的是___
A. 十五大
B. 十六大
C. 十七大
D. 十八大
【单选题】
社会主义经济制度的基础是___
A. 集体所有制
B. 生产资料公有制
C. 按劳分配制度
D. 社会主义市场经济
【单选题】
我国现阶段实行多种所有制经济并存,从根本上说是___
A. 社会主义市场经济规律的要求
B. 社会主义基本经济规律的要求
C. 鼓励非公有制经济发展的要求
D. 生产关系一定要适合生产力状况的规律的要求
【单选题】
改革开放以来产生的社会新阶层是___
A. 社会主义的劳动者
B. 社会主义的创造者
C. 社会主义的建设者
D. 社会主义的剥削者
【单选题】
我国社会主义初级阶段的非公有制经济是___
A. 社会主义经济的重要组成部分
B. 社会主义市场经济的必要补充
C. 带有社会主义性质的私有制经济
D. 社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分
【单选题】
社会主义基本经济制度的确立是由___
A. 社会主义国家决定的
B. 全国人民代表大会决定的
C. 社会主义性质和初级阶段的国情决定的
D. 中国特色社会主义理论确定的
【单选题】
党的十五大提出在按劳分配为主的前提下,和按劳分配结合在一起的是___
A. 按资分配
B. 按风险分配
C. 按福利性分配
D. 按生产要素分配
【单选题】
江泽民在十六大报告中提到的“民生之本”是___
A. 农业的繁荣
B. 工业的飞速发展
C. 就业
D. 国民生产总值的不断提高
【单选题】
江泽民在十六大报告中提到,___是一个民族进步的灵魂,一个国家兴旺发达的不竭动力,以及一个政党永葆生机的源泉
A. 最广大人民的积极性、主动性
B. 坚实的经济基础
C. 马列主义、毛泽东思想和邓小平理沦
D. 在实践中不断创新
【单选题】
十六大报告指出,___是我们党的立党之本、执政之基和力量之源
A. 始终得到最广大人民群众的支持和拥护
B. 不断加强和完善党的自身建设
C. 始终做到“三个代表”
D. 始终确保稳定的国内政治局势和蓬勃发展的经济状况
【单选题】
“三个代表”重要思想,是在科学判断党___的基础上提出来的
A. 组织原则
B. 发展方向
C. 历史方位
D. 历史任务
【单选题】
江泽民曾强调指出,马克思主义最重要的理论品质是___
A. 与时俱进
B. 敢讲真话,做实事
C. 批评与自我批评
D. 尊重实践、尊重群众
【单选题】
明确把建立社会主义市场经济体制作为我国经济体制改革的目标,是在党的___
A. 十三大
B. 十四大
C. 十五大
D. 十六大
【单选题】
社会主义市场经济体制的基本框架是在党的___上确立的
A. 十四大
B. 十四届三中全会
C. 十五大
D. 十五届三中全会
【单选题】
明确提出以公有制为主体、多种所有制经济共同发展,是我国社会主义初级阶段的一项基本经济制度是在党的___
A. 十三大
B. 十四大
C. 十五大
D. 十六大
【单选题】
坚持改革的正确方向,最核心的是___
A. 确立市场在资源配置中起决定性作用
B. 在改革中坚持和完善党的领导,坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度
C. 正确处理改革、发展、稳定的关系
D. 坚持社会主义的本质,解放和发展生产力
【单选题】
贯彻“三个代表”重要思想的本质要求在于___
A. 坚持执政为民
B. 坚持与时俱进
C. 坚持党的先进性
D. 坚持从严治党
【多选题】
“三个代表”重要思想的形成条件是___
A. 对冷战结束后国际局势科学判断
B. 科学判断党的历史方位和总结历史经验
C. 建设中国特色社会主义伟大实践
D. 中国共产党集体智慧的结晶
推荐试题
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值