刷题
导入试题
【多选题】
领导者搞好协调必须做到___
A. 出于公心、顾全大局,坚持原则性
B. 对可能出现的问题要及早预见
C. 要注意政策的相对稳定性
D. 防止朝令夕改变化无常
E. 改进领导方式减少矛盾
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
ABCDE
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
行政执行督查要求___
A. 明确各执行部门的工作计划和各执行者的工作任务
B. 建立评价执行情况和执行者完成任务情况的客观标准
C. 及时地发现和觉察决策执行中的问题和偏差
D. 明确问题的性质及执行者应负的责任
E. 采取有效而适当的纠正措施
【多选题】
执行的实施程序有___
A. 计划
B. 指挥
C. 沟通与协调
D. 督查
E. 控制
【多选题】
中央最近要求建立健全决策咨询制度,深入开展___
A. 立法协商
B. 行政协商
C. 参政协商
D. 社会协商
E. 民主协商
【多选题】
行政决策应该着重讲求___
A. 宏观性
B. 微观性
C. 公共性
D. 中观性
E. 公平性
【多选题】
行政执行的作用在于___
A. 把决策付诸实施的途径
B. 是检验和完善决策的步骤
C. 是领导的一个重要职能
D. 是判断工作绩效的标准
E. 是领导特有的职能
【多选题】
行政执行的外部相关条件___
A. 社会经济水平
B. 社会政治状况
C. 人民群众对决策目标的理解、认同
D. 周边环境影响
E. 国际市场变化趋势
【多选题】
决策的基本程序包括___
A. 总结
B. 发现问题,确定决策目标
C. 集思广益,拟定决策方案
D. 评估选优,择定决策方案
E. 局部试点,完善方案
【多选题】
行政执行中的指挥活动主要有___
A. 会议指挥
B. 现场指挥
C. 调度指挥
D. 口头指挥
E. 书面指挥
【多选题】
非概率抽样的主要形式有___
A. 偶遇抽样
B. 判断抽样
C. 配额抽样
D. 等距抽样
E. 空间抽样
【多选题】
下列哪些属于概率抽样方法___
A. 偶遇抽样
B. 判断抽样
C. 分层抽样
D. 等距抽样
E. 空间抽样
【多选题】
下列属于结构式访问特征的有___
A. 对访问过程高度控制
B. 一般采用判断抽样
C. 访问结果便于量化
D. 提问的次序、方式以及访问记录完全统一
E. 问卷回收率高
【多选题】
下列不属于结构式访问特征的有___
A. 对访问过程高度控制
B. 一般采用判断抽样
C. 访问结果便于量化
D. 费用低
E. 问卷回收率高
【多选题】
选择与确定社会调查课题应遵循哪些原则?___
A. 可行性原则
B. 预测性原则
C. 便利原则
D. 优势原则
E. 价值原则
【多选题】
下列哪些不是选择与确定社会调查课题应遵循的原则?___
A. 交换原则
B. 预测性原则
C. 便利原则
D. 优势原则
E. 价值原则
【多选题】
下列属于无结构式访问的特征的有___
A. 事先不预定问卷、表格和提问的标准程序
B. 对被访问者的要求比较高
C. 应用范围很广泛
D. 只给调查者一个题目
E. 调查提问的方式、顺序以及回答的方式等都不统一
【多选题】
社会测量的可靠性和正确性都是科学的测量所必须满足的条件。两者的关系是___
A. 可靠性低,正确性不可能高
B. 可靠性高,正确性未必高
C. 正确性低,可靠性有可能高
D. 正确性高,可靠性必然也高
E. 两者没有必然联系
【多选题】
对社会测量的数据与资料乃至结论的评价,一般通过下列哪几个指标进行衡量来实现?___
A. 均度
B. 尺度
C. 可靠性
D. 正确性
E. 相似性
【多选题】
下列哪些不是对社会测量的数据与资料乃至结论进行评价的指标?___
A. 均度
B. 尺度
C. 可靠性
D. 正确性
E. 相似性
【多选题】
概率抽样调查就是按照随机性原则在总体中选取一部分单位进行调查观察,并进一步推算总体情况的一种方法。这种抽样形式包括___
A. 简单随机抽样
B. 等距抽样
C. 分层抽样
D. 整群抽样
E. 多阶段抽样
【多选题】
下列哪些是非概率抽样调查方法?___
A. 滚雪球抽样
B. 判断抽样
C. 分层抽样
D. 整群抽样
E. 多阶段抽样
【多选题】
在社会调查中,主要的定性调查方法有___
A. 访问调查法
B. 聚焦讨论小组
C. 现场观察法
D. 等距调查法
E. 数据分析法
【多选题】
下列哪些不是社会调查中的定性调查方法?___
A. 访问调查法
B. 聚焦讨论小组
C. 现场观察法
D. 文本挖掘法
E. 数据分析法
【多选题】
无结构式访问一般有以下哪几类?___
A. 重点访问
B. 正式访问
C. 客观陈述法
D. 深度访谈
E. 焦点访谈
【多选题】
下列哪些不属于无结构式访问?___
A. 重点访问
B. 正式访问
C. 焦点访谈
D. 深度访谈
E. 客观陈述
【多选题】
定性资料的整理要经历以下哪几个阶段?___
A. 审查
B. 分类
C. 汇编
D. 编码
E. 登陆
【多选题】
根据调查需要,社会调查方案可以分为以下哪几类?___
A. 实验性研究设计方案
B. 交叉性社会调查方案
C. 纵观性长期设计方案
D. 案例研究
E. 比较研究
【多选题】
下列原理或定理,哪些是抽样调查的理论基础?___
A. 大数定理
B. 中心极限定理
C. 韦伯理论
D. 萃取原理
E. 指数分布原理
【多选题】
下列哪些是社会调查的工具?___
A. 量表
B. 问卷
C. 问卷中题目选项
D. 地图
E. 统计软件
【多选题】
行政适当原则可以从以下几个方面来理解。___
A. 行政行为符合立法的宗旨
B. 行政行为具有正当的目的
C. 行政行为符合法律的精神
D. 行政行为符合法律程序
E. 行政行为符合法律规定
【多选题】
下列内容需要公开的是___
A. 行政机关的机构设置
B. 行政机关的人员编制
C. 公务员的收入分配
D. 行政机关的职责权限
E. 公务员的兴趣爱好
【多选题】
行政行为合法的要件之一是“意思表示真实”,以下情况属于非真实意思表示的是___
A. 欺诈
B. 胁迫
C. 贿赂
D. 误解
E. 诽谤
【多选题】
党的十八届四中全会在政务公开的问题上强调,“以公开为原则,以不公开为例外”,这里属于例外的情况有___
A. 国家秘密
B. 人事任免
C. 商业秘密
D. 个人隐私
E. 工作内容
【多选题】
提起行政诉讼应符合下列条件:___
A. 有明确的原告
B. 有明确的被告
C. 有具体的诉讼要求
D. 有确保胜诉的充沛证据
E. 属于人民法院受理范围
【多选题】
行政程序法的调整对象是行政行为的___
A. 步骤
B. 方式
C. 次序
D. 时限
E. 主体
【多选题】
我国行政程序法的两大核心原则为___
A. 公正原则
B. 效率原则
C. 民主原则
D. 合法原则
E. 诚信原则
【多选题】
行政立法是指特定的国家行政机关依照法定权限和程序,制定有关国家行政管理的规范性文件的活动。下列属于行政立法形式的有___
A. 通知
B. 行政法规
C. 部门规章
D. 红头文件
E. 地方政府规章
【多选题】
行政处罚是指国家机关或其他行政主体依照法定权限和程序,对违反行政管理秩序而未构成犯罪的公民、法人或其他组织给予制裁的行政行为。下列各项属于行政处罚原则的有___
A. 处罚法定原则
B. 处罚公正、公开原则
C. 处罚与教育相结合原则
D. 保障相对人合法权益原则
E. 一事不再罚原则
【多选题】
国务院部委规章可以设定的行政处罚为___
A. 限制人身自由
B. 吊销营业执照
C. 一定数额罚款
D. 警告
E. 行政拘留
【多选题】
行政复议是行政救济的重要途径。下列属于行政复议受理范围的有___
A. 不服行政处罚决定
B. 不服行政机关对民事纠纷做出的调解
C. 不服关于确认自然资源所有权或使用权的行政决定
D. 不服行政处分
E. 申请行政机关依法发放抚恤金、社保金或者最低生活保障费,行政机关没有发放
【多选题】
行政诉讼的特有原则包括___
A. 被告负举证责任
B. 不适用调解原则
C. 起诉不停止执行原则
D. 合法性审查原则
E. 使用本民族语言原则
推荐试题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用