刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
社会主义核心价值体系的灵魂是___
A. 马克思主义指导思想
B. 中国特色社会主义共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
A
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
社会主义核心价值体系的主题是___
A. 马克思主义指导思想
B. 中国特色社会主义共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
在社会主义初级阶段,我国人民的共同理想是___
A. 发展社会主义民主政治
B. 建设富强、民主、文明、和谐的社会主义现代化国家
C. 实现“三步走”的发展战略目标
D. 建设高度的社会主义精神文明
【单选题】
民族精神是社会主义核心价值体系的重要内容之一,其核心是___
A. 爱国主义
B. 团结统一
C. 勤劳勇敢
D. 自强不息
【单选题】
社会主义荣辱观,是社会主义核心价值体系的基础。以“八荣八耻”为主要内容的社会主义荣辱观,覆盖各个利益群体,涵盖了社会生活的方方面面。社会主义荣辱观解决的是人们___ 的问题
A. 行为规范
B. 羞耻
C. 是非判断
D. 标准
【单选题】
社会主义核心价值体系的基础是___
A. 马克思主义指导思想
B. 中国特色社会主义共同理想
C. 民族精神与时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
社会主义道德建设的根本任务是___
A. 全面提高公民的道德素质
B. 为中华民族的发展提供精神动力
C. 明确经济社会发展的社会主义方向
D. 为教育科学文化建设积累实践经验
【单选题】
在《中共中央关于构建社会主义和谐社会若干重大问题的决定》中,深刻阐明了社会主义和谐社会的性质和定位,指明了建设社会主义和谐社会的指导思想、目标任务、工作原则和重大部署。这个决定获得审议通过是在党的___
A. 十一届三中全会
B. 十六届四中全会
C. 十六届五中全会
D. 十六届六中全会
【单选题】
《中共中央关于构建设社会主义和谐社会若干重大问题的决定》指出,社会和谐是中国特色社会主义的___
A. 根本任务
B. 根本原则
C. 本质属性
D. 基本要求
【单选题】
下面不属于社会主义和谐社会中公平正义含义的是___
A. 社会各方面的利益关系得到妥善协调
B. 人民内部矛盾和其他社会矛盾得到正确处理
C. 社会公平和正义得到切实维护和实现
D. 社会主义法制得到健全
【单选题】
下面不属于社会主义和谐社会中的人与自然和谐相处的含义是___
A. 生产发展
B. 生活富裕
C. 消除自然灾害
D. 生态良好
【单选题】
建设生态文明,是关系人民福祉、关乎民族未来的长远大计。要以对国家和人民高度负责、对子孙后代高度负责、对中华民族高度负责的精神,以壮士断腕的气魄建设好生态文明。党的十八届三中全会进一步强调,建设社会主义生态文明,必须把___放在首位。
A. 节约资源
B. 建设美丽中国
C. 消除自然灾害
D. 减少人口数量
【单选题】
党的十八大提出,面对资源约束趋紧、环境污染严重、生态系统退化的严峻形势,我们应当树立___的生态文明理念。
A. 节约资源、保护环境
B. 保护生态、节约资源
C. 尊重自然、顺应自然、保护自然
D. 感恩自然、顺应自然
【单选题】
以下关于和谐社会的认识正确的是___
A. 和谐社会是最高理想
B. 和谐社会是共同理想
C. 和谐社会是全体公民的理想
D. 和谐神会只是中国人的理想
【单选题】
构建社会主义和谐社会,关键在___
A. 党的基本路线
B. 中国共产党
C. 稳定的社会局面
D. 广大人民群众
【单选题】
构建社会主义和谐社会的根本出发点和落脚点是___
A. 以人为本
B. 科学发展
C. 改革开放
D. 民主法治
【单选题】
构建社会主义和谐社会的主要动力是___
A. 以人为本
B. 科学发展
C. 改革开放
D. 民主法治
【单选题】
构建社会主义和谐社会的重点是___
A. 建设和谐文化,巩固社会和谐的思想道德基础
B. 完善社会管理,保持社会安定有序
C. 加强制度建设,保障社会公平正义
D. 解决人民群众最关心、最直接、最现实的利益问题
【单选题】
“一国两制”构想的提出,是从解决哪个地区问题开始的___
A. 台湾         
B. 香港       
C. 澳门        
D. 香港和澳门
【单选题】
解决台湾问题的前提是___
A. 和平统一                  
B. 承认台湾事实上的主权地位
C. 坚持一个中国原则          
D. 一国两制
【单选题】
实现两岸和平统一的前提是___
A. 实现两岸三通              
B. 坚持一个中国的原则
C. 发展两岸经贸关系          
D. 促进两岸关系良性循环
【单选题】
我国党和政府解决台湾问题的基本方针是___     
A. 中国政府承诺不使用武力上        
B. 和平统一,一国两制
C. 台湾享有完全自治权              
D. 与美国等有关国家共同谈判解决
【单选题】
台湾与大陆和平统一后,可以享有比香港、澳门特别行政区更高度的自治权利,表现在___
A. 拥有行政管理权出             
B. 拥有立法权、独立的司法权和终审权
C. 可以实行单独的财政预算       
D. 可以保留自己的军队
【单选题】
  实行“一国两制”的前提是___
A. 坚持一个国家、两个政府          
B. 坚持公有制和按劳分配   
C. 坚持一个中国即中华人民共和国    
D. 坚持四项基本原则
【单选题】
  日本侵占我国台湾的时间是___
A. 1931年日本制造“九·一八事件”后,又侵占了台湾     
B. 1937年日本制造了“卢沟桥事变”后,又侵占了台湾
C. 1938年占领了广州、武汉后,又侵占了台湾
D. 1895年清政府在中日甲午战争失败后,日本强迫清政府签订了《马关条约》,侵占了台湾
【单选题】
  香港特别行政区政府的行政长官是___
A. 由中央人民政府委派的         
B. 由香港当地选举产生的     
C. 由香港当地人们协商产生的    
D. 由香港人们选举产生并由中央人民政府任命的
【单选题】
  香港特别行政区基本法的修改权属于___
A. 香港特别行政区立法会     
B. 香港特别行政区行政会
C. 全国人民代表大会         
D. 全国人民代表大会常务委员会
【单选题】
  我国实行“一国两制”后,我国的国家结构是___
A. 联邦制   
B. 邦联制   
C. 单一制     
D. 单一制和联邦制混合制
【单选题】
2012年1月,马英九在台湾大选胜选后提出未来两岸政策三原则,分别是___
A. 先政治后经济、紧急的优先、容易的优先。
B. 先经济后政治、迫切的优先、容易的优先。   
C. 先政治后经济、简单的优先、易行的优先。
D. 先经济后政治、紧急的优选、简单的优先。
【单选题】
2012年香港特别行政区举行第四届行政长官选举,___当选,任期为5年
A. 何俊仁
B. 唐英年
C. 梁振英
D. 曾荫权
【单选题】
台湾民进党执政时期两岸政策的实质是___
A. 否认“九二共识”,回避和不承认“一个中国”的原则
B. 挟洋拒统
C. 以武拒统
D. 以拖拒统
【单选题】
当代世界的时代主题是___
A. 战争与革命              
B. 和平与发展 
C. 帝国主义和社会主义革命 
D. 反对霸权主义和强权政治
【单选题】
“东南西北”问题的核心是___
A. 东西问题    
B. 南南问题    
C. 南北问题    
D. 西西问题
【单选题】
发展问题是指___
A. 发达国家的发展问题      
B. 发展中国家的发展问题 
C. 社会主义国家的发展问题 
D. 以发展中国家的发展为核心的整个世界的共同发展与繁荣
【单选题】
二战以来,导致世界动荡不安的主要根源是___
A. 霸权主义和强权政治        
B. 发展中国家的贫穷落后 
C. 各国之间难以协调的矛盾    
D. 西方资本主义国家发展的不平衡
【单选题】
中国外交政策的基本目标是___
A. 提高中国的国际地位    
B. 维护世界和平,促进人类共同繁荣和发展 
C. 反对霸权主义和强权政治 
D. 实现全人类的解放
【单选题】
中国对外政策的根本原则是___
A. 和平共处五项原则     
B. 独立自主 
C. 永不称霸         
D. 维护世界和平,促进人类共同繁荣和发展
【单选题】
中国外交工作的立足点是___
A. 加强同发展中国家的团结与合作 
B. 独立自主 
C. 加强同西方发达国家的合作     
D. 加强对话,反对对抗
【单选题】
国际旧秩序的实质是___
A. 军备竞赛         
B. 划分势力范围,建立军事集团 
C. 操纵和利用联合国     
D. 霸权主义和强权政治
【单选题】
江泽民新安全观的实质是___
A. 平等互利         
B. 加强合作 
C. 以互利合作寻求共同安全 
D. 和平共处
【单选题】
处理国与国之间关系的最好方式是___
A. 大家庭方式       
B. 和平共处五项原则方式 
C. 集团政治方式     
D. 势力范围方式
推荐试题
【单选题】
唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___
A. 事物数量的增加
B. 事物根本性质的变化
C. 事物的一切运动变化
D. 新事物的产生和旧事物的灭亡
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用