刷题
导入试题
【单选题】
个人品德是个体对某种道德要求认同和践履的结果,集中体现了道德认知.道德情感.道德意志.道德信念和___的内在统一。
A. 道德实践
B. 道德行为
C. 道德表现
D. 道德内容
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
B
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
___是个体人格完善的重要标志。
A. 社会公德
B. 职业道德
C. 家庭美德
D. 个人品德
【单选题】
道德修养是一个循序渐进的过程,古人云:“不积跬步,无以至千里;不积小流,无以成江海。”下列名言中与这段话在含义上近似的是___。
A. 仁远乎哉?我欲仁,斯仁至矣
B. 勿以善小而不为,勿以恶小而为之
C. 君子求诸已,小人求诸人
D. 有能一日用其力于仁矣乎?我未见力不足者
【单选题】
形成正确的道德认知和道德判断,最根本的就是要___。
A. 锤炼高尚品格
B. 坚持以唯物史观的基本原理来看待道德
C. 激发正向的道德认同和道德情感
D. 强化坚定的道德意志和道德信念
【单选题】
法律区别于道德规范.宗教规范.风俗习惯等其他社会规范首要在于___。
A. 法律是统治阶级意志的体现
B. 法律是由国家创制和实施的行为规范
C. 法律由社会物质生活条件决定
D. 法律是历史发展规律和自然规律的反映
【单选题】
法律由一定社会的物质生活条件所决定,其中决定法律本质.内容和发展方向的根本因素是___
A. 人口的素质和密度
B. 生产关系
C. 物质资料的生产方式
D. 地理环境
【单选题】
法律发展史上最早出现的法律为___。
A. 原始社会法律
B. 封建制法律
C. 奴隶制法律
D. 资本主义法律
【单选题】
以下不属于奴隶制法律的基本特征的是___。
A. 具有明显的原始习惯残留痕迹
B. 否认奴隶的法律人格
C. 存在严格的等级划分
D. 法律面前人人平等
【单选题】
以下不属于封建制法律的基本特征的是___。
A. 确立农民对封建地主的人身依附关系
B. 实行封建等级制度
C. 维护专制皇权
D. 确认自由民之间的等级划分
【单选题】
社会主义法律体现了___的统一。
A. 党的意志和人民主张
B. 党的主张和人民主张
C. 党的意志和人民意志
D. 党的主张和人民意志
【单选题】
___是一个从创制、实施、到实现的过程。
A. 法律的制度
B. 法律的执行
C. 法律的运行
D. 法律的适用
【单选题】
根据我国宪法.立法法等法律的规定,全国人民代表大会及其常务委员会行使国家立法权。___有权根据宪法和法律制定行政法规。
A. 全国人大及其常委会
B. 国务院
C. 中央及地方各级的立法机关
D. 中央军委
【单选题】
法律运行的起始性和关键性环节___
A. 法律执行
B. 法律适用
C. 法律制定
D. 法律遵守
【单选题】
国务院各部门可以根据宪法、法律和行政法规,在本部门的权限范围内,制定___。
A. 行政法规
B. 部门规章
C. 地方性法规
D. 地方政府规章
【单选题】
省、自治区、直辖市的人民代表大会及其常委会根据本行政区域的具体情况和实际需要,在不与宪法、法律和行政法规相抵触的前提下,可以制定___。
A. 行政法规
B. 部门规章
C. 地方性法规
D. 地方政府规章
【单选题】
设区的市的人民代表大会及其常委会根据本市的具体情况和实际需要,在不与宪法、法律、行政法规和本省、自治区的地方性法规相抵触的前提下,可以制定___,报省、自治区的人民代表大会常委会批准后施行。
A. 行政法规
B. 部门规章
C. 地方性法规
D. 地方政府规章
【单选题】
___是指国家司法机关及其公职人员依照法定职权和程序适用法律处理案件的专门活动。
A. 法律制定
B. 法律执行
C. 法律适用
D. 法律遵守
【单选题】
___是指国家机关.社会组织和公民个人依照法律规定行使权力和权利以及履行职责和义务的活动。
A. 法律执行
B. 法律适用
C. 法律遵守
D. 法律制定
【单选题】
在我国,司法机关是指___。
A. 公安局
B. 人民政府
C. 监狱
D. 人民法院和人们检察院
【单选题】
我国___是国家的根本法,是治国安邦的总章程,是党和人民意志的集中体现。
A. 宪法
B. 法律
C. 行政法规
D. 地方性法规
【单选题】
确认了党领导人民长期奋斗取得的辉煌成果,规定了人民民主专政国家政权的性质和根本制度,明确了国家未来建设发展的根本任务和总的目标的法律是___。
A. 民法
B. 社会法
C. 诉讼法
D. 宪法
【单选题】
2018年3月11日通过的《中华人民共和国宪法修正案》关于宪法第三条第三款中人民代表大会产生的国家机关增加的内容是___
A. 行政机关
B. 监察机关
C. 审判机关
D. 检察机关
【单选题】
2018年3月11日通过的《中华人民共和国宪法修正案》新增的国家机构是___。
A. 中华人民共和国主席
B. 民族自治地方的自治机关
C. 监察委员会
D. 中央军事委员会
【单选题】
2018年1月,中共___审议通过了《关于修改宪法部分内容的建议》。
A. 十九届一中全会
B. 十九届二中全会
C. 十九届三中全会
D. 十九大
【单选题】
___是我国的国体。
A. 人民民主专政
B. 人民代表大会制度
C. 生产资料的社会主义公有制
D. 多党合作制
【单选题】
为了保证人民当家作主,我国宪法规定了___这项根本政治制度。
A. 人民代表大会制度
B. 中国共产党领导的多党合作与政治协商制度
C. 基层群众自治制度
D. 民族区域自治制度
【单选题】
下列不属于我国宪法确立的基本政治制度的是___。
A. 中国共产党领导的多党合作和政治协商制度
B. 民族区域制度
C. 基层群众自治制度
D. 一国两制
【单选题】
我国现行宪法是___年制定的。
A. 1949
B. 1954
C. 1978
D. 1982
【单选题】
我国现行宪法迄今为止最后一次修正案是在___年,是十三届全国人大一次会议审议通过的。
A. 1993
B. 1999
C. 2004
D. 2018
【单选题】
新时代中国特色社会主义思想,明确中国特色社会主义最本质的特征是___。
A. “五位一体”总体布局
B. “四个全面”战略布局
C. 人民利益为根本出发点
D. 中国共产党的领导
【单选题】
国家根据现行法律规范所调整的社会关系的不同,将其分为不同的法律部门。每一法律部门均由一系列调整相同类型社会关系的众多法律.法规所构成。下列选项中属于独立法律部门的是___。
A. 知识产权法
B. 商法
C. 公司法
D. 民法商法
【单选题】
___是调整平等主体的自然人.法人和非法人组织之间的人身关系和财产关系的法律规范。
A. 民法
B. 刑法
C. 宪法
D. 行政法
【单选题】
下列原则中不属于民法的基本原则的是___。
A. 公序良俗原则
B. 民事主体地位平等原则
C. 罪刑法定原则
D. 公平原则
【单选题】
我国的实体法律部门由六个法律部门组成。《婚姻法》、《继承法》属于其中的___法律部门。
A. 民法商法
B. 经济法
C. 社会法
D. 行政法
【单选题】
___是规定了犯罪与刑罚的法律规范。
A. 劳动法
B. 社会法
C. 刑法
D. 宪法
【单选题】
下列原则中不属于刑法的基本原则的是___。
A. 法律面前人人平等
B. 公序良俗原则
C. 罪刑法定原则
D. 罪刑相适应原则
【单选题】
___是中国特色社会主义法治体系的前提,是法治国家.法治政府.法治社会的制度基础。
A. 完备的法律规范体系
B. 高效的法治实施体系
C. 严密的法治监督体系
D. 有力的法治保障体系
【单选题】
建设___是建设中国特色社会主义法治体系的重点。
A. 完备的法律规范体系
B. 高效的法治实施体系
C. 严密的法治监督体系
D. 有力的法治保障体系
【单选题】
建设___是中国特色社会主义法治体系的本质要求和重要内容。
A. 完备的法律规范体系
B. 高效的法治实施体系
C. 严密的法治监督体系
D. 完善的党内法规体系
【单选题】
法治思维与人治思维的分水岭在于___。
A. 有没有法律或者法律的多寡与好坏
B. 最高的权威究竟是法律还是个人
C. 是否强调集思广益
D. 是否注重领导人的个人魅力.德行和才智
【单选题】
___是指当同一项社会关系同时受到多种社会规范的调整而多种社会规范又相互矛盾时,要优先考虑法律规范的适用。
A. 法律的排他性
B. 法律的优先适用性
C. 法律的公正性
D. 法律的不可违抗性
推荐试题
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
欢迎使用我爱刷题
×
微信搜索我爱刷题小程序
温馨提示
×
请在电脑上登陆“www.woaishuati.com”使用