【单选题】
以下对行邮物品归类原则表述正确的是()。___
A. 《归类表》未列名的物品,归入“其他物品”类别
B. 《归类表》未列名的物品,按其物品名称归入相应类别
C. 《归类表》未列名的物品,按其主要功能(或用途)归入相应类别
D. 《归类表》未列名的物品,按其各项功能(或用途)中税率最高的税号归类
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
相关试题
【单选题】
按文物保护工作规定,()文物限制出境。___
A. 一级文物
B. 二级文物
C. 三级文物
D. 一般文物
【单选题】
( )前制作、生产或者出版的旧物出境前,都必须进行文物出境鉴定。___
A. 1860年
B. 1911年
C. 1949年
D. 1966年
【单选题】
携带、邮寄国家限制进出境的印刷品及音像制品进出境,如实向海关申报但不能提交许可证件的,予以()。___
A. 征税放行
B. 收缴
C. 退运
D. 行政处罚
【单选题】
陈某收到境外亲友邮寄进境的3本专业工具书,海关应当予以()。___
A. 免税放行
B. 征税放行
C. 转货运报关处理
D. 凭新闻出版主管部门证明办理放行手续
【单选题】
进境印刷品音像制品中夹杂淫秽色情内容,但有艺术价值的文艺作品,海关凭()的证明放行。___
A. 海关总署
B. 省、市、自治区人民政府
C. 省级以上(含省级)宣传、文化、新闻出版等主管部门
D. 国家宗教事务局、其委托的省级政府宗教事务管理部门或者国务院其他行政主管部门
【单选题】
下列物品属于禁止出境物品的是()。___
A. 金银制品
B. 烟、酒
C. 国家货币
D. 珍贵文物
【单选题】
()是指按照国家规定需经有关单位批准方可进出境或因国内外差价大需要管制其进出境的物品。___
A. 禁止进出境物品
B. 限制进出境物品
C. 有害物品
D. 管制物品
【单选题】
()应按A类快件办理海关手续。___
A. 私人信件
B. 境内收件人向境外订购的印刷品
C. 境内收件人向境外订购的音像制品
D. 境内收件人向境外订购的音像制品
【单选题】
超出个人自用、合理数量进境的宗教类印刷品及音像制品,海关凭()出具的证明予以征税验放。___
A. 海关总署
B. 省、市、自治区人民政府
C. 省级以上(含省级)宣传、文化、新闻出版等主管部门
D. 国家宗教事务局、其委托的省级政府宗教事务管理部门或者国务院其他行政主管部门
【单选题】
下列物品属于限制进境物品的是()。___
A. 无线电收发信机
B. 烈性毒药
C. 毒品
D. 鸦片
【单选题】
在进境快件中如查获赌博用筹码,现场应予以()。___
A. 征税放行
B. 收缴
C. 退运
D. 放行
【单选题】
对应当实施检验检疫的出入境快件,未经检验检疫或者经检验检疫不合格的,不得()。___
【单选题】
海关对进境快件中的个人物品实施开拆查验时,运营人应通知()到场。___
A. 收件人
B. 发件人
C. 承运人
D. 报关员
【单选题】
各关应当加强进出境快件实名制管理,对进境B类快件,应当要求快件企业对()进行核实。___
A. 个人身份信息
B. 收件人住址
C. 收件人电话
D. 发件人信息
【单选题】
进境快件原则上应进行()机检。___
A. 挑选
B. 30%
C. 50%
D. 100%
【单选题】
依据《海关总署关于启用新快件通关系统相关事宜的公告》,C类快件是指价值在()人民币(不包括运、保、杂费等)及以下的货物(涉及许可证件管制的,需要办理出口退税、出口收汇或者进口付汇的除外)。___
A. 3000元
B. 4000元
C. 5000元
D. 6000元
【单选题】
个人邮寄中药材、中成药出境,寄往港澳地区的,总值限人民币()。___
A. 100元
B. 200元
C. 500元
D. 1000元
【单选题】
个人邮寄中药材、中成药出境,寄往国外的,总值限人民币()。___
A. 100元
B. 200元
C. 500元
D. 1000元
【单选题】
个人邮寄单行本发行的图书15册,海关应予()。___
A. 免税放行
B. 征税放行
C. 转货运报关处理
D. 凭新闻出版主管部门证明办理放行手续
【单选题】
进出境快件是指进出境快件运营人以向客户承诺的( )方式承揽、承运的( )。___
A. 快速商业运作;进出境货物
B. 快速商业运作;进出境物品
C. 快速邮递;进出境货物、物品
D. 快速商业运作;进出境货物、物品
【单选题】
快件通关管理系统发生故障时,凭()提交的纸质进出境快件报关单及随附单证办理海关手续。___
A. 快件运营人
B. 快件收货人
C. 快件监管场所运营人
D. 快件发货人
【单选题】
快件通关管理系统发生故障恢复正常后,应在恢复后的( )内补办电子申报手续。___
A. 12小时
B. 24小时
C. 3日
D. 5日
【单选题】
快件通关系统恢复后,对于补申报的电子数据,系统设置随机查验的,快件监管现场海关可凭快件运营人提供的海关审核、验放的原始单证和其他相关材料,()。___
A. 按照查验相符处理
B. 按照查验不符处理
C. 撤销布控信息
D. 对相关布控信息不进行操作
【单选题】
下列进境个人快递物品中,()可以免税验放。___
A. 20册单行本发行的图书
B. 30张单碟(盘)发行的音像制品
C. 2套儿童读物,每套30册
D. 4套音乐CD,每套6张
【单选题】
下列快递进境音像制品中,()免于提交《中华人民共和国文化部进口音像制品批准单》。___
A. 音像制品经营单位进口150盘进口音像制品成品
B. 音像制品经营单位进口用于出版的音像制品母带
C. 非经营音像制品的单位进口用于本单位宣传的光盘200张
D. 非经营音像制品的单位进口用于本单位培训的光盘300张
【单选题】
对进出境快件开箱查验结束后,快件查验关员应填写()。___
A. 《进出境货物查验记录单》
B. 《进出境快件查验通知书》
C. 《进出境快件查验记录单》
D. 《进出境快件查验告知单》
【单选题】
机检查验中,快件机检数据存储最短时间不得少于()。___
A. 3个月
B. 6个月
C. 1年
D. 3年
【单选题】
快件机检图像与快件报关单位信息同屏对比的通知中要求:在处理能力方面,保证机检关员对每件快件的判图时间不少于()。___
【单选题】
未经中华人民共和国()批准,快件运营人不得承揽、承运私人信件。___
A. 海关
B. 交通部门
C. 邮政部门
D. 工商管理部门
【单选题】
进出口货物收发货人或者其代理人拒不签名的,查验人员应当在查验记录中予以注明,并由货物所在监管场所的()签名证明。___
A. 执勤武警战士
B. 经营人
C. 另一名海关关员
D. 国内段运输负责人
【单选题】
自运输工具申报进境之日起超过()未向海关申报的进境快件,应按规定办理移交手续,并手工核销进境舱单。___
A. 三个月
B. 三周
C. 一个月
D. 两周
【单选题】
快件监管职能部门按照《快件办法》第八条所列条件对运营人提交的文件资料进行审核,验核运营人提交的文件资料是否真实,并征求()意见。___
A. 快件监管现场海关
B. 快件监管直属海关
C. 快件监管场所运营人
D. 报关协会
【多选题】
快件区别于一般商业运输的特点是()。___
A. 门到门的服务
B. 时间紧、速度快
C. 品种多、批量运输
D. 网络化经营
【多选题】
快件运营人登记的条件是()。___
A. 注册资本人民币100万元
B. 具备实行电子数据交换方式报关的条件
C. 快件外包装上应标有符合海关自动化检查要求的条形码
D. 已经在海关办理报关企业注册登记手续
【多选题】
对快件运营人资质表述正确的是()。___
A. 内资国际货物运输代理企业及其分支机构已经获得国务院对外贸易主管部门或者其委托的备案机构办理的《国际货运代理企业备案表》
B. 外商投资国际货物运输代理企业已经获得国务院对外贸易主管部门颁发的《外商投资企业批准证书》,获准经营进出境快件业务
C. 外商投资国际货物运输代理企业分公司已经获得国务院对外贸易主管部门的批准文件,获准经营进出境快件业务
D. 领取工商行政管理部门颁发的《企业法人营业执照》,准予或核定其经营进出境快件业务
【多选题】
对行邮物品完税价格确定原则表述正确的是()。___
A. 《完税价格表》已列明完税价格的物品,按照《完税价格表》确定
B. 《完税价格表》未列明完税价格的物品,按照相同物品相同来源地最近时间的主要市场零售价格确定其完税价格
C. 实际购买价格是《完税价格表》列明完税价格的2倍及以上,海关凭进境物品所有人提供的销售方依法开具的真实交易的购物发票或收据,确定应税物品完税价格
D. 实际购买价格是《完税价格表》列明完税价格的1/2及以下的物品,海关凭进境物品所有人提供的销售方依法开具的真实交易的购物发票或收据,确定应税物品完税价格
【多选题】
下列物品属于禁止进境物品的是()。___
A. 烈性毒药
B. 仿真武器
C. 海洛因
D. 伪造货币
【多选题】
禁止进出境的武器弹药包括()。___
A. 各种武器
B. 仿真武器
C. 弹药
D. 爆炸物品
【多选题】
未取得濒危办出口证明书的情况下,邮寄含有以下哪些成分的中成药禁止出口( )。___
推荐试题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系